Search

Study Design: Anatomic study in nine fresh-frozen cadavers.Objective: To confirm the anatomical feasibility of transferring the extradural ventral roots (VRs) and dorsal roots (DRs) of contralateral C7 nerves to those of the ipsilateral C7 nerves respectively through a cervical posterior approach.Summary Of Background Data: The contralateral C7 nerve root transfer technique makes breakthrough for treating spastic limb paralysis. However, its limitations include large surgical trauma and limited indications.Methods: Nine fresh-frozen cadavers (four females and five males) were placed prone, and the feasibility of exposing the bilateral extradural C7 nerve roots, separation of the extradural C7 VR and DR, and transfer of the VR and DR of the contralateral C7 to those of the ipsilateral C7 on the dural mater were assessed. The pertinent distances and the myelography results of each specimen were analyzed. The acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and antineurofilament 200 (NF200) double immunofluorescent staining were preformed to determine the nerve fiber properties.Results: A cervical posterior midline approach was made and the laminectomy was performed to expose the bilateral extradural C7 nerve roots. After the extradural C7 VR and DR are separated, the VR and DR of the contralateral C7 have sufficient lengths to be transferred to those of the ipsilateral C7 on the dural mater. The myelography results showed that the spinal cord is not compressed after the nerve anastomosis. The AChE and NF200 double immunofluorescent staining showed the distal ends of the contralateral C7 VRs were mostly motor nerve fibers, and the distal ends of the contralateral C7 DRs were mostly sensory nerve fibers.Conclusion: Extradural contralateral C7 nerve root transfer in a cervical posterior approach for treating spastic limb paralysis is anatomically feasible.Level Of Evidence: 5. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Severe spasticity adversely affects patient functional status and caregiving. No previous study has compared efficacy between dorsal root entry zone lesioning (DREZL) and selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) for reduction of spasticity. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of DREZL and SDR for attenuating spasticity, and to compare efficacy between these two methods. Methods: All patients who underwent DREZL, SDR, or both for treatment of intractable spasticity caused by cerebral pathology at Siriraj Hospital during 2009 to 2016 were recruited. Severity of spasticity was assessed using Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and Adductor Tone Rating Scale (ATRS). Ambulatory status was also evaluated. Results: Fifteen patients (13 males) with a mean age of 30.3 ± 17.5 years were included. Eight, six, and one patient underwent DREZL, SDR, and combined cervical DREZL and lumbosacral SDR, respectively. Eight of ten patients with preoperative bed-bound status had postoperative improvement in ambulatory status. Spasticity was significantly reduced in the DREZL group ( p < 0.001), the SDR group ( p < 0.001), and in overall analysis ( p < 0.001). SDR was effective in both pediatric and adult spasticity patients. A significantly greater reduction in spasticity as assessed by MAS score ( p < 0.001) and ATRS score ( p = 0.015) was found in the DREZL group. Transient lower limb weakness was found in a patient who underwent SDR. Conclusions: DREZL is more effective for reducing spasticity, but is more destructive than SDR. DREZL should be preferred for bed-ridden patients, and SDR for ambulatory patients. Both operations are helpful for improving ambulatory status. Gait improvement was observed only in patients who underwent SDR. Adult patients with spasticity of cerebral origin benefit from SDR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: Selective dorsal rhizotomy for spastic cerebral palsy is an effective and well-validated surgical approach. Multiple techniques have been described in the past including multiple laminectomies and a single-level laminectomy at the level of the conus. There is considerable technical challenge involved with a single-level laminectomy approach. Methods: We report here a modification of the single- level laminectomy that selectively analyzes each individual nerve root with electromyography to separate dorsal and ventral nerve roots through comparison of stimulus responses. Results: In 18 children with cerebral palsy who underwent this operation there was a mean improvement in the Modified Ashworth Scale of 2.0 with no reported incidence of muscle weakness, sensory loss, or neurogenic bladder. Conclusion: This approach allows for a modification of selective dorsal rhizotomy through a single-level laminectomy and tailors the selection of nerve root sectioning to the individual patient of interest while still maintaining its effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study that evaluated the long-term effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) in pediatric patients with cerebral palsy (CP). The subjects were prospectively assessed at different time periods after SDR. It was found that baseline muscle tone at the knee, hop, and ankle level showed a high degree of spasticity that normalized after SDR. The spasticity-reducing effect of SDR is seen to suggest that contracture development in CP is not mediated only by spasticity.

The perceived need for electrophysiological guidance (EPG) during selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) has limited the frequency with which SDR is performed. The need for EPG during SDR has been questioned. At our institution, of >200 children with SDR for spastic cerebral palsy, 22 children underwent SDR without EPG using clinical guidance (no EPG group). Electrophysiological stimulation was used to distinguish dorsal from ventral roots. The remainder had SDR with EPG. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between the groups having SDR with and without EPG. The 22 patients in the no EPG group were matched with 22 controls in whom EPG was used, with respect to Gross Motor Function Classification System score (GMFCS) and age. The 12-month outcomes with respect to motor function score, hip adductor spasticity (Ashworth), hip abduction range of motion (ROM), quadriceps power [Medical Research Council (MRC)], WeeFIM, Quality of Upper Extremities Skills Test (QUEST), and incidence of complications were compared. There were no statistically significant differences preoperatively with respect to GMFCS, age, gross motor function, Ashworth or MRC scores, joint ROM, WeeFIM, or QUEST. At 1 year after SDR, there were no differences between the groups in the incidence of complications or outcome measures. Percentage of dorsal roots cut was similar, but the duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the no EPG group. There was no advantage of doing SDR with EPG compared to no EPG. SDR can reasonably be done in centers where EPG is not available, but electrophysiological stimulation to distinguish dorsal from ventral roots may be useful in avoiding complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a surgical technique developed over the past decades to manage patients diagnosed with cerebral palsy suffering from spastic diplegia. It involves selectively lesioning sensory rootlets in an effort to maintain a balance between elimination of spasticity and preservation of function. Several recent longterm outcome studies have been published. In addition, shorter follow-up randomized controlled studies have compared the outcome of patients having undergone physiotherapy alone with those that received physiotherapy after selective dorsal rhizotomy. Materials and methods In this account, we will discuss the rationale and outcome after SDR. The outcome is addressed in terms of the gross motor function measurement scale (GMFM), degree of elimination of spasticity, strength enhancement, range of motion, fine motor skills, activity of daily living, spastic hip, necessity for postoperative orthopedic procedures, bladder and sphincteric function, and finally possible early or late complications associated with the procedure. Conclusion We conclude that SDR is a safe procedure, which offers durable and significant functional gains to properly selected children with spasticity related to cerebral palsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose The author describes the history of functional posterior rhizotomy (FPR), the surgical procedure currently used, and the results together with its future perspective in Japan. The modern form of FPR was introduced to Japan in 1995, and the first surgery was carried out in 1996. Despite initial resistance from orthopedic surgeons, the procedure has eventually gained wide recognition in the country. Materials and Methods The author has operated on 98 patients (60 boys and 38 girls, aged from 2 to 19 years old) by the end of 2006. Most patients were mild to severely disabled children with spastic hypertonia because of cerebral palsy and other diseases. The surgical procedure used is based on the Peacock's procedure with some modification for the mildly disabled children whose spasticity was predominantly the muscles of the ankle joint. Intraoperative neurophysiology was an indispensable tool for preserving urogenital function and for judging which root/rootlet to be cut. Results Seventeen to 83% of the root/rootlets were found to be abnormal and were cut, clearly correlating with the degree of disability. However, there was a wide difference in the cutting rate, even in children with the same degree of disability. The result of surgery in this group of patients was the same as in previously published data. Twenty out of 51 patients (39%) followed for more than a year at the current institute showed improved locomotion after FPR. Thirty patients (59%) demonstrated suprasegmental effects after FPR. Conclusion The role of FPR will grow in importance as a treatment for spasticity in Japan in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Suprasegmental effects following selective posterior rhizotomy have been frequently reported. However, few studies have used validated functional outcome measures to report the surgical results beyond 3 years. The authors analyzed data obtained from the McGill Rhizotomy Database to determine the long-term impact of lumbosacral dorsal rhizotomy on fine motor skills. The study population comprised children with debilitating spasticity who underwent SPR and were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team preoperatively, at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Quantitative standardized assessments of upper extremity function were obtained using the fine motor skills section of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS) test. Of 70 patients who met the entry criteria for the study, 45 and 25 completed the 3- and 5-year assessments, respectively. Statistical analysis demonstrated significant improvements in grasping, hand use, eye-hand coordination, and manual dexterity at 1 year after SPR. More importantly, all improvements were maintained at 3 and 5 years following SPR. This study supports that significant improvements in upper extremity fine motor function using the PDMS evaluative measure are present after SPR and that these suprasegmental benefits are durable.Copyright © 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A previous randomized clinical trial compared selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) plus postoperative intensified physiotherapy (group 1) with intensified physiotherapy alone (group 2) for children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. At the end of this trial, all patients in group 2 had an SDR, followed by further intensified physiotherapy. This study was performed to determine if the additional intensified physiotherapy before SDR, as occurred in group 2, improved long-term motor outcome. Outcomes were compared in the two groups, i.e. group 1 without intensified physiotherapy before SDR and group 2 with intensified physiotherapy before SDR. The primary outcome measure was the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM). Lower-limb spasticity, range and strength were secondary outcome measures. Baseline assessments had been done for the prior clinical trial. For this study, patients were reassessed by physiotherapists blinded to the treatment group. Thirteen children in each group were studied at a mean follow-up of 53 months. The mean improvement in GMFM was 10.0 in group 1 and 10.4 in group 2 (p = 0.9). Improvements in spasticity and range were similar in the two groups. There was no significant change in muscle strength in either group. It was concluded that in this relatively small series of patients, additional intensified physiotherapy before SDR did not improve motor outcomes.Copyright © 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spasticity occurs in children and adults due to a wide range of conditions, including cerebral palsy, head and spinal cord trauma, cerebrovascular accidents and multiple sclerosis. Multiple treatment options have been described, including medical and surgical treatments. Medical treatments include intramuscular botulinum A toxin, oral baclofen and supportive bracing. Surgical approaches include selective posterior rhizotomy, intrathecal baclofen and orthopedic procedures to address deformities. Many reports have been published on these different treatment options, but rarely has a comparison been made between them. Therefore, this review is aimed at comparing selective posterior rhizotomy and intrathecal baclofen injection for spasticity due to cerebral palsy, especially in children.Copyright © 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ability to perform a ‘selective’ dorsal rhizotomy has been challenged. EMG responses are inconsistent and often do not represent reflex responses. We perform nonselective partial dorsal rhizotomy (NSPDR) when reflex response is not evident. Ten children undergoing primarily NSPDR were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with the Modified Ashworth Scale, gait lab analyses gross motor function measure and the NSPDR was performed by nonselectively sectioning 50–75% of the dorsal roots not demonstrating a reflex response. Standard selective rhizotomy was performed in the remainder. Only 17 of 106 (16%) dorsal roots demonstrated reflex responses. The results reported in this study demonstrate a benefit to patients undergoing primarily NSPDR which is similar to that reported for patients in whom a selective procedure was intended.Copyright © 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively was performed to determine the long-term outcome of lumbosacral selective posterior rhizotomy (SPR) in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP). The study population comprised children with spastic CP, who had SPR more than 4 years prior to the time of the study and had quantitative standardized assessments of lower limb spasticity (Ashworth scale), range of motion measured goniometrically, muscle strength (MRC scale) and ambulatory function, both preoperatively and at 1 year after SPR. Children meeting these criteria were reassessed at 5 years after SPR using the same measures. Hip adductor spasticity, hip abduction range of motion and quadriceps strength were chosen as the primary outcome measures for statistical analysis. Of 80 patients who met the entry criteria for the study, 33 completed the 5-year assessments. Significant improvements in spasticity, range of motion and muscle strength were noted both at 1 year and at 5 years after SPR. The preoperative, 1-year and 5-year values were as follows: hip adductor spasticity (Ashworth scale) = 4.1, 2.1, 2.2; hip abduction range of motion (degrees) = 20.4, 39.9, 31.7, and quadriceps strength (MRC scale) = 3.6, 4.0, 4.1. Ambulatory function seemed to be better at 1 and 5 years compared to baseline, but no statistical analysis was done for this secondary outcome measure. It was concluded that improvements in lower limb motor outcome are present at 1 year after SPR, and that these improvements are generally maintained at 5 years.Copyright © 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) has been shown to be an effective treatment for the spasticity of cerebral palsy, but few studies have addressed specifically the side effects of the procedure. A retrospective study was performed to determine the frequency and nature of complications in 158 children who had undergone SDR at British Columbia’s Children’s Hospital from 1987 to 1996. Intraoperative, preoperative (immediate postoperative until discharge at approximately 7 days) and postdischarge complications occurred in 3.8, 43.6 and 30% of patients, respectively. The most common intraoperative complication was aspiration pneumonia, which was experienced by 2 patients (1.3%). Perioperatively, sensory changes were found in 8.9% of the children, and transient urinary retention in 4.4%. Complications after discharge included back pain starting more than 6 months after surgery in 10.8%, sensory changes in 13.9%, and neurogenic bladder or bowel problems in 12.7%. Persistent sensory changes occurred in 3.8%, were not important functionally, and tended to occur in patients with the largest amount of dorsal root tissue cut. In 8 patients (5.1%), bladder and/or bowel dysfunction attributed to the SDR was present at the latest follow-up, although in only 2 patients (1.3%) this dysfunction was a definite complication of the rhizotomy. The use of pudendal monitoring and/or cutting less than 50% of the S2 roots may have been associated with a lower incidence of long-term sphincter dysfunction. Data about the nature and frequency of complications may result in further modifications to the SDR procedure, and is critical for counseling about SDR and alternative options available for treatment of the child with spastic cerebral palsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia / Journal Canadien d'Anesthésie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The author discusses the article "Does loss of spasticity matter? A 10-year follow-up after selective dorsal rhizotomy in cerebral palsy," by K. Tedroff and colleagues and published in the issue. The study followed up on 15 patients ten years after they underwent selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) and assessed outcome measures such as the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Gross Motor Function Measure 88 (GMFM-88) and the Wilson gait scale. The authors also found that the spasticity-reducing effect of SDR did not seem to improve long-term functioning.