1. Spatial transcriptomic analysis of amelanotic acral melanoma versus pigmented acral melanoma reveals distinct molecular determinants.
- Author
-
Choi ME, Choi EJ, Lee JH, Won CH, Chang SE, Lee MW, and Lee WJ
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Transcriptome, S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit genetics, S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit metabolism, Adult, Protein Interaction Maps genetics, Melanoma genetics, Melanoma pathology, Melanoma immunology, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Skin Neoplasms genetics, Skin Neoplasms pathology, Skin Neoplasms immunology, Melanoma, Amelanotic genetics, Melanoma, Amelanotic pathology, Melanoma, Amelanotic metabolism, Gene Expression Profiling
- Abstract
Background: Amelanotic acral melanoma (AAM) is a rare type of acral melanoma that has a poor prognosis., Objectives: To investigate the transcriptomic differences between AAM and pigmented acral melanoma (PAM)., Methods: Differences in the spatially resolved transcriptomic profiles of 9 patients with AAM with 29 regions of interest (ROIs) and 11 patients with PAM with 46 ROIs were investigated using S100b and CD3 morphology markers., Results: In S100b+ tumour cell areas, we detected 11 upregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs; including chaperone/ubiquitin--associated DEGs) and 82 downregulated DEGs (including human leucocyte antigen) in AAMs vs. PAMs. Protein-protein interaction network and pathway analyses revealed significant enrichment of dysregulated translational and nonsense-mediated decay pathways but significant decreases in antigen processing and presentation, interferon signalling and melanin biosynthesis pathways in S100b+ ROIs of AAMs compared with PAMs. In tumour-associated immune cell areas, the numbers of CD8 T cells (P = 0.04) and M1 macrophages (P = 0.01) were significantly decreased, whereas those of monocytes (P = 0.04) and endothelial cells (P = 0.04) were increased in AAMs compared with PAMs., Conclusions: These findings could widen our understanding of the biological differences between AAMs and PAMs, which might result in a different clinical course., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF