Search

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the possible presence of multiple spino-thalamic pathways with different conduction velocities (CVs) in the human spinal cord. Methods: Laser evoked potentials (LEPs) were recorded in 10 healthy subjects after stimulation of the dorsal midline at four vertebral level: C5, T2, T6, and T10. This method allowed us to minimize the influence of the conduction in the peripheral fibers and to calculate the spinal CV in two different ways: (1) the reciprocal of the slope of the regression line was obtained from the latencies of the different LEP components, and (2) the distance between C5 and T10 was divided by the latency difference of the responses at the two sites. In particular, we considered the middle-latency N1 potential (latencies of around 135, 150, 157, and 171ms after stimulation at C5, T2, T6, and T10 levels, respectively), which is generated in the second somatosensory (SII) area, and the late P2 response (latencies of around 336, 344, 346, and 362ms after stimulation at C5, T2, T6, and T10 levels, respectively), which is generated in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Results: The calculated CV of the spinal fibers generating the N1 potential (around 9m/s) was significantly different (P <0.05) from the one of the pathway producing the P2 response (around 13m/s). Conclusions: Our results suggest that the N1 and the P2 LEP components are generated by two parallel spinal pathways. Significance: Both the N1 and P2 potentials should be recorded in the clinical routine since a dissociated abnormality of either response may be found in lesions of the nociceptive system not only in the brain, but also at spinal cord level. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objectives:: Our study aimed at investigating the effect of repetitive recordings on somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) related to spatial attention in a population of healthy elderly subjects. Methods:: Fifteen healthy elderly subjects were tested for six consecutive days using a somatosensory oddball paradigm, in which target stimuli were applied above the elbow and the non-target stimuli on the ipsilateral shoulder. Brain electrical activity was recorded from six scalp electrodes (Fz, Cz, F3, F4, T3 and T4). Results:: The N140 response to target stimuli showed a significantly decreased amplitude across the sessions with the lowest value during the fourth day of recording and with a partial recovery at the sixth day. On the contrary, the amplitude of the N140 response to non-target stimuli and that of the P300 potential to target stimuli were not significantly modified. Conclusions:: The significant amplitude reduction of the N140 potential in target, but not in non-target recordings across sessions, suggests that the voluntarily oriented attention is reduced by stimulus repetition, while the automatic attention is not. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To investigate whether the reduction of amplitude of the scalp somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) during movement (gating) is due to an attenuation of the afferent volley at subcortical level.Methods: Median nerve SEPs were recorded from 9 patients suffering from Parkinson''s disease, who underwent implant of intracerebral (IC) electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus or in the globus pallidum. SEPs were recorded from Erb''s point ipsilateral to stimulation, from the scalp surface and from the IC leads, at rest and during a voluntary flexo-extension movement of the stimulated wrist. The recorded IC traces were submitted to an off-line filtering by a 300–1500 bandpass to obtain the high-frequency SEP bursts.Results: IC leads recorded a triphasic component (P1–N1–P2) from 14 to 22 ms of latency. The amplitudes of the scalp N20, P20 and N30 potentials and of the IC triphasic component were significantly decreased during movement, while the peripheral N9 amplitude remained unchanged. Also the IC bursts, whose frequency was around 1000 Hz, were reduced in amplitude by the voluntary movement.Conclusions: Since the IC triphasic component is probably generated by neurons of the thalamic ventro-postero-lateral nucleus, which receive the somatosensory afferent volley, the P1–N1 amplitude reduction during movement suggests that the gating phenomenon involves also the subcortical structures. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To investigate the possible contribution of the primary somatosensory area (SI) to pain sensation.Methods: Depth recordings of CO2 laser evoked potentials (LEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were performed in an epileptic patient with a stereotactically implanted electrode (Talairach coordinates y=−23, z=40) that passed about 10 mm below the hand representation in her left SI area, as assessed by the source of the N20 SEP component.Results: The intracerebral electrode was able to record the N20 SEP component after non-painful electrical stimulation of her right median nerve. The N20 potential showed a phase reversal in the bipolar montage (at about 31 mm from the midline), which confirms that the electrode was located near its generator in area 3b. In contrast, no reliable response was recorded from the SI electrode after painful CO2 laser stimulation of the right hand. An N2-P2 response was evoked at the vertex electrode (Cz), thus demonstrating the effectiveness of the delivered CO2 laser stimuli.Conclusions: Since the N20 SEP component originates from the anterior bank of the post-central gyrus (area 3b), our result suggests that this part of SI does not participate in LEP generation. In fact, the previously published LEP sources in the SI area estimated from scalp recordings are about 10–17 mm posterior of the electrode in our patient, suggesting that they are more likely located in area 1, 2 or posterior parietal cortex. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Our study aimed at investigating the nociceptive contribution to the somatosensory evoked potentials after electrical intramuscular stimulation (mSEPs) at painful intensity. Scalp mSEPs were recorded in 10 healthy subjects after electrical stimulation of the left brachioradialis muscle at three intensities: non-painful (I2), slightly painful (I4) and moderately painful (I6). For each intensity, mSEPs were recorded in a neutral condition (NC) in which subjects did not have any task, and in an attention condition (AC) in which subjects were asked to count the number of stimuli. In both NC and AC, the N120 and P220 amplitudes were significantly higher at I6 than at I2. While the N120 amplitude did not vary between NC and AC, the P220 amplitude was significantly higher in AC than in NC at all stimulus intensities. Our results suggest that nociceptive inputs contribute to the N120 amplitude increase at painful stimulus intensity, while the P220 amplitude is more sensitive to changes of subjects’ attention level. Therefore, the N120 amplitude increase to moderately painful stimuli, as compared to non-painful stimuli, may represent a marker of the activation of the muscular thin myelinated afferents. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To study whether sensorimotor cortical areas are involved in Essential Tremor (ET) generation.Background: It has been suggested that sensorimotor cortical areas can play a role in ET generation. Therefore, we studied median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in 10 patients with definite ET.Methods: To distinguish SEP changes due to hand movements from those specifically related to central mechanisms of tremor, SEPs were recorded at rest, during postural tremor and during active and passive movement of the hand. Moreover, we recorded SEPs from 5 volunteers who mimicked hand tremor. The traces were further submitted to dipolar source analysis.Results: Mimicked tremor in controls as well as active and passive hand movements in ET patients caused a marked attenuation of all scalp SEP components. These SEP changes can be explained by the interference between movement and somatosensory input (‘gating’ phenomenon). By contrast, SEPs during postural tremor in ET patients showed a reduction of N20, P22, N24 and P24 cortical SEP components, whereas the fronto-central N30 wave remained unaffected.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that in ET patients the physiological interference between movement and somatosensory input to the cortex is not effective on the N30 response. This finding thus indicates that a dysfunction of the cortical generator of the N30 response may play a role in the pathogenesis of ET. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]