Search

Background Spinal cord herniation into a traumatic pseudomeningocele is a rare clinical entity. We present the sixth known case and describe surgical management. Case Presentation A 44-year-old male presented with Brown-Sequard syndrome three decades after a cervical nerve root avulsion injury. Imaging revealed hemicord herniation into a C7/T1 pseudomeningocele in addition to extra-axial cord compression from further pseudomeningoceles. Significant clinical improvement was achieved following surgical repair. The radiological findings and technique for operative repair are described. Conclusion The case highlights this rare pathology and presentation, describes the surgical measures for repair of cord herniation, and provides evidence for the favorable outcome that can be achieved by surgical intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Anatomic study in nine fresh-frozen cadavers.Objective: To confirm the anatomical feasibility of transferring the extradural ventral roots (VRs) and dorsal roots (DRs) of contralateral C7 nerves to those of the ipsilateral C7 nerves respectively through a cervical posterior approach.Summary Of Background Data: The contralateral C7 nerve root transfer technique makes breakthrough for treating spastic limb paralysis. However, its limitations include large surgical trauma and limited indications.Methods: Nine fresh-frozen cadavers (four females and five males) were placed prone, and the feasibility of exposing the bilateral extradural C7 nerve roots, separation of the extradural C7 VR and DR, and transfer of the VR and DR of the contralateral C7 to those of the ipsilateral C7 on the dural mater were assessed. The pertinent distances and the myelography results of each specimen were analyzed. The acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and antineurofilament 200 (NF200) double immunofluorescent staining were preformed to determine the nerve fiber properties.Results: A cervical posterior midline approach was made and the laminectomy was performed to expose the bilateral extradural C7 nerve roots. After the extradural C7 VR and DR are separated, the VR and DR of the contralateral C7 have sufficient lengths to be transferred to those of the ipsilateral C7 on the dural mater. The myelography results showed that the spinal cord is not compressed after the nerve anastomosis. The AChE and NF200 double immunofluorescent staining showed the distal ends of the contralateral C7 VRs were mostly motor nerve fibers, and the distal ends of the contralateral C7 DRs were mostly sensory nerve fibers.Conclusion: Extradural contralateral C7 nerve root transfer in a cervical posterior approach for treating spastic limb paralysis is anatomically feasible.Level Of Evidence: 5. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective case series.Objective: Anterior sacral meningocele (ASM) is a rare disorder. We reviewed 11 cases of congenital ASM and classified them into three types based on the anatomy and relationship between the cyst and sacral nerve roots.Summary Of Background Data: The cohort with ASM is relatively large; the classification is novel and has not been previously reported.Methods: Eleven consecutive patients with ASM who underwent surgery between February 2014 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. They included four males and seven females. The dorsal transsacral approach was adopted in all cases. The follow-up time was at least 3 months.Results: We attempted to classify ASM into three types. Of the 11 cases, six were caudal type, two were paraneural type, and three were nerve-root type. The meningocele was ligated after exploring no nerve involvement, in Type I and II. For Type III, the herniating sac and involved nerve roots were ligated when the nerve roots were indicated as nonfunctional on neurophysiological monitoring; otherwise, the sacral nerve roots were protected and imbricated on the residual sac like a hand-in-glove, and sutured to reconstruct the nerves sleeve. Eight cases were accompanied by tethered cord syndrome (TCS); spinal cord detethering was done with one-stage operation. Ten patients' presenting symptoms improved at 3 to 6 months' follow-up; notably, constipation significantly improved. Only one case accompanied by an epidermoid cyst had a second laparoscopic surgery by a general surgeon.Conclusion: Aim of surgical treatment is to obliterate the communication between the subarachnoid space and herniated sac, detether the spinal cord, and resect the congenital tumor. The new classification helps to recognize the relationship between the meningocele and sacral nerve roots, and subsequently adopt different surgical strategies. We consider the dorsal transsacral approach relatively feasible, safe, and with lower complication.Level Of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Both open surgical resection (OSR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have been reported for spinal osteoid osteoma (OO).Purpose: To verify the clinical safety and efficiency of RFA with OSR in treating spinal OO.Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.Patient Sample: Twenty-eight consecutive patients with spinal OO who underwent either RFA or OSR in our institute between September 2006 and December 2016.Outcome Measures: The age, gender, lesion distribution, surgical time, estimated blood loss, complications, local recurrence, visual analogue scale (VAS), and the modified Frankel grade were documented.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients with spinal OO who had been treated in our hospital from September 2006 to December 2016. Patients were followed at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the index surgery. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. This study was funded by Peking University Third Hospital (Y71508-01) (¥ 400,000).Results: Twelve and 16 patients were treated with CT-guided percutaneous RFA and OSR, respectively. Spinal OO locations were cervical in 4, thoracic in 4, lumbar in 3, and sacral vertebra in 1 in the RFA group and cervical in 12, thoracic in 1, and lumber in 3 in the OSR group. RFA showed shorter operating time, less blood loss, and less in-hospital stay than open surgery [105.0 ± 33.8 minutes vs. 186.4 ± 53.5 minutes (p < .001), 1 (0 to 5) ml vs. 125 (30-1200) ml (p < .001) and 1 (1-3) days vs. 6 (3-10) days (p < .001), respectively]. At last follow-up, one patient underwent a secondary RFA for recurrence. VAS improvement was 7.5 (3-10) and 6.5 (4-9) (p = .945) in the RFA and OSR groups, respectively. The overall complication rate was 8.3% (1/12) and 18.8% (3/16) in the RFA and OSR groups, respectively.Conclusions: If there is sufficient cerebrospinal fluid between the spinal OO lesion and spinal cord/nerve root (more than 1 mm), RFA is effective and safe for treatment of well-selected spinal OO, showing reduced operating time, blood loss, in-hospital stay, and complications compared to OSR. However, OSR is still recommended in cases with spinal cord/nerve root compression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Functional recovery after large excision of dorsal roots is absent because of both the limited regeneration capacity of the transected root, and the inability of regenerating sensory fibers to traverse the dorsal root entry zone. In this study, bioresorbable guidance conduits were used to repair 6-mm dorsal root lesion gaps in rats, while neurotrophin-encoding adenoviruses were used to elicit regeneration into the spinal cord. Polyester conduits with or without microfilament bundles were implanted between the transected ends of lumbar dorsal roots. Four weeks later, adenoviruses encoding NGF or GFP were injected into the spinal cord along the entry zone of the damaged dorsal roots. Eight weeks after injury, nerve regeneration was observed through both types of implants, but those containing microfilaments supported more robust regeneration of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-positive nociceptive axons. NGF overexpression induced extensive regeneration of CGRP(+) fibers into the spinal cord from implants showing nerve repair. Animals that received conduits containing microfilaments combined with spinal NGF virus injections showed the greatest recovery in nociceptive function, approaching a normal level by 7-8 weeks. This recovery was reversed by recuffing the dorsal root through the centre of the conduit, demonstrating that regeneration through the implant, and not sprouting of intact spinal fibers, restored sensory function. This study demonstrates that a combination of PNS guidance conduits and CNS neurotrophin therapy can promote regeneration and restoration of sensory function after severe dorsal root injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]