Search

Background: Glyphosate is a broad-spectrum, non-selective systemic herbicide. Introduction of glyphosate tolerance genes such as EPSPS or detoxification genes such as GAT can confer glyphosate tolerance on plants. Our previous study revealed that co-expression of EPSPS and GAT genes conferred higher glyphosate tolerance without "yellow flashing". However, the plant response to glyphosate at the transcriptional level was not investigated. Methods and results: To investigate the glyphosate tolerance mechanism, RNA-seq was conducted using four soybean genotypes, including two non-transgenic (NT) soybeans, ZH10 and MD12, and two GM soybeans, HJ698 and ZH10-6. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in these soybeans before and after glyphosate treatment. Similar response to glyphosate in the two NT soybeans and the different effects of glyphosate on the two GM soybeans were identified. As treatment time was prolonged, the expression level of some DEGs involved in shikimate biosynthetic pathway and herbicide targeted cross-pathways was increased or declined continuously in NT soybeans, and altered slightly in HJ698. However, the expression level of some DEGs was altered in ZH10-6 at 12 hpt, while similar expression level of some DEGs involved in shikimate biosynthetic pathway and herbicide targeted cross-pathways was observed in ZH10-6 at 0 hpt and 72 hpt. These observations likely explain the higher glyphosate tolerance in ZH10-6 than in HJ698 and NT soybeans. Conclusions: These results suggested that GAT and EPSPS genes together play a crucial role in response to glyphosate, the GAT gene may work at the early stage of glyphosate exposure, whereas the EPSPS gene may be activated after the uptake of glyphosate by plants. These findings will provide valuable insight for the molecular basis underlying glyphosate tolerance or glyphosate detoxication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Modern agriculture has gained significant economic benefits worldwide with the use of genetically modified (GM) technologies. While GM crops provide convenience to humans, their biosafety has attracted increasing concern. In this study, the Illumina MiSeq was used to perform a high-throughput sequencing of the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of 16S rRNA gene (16S rDNA) amplicons to compare the rhizosphere bacterial communities of the EPSPS/GAT dual transgenic glyphosate-tolerant soybean line Z106, its recipient variety ZH10, and Z106 with glyphosate application (Z106G) during flowering, seed filling, and maturing stages under field settings. At each of the three stages, the alpha and beta diversity of rhizosphere bacterial communities revealed no significant differences between ZH10, Z106, and Z106G. However, some bacterial taxa demonstrated a greater proportional contribution, particularly the nitrogen-fixing rhizobium Ensifer fredii, in the rhizospheric soil of Z106 at the seed filling and maturing stages, when compared to ZH10 and Z106G. The present study therefore suggests that the EPSPS/GAT dual transgenic line Z106 and exogenous glyphosate application have a minimal effect on the composition of the soybean rhizosphere bacterial community but have no impact on the structure of the rhizosphere microbial community during a single planting season. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glyphosate is a widely used non-selective herbicide with broad spectrum of weed control around the world. At present, most of the commercial glyphosate tolerant soybeans utilize glyphosate tolerant gene CP4-EPSPS or glyphosate acetyltransferase gene GAT separately. In this study, both glyphosate tolerant gene G2-EPSPS and glyphosate degraded gene GAT were co-transferred into soybean and transgenic plants showed high tolerance to glyphosate. Molecular analysis including PCR, Sothern blot, qRT-PCR, and Western blot revealed that target genes have been integrated into genome and expressed effectively at both mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, the glyphosate tolerance analysis showed that no typical symptom was observed when compared with a glyphosate tolerant line HJ06-698 derived from GR1 transgenic soybean even at fourfold labeled rate of Roundup. Chlorophyll and shikimic acid content analysis of transgenic plant also revealed that these two indexes were not significantly altered after glyphosate application. These results indicated that co-expression of G2-EPSPS and GAT conferred high tolerance to the herbicide glyphosate in soybean. Therefore, combination of tolerant and degraded genes provides a new strategy for developing glyphosate tolerant transgenic crops. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As part of an ecological risk assessment, Roundup Ready 2 Yield® soybean (MON 89788) was compared to a conventional control soybean variety, A3244, for disease and arthropod damage, plant response to abiotic stress and cold, effects on succeeding plant growth (allelopathic effects), plant response to a bacterial symbiont, and effects on the ability of seed to survive and volunteer in a subsequent growing season. Statistically significant differences between MON 89788 and A3244 were considered in the context of the genetic variation known to occur in soybean and were assessed for their potential impact on plant pest (weed) potential and adverse environmental impact. The results of these studies revealed no effects of the genetic modification that would result in increased pest potential or adverse environmental impact of MON 89788 compared with A3244. This paper illustrates how such characterization studies conducted in a range of environments where the crop is grown are used in an ecological risk assessment of the genetically modified (GM) crop. Furthermore, risk assessors and decision makers use this information when deciding whether to approve a GM crop for cultivation in—or grain import into—their country. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the development of a genetically modified (GM) crop product, extensive phenotypic and agronomic data are collected to characterize the plant in comparison to a conventional control with a similar genetic background. The data are evaluated for potential differences resulting from the genetic modification process or the GM trait, and the differences-if any-are subsequently considered in the context of contributing to the pest potential of the GM crop. Ultimately, these study results and those of other studies are used in an ecological risk assessment of the GM crop. In the studies reported here, seed germination, vegetative and reproductive growth, and pollen morphology of Roundup Ready 2 Yield soybean, MON 89788, were compared to those of A3244, a conventional control soybean variety with the same genetic background. Any statistically significant differences were considered in the context of the genetic variation known to occur in soybean and were evaluated as indicators of an effect of the genetic modification process and assessed for impact on plant pest (weed) characteristics and adverse ecological impact (ecological risk). The results of these studies revealed no effects attributable to the genetic modification process or to the GM trait in the plant that would result in increased pest potential or adverse ecological impact of MON 89788 compared with A3244. These results and the associated risk assessments obtained from diverse geographic and environmental conditions in the United States and Argentina can be used by regulators in other countries to inform various assessments of ecological risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Glyphosate can now be used for selective, post-emergence weed control in glyphosate-tolerant varieties of soybeans, cotton, canola and maize. It is estimated that glyphosate-tolerant soybeans in the US willaccount for 60-80% of the area planted by 2001. The rapid acceptanceof this new technology is due to multiple factors including broad-spectrum weed control, low cost and simplicity. The use of glyphosate has resulted in a major reduction in the use of other herbicides including the ACCase inhibitors, ALS inhibitors, and Protox inhibitors. Inthe short term (three to five years) this change in herbicide use patterns will continue. In the long term (five to eight years), the primary reliance on glyphosate for weed control particularly in continuous cropping or in rotations of glyphosate-tolerant crops will result in a shift in the weed spectrum toward more tolerant weed species. Asa result of this shift, other herbicides will be needed to fill these weed gaps. Continuous use of glyphosate may also lead to the selection of glyphosate-resistant weed populations, as has already occurredin Australia. However, shifts in the weed species' composition from highly susceptible toward more tolerant species will happen more rapidly than selection of resistance. New herbicides developed in the future will have to be extremely cost-effective to compete against glyphosate and may be geared towards controlling weeds tolerant to glyphosate. There will also be further development of new tolerant crops to other broad-spectrum, non-selective herbicides that will be able to compete directly with glyphosate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]