Search

Objective . Sleep apnea is a common sleep breathing disorder that can significantly decrease sleep quality and have major health consequences. It is diagnosed based on the apnea hypopnea index (AHI). This study explored a novel, generalized algorithm for the automatic diagnosis of sleep apnea employing airflow (AF) and oximetry (SpO 2 ) signals. Approach . Of the 988 polysomnography records, 45 were randomly selected for developing the automatic algorithm and the remainder 943 for validating purposes. The algorithm detects apnea events by a per-sample encoding process applied to the peak excursion of AF signal. Hypopnea events were detected from the per-sample encoding of AF and SpO 2 with an adjustment to time lag in SpO 2 . Total recording time was automatically processed and optimized for computation of total sleep time (TST). Total number of detected events and computed TST were used to estimate AHI. The estimated AHI was validated against the scored data from the Sleep Heart Health Study. Main results . Intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.94 was obtained between estimated and scored AHIs. The diagnostic accuracies were 93.5%, 92.4%, and 96.6% for AHI cut-off values of ≥5, ≥15, and ≥30 respectively. The overall accuracy for the combined severity categories (normal, mild, moderate, and severe) and kappa were 83.4% and 0.77 respectively. Significance . This new automatic technique was found to be superior to the other existing methods and can be applied to any portable sleep devices especially for home sleep apnea tests., (© 2022 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.)

Objective: Sleep apnea significantly decreases the quality of life. The apnea hypopnea index (AHI) is the main indicator for sleep apnea diagnosis. This study explored a novel automatic algorithm to diagnose sleep apnea from nasal airflow (AF) and pulse oximetry (SpO 2 ) signals., Approach: Of the 988 polysomnography (PSG) records from the sleep heart health study (SHHS), 45 were randomly selected for the development of an algorithm and the remainder for validation (n = 943). The algorithm detects apnea events by a digitization process, following the determination of the peak excursion (peak-to-trough amplitude) from AF envelope. Hypopnea events were determined from the AF envelope and oxygen desaturation with correction to time lag in SpO 2 . Total sleep time (TST) was estimated from an optimized percentage of artefact-free total recording time. AHI was estimated from the number of detected events divided by the estimated TST. The estimated AHI was compared to the scored SHHS data for performance evaluation., Main Results: The validation showed good agreement between the estimated and scored AHI (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95 and mean ±95% limits of agreement of -1.6 ±12.5 events h -1 ). The diagnostic accuracies were found: 90.7%, 91%, and 96.7% for AHI cut-off ≥5, ≥15, and ≥30 respectively., Significance: The new algorithm is accurate over other existing methods for the automatic diagnosis of sleep apnea. It is applicable to any portable sleep screeners especially for the home diagnosis of sleep apnea.

Objective: Sleep apnea (SA), a common sleep disorder, can significantly decrease the quality of life, and is closely associated with major health risks such as cardiovascular disease, sudden death, depression, and hypertension. The normal diagnostic process of SA using polysomnography is costly and time consuming. In addition, the accuracy of different classification methods to detect SA varies with the use of different physiological signals. If an effective, reliable, and accurate classification method is developed, then the diagnosis of SA and its associated treatment will be time-efficient and economical. This study aims to systematically review the literature and present an overview of classification methods to detect SA using respiratory and oximetry signals and address the automated detection approach., Approach: Sixty-two included studies revealed the application of single and multiple signals (respiratory and oximetry) for the diagnosis of SA., Main Results: Both airflow and oxygen saturation signals alone were effective in detecting SA in the case of binary decision-making, whereas multiple signals were good for multi-class detection. In addition, some machine learning methods were superior to the other classification methods for SA detection using respiratory and oximetry signals., Significance: To deal with the respiratory and oximetry signals, a good choice of classification method as well as the consideration of associated factors would result in high accuracy in the detection of SA. An accurate classification method should provide a high detection rate with an automated (independent of human action) analysis of respiratory and oximetry signals. Future high-quality automated studies using large samples of data from multiple patient groups or record batches are recommended.