Search

Somatostatin is an important regulator of endocrine and exocrine secretion, affecting the release of many hormones. The effects of somatostatin are mediated through its interaction with one of five somatostatin receptors. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) express multiple somatostatin receptors, making them excellent potential therapeutic targets. Many trials have shown that treatment with somatostatin analogs is associated with disease stabilization and prolonged survival. More recently, somatostatin analogs have been shown to have antiproliferative effects, thus broadening the scope of their uses. In this review, we update the current data on the treatment of GEP-NETs with somatostatin analogs, with particular emphasis on the results of the PROMID study. In addition, we discuss the current state of knowledge of novel therapies against GEP-NETs, including the use of somatostatin analogs with broader receptor binding profiles, chimeric somatostatin-dopamine molecules, combinations of somatostatin analogs with other active chemotherapy agents, and peptide receptor-targeted radionuclide therapy.

Somatostatin is an inhibitor of hormone secretion through specific receptors (sst1-5). The aim of this study was to investigate the putative regulatory role of somatostatin analogues on the secretion of insulin and glucagon by rat pancreatic islets. After 48 h exposure only the non-selective agonists (somatostatin, octreotide and SOM-230) inhibited insulin accumulation. The inhibition of insulin secretion was accompanied by increased islet insulin contents. None of the analogues showed a consistent effect on the glucagon accumulation in the medium after 48 h. Since we observed a difference in the regulatory effect between the non-selective and selective analogues, combinations of selective analogues were studied. Combination of sst2+sst5 agonists inhibited the medium insulin accumulation, while combination of sst1+sst2 analogues caused a decrease in glucagon accumulation. After removal of somatostatin a rebound effect with increased insulin secretion were observed. This effect was reversed after 6 h. For SOM-230 insulin secretion continued to be suppressed even after the analogue was removed and returned to control values after 3 h. As for glucagon secretion there was an initial decline after culture with octreotide, while the other substances failed to induce any changes. In summary, non-selective somatostatin analogues or combinations of receptor selective analogues may cause inhibition of hormone secretion from rat pancreatic islets. For insulin and glucagon, combinations of sst2+sst5 and sst1+sst2, respectively may exert this effects. Thus, our data suggest that more than one sst must be involved to down-regulate islet glucagon and insulin secretion.

Carcinoid tumours belong to the family of neuroendocrine tumours with a capacity to take up and concentrate amines and precursors as well as peptides, and can thereby be detected by nuclear medicine techniques. These rare tumours are difficult to diagnose at earlier stages because of small size and multiplicity. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are mostly of benefit for detection of larger primary tumours (1-3 cm) and liver and lymph-node metastases. A majority of carcinoid tumours express somatostatin receptors, particularly receptor type 2, and thus somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) can be used for detection and staging of carcinoid tumours. The detection rate of carcinoid tumours has been reported to be somewhere between 80 and 100% in different studies. The scintigraphy gives a good staging of the disease and detection of unexpected tumour sites, which were not determined by conventional imaging. This method also indicates content of somatostatin receptors, which might indicate efficacy of treatment with octreotide or other somatostatin analogues. Another new non-invasive technique for detection of carcinoid tumours is positron emission tomography (PET). The biological substance for study can be labelled for radioactive imaging with radionuclears, such as (11)C, (15)O and (18)F, with emission of positrons. More than 95% of patients studied displayed high tracer uptake from PET with (11)C-5HTP (5-hydroxytryptophan), which is significantly higher compared to both computer tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. MIBG has been used for decades to visualize carcinoid tumours, because MIBG is concentrated in the endocrine cells. It was initially developed to detect phaeochromocytomas of the adrenal with reported high sensitivity (87%) and specificity as high as 99%. The method can be used when other methods fail to localize carcinoid tumours and particularly when treatment with (131)I-MIBG is being considered. Tumour-targeted treatment for malignant carcinoid tumour is still investigational, but has become of significant interest with the use of radiolabelled somatostatin analogues. Since a majority of carcinoid tumours present somatostatin receptors and can therefore be visualized in vivo by using radiolabelled somatostatin analogues, it seems logical to try to target these tumours with radioactive substances, not only for visualization but also for treatment. (111)Indium-DTPA-octreotide has been used as the first tumour-targeted treatment, with rather low response rates (in the order of 10-20%) and no significant tumour shrinkage. The second radioactive analogue which has been applied in the clinic is (90)yttrium-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotide, which has given partial and complete remissions in 20-30% of patients. The most significant side-effects have been kidney dysfunction, thrombocytopenia and liver toxicity. The most recent compound is (177)lutetium-DOTA-Tyr3-octreotate, which has been applied by the Rotterdam group and has been reported to give partial remission in about 40% of the patients. In the near future, combined treatment with both (90)yttrium and (177)lutetium coupled to a somatostatin analogue might come into clinical trials. (177)Lutetium may be more effective for smaller tumours whereas (90)yttrium may be more effective for larger tumours.

This consensus report gives a detailed description of the use of somatostatin analogs in the management of neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system. As background information we have outlined critical aspects of the pathology, the use of tumor markers, a definition of functional and non-functional digestive neuroendocrine tumors, different imaging modalities, surgical considerations, liver embolization and the use of cytotoxic drugs as well as interferon. Included in the report is an overview of somatostatin, somatostatin analogs and its receptor expression in different neuroendocrine tumors. It will also define the binding affinities of different somatostatin analogs to the five different subtypes of somatostatin receptor. We compare the efficacy of octreotide and lanreotide in reducing diarrhea and flushing. Side-effects are described and we provide practical information on somatostatin analog treatment.

More than 30 years have passed since somatostatin was discovered and its hormonal function defined. The wide range of anatomical distribution and actions of somatostatin and its receptors have stimulated intense scientific and clinical interest. The development of somatostatin analogues helped define its usefulness in the treatment of endocrine diseases and cancer. The molecular cloning of five distinct subtypes of somatostatin receptors in the 1980s has significantly increased our insight into the biology of somatostatin and its receptor subtypes and has led to the design and development of subtype-selective peptides and nonpeptide agonists and antagonists. In the future, the development of somatostatin-receptor-mediated treatment will go along different lines. Tumor-targeted radioactive treatment based on somatostatin analogues will be further developed and improved. New somatostatin analogues will come into clinical practice, both receptor subtype-specific analogues, but also pan-receptor analogues. One is currently in clinical trial--SOM230--which is a cyclo-hexapeptide binding with high affinity to receptor type 1, 2, 3 and 5, but not 4. It has already shown activity both in acromegaly and in neuroendocrine gastrointestinal tumors. Preclinical studies on somatostatin analogues, coupled to cytotoxic agents, have shown rather promising results and will hopefully be further developed in clinical trials. Another interesting area is treatment of neuroendocrine gut tumors with ultra-high doses of somatostatin analogues, which has demonstrated significant clinical effects in patients resistant to standard-dose treatment with the same somatostatin analogue.

Somatostatin is a polypeptide hormone acting as an inhibitor of pituitary, pancreatic, and gastrointestinal secretion through specific membrane receptors of which five subtypes have been cloned (sst(1-5)). Somatostatin analogs are used in the clinic to treat patients with excessive hormone production due to a neuroendocrine tumor. The aim of this study was to investigate the biological activity of three new somatostatin receptor subtype selective analogs (BIM-23926, sst(1)-selective; BIM-23120, sst(2)-selective; and BIM-23206, sst(5)-selective) in the human neuroendocrine tumor cell line, BON-1, which expresses sst(1), sst(2), and sst(5) natively. Somatostatin-14 and octreotide were used as reference substances. Forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation and chromogranin A (CgA) secretion were inhibited by BIM-23120, BIM-23206, and somatostatin-14 in a dose-dependent manner. Cholecystokinin (CCK-8) stimulated activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase was inhibited by BIM-23120 and BIM-23206, while BIM-23926 stimulated the activity. Selective BIM analogs showed a more efficient inhibitory effect on cAMP accumulation, CgA secretion, and MAP kinase activity than octreotide in BON-1 cells. This may be explained by the differences in affinity of the ligand to the receptor or by interaction between different sst subtypes. We conclude that increasing knowledge about sst physiology and expression in malignant disease indicates a need for new analogs that can be incorporated into the therapeutic arsenal.

Objectives: Scintigraphy with radiolabelled octreotide (octreoscan) is useful for imaging various neuroendocrine tumours, especially in patients with midgut carcinoids. We were interested in estimating the efficacy of octreoscan for detection of the primary tumour and metastases in patients with bronchial carcinoids., Patients and Methods: Twenty-eight patients with histologically verified bronchial carcinoids underwent octreoscan and the imaging results were compared to CT regarding soft tissue metastases, and to bone scan and MRI regarding bone metastases. The primary tumour had been removed prior to the octreoscan in 12 patients. Metastatic disease was diagnosed in 22 patients., Results: Altogether, 20 patients (71%) had octreoscan-positive tumours, including 2/5 patients with ectopic ACTH secretion resulting in Cushing's syndrome and 8/9 patients with carcinoid syndrome. The primary tumour was octreoscan-positive in 13/16 patients and could be detected on CT in 15/16 patients. CT failed to localize the primary tumour in one octreoscan-positive patient, presenting with ectopic ACTH secretion and Cushing's syndrome. Intrathoracic recurrences/metastases were visualized by octreoscan in 7/9 patients and by CT in 8/9 patients. CT showed liver metastases in 14 patients; nine of these patients (64%) had octreoscan-positive liver metastases. Ten patients had bone metastases; octreoscan was positive in seven and bone scan in nine of these 10., Conclusions: Octreoscan may be used for follow-up and detection of recurrent disease in patients with somatostatin receptor-positive bronchial carcinoids. In our limited patient material, CT however, seems to be better than octreoscan for visualization of the primary tumour as well as liver metastases.

Somatostatin analogs and alpha-interferon induce good responses as single drugs in the treatment of endocrine pancreatic tumors. We examined the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of alpha-interferon and somatostatin analogs in 16 patients with metastatic endocrine pancreatic tumors. All patients except one had received prior treatment and were in a progressive state. Doses of alpha-interferon and somatostatin analogs were individually titrated. The alpha-interferon doses varied between 9 and 25 million units per week and were combined with 100-1500 microg of octreotide or 6000 microg of lanreotide daily. Radiological response was seen in 3 of 16 (19%) patients (median duration 23 mo). Biochemical response was seen in 10 of 16 (62.5%) patients (median duration 22 mo). All three patients previously progressing on both alpha-interferon and somatostatin analog as single drugs achieved a stabilization of the disease when treated with the combination (median duration 10 mo). Seven of eight (88%) patients previously progressing on alpha-interferon treatment benefited from the combination with biochemical partial response or stabilization. All six patients previously progressing during somatostatin analog treatment achieved biochemical partial response or stabilization. More than 80% of patients who progressed during previous treatment with either drug benefited from the combined treatment, which also was well tolerated. Thus, a combination of alpha-interferon and somatostatin analogs may be considered for patients previously progressing on treatment with alpha-interferon or somatostatin analogs. However, in this study, the value of sequential treatment has not been evaluated.

Somatostatin, also known as somatotropin release-inhibiting factor (SRIF), is a natural cyclic peptide inhibitor of pituitary, pancreatic, and gastrointestinal secretion. Its long-acting analogs are in clinical use for treatment of various endocrine syndromes and gastrointestinal anomalies. These analogs are more potent inhibitors of the endocrine release of GH, glucagon, and insulin than the native SRIF; hence, they do not display considerable physiological selectivity. Our goal was to design effective and physiologically selective SRIF analogs with potential therapeutic value. We employed an integrated approach consisting of screening of backbone cyclic peptide libraries constructed on the basis of molecular modeling of known SRIF agonists and of high throughput receptor binding assays with each of the five cloned human SRIF receptors (hsst1-5). By using this approach, we identified a novel, high affinity, enzymatically stable, and long-acting SRIF analog, PTR-3173, which binds with nanomolar affinity to human SRIF receptors hsst2, hsst4, and hsst5. The hsst5 and the rat sst5 (rsst5) forms have the same nanomolar affinity for this analog. In the human carcinoid-derived cell line BON-1, PTR-3173 inhibits forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation as efficiently as the drug octreotide, indicating its agonistic effect in this human cell system. In hormone secretion studies with rats, we found that PTR-3173 is 1000-fold and more than 10,000-fold more potent in inhibiting GH release than glucagon and insulin release, respectively. These results suggest that PTR-3173 is the first highly selective somatostatinergic analog for the in vivo inhibition of GH secretion, with minimal or no effect on glucagon and insulin release, respectively.

The diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors have been significantly improved during the last decades. Localization and staging of the disease by somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (Octreoscan) are now the 'gold standard' for the management of these tumors. Treatment with somatostatin analogs has improved quality of life and possibly also survival for patients with neuroendocrine tumors. New long-acting formulations of the somatostatin analogs are as effective as the old regular formulations but will further improve quality of life for the patients. Tumor-targeted therapy with (111)In and (90)Y coupled to somatostatin analogs show promising results but await further studies., (Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel)

The medical treatment of neuroendocrine GEP tumours must be based on the growth properties of the tumour. Medical treatment includes chemotherapy, somatostatin analogues and alpha interferons. Chemotherapy has been particularly active in patients with high proliferating neuroendocrine tumours such as endocrine pancreatic tumours and lung carcinoids. Streptozotocin-based combinations including 5-flourouracil and doxorubicin have generated partial remissions in 40%-60% of the patients giving a median survival of about two years in patients with advanced disease. Cisplatinum plus etoposide have demonstrated significant antitumour effects in anaplastic endocrine pancreatic tumours and lung carcinoids. However, in low proliferating tumours such as classical midgut carcinoids the response rates with the same combinations of cytotoxic agents have only generated short lasting responses in less than 10% of patients. In these patients, biological treatment has been of benefit. Alpha interferon at doses of 3-9 million units three to seven times per week subcutaneously, has given biochemical response rates of 50% and significant tumour reduction in about 15% of patients with long duration, up to three years. Somatostatin analogues have been widely used in the treatment of neuroendocrine gut and pancreatic tumours. The currently available somatostatin analogues particularly bind somatostatin receptor 2 and 5 and with low affinity also receptor subtype 3. Octreotide is registered in most countries for the treatment of patients with carcinoid syndrome and also VIP and glucagon producing tumours. Regular octreotide at standard doses of 100-300 microg/day gives symptomatic responses in a medium of 60% of patients and biochemical responses in up to 70% of patients. Significant tumour responses are rare, less than 5%. Long-acting formulations of somatostatin analogues have been of significant benefit for the patients with similar response rates as for regular formulations. The quality of life has been significantly improved by using the long-acting formulations.

To investigate possible changes in somatostatin receptor expression during treatment with high dose lanreotide, eight patients with neuroendocrine tumors were investigated by [(111)In-DTPA-D-Phe1]-octreotide scintigraphy before and during treatment. The spleen-to-background ratio decreased in all patients, whereas tumor-to-background ratio revealed a heterogeneous pattern with an average increase of 50% (-79% to +1,087%). This finding indicates that lanreotide treatment may influence the binding of radioactively labeled somatostatin to the spleen, while changes in the binding to functioning somatostatin receptors in tumor cells are more complex and not clearly related to treatment.

Somatostatin is a tetradeca peptide hormone produced by many different endocrine cells throughout the body. It is also present in both the central and peripheral nervous system. The peptide has many different moods of action including inhibition of hormone secretion and influence on gastrointestinal motility. Somatostatin was identified in 1973 and about 10 years later the first long-acting analogue, octreotide, became available for use in clinical trials. Somatostatin analogues have been used to treat patients with neuroendocrine tumors, such as carcinoid tumors and endocrine pancreatic tumors, with symptoms due to excessive hormone production. It also has a well-documented effect on hormone levels and symptoms in acromegalic patients, while the use in diabetes mellitus is less well established. Several new analogues have been developed and tested for clinical use and lately non-peptide analogues have been produced. These new somatostatin receptor subtype specific analogues will soon be tested in clinical trials. In this review article the development of new analogues and new preparations of old analogues and their use in the clinic is discussed.

Purpose: To evaluate the prolonged release (PR) of the long-acting somatostatin analog lanreotide in patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors and its effect on hormone-related symptomatology, tumor markers, tumor size, tolerability, and quality of life (QOL)., Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had the following substantial daily symptoms: for patients with carcinoid tumors, three or more stools and/or 1.5 or more flushing episodes; for patients with gastrinoma, greater than 50% elevated basic acid output; and for patients with vasoactive intestinal peptide-secreting tumors (VIPomas), four or more stools and/or a stool volume of >/= 800 mL, a measurable tumor, and an elevated biochemical tumor marker (>/= two times the upper limit of the normal reference range). Lanreotide PR was administered intramuscularly every 14 days at 30 mg for 6 months. We measured efficacy by studying symptoms, tumor markers, tumor size, and QOL. Side effects were scored according to the National Cancer Institute's toxicity grading system and ultrasound examination of the gallbladder., Results: Fifty-five patients were included in the study (48 patients with carcinoid tumors, six patients with gastrinoma, and one patient with VIPoma). Symptomatic improvement (> 50% reduction) occurred in 38% of the assessable patients with carcinoid tumors, in 67% of the gastrinoma patients, and in the VIPoma patient. Tumor markers normalized in two of 45 assessable patients, 19 patients exhibited a reduction (> 50%), 19 patients exhibited no change, and tumor markers rose by more than 50% in five patients. Tumor size was reduced in two of 31 assessable patients and remained stable in 25 patients; four patients experienced progression. QOL assessments after 1 month showed improvements in emotional and cognitive function, and diminished fatigue, sleeping disorders, and diarrhea. Eight of 30 assessable patients developed gallstones., Conclusion: Lanreotide PR is a well-tolerated somatostatin analog with significant clinical, biochemical, and antitumor effects that bring about a significant improvement in QOL for patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

Neuroendocrine gastrointestinal tumors express somatostatin receptors (ssts) in 80%-90% of cases and somatostatin analogs have become increasingly important in the management of these patients. Most of the presently available somatostatin analogs (octreotide, RC-160, and lanreotide) bind to the sst2 and sst5, and in higher doses to sst3 of the ssts 1-5 described. Clinical improvement during somatostatin analog therapy is mainly mediated via a direct inhibitory effect on hormone production from the tumors, seen in 30%-70% of the patients. Also indirect non-tumor mediated effects on peripheral target organs contribute to the subjective improvement, achieved in 30%-70% of patients. Recently, significant improvement of quality of life has been demonstrated with long-acting depot formulations. There is little or no effect on tumor growth during octreotide therapy; tumor shrinkage has been reported in 10%-20% of patients, but stabilization of tumor growth can be achieved in about half of the patients with a duration of 8-16 months. Recently, induction of apoptosis has been described with high doses of lanreotide (12 mg/d). Eventually, however, all patients escape from somatostatin analog therapy with regard both to hormonal production and tumor growth, and the mechanism behind the tachyphylaxis is not yet known. Studies of optimal dosage and modes of administration, development of new slow release formulations, the potential value of high-dose somatostatin analog therapy and novel somatostatin receptor subtype specific analogs are important directions for the use of somatostatin analogs in the future. In addition, assessment of somatostatin receptor status for each patient and studies of tumor biology, e.g., inhibition of exocytosis, antiproliferative effects and induction of apoptosis during treatment will help to optimize treatment and provide new insights into mechanisms of action of somatostatin analogs.

Pharmacologic or surgical manipulation with growth hormone secretion or with the physiologic release of somatostatin and growth hormone-releasing hormone affects some rat liver enzymes, especially the sex-differentiated ones. We investigated the effects of two somatostatin analogs on several enzyme functions in six patients with carcinoid syndrome, using codeine as a probe drug. Codeine was given intravenously and its N- and O-demethylation, as well as 6-glucuronidation catalyzed by CYP3A, CYP2D6, and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase, respectively, were studied before and during treatment with somatostatins. After 3 days of treatment with somatostatins the partial metabolic clearance of codeine by N-demethylation decreased by 21% to 64% in all patients (mean change, 44%; p < 0.05), and the clearance by O-demethylation was decreased by 20% to 69% in five of the patients (mean change in all patients, 35%; p < 0.05). In contrast, the partial clearance by 6-glucuronidation and the total systemic clearance of codeine were unchanged. Our results may be caused by the inhibition of growth hormone secretion induced by the somatostatins, inasmuch as direct metabolic interactions with these peptide drugs are improbable. The decline in CYP3A4 and CYP2D6 activity might have clinical implications when substrates of these enzymes with low therapeutic indices are combined with somatostatin analogs. Because the formation of morphine from codeine was altered, the analgesic effect of this drug may be reduced during concomitant treatment with somatostatins.

We have studied the expression of apoptosis regulating genes bcl-2 and bax in neuroendocrine gut tumors. The expression pattern of these genes was compared with the clinical response (changes in the tumor markers and changes of the tumor size determined by radiology) after treatment with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha, n = 13), somatostatin analog (octreotide, n = 3; lanreotide, n = 2) or a combination of both (n = 5). Immunohistochemistry and in situ RT-PCR were performed and expressions were scored from 0 (no staining) to 6 (strong and wide-spread staining). With regard to clinical outcome, the scores (mean +/- SEM) of immunohistochemical staining of bcl-2 and bax were 1.77 +/- 0.25 and 4 +/- 0.22 for patients with stable disease and, 0.54 +/- 0.28 and 4.68 +/- 0.21 for patients with progressive disease. The scores of bcl-2 and bax staining for IFN-alpha-treated patients were 1.96 +/- 0.35 and 4.12 +/- 0.31 and for untreated patients were 0.5 +/- 0.25 and 4.5 +/- 0.21, respectively. Expression of bcl-2 was observed in all IFN-alpha-treated patients who responded to the drug but not in nonresponsive patients (p = 0.0027). In contrast, bax, a promotor of apoptosis was expressed in all patients with higher degree of expression seen in patients with progressive disease (p = 0.0364). We have also detected bcl-2 expression by western blot analysis in neuroendocrine tumor tissue grown in nude mice, which were treated with IFN-alpha for 28 days. Our results indicate that, IFN-alpha can induce bcl-2. Thus, we, propose that bcl-2 may be used as a prognostic marker for IFN-alpha sensitivity of neuroendocrine tumors.

Background: Neuroendocrine tumors usually present with inoperable metastatic disease and severe hormonal symptoms. Specific chemotherapy, alpha-interferon and the somatostatin analog octreotide are established therapies in these patients but all of them eventually fail. Other somatostatin analogs, e.g., RC-160 and lanreotide, are currently being studied in different doses and modes of administration., Patients and Methods: Nineteen patients with advanced neuroendocrine gastrointestinal tumors [13 carcinoids and six endocrine pancreatic tumors (EPT)], liver metastases being present in 18, most of them heavily pretreated, were included. Seventeen out of 18 patients had somatostatin receptors demonstrated by octreotide scintigraphy. Lanreotide was given as four daily subcutaneous injections, starting with 750 microg/d, then increasing every week up to 12,000 microg/d after six weeks, a dose which was maintained, if tolerated, for 12 months, or until progression., Results: There was a significant tumor size response (>50%) in one patient (5%), whereas 12 patients (70%) had tumor stabilization for 12 months. Bichemical tumor markers were significantly reduced at six months (urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid and plasma chromogranin) and 12 months (chromogranin) and the overall biochemical response rate was 58% with this high dose of lanreotide. Adverse events were observed and four patients stopped the treatment due to adverse events. Studies of tumor biopsies before and during treatment indicated induction of apoptosis in patients with tumor stabilization and biochemical response., Conclusion: High-dose treatment with lanreotide (12,000 microg/d) produced tumor size response in 5%, stabilization in 70% and a biochemical response in 58% of patients. These results should be related to the advanced stage of the disease as indicated by the mean duration of disease of more than four years, but they do not appear to be better than those achieved with standard doses of somatostatin analogs. However, in responding patients we observed induction of apoptosis in the tumors, a phenomenon not seen with regular doses of somatostatin analogs, but often produced by chemotherapeutic agents.

The extent of apoptosis identified by in situ DNA nick end labelling (TUNEL) on tissue samples obtained from patients with neuroendocrine tumors was correlated with the clinical outcome in patients treated with high-dose somatostatin analog (lanreotide 12 mg/day), n = 8, or other biotherapy including interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), n = 4, low-dose somatostatin analog (octreotide or lanreotide), n = 3, or a combination of both, n = 1. Biopsies were obtained before the start of treatment and/or after 6 months and 12 months. After 6 months of treatment, 5 patients receiving high-dose somatostatin analog showed a biochemical response (decrease in different neuroendocrine tumor markers) and 4 of these showed an increase in apoptotic index (AI: percentage of apoptotic cells) by 1.94 +/- 1.71%. At 12 months, AI was also increased in patients with a biochemical response (4.22 +/- 3.93%). However, none showed a decrease in tumor size on computerized tomography (CT) and none of the patients treated with low-dose somatostatin analog or IFN-alpha showed any significant increase in AI during treatment. In an experimental model, nude mice were xenografted with the neuroendocrine cell line (BON-1). From the 2nd day of tumor implantation, they received treatment with either placebo, high-dose octreotide, IFN-alpha, or a combination of both, for 28 days. In mice receiving treatment with high-dose octreotide (300 microg/kg, t.i.d) there was a threefold increase in apoptotic cells as compared to the placebo group (p = 0.0084), while the combination group had few cells with ultra-structural changes indicating apoptosis and the IFN-alpha treated group showed no significant changes. However, tumor growth inhibition was more pronounced in the combination group (p = 0.0011). This probably denotes that tumor growth inhibition could be achieved more efficiently by blocking the cell cycle than by inducing apoptosis. We concluded that treatment with high-dose somatostatin analogs may induce apoptosis in neuroendocrine tumors, while this is not found during treatment with low-dose somatostatin analogs or IFN-alpha. We also found that an increase in AI during high-dose somatostatin analog treatment was correlated with the biochemical response, but not with the tumor size as detected by CT in patients or with the tumor mass in the experimental model.

In an open phase III study, octastatin was given as a continuous subcutaneous (s.c.) infusion to 35 patients (mean age 62 years) with malignant neuroendocrine gastro-intestinal tumours and the carcinoid syndrome. The wash-out was often incomplete because of the advanced stage of disease. The starting dose of 1.5 mg/24 h was increased up to 3.0 mg/24 h at 3 months in some patients. The carcinoid syndrome disappeared in 20% of patients at 3 months and in 23% at 6 months, with 43 and 45% of patients, respectively, experiencing an improvement. The mean Karnovsky index increased by > 10% in 40% of patients at 3 and 6 months. Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (U-5-HIAA) levels at 3 months normalised in 1 patient, fell in 20% (by > 50%; p = 0.0021) and stabilised in 66%. The respective values at 6 months were 1, 17% (p = 0.023) and 60%. There was also a significant decrease in plasma chromogranin levels at 3 months (p = 0.042), which did not persist at 6 months. Tumour size fell (by > 50%) in 1 patient by 6 months but this patient had undergone chemoembolisation one month prior to the start of the study. Most patients had tumour size stabilisation (76 and 68%) or progression (20 and 24%) at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Dose escalation from 1.5 to 3.0 mg did not significantly improve clinical, biochemical or tumour responses. The treatment was well tolerated with minor adverse events. In an open pilot phase II study of 19 patients (mean age 58 years), patients were given high dose somatuline with a maintenance dose of 12,000 mg/day in 4 divided s.c. injections. U-5-HIAA, which was elevated in 13 patients with a mean of 444 mumol/day before the start, was reduced to 58% of baseline at 3 months, 68% at 6 months (p = 0.04), 66% at 9 months and 75% at 12 months (p = 0.14). P-chromogranin was elevated in 18 patients, with a mean of 5,300 micrograms/l before the start, and was reduced to 52, 55, 63 and 64% of the baseline at 3, 6 (p = 0.039), 9 and 12 (p = 0.013) months, respectively. In the responding patients, apoptosis was induced.

Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) has a direct anti-tumour effect and is an immunomodulator. Somatostatin analogues, by contrast, when used to treat neuroendocrine tumours, control the secretion and peripheral effects of hormones, although at high doses they induce apoptosis. We have used IFN-alpha to treat > 350 patients with neuroendocrine tumours, and combining our and published data gives a median 44% biochemical response rate and 11% tumour response rate. Side-effects are mainly flu-like symptoms, then low-grade chronic fatigue syndrome. 15% may develop autoimmune reactions. The side-effects profile of somatostatin analogues is better but patients must take frequent injections and may have bile problems. We combined IFN-alpha and octreotide treatment in 24 patients with malignant carcinoid tumours who did not respond biochemically to high-dose (300 micrograms/day) octreotide alone. Biochemical response occurred in 77% but no significant anti-tumour effect was noted besides disease stabilisation in 4 cases. The combination therapy had an effect on clinical symptoms rather than tumour mass. Interferon was better tolerated when in the combination.

Methods: We used PET to characterize the uptake and decarboxylation of 11C-L-DOPA in vivo in two patients with endocrine pancreatic tumors: one glucagonoma and one gastrinoma., Results: With L-DOPA labeled with 11C in the beta position, in which the radioactive label follows the molecule through decarboxylation to dopamine, significant uptake was observed in the tumors. With L-DOPA labeled in the carboxyl group, in which the label is rapidly eliminated from the tissue as 11CO2 if decarboxylation takes place, an almost complete lack of uptake is noted., Conclusion: This study shows that, using selective position labeling, an in vivo action of enzymatic activity can be observed with PET and that significant decarboxylation occurs in the tested endocrine pancreatic tumors. Also, marked retention of radioactivity occurs after treatment with somatostatin analogs. It is hypothesized that this is a reflection of a reduction of exocytosis which is induced by this treatment.

Neuroendocrine gut and pancreatic tumors have over the years presented a therapeutic challenge. The patients present with a wide range of clinical symptoms related to hormone production that can sometimes be easily managed but are sometimes life threatening. The most frequent clinical symptom related to endocrine gut tumors is the carcinoid syndrome, with flushing, diarrhea, bronchoconstriction, and right heart failure. Until the middle of the 1980s, when a patient was not cured by surgery, very little could be offered except chemotherapy. Biotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of malignant neuroendocrine gut and pancreatic tumors, in which both interferon-alpha and somatostatin analogues improved the quality of life for these patients and possibly also increased survival. Chemotherapy, with response rates of 40% to 60% in endocrine pancreatic tumors, is still first-line treatment in this group of patients, whereas in patients with carcinoids of the gut, no beneficial value of chemotherapy so far has been noticed. Both interferon-alpha and somatostatin analogues provide biochemical responses in 40% to 70% of patients with carcinoid tumors, whereas significant tumor reduction is only noticed in a few cases. Development of biotherapy is just at its beginning, and in the future, when we have learned more about tumor biology and mechanisms of action of these treatments, even better therapeutic results might be encountered. Combinations of biotherapy with chemotherapy as well as combinations of different biotherapies are now under clinical investigation.

Ten patients with malignant endocrine pancreatic tumors were treated with SMS 201-995 at doses of 50 micrograms twice daily, administered subcutaneously. Four out of 10 patients (40%)-1 patient with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and 3 of 6 with the watery diarrhea syndrome--responded objectively with more than 50% reduction of peptide levels, with a median duration of 15.5 months. All four patients improved symptomatically, with decreasing dyspeptic symptoms and decreasing diarrhoea. Three additional patients had a clear relief of symptoms without an effect on tumor-secreted peptides. The disease progressed in three patients during treatment. No reduction of tumor mass was seen in any of the patients. The main side effect noted was a slight but maintained increase in fasting blood glucose in four patients. In conclusion, SMS 201-995 had a beneficial effect in more than half of the patients and seems to be a valuable adjunct to other causal therapy in this patient category, especially in acute situations and weak patients because of its very few side effects.

By using only reverse-phase h.p.l.c., three fragments of prosomatostatin were isolated from an extract of a human pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour that produced somatostatin, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and gastrin-releasing peptide. The amino acid composition of the peptides indicated that they represented prosomatostatin-(1-63)-peptide, prosomatostain-(65-76)-peptide and prosomatostatin-(79-92)-peptide (somatostatin-14). The identity of prosomatostatin-(1-63)-peptide was confirmed by characterization of the products of digestion with Armillaria mellea (honey fungus) proteinase. Partial micro-sequencing of prosomatostatin-(1-63)-peptide showed that the Gly24-Ala25 bond of preprosomatostatin was the site of cleavage of the signal peptide. Thus human prosomatostatin is a protein of 92 amino acid residues that is proteolytically cleaved in a pancreatic tumour at the site of a dibasic-residue (arginine-lysine) processing site and at a single-monobasic-residue (arginine) processing site.