Search

Background: Although the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (AJCC8) provides improved prognosis stratification of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) over AJCC7, T3 has a variable prognosis., Objective: To define prognostic subgroups in T3-AJCC8 CSCC., Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 196 primary T3-AJCC8 CSCCs. We conducted multidimensional scaling analysis using the 6 risk factors that define T3 CSCCs. The prognoses of the groups obtained were analyzed by means of competing risk analysis., Results: Group 1 was characterized by a tumor thickness greater than 6 mm (without invasion beyond the subcutaneous fat), alone or in combination with a tumor width of at least 4 cm. Group 2 was characterized by the presence of either invasion beyond the subcutaneous fat or by the involvement of nerves (≥0.1 mm, or deeper than the dermis). Group 3 was characterized by the combination of both T3b risk factors, or of 3 or more risk factors. Group 3 (tentatively named T3c) patients had the worst prognosis for disease-specific poor outcome events and major events, Group 2 (T3b) had intermediate risk, and Group 1 (T3a) had the best prognosis (disease-specific poor outcome events: hazard ratio [HR], 1.94; P = .00009; major events: HR, 2.55; P = .00001; disease-specific death: HR, 10.25; P = .0009)., Limitations: Retrospective study., Conclusions: There is statistically significant evidence that T3-AJCC8 may be classified into distinct prognostic subgroups., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Advances in virology and skin cancer over recent decades have produced achievements that have been recognized not only in the field of dermatology, but also in other areas of medicine. They have modified the therapeutic and preventive solutions that can be offered to some patients and represent a significant step forward in our knowledge of the biology of skin cancer. In this paper, we review the viral agents responsible for different types of skin cancer, especially for solid skin tumors. We focus on human papillomavirus and squamous cell cancers, Merkel cell polyomavirus and Merkel cell carcinoma, and human herpesvirus 8 and Kaposi's sarcoma.

Introduction: The Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Tübingen cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) stratification systems propose different criteria from the American Joint Committee on Cancer, eighth edition. Our group identified prognostic subgroups within T3 stage according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition's classification, the most common classification for high-risk cutaneous SCCs., Objective: To compare the performance and prognostic accuracy of these staging systems in a subset of high-risk cutaneous SCCs., Methods: Homogeneity, monotonicity, and McNemar tests for pairwise comparisons were assessed. Distinctiveness and relative risk of poor outcome were calculated by stage. Prognostic accuracy was compared with respect to quality (Akaike and Bayesian information criteria), concordance (Harrell C-index and Gönen and Heller concordance probability estimate), and predictive accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and global accuracy)., Results: The Brigham and Women's Hospital and Salamanca systems were more distinctive, homogeneous, and monotonic than the Tübingen system. The Tübingen system was the most specific, whereas the Salamanca and Brigham and Women's Hospital systems were more sensitive. Negative predictive value was high in all 3 systems, but positive predictive value and accuracy were low overall., Conclusions: Alternative staging systems may partially overcome the heterogeneity and low prognostic accuracy of the American Joint Committee on Cancer, eighth edition and enable high-risk cutaneous SCCs to be stratified more reliably, but their prognostic accuracy is still low. Considering the accumulation of risk factors may improve high-risk cutaneous SCC risk stratification., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the second most frequent cancer in humans and its incidence continues to rise. Although CSCC usually display a benign clinical behavior, it can be both locally invasive and metastatic. The signaling pathways involved in CSCC development have given rise to targetable molecules in recent decades. In addition, the high mutational burden and increased risk of CSCC in patients under immunosuppression were part of the rationale for developing the immunotherapy for CSCC that has changed the therapeutic landscape. This review focuses on the molecular basis of CSCC and the current biology-based approaches of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Another purpose of this review is to explore the landscape of drugs that may induce or contribute to the development of CSCC. Beginning with the pathogenetic basis of these drug-induced CSCCs, we move on to consider potential therapeutic opportunities for overcoming this adverse effect.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is the second most frequent cancer in humans and it can be locally invasive and metastatic to distant sites. MicroRNAs (miRNAs or miRs) are endogenous, small, non-coding RNAs of 19-25 nucleotides in length, that are involved in regulating gene expression at a post-transcriptional level. MicroRNAs have been implicated in diverse biological functions and diseases. In cancer, miRNAs can proceed either as oncogenic miRNAs (onco-miRs) or as tumor suppressor miRNAs (oncosuppressor-miRs), depending on the pathway in which they are involved. Dysregulation of miRNA expression has been shown in most of the tumors evaluated. MiRNA dysregulation is known to be involved in the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). In this review, we focus on the recent evidence about the role of miRNAs in the development of CSCC and in the prognosis of this form of skin cancer.