Search

Background: Currently, antivenoms are the only specific treatment available for snakebite envenoming. In Brazil, over 30% of patients cannot access antivenom within its critical care window. Researchers have therefore proposed decentralizing to community health centers to decrease time-to-care and improve morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is no evidence-based method to evaluate the capacity of health units for antivenom treatment, nor what the absolute minimum supplies and staff are necessary for safe and effective antivenom administration and clinical management., Methods: This study utilized a modified-Delphi approach to develop and validate a checklist to evaluate the minimum requirements for health units to adequately treat snakebite envenoming in the Amazon region of Brazil. The modified-Delphi approach consisted of four rounds: 1) iterative development of preliminary checklist by expert steering committee; 2) controlled feedback on preliminary checklist via expert judge survey; 3) two-phase nominal group technique with new expert judges to resolve pending items; and 4) checklist finalization and closing criteria by expert steering committee. The measure of agreement selected for this study was percent agreement defined a priori as ≥75%., Results: A valid, reliable, and feasible checklist was developed. The development process highlighted three key findings: (1) the definition of community health centers and its list of essential items by expert judges is consistent with the Brazilian Ministry of Health, WHO snakebite strategic plan, and a general snakebite capacity guideline in India (internal validity), (2) the list of essential items for antivenom administration and clinical management is feasible and aligns with the literature regarding clinical care (reliability), and (3) engagement of local experts is critical to developing and implementing an antivenom decentralization strategy (feasibility)., Conclusion: This study joins an international set of evidence advocating for decentralization, adding value in its definition of essential care items; identification of training needs across the care continuum; and demonstration of the validity, reliability, and feasibility provided by engaging local experts. Specific to Brazil, further added value comes in the potential use of the checklist for health unit accreditation as well as its applications to logistics and resource distribution. Future research priorities should apply this checklist to health units in the Amazon region of Brazil to determine which community health centers are or could be capable of receiving antivenom and translate this expert-driven checklist and approach to snakebite care in other settings or other diseases in low-resource settings., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Serrão-Pinto et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Introduction: The common lancehead snakes ( Bothrops atrox) are responsible for up to 90% of snakebites in the Amazon, especially in remote areas. The prevalence of microhematuria is similar to that of coagulopathy in B. atrox envenomation in the Amazon. Thus, this study aimed to assess the reliability of microhematuria as an inexpensive and simple alternative to detect snake-induced consumption coagulopathy. Methods: We analyzed samples from patients with confirmed B. atrox envenomation in terms of plasma fibrinogen and microhematuria (>3 red blood cells per high power field) in order to access the reliability of microhematuria to detect snakebite-induced coagulopathy, within 12 hours from admission. Results: A total of 186 patients were recruited. From the total, 85.5% of patients had hypofibrinogenemia and only about 50% ( n  = 94) had a microscopic examination of urine within 12 hours where microhematuria was present in 39 (41.5%). Diagnostic performance showed 38.6% sensitivity and 36.4% specificity (cutpoint 200 mg/dL). No clear association was seen between microhematuria and hypofibrinogenemia ( r : -0.10; p: .34). Conclusion: In this study, microhematuria presented poor diagnostic performance to detect coagulopathy. Further studies are necessary to screen inexpensive and simple alternative diagnostic tools.

Bothrops snakebites usually present systemic bleeding, and the clinical⁻epidemiological and laboratorial factors associated with the development of this manifestation are not well established. In this study, we assessed the prevalence of Bothrops snakebites with systemic bleeding reported at the Fundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado , in Manaus, Amazonas State, Brazil, and the clinical⁻epidemiological and laboratorial factors associated with systemic bleeding. This is an observational, cross-sectional study carried out between August, 2013 and July, 2016. Patients who developed systemic bleeding on admission or during hospitalization were considered cases, and those with non-systemic bleeding were included in the control group. Systemic bleeding was observed in 63 (15.3%) of the 442 Bothrops snakebites evaluated. Bothrops snakebites mostly occurred in males (78.2%), in rural areas (89.0%) and in the age group of 11 to 30 years old (40.4%). It took most of the patients (59.8%) less than 3 h to receive medical assistance. Unclottable blood (AOR = 3.11 (95% CI = 1.53 to 6.31; p = 0.002)) and thrombocytopenia (AOR = 4.52 (95% CI = 2.03 to 10.09; p < 0.001)) on admission were independently associated with systemic bleeding during hospitalization. These hemostatic disorders on admission increase the chances of systemic bleeding during hospitalization. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the pathophysiology of systemic bleeding in Bothrops snakebites in the Amazon region.

Snake envenomation is a major public health problem in Brazil. Systemic complications that may arise from snakebites are mainly related to coagulopathy. The Lee-White clotting time (LWCT) is a simple and inexpensive test and available even in remote health facilities. However, the diagnostic value of such test needs to be evaluated to accurately diagnose coagulopathy in the clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the reliability of the LWCT performed in hospital routine to diagnose venom-induced coagulopathy. We studied 186 patients admitted at the Tropical Medicine Foundation Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado in Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil, with Bothrops envenomation diagnosis. At admission, blood samples were collected for performing LWCT and the concentration of fibrinogen. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and accuracy were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. From the total, 85.5% had hypofibrinogenemia. The sensitivity of the LWCT to the diagnosis of hypofibrinogenemia was 78.0% and the specificity 40.7%. The accuracy of the test was 72.6%, and patients with a prolonged LWCT had 2.4 higher odds of developing hypofibrinogenemia. In addition, the LWCT was also compared with venom antigen levels and systemic hemorrhage. The LWCT showed moderate sensitivity to detect consumption coagulopathy and constitutes a valuable tool for the diagnosis of Bothrops snake envenomation and indication of antivenom therapy.