Search

Introduction: Small nerve fiber dysfunction is an early feature of diabetic neuropathy. There is a strong clinical need for a non-invasive method to assess small nerve fiber function. Small nerve fibers mediate axon reflex-related vasodilation and play an important role in thermoregulation. Assessing the reflex vasodilation after local heating might elucidate some aspects of small fiber functioning. In this study, we determined the reproducibility of the reflex vasodilation after short local heating in healthy subjects, assessed with thermal imaging and laser Doppler imaging., Methods: Healthy subjects underwent six heating rounds in one session (protocol I, N=10) or spread over two visits (protocol II, N=20). Reflex vasodilation was elicited by heating the skin to 42°C with an infrared lamp. Skin temperature and skin blood flow were recorded during heating and recovery with a thermal imaging camera and a laser Doppler imager. Skin temperature curves were fitted with a mathematical model to describe the heating and recovery phase with time constant tau (tauHeat and tauCool1)., Results: The reproducibility of tau within a session was moderate to excellent (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.42-0.86) and good (0.71-0.72) between different sessions. Within one session the differences in tauHeat were small (bias±SD -1.3±18.9s); the bias between two visits was -1.2±12.2s. For tauCool1 the differences were also small, 1.4±6.6s within a session and between visits -1.4±11.6s., Conclusions: The heat induced axon reflex-related vasodilation, assessed with thermal imaging and laser Doppler imaging, was reproducible both within a session and between different sessions. Tau describes the temporal profile in one parameter and represents the effects of all changes including blood flow and as such, is an indicator of the vasodilator function. TauHeat and tauCool1 can accurately describe the dynamics of the axon reflex-related vasodilator response in the heating and recovery phase respectively., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: Skin temperature changes due to vasomotor disturbances are important features of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Because this phenomenon has only been studied under controlled conditions, information on daily circadian variability is lacking. Also, studies in chronic CRPS patients with abnormal posturing, in which coldness of the affected extremity is more common, do not exist. We examined the response to external heating as well as circadian temperature changes over several days in the affected legs of 14 chronic CRPS patients with abnormal posturing and 17 controls. Skin temperatures were recorded hourly for 14 days using wireless sensors. Although the patients' affected extremities were significantly colder before external heating, the vasodilatory response was similar in the 2 groups. Additionally, median skin temperature differences between both legs and their variability was larger in patients than in controls during the day, but not during the night. These findings indicate that the mechanisms underlying impaired skin circulation in CRPS during daytime are reversible under certain circumstances. The large variation in skin temperature differences during the day questions the validity of using a single measurement in the diagnosis of CRPS, and our results indicate that only temperature differences >1.0 °C should be considered to reflect vasomotor disturbances., Perspective: This article shows that chronic CRPS patients have a normal vasodilatory response to external heating and that skin temperature differences between the affected and unaffected lower limbs, which were highly variable during daytime, disappeared during sleep. This indicates that part of the vasomotor regulation in these patients is still functional., (Copyright © 2015 American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Pain is usually assessed by the interpretation of behavior, which can be subjective. Therefore, there is an ongoing search for more objective methods. Performance of skin conductance measurement as a pain assessment tool is variable, as some studies report low specificity and a low predictive value of the method. The aim of this pilot study was to test whether autoregulation of the skin temperature influences the skin conductance of pain-free infants., Results: Skin conductance was highly correlated with skin temperature in all subjects. Moreover, a significant change in all other vital parameters was observed on comparing before- and after-peak data., Discussion: These results indicate that sympathetic neural activity to maintain homeostasis (such as autoregulation of skin temperature) results in skin conductance peaks. Real-time evaluation of the sympathetic nervous system would be valuable for pain assessment. However, the technique should be better defined to increase both sensitivity and specificity for the measurement of pain before use in daily practice can be advocated., Methods: We included 11 infants, median (interquartile range (IQR)) age of 34 (13-76) d, who were admitted to the surgical high-care unit for monitoring after surgery. None was treated with opioids or sedatives, and observational pain scores were low.

Objective: In this study, we assessed the validity of skin surface temperature recordings, based on various calculation methods applied to the thermographic data, to diagnose acute complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS1) fracture patients., Methods: Thermographic recordings of the palmar/plantar side and dorsal side of both hands or feet were made on CRPS1 patients and in control fracture patients with/without and without complaints similar to CRPS1 (total in the three subgroups = 120) just after removal of plaster. Various calculation methods applied to the thermographic data were compared using receiver operating characteristics analysis to obtain indicators of diagnostic value., Results: There were no significant differences in demographic data and characteristics among the three subgroups. The most pronounced differences among the subgroups were vasomotor signs in the CRPS1 patients. The involved side in CRPS1 patients was often warmer compared with the noninvolved extremity. The difference in temperature between the involved site and the noninvolved extremity in CRPS1 patients significantly differed from the difference in temperature between the contralateral extremities of the two control groups. The largest temperature difference between extremities was found in CRPS1 patients. The difference in temperature recordings comparing the palmar/plantar and dorsal recording was not significant in any group. The sensitivity and specificity varied considerably between the various calculation methods used to calculate temperature difference between extremities. The highest level of sensitivity was 71% and the highest specificity was 64%; the highest positive predictive value reached a value of 35% and the highest negative predictive 84%, with a moderate 0.60 > or = area under the curve < or = 0.65., Conclusion: The validity of skin surface temperature recordings under resting conditions to discriminate between acute CRPS1 fracture patients and control fracture patients with/without complaints is limited, and only useful as a supplementary diagnostic tool.

Background: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1 (CRPS1) is a clinical diagnosis based on criteria describing symptoms of the disease. The main aim of the present study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of calculation methods used to assess thermographic images (infrared imaging) obtained during temperature provocation. The secondary objective was to obtain information about the involvement of the sympathetic system in CRPS1., Methods: We studied 12 patients in whom CRPS1 was diagnosed according to the criteria of Bruehl. High and low whole body cooling and warming induced and reduced sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity. The degree of vasoconstrictor activity in both hands was monitored using a videothermograph. The sensitivity and specificity of the calculation methods used to assess the thermographic images were calculated., Results: The temperature difference between the hands in the CRPS patients increases significantly when the sympathetic system is provoked. At both the maximum and minimum vasoconstriction no significant differences were found in fingertip temperatures between both hands., Conclusion: The majority of CRPS1 patients do not show maximal obtainable temperature differences between the involved and contralateral extremity at room temperature (static measurement). During cold and warm temperature challenges this temperature difference increases significantly. As a result a higher sensitivity and specificity could be achieved in the diagnosis of CRPS1. These findings suggest that the sympathetic efferent system is involved in CRPS1.