Search

Objective: Daridorexant is approved for the treatment of insomnia at two dose levels (25 and 50 mg). Dose-efficacy and -safety response relationships were evaluated using Phase 2 and 3 data., Methods: Data (N = 2153) from one Phase 2 (daridorexant 5, 10, 25, 50 mg, placebo once daily for 1 month) and two Phase 3 studies (daridorexant 10 and 25 or 25 and 50 mg, placebo once daily for 3 months) were pooled. Dose-response analyses at 1 month of double-blind treatment were performed using a linear regression and a two-stage meta-analysis approach. Efficacy endpoints were polysomnography-derived wake after sleep onset, latency to persistent sleep (LPS), self-reported total sleep time and the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire total score (only Phase 3 data for the latter). Safety endpoints were the incidence of total adverse events (AEs) and AEs corresponding to somnolence/fatigue., Results: Dose-responses for all efficacy endpoints were significant in the observed dose range (both statistical approaches, p < 0.01). All dose-response relationships were linear except for LPS (two-stage meta-analysis) which showed a change in slope above 10 mg without reaching a plateau. No significant dose-response was observed for any AE (both approaches, p > 0.05). The incidence of AEs corresponding to somnolence/fatigue was low at all doses and, without linear assumption (two-stage meta-analysis) there was no dose-dependency (p = 0.369)., Conclusions: The data support the use of 50 mg as the preferred daridorexant dose in patients with insomnia disorder to provide the greatest opportunity for efficacy with no increased risk for AEs, including somnolence/fatigue, compared to lower doses., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: All authors report article publishing charges, statistical analysis, and writing assistance were provided by Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Antonio Olivieri reports a relationship with Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Guy Braunstein reports a relationship with Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd that includes: employment and equity or stocks. Pierre-Philippe Luyet reports a relationship with Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd that includes: employment. Johann Laurent reports a relationship with Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd that includes: employment. William V McCall reports a relationship with Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd that includes: consulting or advisory. William V McCall reports a relationship with Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc that includes: consulting or advisory. William V McCall reports a relationship with Carelon that includes: consulting or advisory. Claudio Bassetti reports a relationship with Bioproject that includes: consulting or advisory. Claudio Bassetti reports a relationship with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited that includes: consulting or advisory. Claudio Bassetti reports a relationship with Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc that includes: consulting or advisory. Claudio Bassetti reports a relationship with Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd that includes: consulting or advisory. Jan Hedner reports a relationship with Somnomed that includes: funding grants. Jan Hedner reports a relationship with Desitin GmbH that includes: funding grants., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Progress in the field of insomnia since 2017 necessitated this update of the European Insomnia Guideline. Recommendations for the diagnostic procedure for insomnia and its comorbidities are: clinical interview (encompassing sleep and medical history); the use of sleep questionnaires and diaries (and physical examination and additional measures where indicated) (A). Actigraphy is not recommended for the routine evaluation of insomnia (C), but may be useful for differential-diagnostic purposes (A). Polysomnography should be used to evaluate other sleep disorders if suspected (i.e. periodic limb movement disorder, sleep-related breathing disorders, etc.), treatment-resistant insomnia (A) and for other indications (B). Cognitive-behavioural therapy for insomnia is recommended as the first-line treatment for chronic insomnia in adults of any age (including patients with comorbidities), either applied in-person or digitally (A). When cognitive-behavioural therapy for insomnia is not sufficiently effective, a pharmacological intervention can be offered (A). Benzodiazepines (A), benzodiazepine receptor agonists (A), daridorexant (A) and low-dose sedating antidepressants (B) can be used for the short-term treatment of insomnia (≤ 4 weeks). Longer-term treatment with these substances may be initiated in some cases, considering advantages and disadvantages (B). Orexin receptor antagonists can be used for periods of up to 3 months or longer in some cases (A). Prolonged-release melatonin can be used for up to 3 months in patients ≥ 55 years (B). Antihistaminergic drugs, antipsychotics, fast-release melatonin, ramelteon and phytotherapeutics are not recommended for insomnia treatment (A). Light therapy and exercise interventions may be useful as adjunct therapies to cognitive-behavioural therapy for insomnia (B)., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Sleep Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Sleep Research Society.)

Background and Purpose: Contradictory evidence on the impact of single sleep-wake-disturbances (SWD), such as sleep-disorderd breating (SDB) or insomnia, in patients with stroke, on the risk of subsequent cardio- and cerebrovascular events (CCE) and death, exists. Very recent studies in the general population suggest that the presence of multiple SWD increases cardio-cerebrovascular risk. Hence, the aim of this study was to asssess whether a novel score capturing the burden of multiple SWD, a so called "sleep burden index", is predictive for subsequent CCE including death in a prospectively followed cohort of stroke patients., Methods: Patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) were prospectively recruited. Four SWD were analyzed: (i) SDB with respirography; (ii) insomnia (defined using the insomnia severity index [ISI]); (iii) restless legs syndrome (RLS; defined using the International RLS Study Group rating scale); and (iv) self-estimated sleep duration at 1 and 3 months. A "sleep burden index", calculated using the mean of z-transformed values from assessments of these four SWD, was created. The occurrence of CCE was recorded over a mean ± standard deviation (SD) follow-up of 3.2 ± 0.3 years., Results: We assessed 437 patients (87% ischemic stroke, 13% TIA, 64% males) with a mean ± SD age of 65.1 ± 13.0 years. SDB (respiratory event index ≥ 5/h) was present in 66.2% of these patients. Insomnia (ISI ≥ 10), RLS and extreme sleep duration affected 26.2%, 6.4% and 13.7% of the patients 3 months post-stroke. Seventy out of the 437 patients (16%) had at least one CCE during the follow-up. The sleep burden index was associated with a higher risk for subsequent CCE, including death (odds ratio 1.80 per index unit, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.72; p = 0.0056)., Conclusion: The presence of multiple SWDs constitutes a risk for subsequent CCE (including death) within the first 3 years following stroke. Larger systematic studies should assess the utility of the sleep burden index for patients' risk stratification in clinical practice., (© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Background and Objective: The dual orexin receptor antagonist daridorexant, studied in two phase III trials, dose-dependently improved objective and subjective sleep variables and daytime functioning in adults with insomnia. Because treatment of insomnia in older adults is challenging and has limited options, the purpose of the current analysis was to further analyse the phase III trial studying the higher doses of daridorexant, those that showed efficacy (daridorexant 50 mg, daridorexant 25 mg and placebo, nightly for 3 months), and compare the safety and efficacy of daridorexant in patients aged ≥ 65 ('older adults') to those aged < 65 years ('younger adults')., Methods: Analyses by age (≥ 65 years, n = 364; < 65 years, n = 566) were performed on data from the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Trial 1 in adult patients with insomnia (NCT03545191). Efficacy endpoints included a change from baseline at month 1 and month 3 in polysomnography-measured wake after sleep onset (WASO) and latency to persistent sleep (LPS), self-reported total sleep time (sTST) and daytime functioning assessed using the validated Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ). Safety endpoints included adverse events and the Visual Analog Scale for morning sleepiness., Results: At baseline, mean [standard deviation] WASO was numerically greater (110 [39] vs 92 [38] min) in older than younger adults, while LPS was comparable (~ 65 min). Mean baseline IDSIQ total and all domain scores were numerically lower (i.e. better) in older adults. Daridorexant caused similar reductions in WASO and LPS, and similar increases in sTST, from baseline, in both age groups; improvements were numerically greater with daridorexant 50 mg than 25 mg. At month 3, daridorexant 50 mg, compared with placebo, decreased WASO by a least-squares mean of 19.6 (95% confidence interval 9.7, 29.5) in older patients versus 17.4 min (10.7, 24.0) in younger patients and decreased LPS by a least-squares mean of 14.9 (7.5, 22.3) in older patients versus 9.7 min (3.7, 15.7) in younger patients. Daridorexant 50 mg increased sTST from baseline to month 3 by a least-squares mean of 59.9 (49.6, 70.3) in older patients versus 57.1 min (48.9, 65.3) in younger patients. Daridorexant 50 mg progressively improved IDSIQ total and domain scores from week 1 onwards similarly in both groups; daridorexant 25 mg improved IDSIQ scores, but only in younger adults. In both age groups, in comparison with placebo, the overall incidence of adverse events was comparable, and there were fewer falls on daridorexant. Daridorexant improved Visual Analog Scale morning sleepiness in both groups; daridorexant 50 mg increased the mean (standard deviation) Visual Analog Scale morning sleepiness score by 15.9 (20.7) in older adults and by 14.9 (18.7) in younger adults from baseline to month 3. In older adults, there was one case of sleep paralysis, and no cases of narcolepsy, cataplexy, or complex sleep behaviour., Conclusions: In older patients with insomnia, as in younger patients, the efficacy of daridorexant is maximal on night-time and daytime variables at the higher dose of 50 mg. Older patients particularly require this dose to improve daytime functioning. Older patients are not at an increased risk of adverse events or residual effects the next morning after night-time administration of daridorexant, even at 50 mg. The dose of daridorexant does not need to be decreased for older patients., Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03545191) [first posted: 4 June, 4 2018], https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03545191 ., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Daytime functioning is impaired in people with insomnia disorder. Currently available dual orexin receptor antagonists have shown efficacy in insomnia disorder, but do not address all aspects of this disease. We aimed to assess safety and efficacy of daridorexant, a novel orexin receptor antagonist, on night-time and daytime symptoms of insomnia., Methods: We did two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials at 156 sites in 17 countries. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with insomnia disorder were randomly assigned using interactive response technology (1:1:1) to receive daridorexant 50 mg, 25 mg, or placebo (study 1) or daridorexant 25 mg, 10 mg, or placebo (study 2) every evening for 3 months. Participants, investigators, and site personnel were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoints were change from baseline in wake time after sleep onset (WASO) and latency to persistent sleep (LPS), measured by polysomnography, at months 1 and 3. The secondary endpoints were change from baseline in self-reported total sleep time and the sleepiness domain score of the Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ) at months 1 and 3. Study-wise type I error rate (5%) was controlled for all pairwise comparisons. Efficacy was analysed in all randomly assigned participants, and safety in all participants who received at least one dose of treatment. The studies are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03545191 (study 1) and NCT03575104 (study 2)., Findings: Between June 4, 2018 and Feb 25, 2020, 930 participants were randomly assigned to receive daridorexant 50 mg (n=310), daridorexant 25 mg (n=310), or placebo (n=310) in study 1. Between May 29, 2018, and May 14, 2020, 924 participants were randomly assigned to receive daridorexant 25 mg (n=309), daridorexant 10 mg (n=307), or placebo (n=308) in study 2. In study 1, WASO and LPS were significantly reduced among participants in the daridorexant 50 mg group compared with participants in the placebo group at month 1 (least squares mean [LSM] difference -22·8 min [95% CI -28·0 to -17·6], p<0·0001 for WASO; -11·4 min [-16·0 to -6·7], p<0·0001 for LPS) and month 3 (-18·3 min [-23·9 to -12·7], p<0·0001 for WASO; -11·7 min [-16·3 to -7·0], p<0·0001 for LPS). WASO and LPS were significantly reduced among participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group compared with the placebo group at month 1 (LSM difference -12·2 min [-17·4 to -7·0], p<0·0001 for WASO; -8·3 min [-13·0 to -3·6], p=0·0005 for LPS) and month 3 (-11·9 min [-17·5 to -6·2], p<0·0001 for WASO; -7·6 min [-12·3 to -2·9], p=0·0015 for LPS). Compared with placebo, participants in the daridorexant 50 mg group had significantly improved self-reported total sleep time at month 1 (LSM difference 22·1 min [14·4 to 29·7], p<0·0001) and month 3 (19·8 min [10·6 to 28·9], p<0·0001), and IDSIQ sleepiness domain scores at month 1 (-1·8 [-2·5 to -1·0], p<0·0001) and month 3 (-1·9 [-2·9 to -0·9], p=0·0002). Compared with the placebo group, participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group had significantly improved self-reported total sleep time at month 1 (LSM difference 12·6 min [5·0 to 20·3], p=0·0013) and month 3 (9·9 min [0·8 to 19·1], p=0·033), but not IDSIQ sleepiness domain scores (-0·8 [-1·5 to 0·01], p=0·055 at month 1; -1·0 [-2·0 to 0·01], p=0·053 at month 3). In study 2, WASO was significantly reduced among participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group compared with participants in the placebo group at month 1 (LSM difference -11·6 min [-17·6 to -5·6], p=0·0001) and month 3 (-10·3 min [-17·0 to -3·5], p=0·0028), whereas no significant differences in LPS were observed at month 1 (-6·5 min [-12·3 to -0·6], p=0·030) or month 3 (-9·0 [-15·3 to -2·7], p=0·0053). Compared with the placebo group, participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group had significant improvement in self-reported total sleep time at month 1 (LSM difference 16·1 min [8·2 to 24·0], p<0·0001) and month 3 (19·1 [10·1 to 28·0], p<0·0001), but not in IDSIQ sleepiness domain scores (-0·8 [-1·6 to 0·1], p=0·073 at month 1; -1·3 [-2·2 to -0·3], p=0·012 at month 3). Compared with the placebo group, no significant differences were observed among participants in the daridorexant 10 mg group for WASO (LSM difference -2·7 min [-8·7 to 3·2], p=0·37 at month 1; -2·0 [-8·7 to 4·8], p=0·57 at month 3), LPS (-2·6 min [-8·4 to 3·2], p=0·38 at month 1; -3·2 min [-9·5 to 3·1], p=0·32 at month 3), self-reported total sleep time (13·4 min [5·5 to 21·2], p=0·0009 at month 1; 13·6 min [4·7 to 22·5], p=0·0028 at month 3), nor IDSIQ sleepiness domain scores (-0·4 [-1·3 to 0·4], p=0·30 at month 1; -0·7 [-1·7 to 0·2], p=0·14 at month 3). Overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between treatment groups (116 [38%] of 308 participants in the daridorexant 50 mg group, 117 [38%] of 310 in the daridorexant 25 mg group, and 105 [34%] of 309 in the placebo group in study 1; 121 [39%] of 308 participants in the daridorexant 25 mg group, 117 [38%] of 306 in the daridorexant 10 mg group, and 100 [33%] of 306 in the placebo group). Nasopharyngitis and headache were the most common adverse events in all groups. One death (cardiac arrest) occurred in the daridorexant 25 mg group in study 1, which was not deemed to be treatment-related., Interpretation: Daridorexant 25 mg and 50 mg improved sleep outcomes, and daridorexant 50 mg also improved daytime functioning, in people with insomnia disorder, with a favourable safety profile., Funding: Idorsia Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests EM reports research or clinical trial funding from Axsome, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Avadel, Apple, Huami, Sunovion, Takeda; and consultancy fees or speaker's conference reimbursement from Idorsia, Centessa Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Avadel, Dreem and Takeda. DM has been a clinical investigator for Apnimed, Eisai, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Imbrium, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Sage, Takeda, and Vanda. IF reports consulting fees from Bayer, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, STADA, and Takeda during the conduct of the trial. DL reports grants from Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Philips (Netherlands), Rhythm, Sanofi, Vanda (USA), and VitalAire International outside of the submitted work. GZ reports grants and personal fees from Idorsia Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of the trials; reports receiving a salary from Clinilabs Drug Development Corporation; being a stockholder of Clinilabs Drug Development Corporation, Home Sleep and Respiratory Care, and Sleep Disorders Institute; and reports personal fees from Eisai, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Purdue, and Takeda outside of the submitted work. CLAB reports consultancy fees from Bioprojet, Takeda, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of the trials. SP and DSK are employees of Idorsia Pharmaceuticals. TR reports consultancy fees from Eisai and Takeda during the conduct of the trials., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Guidelines recommend cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) as first-line treatment for chronic insomnia, but it is not clear how many primary care physicians (PCPs) in Switzerland prescribe this treatment. We created a survey that asked PCPs how they would treat chronic insomnia and how much they knew about CBT-I. The survey included two case vignettes that described patients with chronic insomnia, one with and one without comorbid depression. PCPs also answered general questions about treating chronic insomnia and about CBT-I and CBT-I providers. Of the 820 Swiss PCPs we invited, 395 (48%) completed the survey (mean age 54 years; 70% male); 87% of PCPs prescribed sleep hygiene and 65% phytopharmaceuticals for the patient who had only chronic insomnia; 95% prescribed antidepressants for the patient who had comorbid depression. In each case, 20% of PCPs prescribed benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine receptor agonists, 8% prescribed CBT-I, 68% said they knew little about CBT-I, and 78% did not know a CBT-I provider. In the clinical case vignettes, most PCPs treated chronic insomnia with phytopharmaceuticals and sleep hygiene despite their lack of efficacy, but PCPs rarely prescribed CBT-I, felt they knew little about it, and usually knew no CBT-I providers. PCPs need more information about the benefits of CBT-I and local CBT-I providers and dedicated initiatives to implement CBT-I in order to reduce the number of patients who are prescribed ineffective or potentially harmful medications., (© 2020 European Sleep Research Society.)

We investigated the prevalence and treatment of patients with chronic insomnia presenting to Swiss primary care physicians (PCPs) part of "Sentinella", a nationwide practice-based research network. Each PCP consecutively asked 40 patients if they had sleep complaints, documented frequency, duration, comorbidities, and reported ongoing treatment. We analysed data of 63% (83/132) of the PCPs invited. The PCPs asked 76% (2,432/3,216) of included patients about their sleep (51% female); 31% (761/2,432) of these had had insomnia symptoms; 36% (875/2,432) had current insomnia symptoms; 11% (269/2,432) met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for chronic insomnia (61% female). In all, 75% (201/269) of patients with chronic insomnia had comorbidities, with 49% (99/201) reporting depression. Chronic insomnia was treated in 78% (209/269); 70% (188/268) took medication, 38% (102/268) benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine receptor agonists, 32% (86/268) took antidepressants. Only 1% (three of 268) had been treated with cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). A third of patients presenting for a non-urgent visit in Swiss primary care reported insomnia symptoms and 11% met the DSM-5 criteria for chronic insomnia. Hypnotics were the most common treatment, but almost no patients received first-line CBT-I. Reducing the burden of insomnia depends on disseminating knowledge about and access to CBT-I, and encouraging PCPs to discuss it with and offer it as a first-line treatment to patients with chronic insomnia., (© 2020 European Sleep Research Society.)

Sleep disorders are highly prevalent in the general population and may be linked in a bidirectional fashion to stroke, which is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality.Four major scientific societies established a task force of experts in neurology, stroke, respiratory medicine, sleep medicine and methodology, to critically evaluate the evidence regarding potential links and the impact of therapy. 13 research questions were evaluated in a systematic literature search using a stepwise hierarchical approach: first, systematic reviews and meta-analyses; second, primary studies post-dating the systematic reviews/meta-analyses. A total of 445 studies were evaluated and 88 included. Statements were generated regarding current evidence and clinical practice.Severe obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) doubles the risk for incident stroke, especially in young to middle-aged patients. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) may reduce stroke risk, especially in treatment-compliant patients. The prevalence of OSA is high in stroke patients and can be assessed by polygraphy. Severe OSA is a risk factor for recurrence of stroke and may be associated with stroke mortality, while CPAP may improve stroke outcome. It is not clear if insomnia increases stroke risk, while pharmacotherapy of insomnia may increase it. Periodic limb movements in sleep (PLMS), but not restless limb syndrome (RLS), may be associated with an increased risk of stroke. Preliminary data suggest a high frequency of post-stroke insomnia and RLS and their association with a less favourable stroke outcome, while treatment data are scarce.Overall, the evidence base is best for OSA relationship with stroke and supports active diagnosis and therapy. Research gaps remain especially regarding insomnia and RLS/PLMS relationships with stroke., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: C.L.A. Bassetti has nothing to disclose related to this work. Conflict of interest: W. Randerath reports grants and personal fees for lectures from Weinmann, Philips Respironics, Resmed, Inspire, Heinen and Löwenstein and Genzyme, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L. Vignatelli has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Ferini-Strambi reports personal fees for advisory board work from UCB-Pharma, Italfarmaco, Resmed, Pfizer and Vitalaire Italia, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A-K. Brill has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.R. Bonsignore has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Grote reports grants and personal fees for lectures from Resmed and Itamar, personal fees for lectures from Philips, during the conduct of the study; personal fees for lectures from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work; in addition, L. Grote has a patent for pharmacological treatment of sleep apnoea licensed to Desitin. Conflict of interest: P. Jennum has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Leys reports compensation paid to hospital research funds and Adrinord for trials, advisory boards and symposia, from BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Bayer, outside the submitted work; and is vice editor of the European Stroke Journal. Conflict of interest: J. Minnerup has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Nobili has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Tonia acts as ERS methodologist. Conflict of interest: R. Morgan has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Kerry has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Riha has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: W.T. McNicholas has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Papavasileiou has nothing to disclose., (The article has been co‐published with permission in the European Respiratory Journal and the European Journal of Neurology. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. Either citation can be used when citing this article. Copyright ©European Academy of Neurology and European Respiratory Society 2020.)