Search

Today's livestock producers face increasing public scrutiny because animal agriculture is often cited as a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, this negative perception does not take into account the carbon (C) sequestration benefits of grazing livestock nor that grazing lands account for 25% of the global soil sequestration potential of soil C storage. Grazing beef cattle and bison are key to healthy grassland ecosystems and provide the most nutrient dense source of protein available for human consumption. Beef and bison producers who graze their livestock are widely recognized as environmental stewards because they use sustainable grazing practices that maintain grassland health. These practices are considered climate-smart agriculture (CSA) because they promote soil C sequestration and resilience to increased climate variability. Yet, these same producers are generally overlooked in GHG reduction and C sequestration incentives because of a relative lack of cost-effective methods to measure C and GHG sinks and sources. Emerging technologies are beginning to bridge that gap by paving the way to develop, implement, and monitor CSA practices. Furthermore, rangelands in the U.S. dedicated to supporting forage-based livestock production amount to nearly 940 million acres. This is more than double the acres dedicated to row crops and represents enormous potential to contribute to U.S. climate change commitments. Successful implementation and monitoring of CSA land management practices creates potential to develop climate-smart livestock commodities that sustainably provide economic incentives to producers operating resilient livestock grazing systems. Recently, South Dakota State University, along with ten external partners, was awarded a CSA commodity development grant by the USDA and NRCS focused on CSA-raised grazing beef cattle and bison in the Northern Great Plains. Specific objectives include: 1) developing and implementing existing and novel CSA practices alongside custom grazing plans; 2) measuring, monitoring, reporting, and verifying CSA practice impacts on GHG emissions, C sequestration, and ecosystem biodiversity of plants, arthropods, and wildlife; and 3) creating sustainable, value-added market opportunities for producers using CSA practices. To achieve these objectives, the project team is partnering with producers throughout the Northern Great Plains and beyond and will provide incentives for CSA practice implementation. Additionally, emerging and novel technologies will be used to collect large-scale data across producer operations and test sites to determine and refine GHG and C sequestration estimates associated with range beef cattle and bison systems. The long-term goal of this project is to provide CSA beef and bison producers with sustainable, value-added market opportunities that align with consumer preferences and demand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Predicting dry matter intake (DMI) for beef cattle on extensive rangelands presents a significant challenge to determining stocking rates. Traditionally, DMI is estimated by taking full body weight (BW) multiplied by a percentage selected based on animal class, production phase, and forage quality, which introduces tremendous levels of accumulated error at the herd level. Animal Unit Months (AUMs) are utilized to simplify the determination of stocking rate (animal units per area per a specific period of time) of pastures. This challenge represents a tremendous opportunity to leverage precision technology to account for individual animal variation in BW and growth, with subsequent impacts on herd-level decisions. Therefore, the objective of this study was to utilize precision livestock technology (PLT) collected data to build a precision system model (PSM) to evaluate the differences in predicted DMI using either initial BW, expected midseason BW, or PLT measured BW. The PSM model was built utilizing BW data measured using SmartScale (C-Lock Inc.) for 60 days during the summers of 2021 and 2022 on Angus yearling steers (average initial BW 393.71 ± 39.01 and 315.23 ± 53.91 kg, n = 130 and 124, for year 2021 and 2022, respectively) on native pastures at the South Dakota State University Cottonwood Field Station. The PSM evaluated total forage consumption and deterministically estimated hectares of pasture required to meet the herd forage demands relative to available biomass (kg/ha). the PSM estimated 4.49% and 6.94% more DMI at the herd level compared with using initial BW for years 2021 and 22, respectively, and 1.64% less DMI than mid-season BW in 2021. This resulted in an additional 14.03 and 17.95 ha required for years 2021 and 22, respectively, according to PSM estimates compared with initial BW, while animals were understocked by 5 and 0.3 ha for 2021 and 2022, respectively, using mid-season BW. Individuals expressed a divergent growth rate, resulting in greater misalignment between static and PSM predicted DMI as the grazing period progressed (Menendez et al., 2023), indicating greater opportunities for targeted grazing management in long grazing periods. Therefore, applying precision data provides more precise DMI estimates and demonstrates the advantages and disadvantages of herd-level estimates. The use of PSM helps to identify high-leverage precision tools to minimize a performance gap like overgrazing extensive rangeland systems and demonstrates the critical need to develop robust data-collection and processing steps to leverage continuously collected PLT data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Attaining sustainability of livestock production and understanding environmental synergies requires in-depth knowledge of grazing animal growth and behavior. A pilot study (2021-22) was conducted at the South Dakota State University Cottonwood Field Station as part of a broader project to evaluate precision livestock technology and environmental synergies on native rangelands. Yearling Angus steers (n = 262) were fitted with virtual fencing collars (Vence), weighed on a traditional chute scale, and allocated to one of six native grass pastures equipped with individual weighing (SmartScale) scales at the water source. Each pasture was assigned either Rotational (RG) or Continuous (CG) grazing strategy and one of three stocking rates (Low, Medium, and High, 0.3, 0.42, and 0.7 AUMs, respectively) in a 2x3 factorial design. The data were downloaded, (Rcore Team, 2023), and spurious weights identified and removed using Robust Regression (hwts > 0.99, Parsons et al. 2023). Effects of stocking rate and grazing strategy were analyzed on water visits, time spent drinking, and growth using a linear mixed effects model to calculate effect sizes. Differences between BW and ADG calculated using the smart-scale vs. traditional chute weights were evaluated using a paired t-test. Steers visited the smart-scale 3.44 ± 2.79 visits per day, with significant effect of RG vs. CG strategies (3.65 ± 0.09 vs. 2.89 ± 0.10 visits per day respectively, P < 0.05). Total water visit duration averaged 5.04 ± 7.58 minutes per day, with most visits occurring between 0600 and 2000 hours and no observations occurring between 2000 and 0000 hours. RG managed steers exhibited significantly higher water visit duration (5.28 ± 0.308 vs 4.16 ± 0.317 minutes/day, P < 0.05) compared with CG managed steers. Smartscale measured weights were significantly heavier than chute weights at the beginning and end of the study period, (7.47 ± 24.54 and 9.77 ± 46.25 kg respectively, P < 0.05). No differences in overall ADG were found between smartscale and traditional chute weights(P > 0.58), however, significant temporal interactions occurred (P < 0.05), which demonstrates that ADG varied over the trial duration. This created significant discrepancies in predicted vs. actual stocking rates in heavy stocked pastures (0.84 AUM, P < 0.05), indicating pastures exceeded their target stocking rate. Overall, we found steers readily acclimated to smart-scale weighing systems, and creates a viable technology to monitor watering behavior, real-time body weight, and ADG in extensively managed cattle. Further, we showed RG vs CG grazing strategies significantly affect animal drinking behavior, while stocking rate resulted in inequalities between expected vs. actual assigned animal unit months. Precision livestock technologies offer a vital solution towards enhancing sustainable livestock management practices and improving nutrition and modeling in extensive rangeland systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Improving individual animal efficiency is important for livestock producers to run financially sustainable operations. Developing heifers to replace a cow in the herd is expensive and reducing costs during the growing and reproductive phases is critical to increase profitability. Precision livestock management technologies can help reduce feed waste and optimize individual animal intake on extensive rangeland systems. Precision supplementation for heifer development programs aims to provide proper nutrition management and develop heifers to meet target body weight without over or under conditioning. With conventional feeding methods, animals are able to over consume feed and may be overdeveloped. Therefore, the objective of our study was to compare differences in yearling heifer performance between conventional and precision supplementation on winter rangeland pastures. The study was conducted at the South Dakota State University Cottonwood Field Station, located near Philip, SD. Angus heifer calves (Bos taurus, n = 60) born in the spring of 2021were utilized for the project. Following fall weaning, initial weight was used to randomly assign heifers to one of two treatments: control (n = 30) or precision (n = 30). Treatment groups were separated into different pastures to graze dormant native range from November to June and were rotated monthly to reduce pasture influence. Both groups were offered 2.27 kg/hd/d dried distillers grain pellets; the control group was bunk fed, allowing for normal variation in consumption and the precision group was fed individually using the Super SmartFeed Producer. Individual daily BW was measured using SmartScale technology and used to calculate daily rate of gain. Heifers were supplemented to reach 60% of their mature body weight (MBW; 635 kg) at time of breeding. Heifers were bred in June using estrus synchronization with fixed time artificial insemination. Statistical analysis was conducted in Program R, which included an ANOVA to evaluate the differences in ADG between the control and precision treatments. Our results indicated a significant difference in average daily gain between the control (P < 0.05), mean ADG of 1.94 and 1.76 lb/d, respectively. Further, the control group utilized 5,600 lb more feed compared to the precision group. The number of heifers that achieved estrous was similar for both control (27) and precision groups (25) based on visual qualitative assessment of heat detection patches. At completion of the winter grazing season, the control group was developed to 64.9% MBW with an average weight of 909.37 lb and the precision group reached 62.2% MBW with an average weight of 870.37 lb. Successful implementation of precision supplementation has the potential to develop more uniform heifers at breeding, reduce intake variation, and reduce supplement overconsumption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]