1. On the Radial and Longitudinal Variation of a Magnetic Cloud: ACE, Wind, ARTEMIS and Juno Observations
- Author
-
Emilia Kilpua, R. J. Forsyth, Emma E. Davies, Simon Good, Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC DTP 2017-2021), Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Space Physics Research Group, and Department of Physics
- Subjects
Juno ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Multi-spacecraft observations ,FOS: Physical sciences ,Flux ,Astronomy & Astrophysics ,01 natural sciences ,Physics - Space Physics ,MULTIPLE ,0201 Astronomical and Space Sciences ,0103 physical sciences ,interplanetary ,Coronal mass ejection ,EARTH ,RECONSTRUCTION ,Magnetic cloud ,010303 astronomy & astrophysics ,Longitudinal variation ,SIGNATURES ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Physics ,Geomagnetic storm ,IDENTIFICATION ,Spacecraft ,business.industry ,Astronomy ,Astronomy and Astrophysics ,115 Astronomy, Space science ,EVOLUTION ,Space Physics (physics.space-ph) ,CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS ,Solar wind ,13. Climate action ,Space and Planetary Science ,SOLAR-WIND ,Physics::Space Physics ,Astrophysics::Earth and Planetary Astrophysics ,Magnetic clouds ,Interplanetary spaceflight ,business ,FLUX ROPES ,PLASMA INSTRUMENT ,Radial evolution ,Rope - Abstract
We present observations of the same magnetic cloud made near Earth by the Advance Composition Explorer (ACE), Wind, and the Acceleration, Reconnection, Turbulence and Electrodynamics of the Moon’s Interaction with the Sun (ARTEMIS) mission comprising the Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) B and THEMIS C spacecraft, and later by Juno at a distance of 1.2 AU. The spacecraft were close to radial alignment throughout the event, with a longitudinal separation of $3.6^{\circ}$ 3.6 ∘ between Juno and the spacecraft near Earth. The magnetic cloud likely originated from a filament eruption on 22 October 2011 at 00:05 UT, and caused a strong geomagnetic storm at Earth commencing on 24 October. Observations of the magnetic cloud at each spacecraft have been analysed using minimum variance analysis and two flux rope fitting models, Lundquist and Gold–Hoyle, to give the orientation of the flux rope axis. We explore the effect different trailing edge boundaries have on the results of each analysis method, and find a clear difference between the orientations of the flux rope axis at the near-Earth spacecraft and Juno, independent of the analysis method. The axial magnetic field strength and the radial width of the flux rope are calculated using both observations and fitting parameters and their relationship with heliocentric distance is investigated. Differences in results between the near-Earth spacecraft and Juno are attributed not only to the radial separation, but to the small longitudinal separation which resulted in a surprisingly large difference in the in situ observations between the spacecraft. This case study demonstrates the utility of Juno cruise data as a new opportunity to study magnetic clouds beyond 1 AU, and the need for caution in future radial alignment studies.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF