Search

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have a reliable hypoglycaemic and weight-loss effect that can intervene in obesity, which is the basis of type 2 diabetes pathology. GLP-1RA therapy has shown potential benefits in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and improving kidney outcomes in patients with diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular disease. More recent evidence is expanding their benefits to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and clinically important renal outcomes in patients with and without diabetes. Some sub-analyses of large clinical trials suggest that GLP-1RA and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor combination therapy may provide more significant reductions in heart failure hospitalization and renal composite events than each alone. Moreover, the addition of finerenone to this combination therapy could potentially provide stronger cardiorenal protective benefits. Further studies are needed to assess the potential cardiovascular and renal benefits of combination therapy and to determine suitable patient population for the therapy., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethical approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication All authors have read and approved the submission of the manuscript. The manuscript has not been published and is not being considered for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part, in any language. If the manuscript is accepted, we will approve it for publication in Cardiovascular Diabetology. Competing interests KS declares nothing to disclose. AT has received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Mochida, and Amgen; research funding from GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novo Nordisk. KN has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan, Kowa, Mitsubishi Tanabe, MSD, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Otsuka; research grant from Astellas, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Fuji, Mochida, and Novartis; scholarship from Abbott Medical, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Daiichi Sankyo Healthcare, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and Teijin., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a stronger predictor of mortality than traditional risk factors and is a neglected vital sign of health. Enhanced fitness is a cornerstone in diabetes management and is most often delivered concurrently with pharmacological agents, which can have an opposing impact, as has been reported with metformin. Considering the rapid evolution of diabetes medications with improved cardiovascular outcomes, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, it is of importance to consider the influence of these vis-a-vis effects on CRF., Materials and Methods: Combining the words glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors with cardiorespiratory fitness, an online search was done using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Scientific Electronic Library Online, and Cochrane., Results: There were only a few randomized controlled studies that included CRF, and the results were mostly neutral. A handful of smaller studies detected improved CRF using sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with congestive heart failure., Conclusions: Since CRF is a superior prognosticator for cardiovascular outcomes and both medications can cause lean muscle mass loss, the current review highlights the paucity of relevant interactive analysis., (© The Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site–for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This brief communication describes the concept of physiofriendly pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Physio-friendly therapy is defined as that which restores metabolic, including glycaemic and weight homoeostasis, to near normal levels. Drugs such as glucagon like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA), sodium glucose cotransporter- 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and alfa glucosidase inhibitors, along with metformin, work in a physio-friendly manner and may facilitate remission. Thus, they can also be termed as remission-facilitating drugs.

Source Citation: Apperloo EM, Neuen BL, Fletcher RA, et al. Efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors with and without glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: a SMART-C collaborative meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024;12:545-557. 38991584., Competing Interests: Disclosures: Disclosure forms are available with the article online.

Background: We aimed to investigate the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in clinical practice., Research Design and Methods: A total of 340 patients were included. Data on age, gender, antidiabetic medications, and bioanalytical parameters were collected at baseline and one year later. Were analyzed estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood sodium and potassium levels, blood pressure, weight, cardiovascular risk, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c)., Results: Patients treated with SGLT2i exhibited a significant improvement in eGFR at the endpoint compared to baseline ( p  = 0.006). Both treatment groups experienced reductions in systolic blood pressure at the endpoint; especially patients treated with SGLT2i ( p  = 0.0002). GLP1RA treatment resulted in a statistically significant weight reduction from baseline to endpoint ( p  < 0.0001), with a higher percentage of patients achieving ≥ 5% weight loss compared to the non-GLP1RA group (33.6% vs. 19.8%). Both SGLT2i and GLP1RA treatments significantly reduced cardiovascular risk scores ( p  = 0.004 and p  = 0.002, respectively). Additionally, both treatments were associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c levels at the endpoint ( p  = 0.010 and p  = 0.002, respectively)., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that SGLT2i and GLP1RA offer beneficial effects in patients with T2DM.

Aim: To analyse patterns of glucose-lowering therapies among people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Denmark from 2016 to 2023., Materials and Methods: We examined time trends in the clinical profiles of people with T2D who initiated different glucose-lowering therapy classes for the first time. We furthermore investigated individual-level treatment trajectories following first-ever glucose-lowering therapy in people with or without cardiorenal disease. The study utilized data from the nationwide Danish health registries and included all individuals who filled a first-ever prescription for metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) or insulin, excluding those without HbA1c-confirmed T2D or probable type 1 diabetes., Results: We included 260 393 individuals initiating a new glucose-lowering therapy class from 2016 to 2023, during which there were 6- and 3-fold increases in initiators of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is, respectively. The median HbA1c level at treatment initiation with GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2is decreased, from 67-68 mmol/mol in 2016-2017 to 57-58 mmol/mol in 2022-2023. Among individuals who initiated metformin as first-line therapy, the proportion who started additional glucose-lowering therapy within 2 years increased from 25% in 2016 to 40% in 2021. Among the 38% of individuals who had established cardiorenal disease when they initiated first-ever glucose-lowering therapy in 2020, 22% used SGLT-2is and 18% GLP-1RAs after 2.5 years, compared with 17% and 21% among initiators without cardiorenal disease, respectively., Conclusions: Our study documents a trend towards earlier T2D treatment intensification and an increase in the use of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is in Denmark. However, optimal T2D treatment is still not received by most individuals with early T2D and established cardiorenal disease., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Limited evidence exists to support any specific medication over others to prevent dementia in older patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We investigated whether treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors is associated with a lower risk of incident dementia and all-cause mortality, relative to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA)., Methods: In this retrospective, active-comparator cohort study, we used data from the TriNetX electronic health records network. Our primary cohort comprised patients with T2D aged ≥50 years, registered between January 2012 and December 2022. Patients with a history of dementia were excluded. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to estimate the incidence of dementia and all-cause mortality in our cohort after they had used glucose-lowering drugs for at least 12 months. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the SGLT-2 inhibitor, DPP-4 inhibitor and GLP-1 RA cohorts. Subgroup analyses for sex and age were also conducted., Results: Our first cohort comprised 193 948 patients treated with metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitors and an equal number of patients treated with metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors. In this cohort, the risk of dementia and all-cause mortality was lower in patients treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors than in those treated with DPP-4 inhibitors (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.65, for dementia; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.52-0.56, for all-cause mortality). Our second cohort comprised 165 566 patients treated with metformin and SGLT-2 inhibitors and an equal number of patients treated with metformin and GLP-1 RAs. In this cohort, the risk of dementia and all-cause mortality was lower in those treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors than in those treated with GLP-1 RAs (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87-0.98, for dementia; HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.85-0.91, for all-cause mortality)., Conclusions: The use of SGLT-2 inhibitor was associated with a lower risk of incident dementia and all-cause mortality in older adults with T2D compared to DPP-4 inhibitor and GLP-1 RA., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Although the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) in patients with obesity and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has demonstrated improvement in cardiovascular outcomes, the incremental benefits of GLP-1 RA for patients already on sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) remain underexplored., Objectives: This study aimed to assess the incremental benefits of GLP-1 RA in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, overweight/obesity, and HFpEF receiving SGLT2i therapy., Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX research database including patients ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus, body mass index ≥27 kg/m 2 , and HFpEF on SGLT2i. Two cohorts were created based on GLP-1 RA prescription. The outcomes were heart failure exacerbation, all-cause emergency department visits/hospitalizations among others over a 12-month period., Results: A total of 7,044 patients remained in each cohort after propensity score matching. There was a significantly lower risk of heart failure exacerbations, all-cause emergency department visits/hospitalizations, new-onset atrial arrhythmias, new-onset acute kidney injury, and pulmonary hypertension in the GLP-1 RA plus SGLT2i cohort compared with the SGLT2i-only cohort. The associated benefits persisted across different body mass indexes and ejection fractions as well as in patients with elevated natriuretic peptide. The risk of diabetic retinopathy was higher in the combination therapy group than with SGLT2i-only use., Conclusions: GLP-1 RA, in addition to SGLT2i, was associated with a significantly lower risk of heart failure hospitalizations in this patient population, suggesting a potential incremental benefit. This highlights the need for prospective studies to confirm the clinical benefits., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Bhatt is on the advisory board for Angiowave, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, High Enroll, Janssen, Level Ex, McKinsey, Medscape Cardiology, Merck, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, and Stasys; he is on the Board of Directors for American Heart Association New York City, Angiowave (stock options), Bristol Myers Squibb (stock), DRS.LINQ (stock options), and High Enroll (stock); he is a consultant for Broadview Ventures, GlaxoSmithKline, Hims, SFJ, Youngene; he is on the Data Monitoring Committees for Acesion Pharma, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), Boston Scientific (Chair, PEITHO trial), Cleveland Clinic, Contego Medical (Chair, PERFORMANCE 2), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo; for the ABILITY-DM trial, funded by Concept Medical; for ALLAY-HF, funded by Alleviant Medical), Novartis, Population Health Research Institute, Rutgers University (for the National Institutes of Health–funded MINT Trial); he has received honoraria from the American College of Cardiology (Senior Associate Editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org; Chair, ACC Accreditation Oversight Committee), Arnold and Porter law firm (work related to Sanofi/Bristol Myers Squibb clopidogrel litigation), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (Editor in Chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group (clinical trial steering committees), CSL Behring (AHA lecture), Cowen and Company, Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (Editor in Chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Guest Editor, Associate Editor), K2P (Co-Chair, interdisciplinary curriculum), Level Ex, Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), MJH Life Sciences, Oakstone CME (Course Director, Comprehensive Review of Interventional Cardiology), Piper Sandler, Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), WebMD (CME steering committees), Wiley (steering committee), Clinical Cardiology (Deputy Editor); he is named on a patent for sotagliflozin (assigned to Brigham and Women’s Hospital who assigned to Lexicon; neither he nor Brigham and Women's Hospital receive any income from this patent); he has received research funding for Abbott, Acesion Pharma, Afimmune, Aker Biomarine, Alnylam, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beren, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Chiesi, CinCor, Cleerly, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Garmin, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Janssen, Javelin, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Moderna, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Owkin, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Recardio, Regeneron, Reid Hoffman Foundation, Roche, Sanofi, Stasys, Synaptic, The Medicines Company, Youngene, and 89Bio; he has received royalties from Elsevier (Editor, Braunwald’s Heart Disease); he is Site Co-Investigator for Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, Endotronix, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Philips, SpectraWAVE, Svelte, and Vascular Solutions; he is trustee for American College of Cardiology; and he has done unfunded research for FlowCo. Dr Butler has been a consultant to Abbott, American Regent, Amgen, Applied Therapeutic, AskBio, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiac Dimension, Cardiocell, Cardior, CSL Bearing, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Daxor, Edwards, Element Science, Faraday, Foundry, G3P, Innolife, Impulse Dynamics, Imbria, Inventiva, Ionis, Lexicon, Lilly, LivaNova, Janssen, Medtronics, Merck, Occlutech, Owkin, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Pharmain, Prolaio, Regeneron, Renibus, Roche, Salamandra, Sanofi, SC Pharma, Secretome, Sequana, SQ Innovation, Tenex, Tricog, Ultromics, Vifor, and Zoll. Dr Kosiborod has received research grants from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; and has served as a consultant for Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Eli Lilly, Esperion Therapeutics, Janssen, Merck (Diabetes and Cardiovascular), Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Sanofi, and Vifor. Dr Fonarow has done consulting for Abbot, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cytokinetics, Eli Lilly, Johnson and Johnson, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To investigate the utilization and costs of non-insulin glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) in Australia from 2013 to 2023., Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) administrative dataset of 118 727 494 GLD prescriptions. The main outcome measures were the annual number of GLD prescriptions dispensed, accounting for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) prevalence and healthcare system costs, adjusted for inflation., Results: Utilization of GLDs doubled from 6.4 million prescriptions in 2013 to 15.6 million in 2023. The average annual percent increase in utilization was 8.1%, compared to the average annual increase in prevalence of T2DM of 1.8%. The biggest change was in sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, for which there was an average annual increase in utilization of 59.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 51.7%, 68.2%; p < 0.05) from 2014 (first full year of PBS listing), followed by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), which showed an increase of 31.4% (95% CI 28.5%, 33.8%; p < 0.05) annually (2013 to 2023). Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor utilization tripled, with an average annual increase of 10.9% (95% CI 8.1%, 13.8%; p < 0.05), but this plateaued from 2020. Metformin utilization increased by 4.7% (95% CI 2.0%, 6.9%; p < 0.05) annually. In contrast, sulphonylurea, glitazone and acarbose utilization declined. Total GLD costs increased threefold over the same period. Despite only accounting for 11.7% of utilization, GLP-1RAs contributed to 35% of the costs., Conclusion: Utilization of GLDs doubled, and associated costs tripled over the past 11 years, with no sign of either utilization or costs plateauing, predominantly due to increased GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitor prescribing., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Diabetic nephropathy, also known as diabetic kidney disease (DKD), remains a challenge in clinical practice as this is the major cause of kidney failure worldwide. Clinical trials do not answer all the questions raised in clinical practice and real-world evidence provides complementary insights from randomized controlled trials. Real-life longitudinal data highlight the need for improved screening and management of diabetic nephropathy in primary care. Adherence to the recommended guidelines for comprehensive care appears to be suboptimal in clinical practice in patients with DKD. Barriers to the initiation of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for patients with DKD persist in clinical practice, in particular for the elderly. Attainment of blood pressure targets often remains an issue. Initiation of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) in routine clinical practice is associated with a reduced risk of albuminuria progression and a possible beneficial effect on kidney function. Real-world evidence confirms a beneficial effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on the decline of glomerular filtration, even in the absence of albuminuria, with a lower risk of acute kidney injury events compared to GLP-1RA use. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors confer a lower risk of hyperkalaemia after initiation compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in patients with DKD. Data from a large population indicate that diuretic treatment increases the risk of a significant decline in glomerular filtration rate in the first few weeks of treatment after SGLT2 inhibitor initiation. The perspective for a global approach targeting multifaceted criteria for diabetic individuals with DKD is emerging based on real-world evidence but there is still a long way to go to achieve this goal., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims/hypothesis: We compared the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) on renal outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes, focusing on the changes in eGFR and albuminuria., Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective observational study on new users of diabetes medications. Participant characteristics were assessed before and after propensity score matching. The primary endpoint, change in eGFR, was analysed using mixed-effects models. Secondary endpoints included categorical eGFR-based outcomes and changes in albuminuria. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess robustness of the findings., Results: After matching, 5701 participants/group were included. Participants were predominantly male, aged 61 years, with a 10 year duration of diabetes, a baseline HbA 1c of 64 mmol/mol (8.0%) and BMI of 33 kg/m 2 . Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was present in 23% of participants. During a median of 2.1 years, from a baseline of 87 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , eGFR remained higher in the SGLT2i group compared with the GLP-1RA group throughout the observation period by 1.2 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . No differences were detected in albuminuria change. The SGLT2i group exhibited lower rates of worsening CKD class and favourable changes in BP compared with the GLP-1RA group, despite lesser HbA 1c decline. SGLT2i also reduced eGFR decline better than GLP-1RA in participants without baseline CKD., Conclusions/interpretation: In individuals with type 2 diabetes, treatment with SGLT2i was associated with better preservation of renal function compared with GLP-1RA, as evidenced by slower decline in eGFR. These findings reinforce SGLT2i as preferred agents for renal protection in this patient population., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To emulate target trials comparing recurrence of nephrolithiasis among patients with pre-existing nephrolithiasis (overall and stratified by concomitant gout) initiating sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors versus an active comparator., Design: Target trial emulation studies., Setting: Canadian population database, January 2014 to June 2022., Participants: 20 146 patients with nephrolithiasis and type 2 diabetes, including those with concomitant gout at baseline, a high risk group., Interventions: Initiation of an SGLT-2 inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor as alternative comparator., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was recurrent nephrolithiasis events ascertained from diagnoses during emergency department visits, hospital admissions, or outpatient visits. Secondary outcomes included nephrolithiasis resulting in hospital admission or emergency department visits and flare-up of gout, as well as a positive control outcome (genital infection) and negative control outcomes (osteoarthritis encounter and appendicitis). Poisson and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used (primary analyses), as well as overlap weighting., Results: After inverse probability of treatment weighting, 1924 recurrent nephrolithiasis events occurred among the 14 456 weighted patients who used an SGLT-2 inhibitor (105.3 per 1000 person years), compared with 853 events among the 5877 weighted patients who used a GLP-1 receptor agonist (156.4 per 1000 person years). The adjusted rate ratio was 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.79) and rate difference was -51 (95% CI -63 to -40) per 1000 person years, with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 20. Among those with recently active nephrolithiasis, the absolute rate difference was 219 per 1000 person years (NNT of 5). Protective associations persisted for nephrolithiasis events that required emergency department visits, hospital admissions, or procedures, and when an SGLT-2 inhibitor was compared with a DPP-4 inhibitor (rate ratio 0.73 (0.68 to 0.78), rate difference -38 (-46 to -29) per 1000 person years (NNT of 26)). Protective associations also persisted among patients with nephrolithiasis and concomitant gout, with a rate ratio of 0.67 (0.57 to 0.79) and rate difference of -53 (95% CI -78 to -27) per 1000 person years versus a GLP-1 receptor agonist (NNT of 19), and 0.63 (0.55 to 0.72) and-62 (-81 to -42) per 1000 person years, respectively, versus a DPP-4 inhibitor (NNT of 16). Furthermore, SGLT-2 inhibitor use was associated with a lower rate of gout flare-ups (rate ratio 0.72, 0.54 to 0.95, rate difference -16, -31 to -1 per 1000 person years) compared with GLP-1 receptor agonists (0.65, 0.52 to 0.82, and -21, -33 to -9 per 1000 person years) compared with DPP-4 inhibitors. SGLT-2 inhibitor initiators showed higher risk of genital infection (eg, hazard ratio 2.21, 95% CI 1.68 to 2.90, and rate difference 13 per 1000 person years), but no altered risk of osteoarthritis encounter (0.87, 0.68 to 1.1, and -2 per 1000 person years) or appendicitis (1.07, 0.69 to 1.67, and 1 per 1000 person years). Results were similar when propensity score overlap weighting was applied., Conclusions: The benefits associated with SGLT-2 inhibitor for patients with nephrolithiasis in these target trial emulations suggest they may be a useful addition to current treatments to simultaneously manage nephrolithiasis recurrence and comorbidities, including gout., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: support from the National Institutes of Health and Canadian Institutes of Health Research; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. DW reports serving on data monitoring committees for Novo Nordisk, not related to the topic of this work. RM has received support from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Aging of the NIH, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and the American Diabetes Association. She also serves as a consultant to Emmi (Wolters Kluwer) on developing patient education materials related to diabetes, and to Yale-New Haven Health System’s Center For Outcomes Research and Evaluation on developing quality measures related to diabetes. GCC is the Chief Medical Officer at OM1 and reports research support from GSK. HKC reports research support from Horizon, and consulting fees from Ani, LG, Horizon, Shanton, and Protalix., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLDs)/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are the most common liver disorders among patients with type 2 diabetes. Newer classes of glucose-lowering agents (GLAs), such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), have been shown to improve liver-related biomarkers. However, their effects on the development of NAFLD/NASH remain inconclusive., Methods: A nested case-control study was conducted using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database for 2011-2018. Patients aged ≥ 40 years, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, having stable non-insulin GLA use, and without NAFLD/NASH history were included. Patients with incident NAFLD/NASH were matched up to 10 randomly sampled controls based on individual's age, gender, cohort entry date, type 2 diabetes diagnosis date, and disease risk score. Conditional logistic regression analyses were employed to estimate the association between liver risk and treatment exposure. Dose-response analysis was also performed., Results: There were 621,438 study patients included for analysis. During 1.8 years of median follow-up, the incidence of NAFLD/NASH was 2.7 per 1000 person-years. After matching, 5,730 incident NAFLD cases (mean age: 57.6 years, male: 53.2%) and 45,070 controls (57.7 years, 52.7%) were identified. Using GLP-1RAs or SGLT2is was associated with an insignificantly lower NAFLD/NASH risk (i.e., odds ratios [95% CIs]: 0.84 [0.46-1.52] and 0.85 [0.63-1.14], respectively) and increased cumulative SGLT2i doses were significantly associated with a reduced NAFLD/NASH risk (0.61 [0.38-0.97])., Conclusion: GLP-1RA and SGLT2i therapies in type 2 diabetes patients might prevent NAFLD/NASH development, with a significantly lower risk related to greater treatment exposure., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Heart failure is a syndrome that may develop when cardiovascular disease progresses or is insufficiently treated and associated with a poor quality of life, high mortality rates, and increased healthcare expenditures. Prevention and treatment of heart failure are therefore of utmost importance. New therapies in patients with cardiovascular disease have recently been shown to be effective in the prevention and sometimes treatment of heart failure, and additional research is underway. Specifically, in high-risk patients with either (a combination of) diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and/or heart failure, three specific drug classes [sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs), and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs)] have taken centre stage in therapeutic approach for these high cardiovascular risk patients. The commonality of these drugs is the finding that they improve cardiovascular and renal endpoints across the cardiorenal continuum and SGTL2i have already proved effective in all subtypes of heart failure, while we await data on non-steroidal MRA therapy in heart failure. The story may be different for GLP-1-RA in patients with established heart failure, but these drugs are effective in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. Taken together, these new therapies advance the treatment and improve the associated outcomes of patients with cardiorenal disease and diabetes, with similar characteristics and effectiveness in different conditions., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: KD reports speaker/consultancy fees to his employer by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbott, Novartis, FIRE1., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is linked to a heightened likelihood of experiencing fractures. It is crucial to ascertain whether medications used to lower blood sugar levels can elevate the risk of fractures. We aimed to investigate and compare the effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors (DPP-4i), and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT-2i) on the fracture risk in patients with T2D in the real world., Methods: A network meta-analysis conducted an inclusive literature search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to select appropriate population-based cohort studies that investigated the risk of bone fractures of (GLP-1RA), (DPP-4i) or (SGLT-2i) in the real world. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using R software to investigate the risk of total fractures as a primary outcome among patients who used (GLP-1RAs), (SGLT-2i) or (DPP-4i) versus each other or other glucose-lowering medications (GLMs). The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were summarized overall network and for each pairwise direct and indirect comparison. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) with the P-scores was calculated for each treatment in the network meta-analysis to detect their cumulative ranking probabilities in lowering the risk of total fractures., Results: In our NMA, we identified a set of 13 population-based cohort studies comprising a total of 1,064,952 patients. The risk of fracture was identified with the follow-up duration for each class. We found a significant decrease in the fracture risk by about 87% associated with patients who used SGLT2 inhibitors in combination with other glucose-lowering medications, followed by SGLT2 inhibitors alone by about 67%, then GLP-1 receptor agonists by about 60%, and at last DPP-4 inhibitors by about 55%., Conclusion: Our study's collective findings suggest a significant association of the low risk of fracture with the use of SGLT2i with other GLMs combination, SGLT2i alone, GLP-1RA, and DPP-4i, respectively. This population-based analysis offers the best available evidence and might be helpful for clinicians in the decision of the most suitable T2DM treatment strategies, especially for elderly type 2 diabetic patients, as they may be safe in terms of fracture., Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023448720., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Mostafa and Alrasheed.)

Introduction: This study aimed to assess recent trends in the US use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), including incident use following newly diagnosed ASCVD., Research Design and Methods: This real-world, retrospective observational study used de-identified data from the TriNetX Dataworks-USA network. A longitudinal analysis of cross-sectional data (interval: January 01, 2018 to December 31, 2022) assessed the yearly prevalent use of GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i. A nested cohort study (January 01, 2017 to January 31, 2023) assessed the proportions of patients with T2D newly prescribed GLP-1 RAs and SGLT2is after incident ASCVD diagnosis., Results: Prevalent use of GLP-1 RA and/or SGLT2i increased from 9.2% of patients in 2018 to 27.1% in 2022, with eligible annual patient numbers ranging from 279,474 to 348,997. GLP-1 RA-alone use rose from 5.2% to 9.9% and SGLT2i-alone use rose from 2.8% to 12.2% over this interval. Incident use of GLP-1 RA and/or SGLT2i within the year following ASCVD diagnosis increased from 5.9% to 17.0% (2018-2022). For GLP-1 RA alone, this increase was from 3.6% to 7.8%, while for SGLT2i alone, it was from 1.8% to 7.0%., Conclusions: Use of GLP-1 RAs/SGLT2is in patients with T2D and ASCVD has increased in recent years in the USA, but remains suboptimal given the prevalence of ASCVD and its high morbidity and mortality., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AK: Paid speaker and clinical advisor for Astellas Pharma, Abbott, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, MannKind and Novo Nordisk. XT: Employee of Novo Nordisk. ND: Employee of TriNetX LLC. RB: No conflicts of interest. KD: Consultant of TriNetX LLC. CEL: CEL reports NIH funding. CEL is a special government employee of the US Food and Drug Administration. CEL recently received honoraria from the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Foundation and the Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research. CEL consults for Novo Nordisk and TriNetX, LLC. CEL’s spouse is employed by Merck; neither she nor he own stock in the company. AdH: AdH reports NIH funding, consultant fees from Novo Nordisk, royalty fees from UpToDate, and has equity in Titin KM and Certus., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The newer glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), including Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), have demonstrated superior cardio- and renal protective benefits compared to older GLDs in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD)., Objective: This study examined the trends of the newer GLDs use in people with T2D who had a history of coronary heart disease or heart failure in the United States., Method: We used 2005-2019 data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). Individuals with self-reported diabetes and CVD history were identified., Results: There was a steady increase in the use of GLP-1RA only from 2008 (3 %) to 2019 (21 %) and SGLT2i only from 2014 (5 %) to 2019 (12 %). Individuals with dual use of both newer GLD classes increased from 0.62 % in 2015 to 6 % in 2019. The overall uptake of these two newer drugs in 2019 was less than 40 %. In other words, 60 % of individuals who can substantially benefit from these newer treatments did not use the treatments., Conclusion: The use of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i among individuals with T2D and a history of CVD was low and varied by insurance type. Policy-level interventions are needed to improve the use of these newer treatments further., Summary: We examined how newer glucose-lowering drugs are used among individuals with type 2 diabetes and at high risk for coronary heart disease or heart failure in the US. We found that 60 % of individuals who can substantially benefit from these newer treatments did not use the treatments due to the variation of insurance type., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest “All authors of Trends in Utilization Patterns of Newer Glucose-lowering Drugs in US Adults with Type 2 Diabetes and a History of Cardiovascular Disease: 2005–2019 have no Conflict of Interest of publishing this Brief Research.”, (Copyright © 2024 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are both recommended for patients with diabetes, yet their effects on the development or progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) are largely unknown., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data were collected from a nationwide database. Patients with diabetes who initiated treatment with a GLP1RA or SGLT2i between 1 May 2016 and 31 December 2017, were identified. Patients were divided into those with or without a previous diagnosis of DR and then categorized into the GLP1RA and the SGLT2i groups according to drug use. The primary outcome of interest in the DR group was the composite of new-onset proliferative DR, vitreous haemorrhage and tractional retinal detachment (RD). In the non-DR group, the primary outcome was the composite of newly diagnosed DR of any severity, vitreous haemorrhage and RD., Results: In total, 97 413 patients were identified. After matching, 1517 patients were treated with a GLP1RA and 3034 with an SGLT2i in the DR cohort. In the non-DR cohort, 9549 initiated a GLP1RA and 19 098 initiated an SGLT2i. In patients with pre-existing DR, the incidence of any DR progression event was significantly higher in the GLP1RA group than the SGLT2i group (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.50, 95% confidence interval 1.01-2.23), primarily because of the increased risk of tractional RD. In patients without DR at baseline, the risks of all ocular outcomes were similar between the GLP1RA and SGLT2i groups., Conclusions: In patients with diabetes mellitus and established DR, GLP1RA treatment was associated with increased risks of DR progression compared with SGLT2i use., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of adding a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) with adding basal insulin among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) already treated with a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and not reaching their glycaemic control targets., Methods: A retrospective analysis of the Canadian LMC Diabetes Registry was conducted. Adults who initiated a GLP-1 RA were matched 1:1 to adults who initiated basal insulin in a T2D and CKD population. Changes in metabolic outcomes were evaluated at 26-52 weeks following the therapy start date., Results: Propensity score matching was used to match participants who initiated a GLP-1 RA to participants who initiated basal insulin (n = 153/cohort). A significantly greater reduction in HbA1c at 26-52 weeks of follow-up was observed in the GLP-1 RA cohort compared with the basal insulin cohort (-1.3% ± 1.4% vs. -1.1% ± 1.4%, P = .03). Weight was significantly reduced (-3.4 ± 3.7 vs. 2.6 ± 4.5 kg, P < .001), and the estimated glomerular filtration rate decline slowed significantly (-0.3 ± 8.2 vs. -2.4 ± 10.4 mL/min/1.73m 2 , P = .02), but the change in albuminuria was not significantly different (-5.7 ± 38.1 vs. -0.5 ± 38.3 mg/mmol, P = .47) at follow-up in the GLP-1 RA group compared with the basal insulin group. No differences in self-reported hypoglycaemic events per week and therapy discontinuations were reported between the cohorts., Conclusions: The study shows the real-world effectiveness of GLP-1 RA therapy for T2D and CKD. GLP-1 RAs provided superior reductions in HbA1c and weight, and greater kidney protection, compared with basal insulin among adults with T2D and CKD already treated with an SGLT2i., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim: To investigate the efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in liver transplant (LT) recipients with diabetes., Methods: A single-centre, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from an LT recipient database (1990-2023) was conducted. We included adults with pre-existing diabetes and post-transplant diabetes, newly started on GLP-1RAs and/or SGLT2 inhibitors after LT. Metabolic and biochemical parameters and outcomes were collected for up to 12 months after starting medications and were compared to those in patients receiving dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and linear mixed models., Results: We included participants on GLP-1RAs (n = 46), SGLT2 inhibitors (n = 87), combination therapy (n = 12), and a DPP-4 inhibitor comparator (n = 217). Both GLP-1RAs and combination therapy decreased mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, and combination therapy remained significant when adjusted for DPP-4 inhibitor treatment (-3.5%, 95% CI [-6.1, -0.95]; p = 0.0089) at 12 months. All three groups had significant decreases in mean weight and body mass index, but these remained significant in the GLP-1RA (-5.2 kg, 95% CI [-8.7, -1.7], p = 0.0039 and 1.99 kg/m 2 , 95% CI [-3.4, -0.6], p = 0.0048) and combination therapy groups (-5.4 kg, 95% CI [-10.5, -0.36], p = 0.04 and -3.4 kg/m 2 , 95% CI [-5.5, -1.3], p = 0.0015) when adjusted for DPP-4 inhibitor treatment at 12 months. Alanine aminotransferase levels decreased with GLP-1RA and combination therapy. There were two (1.4%) cases of graft rejection., Conclusion: We found that GLP-1RAs, SGLT2 inhibitors, and their combination, led to significant weight loss in LT recipients with diabetes. Combination therapy, in particular, lowered HbA1c and alanine aminotransferase levels compared to DPP-4 inhibitors. Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety and efficacy., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1Ra) and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We assessed whether the effect differs in patients with and without cardiovascular (CV) disease, and rated the certainty of evidence by conducting a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. Certainty of the evidence (CoE) was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation guidelines. The reduction in the risk of MACE was significant for both medications (high CoE), and the effect was similar in patients with and without CV disease (moderate CoE). GLP1Ra and SGLT2i reduced the risk of CV death (with high and moderate CoE, respectively), and the effects were consistent in the subgroups, but with very low CoE. While SGLT2i reduced the risk of fatal or non-fatal MI with a consistent effect in the subgroups, GLP1Ra reduced the risk of fatal or non-fatal stroke (with high CoE). In conclusion, GLP1Ra and SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the MACE to a similar extent in patients with and without CV disease, but have a differential effect on the reduction of fatal or non-fatal MI and stroke., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflict of InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Mustafa Kilickap has received honoraria from NovoNordisk (for lectures and consultancy), Daiichi Sankyo (for consultancy), Amgen (for consultancy), and Astra-Zeneca (for lecture). Other authors do not have conflict of interest to disclose.

Aim: To perform a meta-analysis comparing real-world medication adherence to sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs)., Materials and Methods: A systematic search of Medline and Embase was conducted through October 2023. To meet inclusion criteria, articles had to be published in full text form and directly compare medication adherence to SGLT2is versus GLP-1RAs in adults. Only studies evaluating real-world data and utilizing the proportion of days covered (PDC) to measure adherence were included. Non-adherence, defined as the proportion of patients with a PDC <80%, was the primary outcome. A subgroup analysis evaluating results among studies conducted in the United States was performed., Results: We identified eight studies evaluating 205 103 patients for inclusion. The most common country from which the data was derived was the United States (n = 5 studies). Upon meta-analysis, we observed no difference in non-adherence (i.e. PDC <80%) to SGLT2is versus GLP-1RAs (relative risk = 0.86; 95% confidence interval = 0.72-1.02). In the analysis, including only US studies, SGLT2i use was associated with a 23% lower risk of non-adherence compared with GLP-1RA use (relative risk = 0.77; 95% confidence interval = 0.72-0.82)., Conclusions: In this meta-analysis of eight studies that included approximately 200 000 patients, there was no difference in adherence to SGLT2is versus GLP-1RAs. However, SGLT2i use was associated with higher adherence when the analysis was limited to US studies., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To investigate whether the choice of glucose-lowering agent for type 2 diabetes (T2D) impacts a patient's risk of developing sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy complications., Design: Retrospective observational database study emulating an idealized target trial., Subjects: Adult (≥21 years) enrollees in United States commercial, Medicare Advantage, and Medicare fee-for-service plans from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2021, with T2D and moderate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk who had no baseline history of advanced diabetic retinal complications, initiating treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), and sulfonylureas., Methods: We used inverse propensity scoring weights in time-to-event Cox proportional hazards models., Main Outcome Measures: Treatment for either diabetic macular edema or proliferative diabetic retinopathy., Results: The final study population included 371 698 patients, of whom 42 265 initiated GLP-1 RA, 53 476 initiated SGLT2i, 78 444 initiated DPP-4i, and 197 513 initiated sulfonylurea agents. The probability of treatment for sight-threatening retinopathy within 2 and 5 years was 0.3% and 0.7% for patients initiating SGLT2i (median follow-up 830 [interquartile range (IQR), 343-1401] days), 0.4% and 1.0% for GLP-1 RA (669 [IQR, 256-1167] days), 0.4% and 0.9% for DPP-4i (1263 [IQR, 688-1938] days), and 0.5% and 1.2% for sulfonylurea (1223 [IQR, 662-1879] days). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors use was associated with a lower risk of treatment for sight-threatening retinopathy compared with all other medication classes, including GLP-1 RA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.97), DPP-4i (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.97), and sulfonylurea (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50-0.74). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists use was associated with a similar risk of sight-threatening retinopathy as DPP-4i (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.85-1.35) and sulfonylurea (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.03)., Conclusions: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors use was associated with a lower risk of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy among adults with T2D and moderate CVD risk compared with other glucose-lowering therapies. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists do not confer increased retinal risk, relative to DPP-4i and sulfonylurea medications., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To explore the views of general practitioners (GPs) and nurses on type 2 diabetes (T2D) management, including the use of recently funded T2D medications in New Zealand (NZ) and their perceived barriers to providing optimal care., Background: T2D is a significant health concern in NZ, particularly among Māori and Pacific adults. Characterised by prolonged hyperglycaemia, T2D is generally a progressive condition requiring long-term care., Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted between July and December 2022 with 21 primary care clinicians (10 GPs and 11 nurses/nurse prescribers) from nine different general practice clinics across the Auckland and Waikato regions of NZ. Framework analysis was conducted to identify common themes in clinicians' perceptions and experiences with T2D management., Findings: Three themes were identified: health-system factors, new medications, and solution-based approaches. Lack of clinician time, healthcare funding, staff shortages, and burn-out were identified as barriers to T2D management under health-system factors. The two newly funded medications, empagliflozin and dulaglutide, were deemed to be a positive change for T2D care in that they improved patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes, but several clinicians were hesitant to prescribe these medications. Participants suggested that additional education and specialist diabetes support would be helpful to inform optimal medication prescribing and that better use of a multi-disciplinary team (clinical and support staff) could support T2D care by reducing workload, addressing cultural gaps in healthcare delivery, and reducing burnout. An improved primary care work environment, including appropriate professional development to support prescribing of new medications and the value of collaboration with a non-regulated workforce, may be required to facilitate optimal T2D management in primary care. Future research should focus on interventions to increase support for both clinical teams and patients while adopting a culturally appropriate approach to increase patient satisfaction and improve health outcomes.

Context: The coexistence of diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with substantial risks of adverse cardiovascular events., Objective: The relevant outcomes associated with the use of a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) vs glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with/without concomitant AF remain unknown., Methods: In this nationwide retrospective cohort study from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, there were 344 392 and 31 351 patients with T2D without AF, and 11 462 and 816 T2D patients with AF treated with SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs, respectively, from May 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Patients were followed from the drug index date until the occurrence of study events, discontinuation of the index drug, or the end of the study period (December 31, 2020), whichever occurred first. We used propensity score-stabilized weight to balance covariates across the 2 medication groups., Results: The incidence rate of all study outcomes in patients with concomitant AF was much higher than in those without concomitant AF. For the AF cohort, SGLT2i vs GLP-1RA was associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF) (2.32 vs 4.74 events per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.36-0.66), with no benefit seen for the non-AF cohort (P for homogeneity < .01). SGLT2i vs GLP-1RA was associated with a lower risk of composite kidney outcomes both in the AF (0.38 vs 0.79 events per 100 person-years; HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23-0.96) and the non-AF cohorts (0.09 vs 0.18 events per 100 person-years; HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.43-0.64). There were no significant differences in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in those who received SGLT2i compared with GLP-1RA for the AF or non-AF cohorts., Conclusion: Considering the high risk of developing HF and/or high prevalence of concomitant HF in patients with concomitant diabetes and AF, whether SGLT2is should be the preferred treatment to GLP-1RAs for such a high-risk population requires further investigation., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, their effectiveness relative to each other and other second-line antihyperglycemic agents is unknown, without any major ongoing head-to-head clinical trials., Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the cardiovascular effectiveness of SGLT2is, GLP-1 RAs, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is), and clinical sulfonylureas (SUs) as second-line antihyperglycemic agents in T2DM., Methods: Across the LEGEND-T2DM (Large-Scale Evidence Generation and Evaluation Across a Network of Databases for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) network, 10 federated international data sources were included, spanning 1992 to 2021. In total, 1,492,855 patients with T2DM and cardiovascular disease (CVD) on metformin monotherapy were identified who initiated 1 of 4 second-line agents (SGLT2is, GLP-1 RAs, DPP4is, or SUs). Large-scale propensity score models were used to conduct an active-comparator target trial emulation for pairwise comparisons. After evaluating empirical equipoise and population generalizability, on-treatment Cox proportional hazards models were fit for 3-point MACE (myocardial infarction, stroke, and death) and 4-point MACE (3-point MACE plus heart failure hospitalization) risk and HR estimates were combined using random-effects meta-analysis., Results: Over 5.2 million patient-years of follow-up and 489 million patient-days of time at risk, patients experienced 25,982 3-point MACE and 41,447 4-point MACE. SGLT2is and GLP-1 RAs were associated with lower 3-point MACE risk than DPP4is (HR: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.79-1.00] and 0.83 [95% CI: 0.70-0.98]) and SUs (HR: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.65-0.89] and 0.72 [95% CI: 0.58-0.88]). DPP4is were associated with lower 3-point MACE risk than SUs (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.79-0.95). The pattern for 3-point MACE was also observed for the 4-point MACE outcome. There were no significant differences between SGLT2is and GLP-1 RAs for 3-point or 4-point MACE (HR: 1.06 [95% CI: 0.96-1.17] and 1.05 [95% CI: 0.97-1.13])., Conclusions: In patients with T2DM and CVD, comparable cardiovascular risk reduction was found with SGLT2is and GLP-1 RAs, with both agents more effective than DPP4is, which in turn were more effective than SUs. These findings suggest that the use of SGLT2is and GLP-1 RAs should be prioritized as second-line agents in those with established CVD., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was partially funded through National Institutes of Health grants R01 HL167858, K23 HL153775, R01 LM006910, R01 HG006139, and R01 HL169954 and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs under the research priority to “Put VA Data to Work for Veterans” (VA ORD 22-D4V). The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the protocol; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Dr Khera is an associate editor at JAMA; and has received support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (awards R01 HL167858 and K23 HL153775) and the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (award 2022060); has received research support, through Yale University, from Bristol Myers Squibb, Novo Nordisk, and BridgeBio; is a coinventor of U.S. provisional patent applications WO2023230345A1, US20220336048A1, 63/346,610, 63/428,569, 63/484,426, 63/508,315, 63/580,137, 63/606,203, 63/619,241, and 63/562,335, unrelated to the present work; and is a cofounder of Evidence2Health and Ensight-AI, precision health platforms to improve evidence-based cardiovascular care and cardiovascular diagnostics. Dr DuVall has received grants from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Biodesix, Celgene, Cerner Enviza, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis International, and Parexel International through the University of Utah or the Western Institute for Veteran Research (outside the submitted work). Dr Man has received support from the C.W. Maplethorpe Fellowship, the National Institute of Health Research, European Commission Framework Horizon 2020, the Hong Kong Research Grant Council, and the Innovation and Technology Commission of the Hong Kong Special Administration Region Government outside the submitted work). Dr Morales is supported by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Fellowship (214588/Z/18/Z). In the past 3 years, Dr Krumholz has received expenses and/or personal fees from UnitedHealth, Element Science, Aetna, Reality Labs, Tesseract/4Catalyst, F-Prime, the Siegfried and Jensen Law Firm, the Arnold and Porter Law Firm, and the Martin/Baughman Law Firm; is a cofounder of Refactor Health, HugoHealth, and Ensight-AI; and is associated with contracts, through Yale New Haven Hospital, from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and, through Yale University, from Johnson & Johnson. Dr You is chief technology officer of PHI Digital Healthcare. Dr Ross has received research support through Yale University from Johnson & Johnson to develop methods of clinical trial data sharing, from the Food and Drug Administration for the Yale-Mayo Clinic Center for Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation program (grant U01 FD005938), from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (grant R01 HS022882), and from Arnold Ventures; has received research support from the Medical Device Innovation Consortium as part of the National Evaluation System for Health Technology and from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (grants R01 HS025164 and R01 HL144644); and was an expert witness at the request of the relator’s attorneys, the Greene Law Firm, in a qui tam suit alleging violations of the False Claims Act and Anti-Kickback Statute against Biogen that was settled September 2022. Dr Thangaraj is a coinventor on provisional patent 63/606,203, unrelated to the present work, and is funded by grant 5T32 HL155000-03. Ms Blacketer, Dr Ostropolets, and Dr Ryan are employees of Johnson & Johnson. Dr Schuemie is an employee and shareholder of Johnson & Johnson. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) mellitus is increasing exponentially in India, with overweight/obesity being prime contributors. This study aimed at assessing the clinical impact of the combination therapy of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) injection (inj.) and a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) in overweight/obese patients from the Indian subcontinent., Methods: In two real-world evidence (RWE) studies (RWE1 and 2), we retrospectively observed the effect of the combination therapy of a GLP-1RA, injection dulaglutide (DU) 1.5 mg/week, and an SGLT-2i, canagliflozin (CAN) 100 mg/day at weeks 16, 32, and 52 on HbA1c, body weight (weight), systolic blood pressure (SBP), lipids, change in doses of antidiabetic agents (ADA) and antihypertensive agents (AHA) in overweight/obese Asian Indian subjects with T2D, who had suboptimal glycemic control., Results: A total of 95 T2D patients [51 males (M), 44 females (F)] completed the two RWE studies. In RWE 1, 40 patients (20 M/20 F), mean [standard deviation (SD)] age 49.4 (10.7) years (Y), weight 92.6 (6.6) kg, body mass index (BMI) 30.6 (2.3) kg/m 2 , duration of T2D 8.1 (3.2) Y, completed the study. At week 32, the mean (SD) reduction in A1c (%) was -1.3% [8.4 (0.7) to 7.1 (0.3); p < 0.01] and mean (SD) weight (kg) loss was -5.5 [92.6 (6.6) to 87.9 (7.02); p < 0.00001]. This group was then followed up until week 52. In RWE 2, 55 patients (31 M/24 F), age 51 (5.8) Y, weight 92.6 ± 3.4 kg, BMI 31.1 ± 2.1 kg/m 2 , SBP 142.4 ± 3.9 mm Hg, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 62 ± 5 mL/minute/1.73 m 2 , with 8.4 ± 3.3 Y duration of diabetes met the inclusion criteria. In 71% of subjects, A1c decreased by -1.4% [8.5 ± 0.4 to 7.1 ± 0.2; p < 0.0001] at week 16 and was 6.8 ± 0.3 ( p = 0.0002) in 18% at week 32., Conclusion: A statistically significant (SS) improvement in glycemic control, weight, and improvement in cardiovascular (CV) risk factors was observed with the GLP-1RA/SGLT-2i combination, which was well tolerated., (© Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 2024.)

Competing Interests: We declare no conflicting interests.

Background: GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors are increasingly being used in people with type 2 diabetes on the basis of findings from randomised clinical trials; however, little is known of whether clinical outcomes are affected by frailty in real-world settings. We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors in managing type 2 diabetes, with a specific focus on stratifying people by their frailty status., Methods: In this retrospective, nationwide, longitudinal study, we identified people (aged ≥20 years) with type 2 diabetes who newly initiated either a GLP-1 receptor agonist or an SGLT2 inhibitor during the period Jan 1, 2017 to Dec 31, 2019 from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database. Individuals were excluded if they had been diagnosed with cancer, received dialysis for kidney failure, or had prescriptions for a GLP-1 receptor agonist or an SGLT2 inhibitor, within 1 year before the index date. Mortality data were collected from the Taiwan National Death Registry. Eligible individuals were categorised into three frailty subgroups-fit, mild frailty, and moderate or severe frailty-on the basis of the multimorbidity frailty index. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance covariates between recipients of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors among each frailty subgroup. Clinical outcomes of interest included three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and fatal cardiovascular disease), all-cause mortality, hospitalisation for heart failure, dialysis or renal transplant, severe diabetic foot complications, retinopathy, hospitalisation for severe hyperglycaemia, and hospitalisation for severe hypoglycaemia. The association between the use of a GLP-1 receptor agonist versus an SGLT2 inhibitor and the risk of the outcomes of interest among each frailty subgroup was examined using a subdistribution hazard model., Findings: We identified 320 210 people with type 2 diabetes, of whom 280 163 met the eligibility criteria, who initiated either a GLP-1 receptor agonist (n=22 968; mean age 57·7 years [SD 13·9], 11 338 [49·4%] were female, and 11 630 [50·6%] were male) or SGLT2 inhibitor (n=257 195; mean age 58·8 years [12·3], 107 988 [42·0%] were female, and 149 207 [58·0%] were male) during 2017-19. After matching, 11 882, 7210, and 3414 pairs of GLP-1 receptor agonist and SGLT2 inhibitor users were assigned in the fit, mild frailty, and moderate or severe frailty subgroups. All clinical outcomes were comparable between users of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors among each frailty subgroup, except for a higher risk of hospitalisation for severe hyperglycaemia with GLP-1 receptor agonists than with SGLT2 inhibitors in the mild frailty subgroup (subdistribution hazard ratio 1·25 [95% CI 1·13-1·38]; p<0·0001) and a higher risk of dialysis or renal transplant with GLP-1 receptor agonists than with SGLT2 inhibitors in the fit (2·43 [1·82-3·23]; p<0·0001), mild frailty (3·93 [3·03 -5·09]; p<0·0001), and moderate or severe frailty (2·60 [2·03-3·31]; p<0·0001) subgroups., Interpretation: Formulating clear and updated guidelines on the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors according to frailty status could improve management of type 2 diabetes., Funding: Ministry of Education, Taiwan., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests F-YH, EC-HT, and C-YW have received a research grant, awarded to the National Taiwan University, from Novo Nordisk. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have beneficial effects on cardiovascular disease in addition to their glucose-lowering effects. In this study, the effects of these drugs, when used individually or in combination, on cardiovascular atherosclerotic lesion development were compared in diabetic ApoE-deficient (ApoE KO) hyperlipidemic mice., Methods: ApoE-KO mice were treated with streptozotocin and nicotinamide, generating a type 2 diabetes model. The mice were randomly divided into four groups: vehicle-treated (untreated), liraglutide (LIRA), ipragliflozin (IPRA), and combination therapy (combo). These mice, as well as non-diabetic controls, were fed a high-fat diet. After 8 weeks of drug administration, the heart and aorta were removed and analyzed., Results: Atherosclerotic lesions evaluated by oil red O (ORO) staining were significantly larger in the untreated group (13.4±0.8% of the total aortic area) than in the non-diabetic controls (4.4±0.5%, p<0.01), while being reduced in the combo group (6.0±1.0%, p<0.01) as compared with the untreated group. The ORO stain-positive area in the LIRA and IPRA groups tended to be reduced but their differences were not statistically significant. Transcript levels of Mcp1 and Sirt1 were significantly reduced and increased, respectively, in the combo compared with the untreated group, while no significant changes were observed in the monotherapy groups., Conclusions: The data suggest that combination therapy with liraglutide and ipragliflozin may be an efficient regimen for preventing the development of atherosclerosis in diabetic mice deficient in ApoE., Competing Interests: H.I. has received lecture fees from Astellas Pharma, MSD, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim and NovoNordisc Pharma, and has received grants from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, and Eli Lilly. K.W. received lecture fees from Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Sumitomo Pharma. M.T., H.S., G.K. have nothing to declare., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To examine the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1) agonists compared to SGLT-2 inhibitors on diabetic retinopathy., Design: Retrospective clinical cohort study using TriNetX, a federated electronic health records network comprising multiple healthcare organizations., Methods: Patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and monotherapy treatment, excluding insulin, with GLP-1 agonists or SGLT-2 inhibitors. Patients with a history of PDR prior to initiation of treatment were excluded. The rate of progression to PDR and rate of development of diabetic macular edema (DME) were compared between patients on GLP-1 agonists compared to those on SGLT-2 inhibitors. The groups were propensity score matched for age, gender, ethnicity, race, type of diabetes, and severity of PDR. Main outcomes included rate and relative risk (RR) of progression to PDR and risk of DME in the GLP-1 agonist group versus the SGLT-2 inhibitor group., Results: A total of 6481 patients were identified in the GLP-1 cohort and the SGLT-2 inhibitor cohort after propensity score matching. At 1 and 3 years after initiation of therapy, a higher rate of progression of PDR was noted (RR: 1.26, CI 1.04-1.51, P = .017 at 1 year, RR: 1.284, CI 1.1-1.499, P = .002 at 3 years) in the GLP-1 agonist cohort compared to the SGLT-2 inhibitor cohort. There was a higher rate of DME noted at 3 months (RR: 1.192, CI 1.059-1.276, P = .002), 6 months (RR: 1.22, CI 1.13-1.32, P < .001), 1 year (RR: 1.24, CI 1.15-1.33, P < .001), and at 3 years (RR: 1.29, CI 1.21-1.38, P < .001) in the GLP-1 agonist cohort compared to the SGLT-2 inhibitor cohort., Conclusions: A higher rate of progression of PDR and risk of new-onset DME was observed in patients on monotherapy with GLP-1 agonists compared to those on SGLT-2 inhibitors. It is important for clinicians to be aware of these potential effects and to consider the current retinopathy status when initiating treatment with newer hypoglycemic agents to ensure these patients are appropriately monitored for developing potential vision-threatening complications., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with sodium-glucose cotransporter2(SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)., Methods: To construct an exhaustive database of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists, a methodical search was undertaken across a range of databases, such as Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from their inception to January 2023. Following this, a meta-analysis was executed to amalgamate the collected data, which allowed for the calculation of standardized mean differences (SMDs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for a spectrum of outcomes. This analytical approach was designed to yield a quantitative evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy and safety profile of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists for the treatment of diabetes mellitus., Results: When compared to GLP-1 agonist therapy alone, the combination therapy did not significantly reduce fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels (95 % confidence interval [CI]: -0.27, 0.10; p = 0.35), body weight (95 % CI: -0.18, 0.18; p = 1.00), Glycosylated Hemoglobin, Type A1C (HbA1c) (95 % CI: -0.29, 0.07; p = 0.22), or systolic blood pressure (SBP) values (95 % CI: -0.29, 0.06; p = 0.21). In contrast, when compared to SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy alone, combination therapy significantly decreased FPG by 0.24 mmol/L (95 % CI: -0.43, -0.05; p = 0.01), HbA1c by 0.45 % (95 % CI: -0.72, -0.18; p = 0.001), and SBP by 0.12 mmHg (95 % CI: -0.24, 0.00; p = 0.05). However, the combination therapy failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in body weight when compared with either SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy (95 % CI: -0.20, 0.05; p = 0.24) or GLP-1 agonist therapy (95 % CI: -0.18, 0.18; p = 1.00). Additionally, the combination therapy did not increase the incidence of hypoglycemia. It should be noted that data regarding mortality and cardiovascular outcomes were limited., Conclusions: The combination treatment of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists effectively reduces HbA1c, FPG, and SBP without elevating the risk of hypoglycemia when compared to monotherapy with SGLT-2 inhibitors. However, these beneficial effects were not observed when the combination therapy was compared with GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment alone., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence the work submitted, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled, “ the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination or Monotherapy With GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT-2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus:An update Systematic Review and Meta-analysis ”., (Copyright © 2024 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Monotherapy to treat obesity-associated liver insult is limited., Objectives: In diet-induced obese mice showing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), we aimed to compare the combinations of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i, empagliflozin, E), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i, linagliptin, L), and glucagon-like peptide type 1 receptor agonist (GLP1RA, dulaglutide, D)., Methods: Male 3-month-old C57BL/6J mice were fed for 12 weeks in a control (C, n = 10) or high-fat (HF, n = 30) diet. Then, mice were followed for three additional weeks: C, HF, HF E + L, and HF E + D (n = 10/group)., Results: HF versus C showed higher hepatic triacylglycerol (TAG, +82%), steatosis (+850%), glucose intolerance (+71%), insulin (+98%), and insulin resistance (+68%). Compared to the HF group, HF E + L showed lower glucose intolerance (-60%), insulin (-61%), insulin resistance (-46%), TAG (-61%), and steatosis (-58%), and HF E + D showed lower glucose intolerance (-71%), insulin (-58%), insulin resistance (-62%), TAG (-61%), and steatosis (-82%). The principal component analysis (PCA) placed the HF group and the HF E + D group on opposite sides, while the HF E + L group was placed between C and HF E + D., Conclusion: PCA separated the groups considering the metabolism-related genes (glucose and lipid), mitochondrial biogenesis, and steatosis. The two pharmacological combinations showed beneficial effects in treating obesity and MASLD. However, the combination of SGLT2i and GLP1RA showed more potent beneficial effects on MASLD than SGLT2i and DPP4i and, therefore, should be the recommended combination., (© 2024 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), leading to high morbidity and mortality. Managing HFpEF in diabetic patients is challenging with limited treatments. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) have shown potential cardiovascular benefits. This meta-analysis compares the effects of GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors on HFpEF in T2D patients., Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors' impact on HFpEF in T2D patients. Databases searched included PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library up to July 2024. Primary outcomes were changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), myocardial fibrosis (extracellular volume fraction, ECV), and functional capacity (6-minute walk test, 6MWT). Secondary outcomes included HbA1c, body weight, and systolic blood pressure (SBP).  RESULTS: Twelve studies with 3,428 patients (GLP1-RA: 1,654; SGLT2 inhibitors: 1,774) were included. Both GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors significantly improved LVEF compared to placebo (GLP1-RA: mean difference [MD] 2.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5 to 4.1, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD 3.2%, 95% CI 2.0 to 4.4, p < 0.001). SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced myocardial fibrosis (MD -3.5%, 95% CI -4.2 to -2.8, p < 0.001) more than GLP1-RA (MD -2.3%, 95% CI -3.0 to -1.6, p < 0.001). Functional capacity improved significantly with both treatments (GLP1-RA: MD 45 m, 95% CI 30 to 60, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD 50 m, 95% CI 35 to 65, p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes showed reductions in HbA1c (GLP1-RA: MD -1.1%, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.8, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD -1.0%, 95% CI -1.3 to -0.7, p < 0.001) and body weight (GLP1-RA: MD -2.5 kg, 95% CI -3.1 to -1.9, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD -2.0 kg, 95% CI -2.6 to -1.4, p < 0.001). Both treatments significantly lowered SBP (GLP1-RA: MD -5.2 mmHg, 95% CI -6.5 to -3.9, p < 0.001; SGLT2 inhibitors: MD -4.8 mmHg, 95% CI -6.0 to -3.6, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: GLP1-RA and SGLT2 inhibitors significantly benefit HFpEF management in T2D patients. SGLT2 inhibitors reduce myocardial fibrosis more effectively, while both improve LVEF, functional capacity, and metabolic parameters. These therapies should be integral to HFpEF management in diabetic patients. Further research is needed on long-term outcomes and potential combined therapy effects., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Both glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) improve cardiorenal -prognosis of at-risk patients with type 2 diabetes thanks to pleiotropic effects that are either common or specific. This article discusses the clinical efficacy of a combined therapy with the two medications. Data were obtained from post hoc analyses of subgroups of participants to cardiovascular outcome trials and from real-life observational retro-spective cohort studies. The reported superiority of the combination versus either monotherapy should be confirmed in an ongoing large prospective trial (PRECIDENTD). The extra-cost of such a combined therapy as well as the common underuse of each pharmacological class in daily clinical practice deserve attention., Competing Interests: Les auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

Background: Emerging data suggest that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) improve kidney outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Direct comparisons of the kidney and cardiovascular effectiveness of GLP-1 RA with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), a first-line therapy for this population, are needed., Objectives: The authors compared kidney and cardiovascular outcomes for new users of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs with T2D., Methods: Using propensity score overlap weighting, we analyzed electronic health record data from 20 U.S. health systems contributing to PCORnet between 2015 and 2020. The primary kidney outcome was a composite of sustained 40% estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, incident end-stage kidney disease, or all-cause mortality over 2 years or until censoring. In addition, we examined cardiovascular and safety outcomes., Results: The weighted study cohort included 35,004 SGLT2i and 47,268 GLP-1 RA initiators. Over a median of 1.2 years, the primary outcome did not differ between treatments (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.81-1.02), although SGLT2i were associated with a lower risk of 40% eGFR decline (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65-0.91). Risks of mortality (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.92-1.27), a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.93-1.14), and heart failure hospitalization (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.80-1.13) did not differ. Genital mycotic infections were more common for SGLT2i initiators, but other safety outcomes did not differ. The results were similar regardless of chronic kidney disease status., Conclusions: SGLT2i and GLP-1 RAs led to similar kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in people with T2D, though SGLT2i initiation was associated with a lower risk of 40% eGFR decline. (Evaluating Comparative Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes Population With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease; NCT05465317)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was funded by the Boehringer Ingelheim & Lilly Diabetes Alliance. The authors meet criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Boehringer Ingelheim was given the opportunity to review the manuscript for medical and scientific accuracy as well as intellectual property considerations. Dr Butler has received consultant honoraria from Abbott, American Regent, Amgen, Applied Therapeutic, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiac Dimension, Cardior, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Edwards, Element Science, Innolife, Impulse Dynamics, Imbria, Inventiva, Lexicon, Lilly, LivaNova, Janssen, Medtronics, Merck, Occlutech, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Pharmain, Roche, Sequana, SQ Innovation, and Vifor. Dr Pagidipati has received research support from Alnylam, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eggland’s Best, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Verily Life Sciences; has served on consultation/advisory panels for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CRISPR Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Esperion, AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk; has served as an executive committee member for trials sponsored by Novo Nordisk and Amgen; has served on the Data Safety Monitoring Boards for trials sponsored by Johnson and Johnson and Novartis; and has served on the medical advisory board for Miga Health. Dr Fonseca has received research support (to Tulane) from Fractyl and Jaguar Gene Therapy; has received consultant honoraria from Asahi, Bayer, Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Corcept; has stock or stock options in Mellitus Health, BRAVO4Health, Amgen, and Abbott; and has patents pending for BRAVO risk engine for predicting diabetes complications and PAX4 gene therapy for type 1 diabetes. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To explore trends in prognosis and use of glucose-lowering drugs (GLD) in patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease (CAD)., Research Design and Methods: All patients with diabetes and CAD undergoing a coronary angiography between 2010 and 2021 according to the Swedish Angiography and Angioplasty Registry were included. Information on GLD (dispended 6 months before or after coronary angiography) was collected from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Registry. Data on major cardiovascular events (MACE; mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure) through December 2021 were obtained from national registries. Cox proportional survival analysis was used to assess outcomes where cardioprotective GLD (any of Sodium Glucose Lowering Transport 2 receptor inhibitors [SGLT2i] and Glucagon Like Peptide Receptor Agonists [GLP-1 RA]) served as a reference., Results: Among all patients (n = 38,671), 31% had stable CAD, and 69% suffered an acute myocardial infarction. Mean age was 69 years, 67% were male, and 81% were on GLD. The use of cardioprotective GLD increased rapidly in recent years (2016-2021; 7-47%) and was more common in younger patients (66 vs. 68 years) and men (72.9% vs. 67.1%) than other GLD. Furthermore, compared with other GLD, the use of cardioprotective GLD was more common in patients with a less frequent history of heart failure (5.0% vs. 6.8%), myocardial infarction (7.7% vs. 10.5%) and chronic kidney disease (3.7% vs. 5.2%). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) for MACE was greater in patients on other GLD than in those on cardioprotective GLD (1.10; 1.03-1.17, p = 0.004). Trend analyses for the years 2010-2019 revealed improved one-year MACE in patients with diabetes and CAD (year 2019 vs. 2010; 0.90; 0.81-1.00, p = 0.045), while 1-year mortality was unchanged., Conclusions: The prescription pattern of diabetes medication is changing quickly in patients with diabetes and CAD; however, there are worrying signals of inefficient use prioritizing cardioprotective GLD to younger and healthier individuals at lower cardiovascular risk. Despite this, there are improving trends in 1-year morbidity., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

New anti-diabetic medications, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are recommended in guidelines to reduce cardio-renal events in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), independent of glucose control. Yet they might be underused in real world. This study aims to address the knowledge gap, prescription patterns and barriers faced by Chinese doctors. Cardio-Metabolic Survey was a cross-sectional study conducted among doctors managing diabetic patients in clinical practice, via a designated online questionnaire from May 1st, to Dec. 31th, 2022. A total of 358 doctors from 57 hospitals across Beijing participated in this survey, 34.9% from tertiary hospitals. Only 30-40% doctors demonstrated somewhat understanding of the mechanism and clinical applications of GLP-1RA or SGLT2 inhibitors. There is no difference in understanding of these two medications overall (p = 0.336). However, doctors in tertiary hospitals have a higher understanding of GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitors compared to those in non-tertiary hospitals (p = 0.049, and 0.008, respectively). 40.2% doctors have never prescribed GLP-1RA, and 36.6% for SGLT2 inhibitors. The frequency of prescribing SGLT2 inhibitors was significantly higher than prescribing GLP-1RA (p = 0.005). The main barriers on prescription include high cost, poor adherence, side effects concern, and insufficient knowledge about these medications. Chinese doctors currently have limited understanding and low prescription frequency for GLP-1RA and SGLT2 inhibitors. Multifaceted approaches are needed to improve doctors' knowledge and strengthen their ability to manage T2DM effectively., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Myocardial infarction (MI) is a life-threatening cardiovascular disease that, on average, results in 8.5 million deaths worldwide each year. Timely revascularization of occluded vessels is a critical method of myocardial salvage. However, reperfusion paradoxically leads to the worsening of myocardial damage known as myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion injury (MI/RI). Therefore, reducing the size of myocardial infarction after reperfusion is critical and remains an important therapeutic goal. The susceptibility of the myocardium to MI/RI may be increased by diabetes. Currently, some traditional antidiabetic agents such as metformin reduce MI/RI by decreasing inflammation, inhibiting oxidative stress, and improving vascular endothelial function. This appears to be a new direction for the treatment of MI/RI. Recent cardiovascular outcome trials have shown that several oral antidiabetic agents, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), and sodium-glucose-linked transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is), not only have good antidiabetic effects but also have a protective effect on myocardial protection. This article aims to discuss the mechanisms and effects of oral antidiabetic agents, including GLP-1RAs, DPP-4is, and SGLT-2is, on MI/RI to facilitate their clinical application., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are guideline-recommended therapies for the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. We previously observed in people living with T2D and coronary artery disease that circulating vascular regenerative (VR) progenitor cell content increased following 6-mo use of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin. In this post hoc subanalysis of the ORIGINS-RCE CardioLink-13 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05253521), we analyzed the circulating VR progenitor cell content of 92 individuals living with T2D, among whom 20 were on a GLP-1RA, 42 were on an SGLT2 inhibitor but not a GLP-1RA, and 30 were on neither of these vascular protective therapies. In the GLP-1RA group, the mean absolute count of circulating VR progenitor cells defined by high aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity (ALDH hi SSC low ) and VR progenitor cells further characterized by surface expression of the proangiogenic marker CD133 (ALDH hi SSC low CD133 + ) was higher than the group receiving neither a GLP-1RA nor an SGLT2 inhibitor ( P = 0.02) and comparable with that in the SGLT2 inhibitor group ( P = 0.25). The absolute count of proinflammatory, granulocyte-restricted precursor cells (ALDH hi SSC hi ) was significantly lower in the GLP-1RA group compared with the group on neither therapy ( P = 0.031). Augmented vessel repair initiated by VR cells with previously documented proangiogenic activity, alongside a reduction in systemic, granulocyte precursor-driven inflammation, may represent novel mechanisms responsible for the cardiovascular-metabolic benefits of GLP-1RA therapy. Prospective, randomized clinical trials are now warranted to establish the value of recovering circulating VR progenitor cell content with blood vessel regenerative functions. NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this post hoc subanalysis of 92 individuals living with T2D and at high cardiovascular risk, the authors summarize the differences in circulating vascular regenerative (VR) progenitor cell content between those on GLP-1RA therapy, on SGLT2 inhibitor without GLP-1RA therapy, and on neither therapy. Those on GLP-1RA therapy demonstrated greater circulating VR progenitor cell content and reduced proinflammatory granulocyte precursor content. These results offer novel mechanistic insights into the cardiometabolic benefits associated with GLP-1RA therapy.

Background: The benefits of new glucose-lowering agents on cardiovascular disease have been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. However, more evidence is required to assess the additive value of a combined therapy based on sodium-glucose transporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP1ra) in a real-world population., Methods: A nonconcurrent prospective study was conducted using integrated electronic medical records from primary care and hospitals obtained through "big data" technologies in a healthy area in Galicia. The study involved patients who were given SGLT2i, GLP1ra, or both treatments between January 2018 and June 2022 and were categorized as either mono- or combined therapy (SGLT2i, GLP1ra, or both). The cumulative risk for different events: hospitalization or mortality, or both, for 1) coronary artery disease, 2) heart failure, 3) cerebrovascular accident, and all-cause mortality were represented by Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression analysis to obtain the hazard ratio (HR) and (95% confidence interval [CI]). Validation was performed in a subpopulation with propensity score matching., Results: The patients (15,549) who were included were median (standard deviation) 68 (12) years old, with 41% of them being female and 46% experiencing obesity. The median (interquartile range) of follow-up was 19 (8-33) months. The Kaplan-Meier analysis determined that the cumulative risk for coronary artery disease and cerebrovascular accident events was similar among the 3 different therapy groups. However, the combined therapy vs SGLT2i reduced the risk of heart failure events (HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.87) or all-cause mortality (HR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.86). Multivariate Cox regression analysis, after matching with a propensity score, confirmed the benefits of combined therapy regarding SGLT2i or GLP1ra monotherapy., Conclusion: Compared with SGLT2i or GLP1ra alone, combined therapy SGLT2i + GLP1ra reduces heart failure risk and all-cause mortality in a real-world population., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Current evidence for medical therapies for diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is largely based on large-scale clinical trials. These trials, however, often exhibit heterogeneity in participant characteristics and baseline kidney function. These differences may lead to misinterpretation in clinical practice, such that treatment effects from different trials are directly compared and generalized to broader populations beyond the population in which each trial was conducted. This is particularly relevant if comparisons on efficacy and safety are made when the underlying study populations are distinctly different. Indeed, key clinical trials evaluating sodium-glucose transport protein-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (nsMRA), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) differed in recruitment requirements (inclusion/exclusion criteria), resulting in differences in the severity of the underlying kidney disease as well as risk factor profiles. Moreover, these trials defined their primary and secondary outcomes differently. Collectively, these factors lead to distinct study populations with different baseline risks for DKD progression in the placebo arm in each clinical trial. Consequently, a direct head-to-head comparison of the treatment effect between treatments using relative risk measures from placebo-controlled clinical trials alone is not recommended. In addition, healthcare professionals should be equipped to understand the specific target population of clinical trials to avoid over-generalization when drawing conclusions from these trials.

Competing Interests: I declare no competing interests.

Aim: To demonstrate cardiovascular safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), and sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) across age-groups., Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were searched for cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) testing newer agents until August 31, 2022 (PROSPERO ID CRD42021260167). Studies with ≥1000 T2D participants enrolled for ≥12 months were included. Random effect models were used to report relative-risk (RR) for three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE) and its components by age subgroups (65 years; 75 years)., Results: For SGLT-2is, five CVOTs (46,969 patients, 45-50 % ≥65 years) were included. SGLT-2is reduced risk of MACE (RR; 0.91 [CI, 0.85-0.98]); cardiovascular death (CV-death) (RR; 0.84 [CI, 0.73-0.96]); and all-cause mortality (ACM) (RR; 0.86 [CI, 0.79-0.93]) with no difference in subgroups <65 or ≥65 years. For GLP-1RAs, nine CVOTs (n = 64,236, 34-75 % ≥65 years) were included. GLP-1RAs reduced risk of MACE (RR; 0.89 [CI, 0.83-0.95]), stroke (RR; 0.86 [CI, 0.76-0.97]) and ACM (RR; 0.90 [CI, 0.83-0.97]) with no significant difference in subgroups <65 or ≥65 years. Additionally, GLP-1RAs reduced risk of MACE (10 %), ACM (12 %) and CV-death (12 %) with no significant difference in subgroups <75 or ≥75 years. Four CVOTs (n = 33,063; 35-58 % ≥65 years) with DPP-4is were included. There were no significant differences in risk for CV outcomes with DPP-4is compared to placebo in any of the age subgroups., Conclusion: The overall cardiovascular safety profile of newer anti-hyperglycemic agents is consistent in older and younger individuals., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest REP reports speaker fees from Merck and Novo Nordisk; consulting fees from Bayer AG, Endogenex, Inc., Gasherbrum Bio, Inc., Hengrui (USA) Ltd., Intas Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Rivus Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries; and grants from Dompe and Novo Nordisk. All funds are paid directly to Dr. Pratley's employer, AdventHealth, a nonprofit organization that supports education and research. TKT reports consulting fees from Novo Nordisk and Lilly, research support from Novo Nordisk and Bayer. She is on the speaker bureau for Bayer and Lilly. CTR received research grant through institution from Anthos, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen and Novartis; Honoraria for scientific advisory boards and consulting fees from Anthos, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Pfizer. CTR and KI are members of the TIMI Study Group, which has received institutional research grant support through Brigham and Women's Hospital from Abbott, Amgen, Anthos Therapeutics, ARCA Biopharma, Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Intarcia, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Research and Development, LLC, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Quark Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Roche, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Inc., Softcell Medical Limited, The Medicines Company, Zora Biosciences. All other authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: There are limited studies on dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2-i), and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist use and occurrence of diabetic macular edema (DME). The objective of this study was to determine the association between DPP-4i, SGLT2-i, and GLP-1 receptor agonist use and occurrence of DME., Methods: Proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the change in hazard of developing DME associated with DPP-4i, SGLT2-i, or GLP-1 receptor agonist use. Models accounted for age at DR diagnosis, DR severity (proliferative vs non-proliferative stage), time-weighted average of HbA1c level, sex, and self-reported race/ethnicity. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: The hazard ratio of developing DME after diagnosis of DR was 1.2 (CI = 0.75 to 1.99; p = 0.43) for DPP-4i use, 0.93 (CI = 0.54 to 1.61; p = 0.81) for GLP-1 receptor agonist use, 0.82 (CI = 0.20 to 3.34; p = 0.78) for SGLT2-i use, 1.1 (CI = 0.75 to 1.59; p = 0.66) for any one medication use, 1.1 (CI = 0.62 to 2.09; p = 0.68) and for any two or more medications use., Conclusions: We did not find an association between DPP-4i, SGLT2-i, or GLP-1 receptor agonist use and increased hazard of development of DME among patients with DR., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest RMW reports receiving research support from Novo Nordisk outside the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Studies examining the safety and effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) among community-dwelling adults may not generalize to nursing home (NH) residents, who are typically older and more multimorbid. We compared the safety and cardiovascular effectiveness of SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs among US NH residents., Materials and Methods: Eligible individuals were aged ≥66 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus and initiated an SGLT2i or GLP-1RA in an NH between 2013 and 2018. Safety outcomes included fall-related injuries, hypoglycaemia, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), urinary tract infection or genital infection, and acute kidney injury in the year following treatment initiation. Cardiovascular effectiveness outcomes included death, major adverse cardiovascular events and hospitalization for heart failure. Per-protocol adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using stabilized inverse probability of treatment and censoring weighted cause-specific hazard regression models accounting for 127 covariates., Results: The study population included 7710 residents (31.08% SGLT2i, 68.92% GLP-1RA). Compared with GLP-1RA initiators, SGLT2i initiators had higher rates of DKA (HR 1.95, 95% confidence limits 1.27, 2.99) and death (HR 1.18, 95% confidence limits 1.02, 1.36). Rates of urinary tract infection or genital infection, acute kidney injury, major adverse cardiovascular events, and heart failure were also elevated, while rates of fall-related injuries and hypoglycaemia were reduced, but all estimates were imprecise and highly compatible with no difference., Conclusions: SGLT2is do not have superior, and may have inferior, effectiveness compared with GLP-1RAs for cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in NH residents. Residents initiating SGLT2is should be monitored closely for DKA., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)