Search

At least 52 % of the planted rice area in Rio Grande do Sul, a major rice producing state in Brazil, employs Clearfield(®) production system, corresponding to 580,000 ha of cultivated area. To grow rice with Clearfield(®) technology, producers combine imazethapyr and imazapic herbicides. However, these herbicides leave residual activity in soil; consequently, the repeated application of imazethapyr and imazapic on Brazilian Clearfield(®) rice fields has increased these herbicides persistence in treated soils. In this study, a method has been developed for removal and quantification of imazethapyr and imazapic residues in soil through ultrasonic assisted extraction using methanol-phosphoric acid aqueous solution (pH 2.0). The detected response was linear for both herbicides within the range of 0.25-5 ng mL(-1) with correlations coefficients >0.99. The quantification limit was limit of quantification 0.2 µg Kg(-1) for both pesticides. The good recovery rate from all pesticides, which ranges between 70 % and 120 %, demonstrates the method's validity.

This study was undertaken to evaluate the degradation and mobility of the herbicide tebuthiuron (N-[5-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl]-N,N'-dimethylurea) in soil under field conditions, and its potential for leaching and groundwater contamination. A watershed, Espraiado, located over a recharge area in Brazil, was chosen for soil and water studies. At Espraiado, water samples were collected from seven wells at intervals of three months from March 2004 to June 2006 and analyzed for tebuthiuron. Other samples were taken from city wells located outside of the recharge area. To assess the potential movement to the aquifer, tebuthiuron was also applied to trial plots at the recommended label rate of 1.0 kg/ha a.i. in May of 2004, with and without sugarcane coverage, on sandy soil. Soil samples were collected during the years of 2004 and 2005, at depths intervals of 20 cm from soil surface down to 120 cm and analyzed for tebuthiuron at zero, 3, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 240, and 300 days after application. There was no clear effect of sugarcane coverage on the tebuthiuron degradation in soils, but it moved faster into the soil where there was no cover. After 180 days there were no measurable residues in the soil, and tebuthiuron was not found below 40 cm depth in any time. Tebuthiuron had a half-life of 20 days under those conditions. No tebuthiuron residue was found in ground water samples at any sampling time.