Search

As global climate change intensifies and population growth continues, water scarcity has emerged as a critical constraint to sustainable agricultural development. Conservation management, an effective water-saving technique, plays a crucial role in enhancing soil water content (SWC) and promoting sustainable agriculture. This study utilizes CiteSpace to perform a bibliometric analysis of research literature on the effects of conservation management on SWC, encompassing publications indexed in the Web of Science database from 1992 to 2024. By systematically examining 599 papers, we analyzed key research institutions, authors' collaborative contributions, keyword co-occurrences, and shifts in research hotspots related to conservation management and its impact on SWC. The results reveal that significant topics in this field include "conservation agriculture", "water use efficiency", and "conservation tillage". China (225, 38%) and the United States (129, 22%) lead in publication volume, whereas European countries and institutions show a higher degree of collaboration. The research focus has transitioned from examining the impacts and mechanisms of conservation tillage on crop yield and soil physical and chemical properties to long-term monitoring, water use efficiency, and mitigation. Furthermore, keyword co-occurrence and temporal analysis highlight a growing emphasis on soil quality and greenhouse gas emissions. In the future, it remains imperative to enhance the implementation of automated monitoring systems, secure long-term continuous monitoring data, promote conservation agriculture technology, and bolster the early warning network for extreme climate events. These measures are crucial for preserving soil nutrient levels and ensuring the sustainable development of agriculture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The soil water retention curve (SWRC) is essential for assessing water flow and solute transport in unsaturated media. The van Genuchten (VG) model is widely used to describe the SWRC; however, estimation of its effective hydraulic parameters is often prone to error, especially when data exist for only a limited range of matric potential. We developed a Metropolis-Hastings algorithm of the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MH-MCMC) approach using R to estimate VG parameters, which produces a numerical estimate of the joint posterior distribution of model parameters, including fully-quantified uncertainties. When VG model parameters were obtained using complete range of soil water content (SWC) data (i.e., from saturation to oven dryness), the MH-MCMC approach returned similar accuracy as the widely used non-linear curve-fitting program RETC (RETention Curve), but avoiding non-convergence issues. When VG model parameters were obtained using 5 SWC data measured at matric potential of around −60, −100, −200, −500, and −15,000 cm, the MH-MCMC approach was more robust than the RETC program. The performance of MH-MCMC are generally good (R2 > 0.95) for all 8 soils, whereas the RETC underperformed for coarse-textured soils. The MH-MCMC approach was used to obtain VG model parameters for all 1871 soils in the National Cooperative Soil Characterization dataset with SWC measured at matric potentials of −60 cm, −100 cm, −330 cm, and −15,000 cm; the results showed that the simulated SWC by MH-MCMC model were highly consistent with the measured SWC at corresponding matric potential. Altogether, our new MH-MCMC approach to solving the VG model is more robust to limited coverage of soil matric potential when compared to the RETC procedures, making it an effective alternative to traditional water retention solvers. We developed an MH-MCMC code in R for solving VG model parameters, which can be found at the GitHub repository. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Soil respiration (RS), the soil‐to‐atmosphere CO2 flux that is a major component of the global carbon cycle, is strongly influenced by local soil temperature (Tsoil) and water content (SWC). Regional to global‐scale RS modelling thus requires this information at local scales, but few high‐quality, wall‐to‐wall (global) Tsoil and SWC data exist. As a result, such modelling efforts commonly use air temperature (Tair) and monthly precipitation (Pm) as surrogate predictors, but their site‐scale accuracy and potential bias are unknown. Here, we used monthly data from 880 sites across a wide variety of different environmental conditions (i.e., climate, ecosystem type, elevation, vegetation leaf habit and drainage conditions) to determine the suitability of Tair as a surrogate for Tsoil, and data from 507 sites to examine the suitability of Pm as a surrogate for SWC. Site‐specific linear and second‐order exponential non‐linear models were compared using model evaluation metrics (i.e., slope, p‐value of slope, root mean square error [RMSE], index of agreement and model efficiency). We found that Tsoil and Tair are highly correlated and explain similar RS variability. In contrast, Pm is not a good surrogate for SWC, even though Pm explains a similar amount of RS variability to SWC. The wide variability in the site‐specific relationships between RS and SWC means that no single relationship can be used for large‐scale modelling. The results from this study support the use of Tair in continental‐to‐global scale RS models, and highlight the urgent need for continental‐to‐global scale SWC datasets for the modelling and evaluation of future soil carbon dynamics under global climate change. Highlights: The accuracy of air temperature and precipitation as surrogates in global soil respiration modelling is unknown.Monthly air temperature and soil temperature are strongly correlated and explained similar amounts of variability in soil respiration.Relationships between precipitation and soil water content are extremely variable by region, thus precipitation is a poor surrogate in global modelling.There is a need for accurate multiscale soil moisture datasets to evaluate future soil carbon dynamics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Microbially explicit models may improve understanding and projections of carbon dynamics in response to future climate change, but their fidelity in simulating global‐scale soil heterotrophic respiration (RH), a stringent test for soil biogeochemical models, has never been evaluated. We used statistical global RH products, as well as 7821 daily site‐scale RH measurements, to evaluate the spatiotemporal performance of one first‐order decay model (CASA‐CNP) and two microbially explicit biogeochemical models (CORPSE and MIMICS) that were forced by two different input datasets. CORPSE and MIMICS did not provide any measurable performance improvement; instead, the models were highly sensitive to the input data used to drive them. Spatial variability in RH fluxes was generally well simulated except in the northern middle latitudes (~50°N) and arid regions; models captured the seasonal variability of RH well, but showed more divergence in tropic and arctic regions. Our results demonstrate that the next generation of biogeochemical models shows promise but also needs to be improved for realistic spatiotemporal variability of RH. Finally, we emphasize the importance of net primary production, soil moisture, and soil temperature inputs, and that jointly evaluating soil models for their spatial (global scale) and temporal (site scale) performance provides crucial benchmarks for improving biogeochemical models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Quantifying global soil respiration (RSG) and its response to temperature change are critical for predicting the turnover of terrestrial carbon stocks and their feedbacks to climate change. Currently, estimates of RSG range from 68 to 98 Pg C year−1, causing considerable uncertainty in the global carbon budget. We argue the source of this variability lies in the upscaling assumptions regarding the model format, data timescales, and precipitation component. To quantify the variability and constrain RSG, we developed RSG models using Random Forest and exponential models, and used different timescales (daily, monthly, and annual) of soil respiration (RS) and climate data to predict RSG. From the resulting RSG estimates (range = 66.62–100.72 Pg), we calculated variability associated with each assumption. Among model formats, using monthly RS data rather than annual data decreased RSG by 7.43–9.46 Pg; however, RSG calculated from daily RS data was only 1.83 Pg lower than the RSG from monthly data. Using mean annual precipitation and temperature data instead of monthly data caused +4.84 and −4.36 Pg C differences, respectively. If the timescale of RS data is constant, RSG estimated by the first‐order exponential (93.2 Pg) was greater than the Random Forest (78.76 Pg) or second‐order exponential (76.18 Pg) estimates. These results highlight the importance of variation at subannual timescales for upscaling to RSG. The results indicated RSG is lower than in recent papers and the current benchmark for land models (98 Pg C year−1), and thus may change the predicted rates of terrestrial carbon turnover and the carbon to climate feedback as global temperatures rise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]