1. Adherence to melanoma screening and surveillance skin check schedules tailored to personal risk.
- Author
-
Perera MM, Smit AK, Smith AL, Gallo B, Tan I, Espinoza D, Laginha BI, Guitera P, Martin LK, and Cust AE
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Aged, Adult, Australia epidemiology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Assessment methods, Appointments and Schedules, Melanoma diagnosis, Melanoma prevention & control, Skin Neoplasms diagnosis, Skin Neoplasms prevention & control, Early Detection of Cancer methods, Early Detection of Cancer psychology, Patient Compliance statistics & numerical data, Patient Compliance psychology
- Abstract
Population-wide skin cancer screening is not currently recommended in most countries. Instead, most clinical guidelines incorporate risk-based recommendations for skin checks, despite limited evidence around implementation and adherence to recommendations in practice. We aimed to determine adherence to personal risk-tailored melanoma skin check schedules and explore reasons influencing adherence. Patients (with/without a previous melanoma) attending tertiary dermatology clinics at the Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, Australia, were invited to complete a melanoma risk assessment questionnaire via iPad and provided with personal risk information alongside a risk-tailored skin check schedule. Data were collected from the risk tool, clinician-recorded data on schedule deviations, and appointment booking system. Post-consultation, we conducted semi-structured interviews with patients and clinic staff. We used a convergent segregated mixed methods approach for analysis. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and data were analysed thematically. Participant data were analysed from clinic records (n = 247) and interviews (n = 29 patients, 11 staff). Overall, there was 62% adherence to risk-tailored skin check schedules. In cases of non-adherence, skin checks tended to occur more frequently than recommended. Decisions to deviate were similarly influenced by patients (44%) and clinicians (56%). Themes driving non-adherence among patients included anxiety and wanting autonomy around decision-making, and among clinicians included concerns around specific lesions and risk estimate accuracy. There was moderate adherence to a clinical service program of personal risk-tailored skin check recommendations. Further adherence may be gained by incorporating strategies to identify and assist patients with high levels of anxiety and supporting clinicians to communicate risk-based recommendations with patients., (© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Cancer published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of UICC.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF