1. Impact of continuous positive airway pressure on cognitive functions in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Durtette A, Dargent B, Gierski F, Barbe C, Deslée G, Perotin JM, Henry A, and Launois C
- Subjects
- Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Neuropsychological Tests statistics & numerical data, Adult, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure methods, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive therapy, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive psychology, Cognition physiology
- Abstract
Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with the impairment of a range of cognitive functions. Whether treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improves these cognitive functions is still a matter of debate., Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included OSA patients (apnea hypopnea index, AHI >10/h), naive to CPAP treatment, with a cognitive assessment before and after CPAP initiation. We compared CPAP versus sham-CPAP or placebo tablet or dietary rules or no treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42021275214)., Results: Eleven RCTs encompassing 923 OSA patients were included. For most of them, CPAP initiation was ≤3 months. A significant post-treatment improvement was found for the Trail Making Test part B (TMT-B; SMD = -0.93, 95 % CI = [-1.60, -0.25], Z = -2.70, p = 0.007), but not for the other neuropsychological assessments. No global effects on other cognitive domains (information processing speed, executive functions, working memory) were found., Conclusion: The significant improvement in the TMT-B supports a short-term enhancement in cognitive flexibility with CPAP treatment. Further studies that take into account OSA comorbidities, cognitive profiles, a more diverse range of cognition assessments and include long-term evaluations are needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF