Search

The dermal oncogenic potential of ethylenediamine (EDA) was assessed by applying 25 microliter of a 1% solution in deionized water to the skin of 50 male C3H/HeJ mice. This was the highest concentration not producing irritation or weight changes in a preliminary 2-week study. Two EDA samples (Nos. 1 and 2) from different production sources were tested. Applications were made thrice weekly until the death of the animals. A negative control group received deionized water only. This group and the EDA-treated groups were individually housed. A fourth group of 40 mice, housed 5 per cage, received 0.1% 3-methylcholanthrene (MC) in acetone as a positive control substance. A fifth group of 40 mice, housed 5 per cage, also received deionized water to determine the effect of group housing on survival. No skin tumors were observed in the EDA-treated groups. In the positive control group, however, 39 animals (98%) had skin tumors including 37 (92%) with confirmed squamous cell carcinomas. Eleven mice (22%) which received EDA No. 1 had dermal fibrosis indicative of probable skin irritation in this group; there was no such lesion in the controls. The mean survival times were 639, 626, and 598 days for the EDA No. 1, water control, and EDA No. 2 groups, respectively. The survival time of the EDA No. 2 group was significantly reduced compared to the individually housed water controls by one of two statistical tests. Irrespective of this difference, the study is considered to be a valid assessment of the oncogenic potential of EDA No. 2 because the magnitude of the difference in mean survival time was small.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The dermal oncogenic potential of beta-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)ethyltrimethoxysilane (EEMS), gamma-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GPMS), beta-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)ethyltriethoxysilane (EEES), and gamma-glycidoxypropyltriethoxysilane (GPES) was assessed by applying 25-microliters aliquots of acetone solutions to the skin of 40 male C3H/HeJ mice. The concentrations applied were 100, 25, 10, and 10% by volume for EEMS, GPMS, EEES, and GPES, respectively. Applications were made thrice weekly until the death of the animals. A negative control group received acetone (solvent) only. No treatment-related skin tumors were observed, nor was there evidence of increased incidence of any internal tumor in the groups that received GPMS, EEES, or GPES. In the group treated with EEMS, four mice were observed with squamous cell carcinomas of the treated skin and two mice had subcutaneous sarcomas outside of the treated area. No skin tumors were observed in the group treated with acetone, but two mice had subcutaneous sarcomas outside of the treated area. The mean survival times were 529, 482, 545, 492, and 502 days for the EEMS, GPMS, EEES, GPES, and acetone control groups, respectively. In no case was the mortality rate significantly different from that of the controls. The results indicate that only EEMS was oncogenic under the conditions of these studies.

Male C3H/HeJ mice (40 per group) were treated with 25-microliter applications of undiluted ethyl acrylate, 1% acrylic acid, or 1% butyl acrylate on the dorsal skin 3 times weekly for their lifetime. A negative control group received acetone (diluent) only, and a positive control group received 0.1% 3-methylcholanthrene (MC). No epidermal tumors were observed in the animals that received any of the three test substances. In the positive control group, 39 animals had skin tumors, including 33 with confirmed squamous-cell carcinomas. Nonneoplastic skin changes such as dermatitis, dermal fibrosis, epidermal necrosis, and hyperkeratosis were observed in several mice that received ethyl acrylate. No statistically significant effects on survival were seen. Therefore, there was no evidence for local carcinogenic activity of acrylic acid, ethyl acrylate, or butyl acrylate under the conditions of these studies.

In general, the carcinogenic potential of petroleum-derived materials is related to the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) content. Thus it has been assumed that liquids which boil below the PAH distillation range (i.e., below approx. 370 degrees C (700 degrees F) would not be carcinogenic. Several early studies supported this conclusion but were of relatively short duration. Several recent and more rigorous studies have shown that repeated application of certain petroleum-derived materials boiling between approximately 177-370 degrees C (350-700 degrees F) (i.e., middle distillate fuels) can produce tumors in mouse skin. The current studies assessed the tumorigenic potential of a series of middle distillates which varied with respect to boiling range, composition, and source of blending stocks. All of the samples produced evidence of weak tumorigenic activity which was characterized by low tumor yields and long median latencies. However, the majority of the tumor yields were significantly different from the control. There were no apparent differences in response among the samples. Thus the various parameters examined did not substantially influence tumor outcome. In particular, there was no association of tumorigenic activity with aromatic carbon content; this finding, coupled with evidence that PAH levels were low, suggested that the tumorigenic responses were not PAH-dependent. In addition to the tumors, there was evidence of non-neoplastic dermal changes including hyperplasia. These may have contributed to the tumorigenic responses; however, the actual mechanism of tumor induction is unknown.

The carcinogenic potential of Athabasca tar sands and six experimental liquids derived from crude bitumen was evaluated utilizing the mouse epidermal carcinogenesis model. Tar sands, bitumen, and untreated naphtha produced few, if any, tumors. Three thermally and catalytically cracked liquids, light (nominal boiling range: 149-316 degrees C) and heavy (nominal boiling range: greater than 316 degrees C) gas oils and gas oil blend (boiling range: greater than 316 degrees C), produced a significant number of epidermal neoplasms. A synthetic crude oil, prepared by blending naphtha and light and heavy gas oils, was moderately carcinogenic; however, the activity of this sample fell within the range of values obtained in studies of crude petroleum samples. Since the bitumen-derived streams do not differ substantially in carcinogenic potency from petroleum-derived materials of comparable boiling range and process history, industrial hygiene practices which limit exposures to levels comparable to those observed in the petroleum-refining industry should provide similar measures of protection.

Male C3H/HeJ mice were thrice weekly given 25 microliter applications of 0.25, 0.05, or 0.01% (w/w) benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) in acetone, or acetone alone, to clipped dorsal skin from 12 to 14 weeks of age for the remainder of their life spans. There were two groups of 40 mice for each treatment regimen, one group being housed in conventional stainless-steel wire mesh cages and the other in polycarbonate cages with wood shavings held in an enclosed ventilated cabinet. Under both housing conditions, tumor incidence was directly related and latency inversely related to BaP concentration. The time-adjusted incidence of epidermal neoplasms was significantly greater for the groups housed in polycarbonate cages. Mortality rates were directly related to BaP concentration and were significantly enhanced by the polycarbonate-cage housing conditions for the high and intermediate concentrations. Survival patterns for the two acetone control groups were similar. These findings indicate that differences in housing conditions can influence both the incidence and the latency of local neoplasms produced in response to the chronic application of a carcinogen in dermal oncogenesis bioassays.

The dermal oncogenic potential of diethylenetriamine, high purity and commercial grades (DETA-HP and DE-TA-C), triethylenetetramine (TETA), tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA), and polyamine HPA No. 2 was assessed by applying 25-microliter aliquots of aqueous solutions to the skin of groups of 50 male C3H/HeJ mice. The concentrations applied were 5.0, 5.0, 5.0, 25.0, and 10.0% by volume for DETA-HP, DETA-C, TETA, TEPA, and HPA No. 2, respectively. Applications were made thrice weekly until the death of the animals. A negative control group received deionized water (solvent) only. All animals were individually housed. No treatment-related skin tumors were observed, nor was there evidence of increased incidence of any internal tumor. Twenty TEPA-treated mice had hyperkeratosis and 13 had necrosis of the epidermis, both indicative of skin irritation. Such lesions were absent or occurred very infrequently in the other groups of mice. The mean survival times were 587, 662, 627, 591, 601, and 626 days for the DETA-HP, DETA-C, TETA, TEPA, HPA No. 2, and water control groups, respectively. In no case was the mortality rate significantly different from that of the controls. The results indicate that none of these compounds was oncogenic under the conditions of these studies.

Several important components of photocurable coatings were studied for dermal tumorigenic activity by repeated application to the skin of mice. The substances tested were 2-ethylhexyl acrylate (EHA) and methylcarbamoyloxyethyl acrylate (MCEA) (monomers); neopentyl glycol diacrylate (NPGDA), esterdiol-204-diacrylate (EDDA), and pentaerythritol tri(tetra)acrylate (PETA) (cross-linkers); and three acrylated urethane oligomers. For each bioassay, 40 C3H/HeJ male mice were dosed 3 times weekly on the dorsal skin for their lifetime with the highest dose of the test agent that caused no local irritation or reduction in body weight gain. Two negative control groups received acetone (diluent) only. A positive control group received 0.2% methylcholanthrene (MC). NPGDA and EHA had significant tumorigenic activity with tumor yields of eight and six tumor-bearing mice (three and two malignancies), respectively. The MC group had 34 mice with carcinomas and 1 additional mouse with a papilloma. MCEA had no dermal tumorigenic activity but resulted in early mortality. No skin tumors in the treatment area were observed in the other groups. Additional studies will be necessary to elucidate possible relationships between structure and tumorigenic activity for the acrylates.

Groups of 40 male C3H/HeJ mice were treated 3 times per week for their lifetime on the skin of the back with undiluted di-sec-butoxyacetophenone (DBAP), or with diethoxyacetophenone (DEAP), undiluted and as a 50% dilution in acetone. Approximate doses per application were 22.4 mg for DBAP, and 25.0 or 11.3 mg for DEAP. Two negative control groups received acetone only. Both DBAP and DEAP (undiluted) had weak tumorigenic activity. In the DBAP group, one mouse developed a squamous-cell papilloma, whereas one mouse in the high-dose DEAP group had a squamous-cell carcinoma, both tumors appearing in the treatment area. No skin tumors were observed in the other groups. Both DEAP-treated groups also had substantial incidences of hyperkeratosis, epidermal hyperplasia, and dermatitis. No significant reduction in survival was observed in the test groups. The occurrence of the skin tumors in the DBAP- and DEAP-treated groups is considered to be treatment-related and suggestive of oncogenic potential, because of the extremely low historical control incidence of skin tumors in similar studies.