1. Quantitative validation of the suprasternal pressure signal to assess respiratory effort during sleep.
- Author
-
Cerina L, Papini GB, Fonseca P, Overeem S, van Dijk JP, van Meulen F, and Vullings R
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Adult, Plethysmography, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Respiration, Sternum physiology, Middle Aged, Polysomnography, Young Adult, Pressure, Sleep physiology
- Abstract
Objective. Intra-esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement is the recommended gold standard to quantify respiratory effort during sleep, but used to limited extent in clinical practice due to multiple practical drawbacks. Respiratory inductance plethysmography belts (RIP) in conjunction with oronasal airflow are the accepted substitute in polysomnographic systems (PSG) thanks to a better usability, although they are partial views on tidal volume and flow rather than true respiratory effort and are often used without calibration. In their place, the pressure variations measured non-invasively at the suprasternal notch (SSP) may provide a better measure of effort. However, this type of sensor has been validated only for respiratory events in the context of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA). We aim to provide an extensive verification of the suprasternal pressure signal against RIP belts and Pes, covering both normal breathing and respiratory events. Approach. We simultaneously acquired suprasternal (207) and esophageal pressure (20) signals along with RIP belts during a clinical PSG of 207 participants. In each signal, we detected breaths with a custom algorithm, and evaluated the SSP in terms of detection quality, breathing rate estimation, and similarity of breathing patterns against RIP and Pes. Additionally, we examined how the SSP signal may diverge from RIP and Pes in presence of respiratory events scored by a sleep technician. Main results. The SSP signal proved to be a reliable substitute for both esophageal pressure (Pes) and respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) in terms of breath detection, with sensitivity and positive predictive value exceeding 75%, and low error in breathing rate estimation. The SSP was also consistent with Pes (correlation of 0.72, similarity 80.8%) in patterns of increasing pressure amplitude that are common in OSA. Significance. This work provides a quantitative analysis of suprasternal pressure sensors for respiratory effort measurements., (Creative Commons Attribution license.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF