Search

Escherichia coli chemotaxis relies on control of the autophosphorylation activity of the histidine kinase CheA by transmembrane chemoreceptors. Core signaling units contain two receptor trimers of dimers, one CheA homodimer, and two monomeric CheW proteins that couple CheA activity to receptor control. Core signaling units appear to operate as two-state devices, with distinct kinase-on and kinase-off CheA output states whose structural nature is poorly understood. A recent all-atom molecular dynamic simulation of a receptor core unit revealed two alternative conformations, “dipped” and “undipped,” for the ATP-binding CheA.P4 domain that could be related to kinase activity states. To explore possible signaling roles for the dipped CheA.P4 conformation, we created CheA mutants with amino acid replacements at residues (R265, E368, and D372) implicated in promoting the dipped conformation and examined their signaling consequences with in vivo Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based kinase assays. We used cysteine-directed in vivo cross-linking reporters for the dipped and undipped conformations to assess mutant proteins for these distinct CheA.P4 domain configurations. Phenotypic suppression analyses revealed functional interactions among the conformation-controlling residues. We found that structural interactions between R265, located at the N terminus of the CheA.P3 dimerization domain, and E368/D372 in the CheA.P4 domain played a critical role in stabilizing the dipped conformation and in producing kinase-on output. Charge reversal replacements at any of these residues abrogated the dipped cross-linking signal, CheA kinase activity, and chemotactic ability. We conclude that the dipped conformation of the CheA.P4 domain is critical to the kinase-active state in core signaling units. IMPORTANCE Regulation of CheA kinase in chemoreceptor arrays is critical for Escherichia coli chemotaxis. However, to date, little is known about the CheA conformations that lead to the kinase-on or kinase-off states. Here, we explore the signaling roles of a distinct conformation of the ATP-binding CheA.P4 domain identified by all-atom molecular dynamics simulation. Amino acid replacements at residues predicted to stabilize the so-called “dipped” CheA.P4 conformation abolished the kinase activity of CheA and its ability to support chemotaxis. Our findings indicate that the dipped conformation of the CheA.P4 domain is critical for reaching the kinase-active state in chemoreceptor signaling arrays.

Significance Motile bacteria use chemoreceptor signaling arrays to track chemical gradients with high precision. The Escherichia coli chemotaxis system offers an ideal model for probing the molecular mechanisms of transmembrane and intracellular signaling. In this study, we characterized the signaling properties of mutant E. coli receptors that had amino acid replacements in residues that form a salt-bridge connection between the cytoplasmic tips of receptor molecules. The mutant signaling defects suggested that the chemoreceptor tip operates as a two-state device with discrete active and inactive conformations and that the level of output activity modulates connections between receptor signaling units that produce highly cooperative responses to attractant stimuli. These findings shed important light on the nature and control of receptor signaling states., Motile Escherichia coli cells use chemoreceptor signaling arrays to track chemical gradients with exquisite precision. Highly conserved residues in the cytoplasmic hairpin tip of chemoreceptor molecules promote assembly of trimer-based signaling complexes and modulate the activity of their CheA kinase partners. To explore hairpin tip output states in the serine receptor Tsr, we characterized the signaling consequences of amino acid replacements at the salt-bridge residue pair E385-R388. All mutant receptors assembled trimers and signaling complexes, but most failed to support serine chemotaxis in soft agar assays. Small side-chain replacements at either residue produced OFF- or ON-shifted outputs that responded to serine stimuli in wild-type fashion, suggesting that these receptors, like the wild-type, operate as two-state signaling devices. Larger aliphatic or aromatic side chains caused slow or partial kinase control responses that proved dependent on the connections between core signaling units that promote array cooperativity. In a mutant lacking one of two key adapter-kinase contacts (interface 2), those mutant receptors exhibited more wild-type behaviors. Lastly, mutant receptors with charged amino acid replacements assembled signaling complexes that were locked in kinase-ON (E385K|R) or kinase-OFF (R388D|E) output. The hairpin tips of mutant receptors with these more aberrant signaling properties probably have nonnative structures or dynamic behaviors. Our results suggest that chemoeffector stimuli and adaptational modifications influence the cooperative connections between core signaling units. This array remodeling process may involve activity-dependent changes in the relative strengths of interface 1 and 2 interactions between the CheW and CheA.P5 components of receptor core signaling complexes.

The Escherichia coli Tsr protein contains a periplasmic serine-binding domain that transmits ligand occupancy information to a cytoplasmic kinase-control domain to regulate the cell's flagellar motors. The Tsr input and output domains communicate through sequential conformational changes transmitted through a transmembrane helix (TM2), a five-residue control cable helix at the membrane-cytoplasm interface, and a four-helix HAMP bundle. Changes in serine occupancy are known to promote TM2 piston displacements in one subunit of the Tsr homodimer. We explored how such piston motions might be relayed through the control cable to reach the input AS1 helix of HAMP by constructing and characterizing mutant receptors that had one-residue insertions or deletions in the TM2-control cable segment of Tsr. TM2 deletions caused kinase-off output shifts; TM2 insertions caused kinase-on shifts. In contrast, control cable deletions caused kinase-on output, whereas insertions at the TM2-control cable junction caused kinase-off output. These findings rule out direct mechanical transmission of TM2 conformational changes to HAMP. Instead, we suggest that the Tsr control cable transmits input signals to HAMP by modulating the intensity of structural clashes between out-of-register TM2 and AS1 helices. Inward displacement of TM2 might alter the sidechain environment of control cable residues at the membrane core-headgroup interface, causing a break in the control cable helix to attenuate the register mismatch and enhance HAMP packing stability, leading to a kinase-off output response. This helix-clutch model offers a new perspective on the mechanism of transmembrane signaling in chemoreceptors.

Environmental awareness is an essential attribute for all organisms. The chemotaxis system of Escherichia coli provides a powerful experimental model for the investigation of stimulus detection and signaling mechanisms at the molecular level. These bacteria sense chemical gradients with transmembrane proteins [methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs)] that have an extracellular ligand-binding domain and intracellular histidine kinases, adenylate cyclases, methyl-accepting proteins, and phosphatases (HAMP) and signaling domains that govern locomotor behavior. HAMP domains are versatile input-output elements that operate in a variety of bacterial signaling proteins, including the sensor kinases of two-component regulatory systems. The MCP HAMP domain receives stimulus information and in turn modulates output signaling activity. This study describes mutants of the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor, Tsr, that identify a heptad-repeat structural motif (LLF) at the membrane-proximal end of the receptor signaling domain that is critical for HAMP output control. The homodimeric Tsr signaling domain is an extended, antiparallel, four-helix bundle that controls the activity of an associated kinase. The N terminus of each subunit adjoins the HAMP domain; the LLF residues lie at the C terminus of the methylation-helix bundle. We found, by using in vivo Forster resonance energy transfer kinase assays, that most amino acid replacements at any of the LLF residues abrogate chemotactic responses to serine and lock Tsr output in a kinase-active state, impervious to HAMP-mediated down-regulation. We present evidence that the LLF residues may function like a leucine zipper to promote stable association of the C-terminal signaling helices, thereby creating a metastable helix-packing platform for the N-terminal signaling helices that facilitates conformational control by the HAMP domains in MCP-family chemoreceptors.

Bacteria use two-component signal transduction systems to elicit adaptive responses to environmental changes. The simplest of these systems comprises a transmembrane sensor with histidine kinase activity and its cytoplasmic response regulator partner. Stimulus-response studies of two-component signaling systems typically employ expression reporters, such as β-galactosidase, that operate with relatively slow kinetics and low precision. In this chapter, we illustrate a new strategy for directly measuring the signaling activities of two-component sensor kinases in vivo. Our method exploits recent work that defines the recognition determinants for sensor-response regulator signaling transactions, which enabled us to couple histidine kinases to a FRET-based assay that uses signaling components of the E. coli chemotaxis system. We demonstrate the approach with NarX, a nitrate/nitrite sensor kinase, but the method should be applicable to other two-component sensor kinases.

The technique of all-codon mutagenesis can generate mutants that represent all possible amino acid replacements at any particular residue in a protein. It is thus a powerful tool to probe structure-function relationships in proteins of interest. In this chapter, we describe how we used all-codon mutagenesis to obtain mutants of the Escherichia coli serine receptor Tsr with amino acid replacements at residue F373, a functionally important site in this protein. We provide general protocols for mutagenesis of a target codon in a plasmid-borne gene and for the selection and screening of the resultant mutants. These techniques should be adaptable for the study of a variety of bacterial proteins.

Bacteria use two-component signal transduction systems to elicit adaptive responses to environmental changes. The simplest of these systems comprises a transmembrane sensor with histidine kinase activity and its cytoplasmic response regulator partner. Stimulus-response studies of two-component signaling systems typically employ expression reporters, such as β-galactosidase, that operate with relatively slow kinetics and low precision. In this chapter, we illustrate a new strategy for directly measuring the signaling activities of two-component sensor kinases in vivo. Our method exploits recent work that defines the recognition determinants for sensor-response regulator signaling transactions, which enabled us to couple histidine kinases to a FRET-based assay that uses signaling components of the E. coli chemotaxis system. We demonstrate the approach with NarX, a nitrate/nitrite sensor kinase, but the method should be applicable to other two-component sensor kinases.

In Escherichia coli chemosensory arrays, transmembrane receptors, a histidine autokinase CheA, and a scaffolding protein CheW interact to form an extended hexagonal lattice of signaling complexes. One interaction, previously assigned a crucial signaling role, occurs between chemoreceptors and the CheW-binding P5 domain of CheA. Structural studies showed a receptor helix fitting into a hydrophobic cleft at the boundary between P5 subdomains. Our work aimed to elucidate the in vivo roles of the receptor-P5 interface, employing as a model the interaction between E. coli CheA and Tsr, the serine chemoreceptor. Crosslinking assays confirmed P5 and Tsr contacts in vivo and their strict dependence on CheW. Moreover, the P5 domain only mediated CheA recruitment to polar receptor clusters if CheW was also present. Amino acid replacements at CheA.P5 cleft residues reduced CheA kinase activity, lowered serine response cooperativity, and partially impaired chemotaxis. Pseudoreversion studies identified suppressors of P5 cleft defects at other P5 groove residues or at surface-exposed residues in P5 subdomain 1, which interacts with CheW in signaling complexes. Our results indicate that a high-affinity P5-receptor binding interaction is not essential for core complex function. Rather, P5 groove residues are probably required for proper cleft structure and/or dynamic behavior, which likely impact conformational communication between P5 subdomains and the strong binding interaction with CheW that is necessary for kinase activation. We propose a model for signal transmission in chemotaxis signaling complexes in which the CheW-receptor interface plays the key role in conveying signaling-related conformational changes from receptors to the CheA kinase.

The transmembrane Tsr protein of Escherichia coli mediates chemotactic responses to environmental serine gradients. Serine binds to the periplasmic domain of the homodimeric Tsr molecule, promoting a small inward displacement of one transmembrane helix (TM2). TM2 piston displacements, in turn, modulate the structural stability of the Tsr-HAMP domain on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane to control the autophosphorylation activity of the signaling CheA kinase bound to the membrane-distal cytoplasmic tip of Tsr. A five-residue control cable segment connects TM2 to the AS1 helix of HAMP and transmits stimulus and sensory adaptation signals between them. To explore the possible role of control cable helicity in transmembrane signaling by Tsr, we characterized the signaling properties of mutant receptors with various control cable alterations. An all-alanine control cable shifted Tsr output toward the kinase-on state, whereas an all-glycine control cable prevented Tsr from reaching either a fully on or fully off output state. Restoration of the native isoleucine (I214) in these synthetic control cables largely alleviated their signaling defects. Single amino acid replacements at Tsr-I214 shifted output toward the kinase-off (L, N, H, and R) or kinase-on (A and G) states, whereas other control cable residues tolerated most amino acid replacements with little change in signaling behavior. These findings indicate that changes in control cable helicity might mediate transitions between the kinase-on and kinase-off states during transmembrane signaling by chemoreceptors. Moreover, the Tsr-I214 side chain plays a key role, possibly through interaction with the membrane interfacial environment, in triggering signaling changes in response to TM2 piston displacements. IMPORTANCE The Tsr protein of E. coli mediates chemotactic responses to environmental serine gradients. Stimulus signals from the Tsr periplasmic sensing domain reach its cytoplasmic kinase control domain through piston displacements of a membrane-spanning helix and an adjoining five-residue control cable segment. We characterized the signaling properties of Tsr variants to elucidate the transmembrane signaling role of the control cable, an element present in many microbial sensory proteins. Both the kinase-on and kinase-off output states of Tsr depended on control cable helicity, but only one residue, I214, was critical for triggering responses to attractant inputs. These findings suggest that signal transmission in Tsr involves modulation of control cable helicity through interaction of the I214 side chain with the cytoplasmic membrane.

Motile Escherichia coli cells track gradients of attractant and repellent chemicals in their environment with transmembrane chemoreceptor proteins. These receptors operate in cooperative arrays to produce large changes in the activity of a signaling kinase, CheA, in response to small changes in chemoeffector concentration. Recent research has provided a much deeper understanding of the structure and function of core receptor signaling complexes and the architecture of higher-order receptor arrays, which, in turn, has led to new insights into the molecular signaling mechanisms of chemoreceptor networks. Current evidence supports a new view of receptor signaling in which stimulus information travels within receptor molecules through shifts in the dynamic properties of adjoining structural elements rather than through a few discrete conformational states.

A sensory adaptation system that tunes chemoreceptor sensitivity enables motile Escherichia coli cells to track chemical gradients with high sensitivity over a wide dynamic range. Sensory adaptation involves feedback control of covalent receptor modifications by two enzymes: CheR, a methyltransferase, and CheB, a methylesterase. This study describes a CheR function that opposes the signaling consequences of its catalytic activity. In the presence of CheR, a variety of mutant serine chemoreceptors displayed up to 40-fold enhanced detection sensitivity to chemoeffector stimuli. This response enhancement effect did not require the known catalytic activity of CheR, but did involve a binding interaction between CheR and receptor molecules. Response enhancement was maximal at low CheR:receptor stoichiometry and quantitative analyses argued against a reversible binding interaction that simply shifts the ON-OFF equilibrium of receptor signaling complexes. Rather, a short-lived CheR binding interaction appears to promote a long-lasting change in receptor molecules, either a covalent modification or conformation that enhances their response to attractant ligands.

Motile bacteria use large receptor arrays to detect and follow chemical gradients in their environment. Extended receptor arrays, composed of networked signaling complexes, promote cooperative stimulus control of their associated signaling kinases. Here, we used structural lesions at the communication interface between core complexes to create an Escherichia coli strain with functional but dispersed signaling complexes. This strain allowed us to directly study how networking of signaling complexes affects chemotactic signaling and gradient-tracking performance. We demonstrate that networking of receptor complexes provides bacterial cells with about 10-fold-heightened detection sensitivity to attractants while maintaining a wide dynamic range over which receptor adaptational modifications can tune response sensitivity. These advantages proved especially critical for chemotaxis toward an attractant source under conditions in which bacteria are unable to alter the attractant gradient., IMPORTANCE Chemoreceptor arrays are found in many motile bacteria. However, although our understanding of bacterial chemotaxis is quite detailed, the signaling and behavioral advantages of networked receptor arrays had not been directly studied in cells. We have recently shown that lesions in a key interface of the E. coli receptor array diminish physical connections and functional coupling between core signaling complexes while maintaining their basic signaling capacity. In this study, we exploited an interface 2 mutant to show, for the first time, that coupling between core complexes substantially enhances stimulus detection and chemotaxis performance.

Residues E402 and R404 of the Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor, Tsr, appear to form a salt bridge that spans the interfaces between neighboring dimers in the Tsr trimer of dimers, a key structural component of receptor core signaling complexes. To assess their functional roles, we constructed full sets of single amino acid replacement mutants at E402 and R404 and characterized their signaling behaviors with a suite of in vivo assays. Our results indicate that the E402 and R404 residues of Tsr play their most critical signaling roles at their inner locations near the trimer axis where they likely participate in stabilizing the trimer-of-dimer packing and the kinase-ON state of core signaling complexes. Mutant receptors with a variety of side-chain replacements still accessed both the ON and OFF signaling states, suggesting that core signaling complexes produce kinase activity over a range of receptor conformations and dynamic motions. Similarly, the kinase-OFF state may not be a discrete conformation but rather a range of structures outside the range of those suitable for kinase activation. Consistent with this idea, some structural lesions at both E402 and R404 produced signaling behaviors that are not compatible with discrete two-state models of core complex signaling states. Those lesions might stabilize intermediate receptor conformations along the OFF-ON energy landscape. Amino acid replacements produced different constellations of signaling defects at each residue, indicating that they play distinct structure-function roles. R404, but not E402, was critical for high signal cooperativity in the receptor array.

HAMP domains mediate input-output transactions in many bacterial signalling proteins. To clarify the mechanistic logic of HAMP signalling, we constructed Tsr-HAMP deletion derivatives and characterized their steady-state signal outputs and sensory adaptation properties with flagellar rotation and receptor methylation assays. Tsr molecules lacking the entire HAMP domain or just the HAMP-AS2 helix generated clockwise output signals, confirming that kinase activation is the default output state of the chemoreceptor signalling domain and that attractant stimuli shift HAMP to an overriding kinase-off signalling state to elicit counter-clockwise flagellar responses. Receptors with deletions of the AS1 helices, which free the AS2 helices from bundle-packing constraints, exhibited kinase-off signalling behaviour that depended on three C-terminal hydrophobic residues of AS2. We conclude that AS2/AS2' packing interactions alone can play an important role in controlling output kinase activity. Neither kinase-on nor kinase-off HAMP deletion outputs responded to sensory adaptation control, implying that out-of-range conformations or bundle-packing stabilities of their methylation helices prevent substrate recognition by the adaptation enzymes. These observations support the previously proposed biphasic, dynamic-bundle mechanism of HAMP signalling and additionally show that the structural interplay of helix-packing interactions between HAMP and the adjoining methylation helices is critical for sensory adaptation control of receptor output.

Chemoreceptors such as Tsr, the serine receptor, function in trimer-of-dimer associations to mediate chemotactic behavior in Escherichia coli. The two subunits of each receptor homodimer occupy different positions in the trimer, one at its central axis and the other at the trimer periphery. Residue N381 of Tsr contributes to trimer stability through interactions with its counterparts in a central cavity surrounded by hydrophobic residues at the trimer axis. To assess the functional role of N381, we created and characterized a full set of amino acid replacements at this Tsr residue. We found that every amino acid replacement at N381 destroyed Tsr function, and all but one (N381G) of the mutant receptors also blocked signaling by Tar, the aspartate chemoreceptor. Tar jamming reflects the formation of signaling-defective mixed trimers of dimers, and in vivo assays with a trifunctional cross-linking reagent demonstrated trimer-based interactions between Tar and Tsr-N381 mutants. Mutant Tsr molecules with a charged amino acid or proline replacement exhibited the most severe trimer formation defects. These trimer-defective receptors, as well as most of the trimer-competent mutant receptors, were unable to form ternary signaling complexes with the CheA kinase and with CheW, which couples CheA to receptor control. Some of the trimer-competent mutant receptors, particularly those with a hydrophobic amino acid replacement, may not bind CheW/CheA because they form conformationally frozen or distorted trimers. These findings indicate that trimer dynamics probably are important for ternary complex assembly and that N381 may not be a direct binding determinant for CheW/CheA at the trimer periphery.

During chemotactic signalling by Escherichia coli, the small cytoplasmic CheW protein couples the histidine kinase CheA to chemoreceptor control. Although essential for assembly and operation of receptor signalling complexes, CheW in stoichiometric excess disrupts chemotactic behaviour. To explore the mechanism of the CheW excess effect, we measured the physiological consequences of high cellular levels of wild-type CheW and of several CheW variants with reduced or enhanced binding affinities for receptor molecules. We found that high levels of CheW interfered with trimer assembly, prevented CheA activation, blocked cluster formation, disrupted chemotactic ability and elevated receptor methylation levels. The severity of these effects paralleled the receptor-binding affinities of the CheW variants. Because trimer formation may be an obligate step in the assembly of ternary signalling complexes and higher-order receptor arrays, we suggest that all CheW excess effects stem from disruption of trimer assembly. We propose that the CheW-binding sites in receptor dimers overlap their trimer contact sites and that high levels of CheW saturate the receptor-binding sites, preventing trimer assembly. The CheW-trapped receptor dimers seem to be improved substrates for methyltransferase reactions, but cannot activate CheA or assemble into clusters, processes that are essential for chemotactic signalling.

Bacterial chemoreceptors form ternary signaling complexes with the histidine kinase CheA through the coupling protein CheW. Receptor complexes in turn cluster into cellular arrays that produce highly sensitive responses to chemical stimuli. In Escherichia coli , receptors of different types form mixed trimer-of-dimers signaling teams through the tips of their highly conserved cytoplasmic domains. To explore the possibility that the hairpin loop at the tip of the trimer contact region might promote interactions with CheA or CheW, we constructed and characterized mutant receptors with amino acid replacements at the two nearly invariant hairpin charged residues of Tsr: R388, the most tip-proximal trimer contact residue, and E391, the apex residue of the hairpin turn. Mutant receptors were subjected to in vivo tests for the assembly and function of trimers, ternary complexes, and clusters. All R388 replacements impaired or destroyed Tsr function, apparently through changes in trimer stability or geometry. Large-residue replacements locked R388 mutant ternary complexes in the kinase-off (F, H) or kinase-on (W, Y) signaling state, suggesting that R388 contributes to signaling-related conformational changes in the trimer. In contrast, most E391 mutants retained function and all formed ternary signaling complexes efficiently. Hydrophobic replacements of any size (G, A, P, V, I, L, F, W) caused a novel phenotype in which the mutant receptors produced rapid switching between kinase-on and -off states, indicating that hairpin tip flexibility plays an important role in signal state transitions. These findings demonstrate that the receptor determinants for CheA and CheW binding probably lie outside the hairpin tip of the receptor signaling domain.

Chemoreceptors are crucial components in the bacterial sensory systems that mediate chemotaxis. Chemotactic responses exhibit exquisite sensitivity, extensive dynamic range and precise adaptation. The mechanisms that mediate these high-performance functions involve not only actions of individual proteins but also interactions among clusters of components, localized in extensive patches of thousands of molecules. Recently, these patches have been imaged in native cells, important features of chemoreceptor structure and on–off switching have been identified, and new insights have been gained into the structural basis and functional consequences of higher order interactions among sensory components. These new data suggest multiple levels of molecular interactions, each of which contribute specific functional features and together create a sophisticated signaling device.

Bacterial chemoreceptors of the methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP) family operate in commingled clusters that enable cells to detect and track environmental chemical gradients with high sensitivity and precision. MCP homodimers of different detection specificities form mixed trimers of dimers that facilitate inter-receptor communication in core signaling complexes, which in turn assemble into a large signaling network. The two subunits of each homodimeric receptor molecule occupy different locations in the core complexes. One subunit participates in trimer-stabilizing interactions at the trimer axis, the other lies on the periphery of the trimer, where it can interact with two cytoplasmic proteins: CheA, a signaling autokinase, and CheW, which couples CheA activity to receptor control. As a possible tool for independently manipulating receptor subunits in these two structural environments, we constructed and characterized fused genes for the E. coli serine chemoreceptor Tsr that encoded single-chain receptor molecules in which the C-terminus of the first Tsr subunit was covalently connected to the N-terminus of the second with a polypeptide linker. We showed with soft agar assays and with a FRET-based in vivo CheA kinase assay that single-chain Tsr~Tsr molecules could promote serine sensing and chemotaxis responses. The length of the connection between the joined subunits was critical. Linkers nine residues or shorter locked the receptor in a kinase-on state, most likely by distorting the native structure of the receptor HAMP domain. Linkers 22 or more residues in length permitted near-normal Tsr function. Few single-chain molecules were found as monomer-sized proteolytic fragments in cells, indicating that covalently joined receptor subunits were responsible for mediating the signaling responses we observed. However, cysteine-directed crosslinking, spoiling by dominant-negative Tsr subunits, and rearrangement of ligand-binding site lesions revealed subunit swapping interactions that will need to be taken into account in experimental applications of single-chain chemoreceptors.

The C-terminal P5 domain of the histidine kinase CheA is essential for coupling CheA autophosphorylation activity to chemoreceptor control through a binding interaction with the CheW protein. To locate P5 determinants critical for CheW binding and chemoreceptor control, we surveyed cysteine replacements at 39 residues predicted to be at or near the P5 surface in Escherichia coli CheA. Two-thirds of the Cys replacement proteins exhibited in vitro defects in CheW binding, either before or after modification with a bulky fluorescein group. The binding-defective sites were widely distributed on the P5 surface and were often interspersed with sites that caused no functional defects, implying that relatively minor structural perturbations, often far from the actual binding site, can influence its conformation or accessibility. The most likely CheW docking area included loop 2 in P5 folding subdomain 1. All but four of the binding-defective P5-Cys proteins were defective in receptor-mediated activation, suggesting that CheW binding, as measured in vitro, is necessary for assembly of ternary signaling complexes and/or subsequent CheA activation. Other Cys sites specifically affected receptor-mediated activation or deactivation of CheA, demonstrating that CheW binding is not sufficient for assembly and/or operation of receptor signaling complexes. Because P5 is quite similar to CheW, whose structure is known to be dynamic, we suggest that conformational flexibility and dynamic motions govern the signaling activities of the P5 domain. In addition, relative movements of the CheA domains may be involved in CheW binding, in ternary complex assembly, and in subsequent stimulus-induced conformational changes in receptor signaling complexes.

Aer, a low-abundance signal transducer in Escherichia coli , mediates robust aerotactic behavior, possibly through interactions with methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCP). We obtained evidence for interactions between Aer and the high-abundance aspartate (Tar) and serine (Tsr) receptors. Aer molecules bearing a cysteine reporter diagnostic for trimer-of-dimer formation yielded cross-linking products upon treatment with a trifunctional maleimide reagent. Aer also formed mixed cross-linking products with a similarly marked Tar reporter. An Aer trimer contact mutation known to abolish trimer formation by MCPs eliminated Aer trimer and mixed trimer formation. Trimer contact alterations known to cause epistatic behavior in MCPs also produced epistatic properties in Aer. Amino acid replacements in the Tar trimer contact region suppressed an epistatic Aer signaling defect, consistent with compensatory conformational changes between directly interacting proteins. In cells lacking MCPs, Aer function required high-level expression, comparable to the aggregate number of receptors in a wild-type cell. Aer proteins with clockwise (CW)-biased signal output cannot function under these conditions but do so in the presence of MCPs, presumably through formation of mixed signaling teams. The Tar signaling domain was sufficient for functional rescue. Moreover, CW-biased lesions did not impair aerotactic signaling in a hybrid Aer-Tar transducer capable of adjusting its steady-state signal output via methylation-dependent sensory adaptation. Thus, MCPs most likely assist mutant Aer proteins to signal productively by forming collaborative signaling teams. Aer evidently evolved to operate collaboratively with high-abundance receptors but can also function without MCP assistance, provided that it can establish a suitable prestimulus swimming pattern.

During chemotactic signaling by Escherichia coli, autophosphorylation of the histidine kinase CheA is coupled to chemoreceptor control by the CheW protein, which interacts with the C-terminal P5 domain of CheA. To identify P5 determinants important for CheW binding and receptor coupling control, we isolated and characterized a series of P5 missense mutants. The mutants fell into four phenotypic groups on the basis of in vivo behavioral and protein stability tests and in vitro assays with purified mutant proteins. Group 1 mutants exhibited autophosphorylation and receptor-coupling defects, and their CheA proteins were subject to relatively rapid degradation in vivo. Group 1 mutations were located at hydrophobic residues in P5 subdomain 2 and most likely caused folding defects. Group 2 mutants made stable CheA proteins with normal autophosphorylation ability but with defects in CheW binding and in receptor-mediated activation of CheA autophosphorylation. Their mutations affected residues in P5 subdomain 1 near the interface with the CheA dimerization (P3) and ATP-binding (P4) domains. Mutant proteins of group 3 were normal in all tests yet could not support chemotaxis, suggesting that P5 has one or more important but still unknown signaling functions. Group 4 mutant proteins were specifically defective in receptor-mediated deactivation control. The group 4 mutations were located in P5 subdomain 1 at the P3/P3 interface. We conclude that P5 subdomain 1 is important for CheW binding and for receptor coupling control and that these processes may require substantial motions of the P5 domain relative to the neighboring P3 and P4 domains of CheA. The histidine kinase CheA plays a central signaling role in bacterial chemotaxis pathways (see references 48 and 49 for recent reviews). In Escherichia coli, CheA forms signaling complexes with five membrane-associated chemoreceptors, known as methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), that communicate with the flagellar motors by controlling CheA activity. CheA autophosphorylates at a histidine residue, using ATP as the phosphodonor, and subsequently donates those phosphoryl groups to two response regulators, CheY and CheB. Phosphorylated CheY (phospho-CheY) interacts with the switching machinery at the base of the flagellar motors to promote clockwise (CW) rotation, which causes random turning episodes or tumbles during swimming. Phospho-CheB functions in a feedback adaptation circuit that enables the cells to detect temporal changes in attractant and repellent concentrations as they move through spatial chemical gradients. Chemoeffectors, sensed by the chemoreceptors, modulate CheA activity over a wide range. Unliganded receptors activate CheA several hundredfold over its basal, receptor-uncoupled autophosphorylation rate, whereas attractant-bound receptors deactivate CheA to about its basal activity level (8, 9, 26, 33, 45). CheA autophosphorylation control occurs in ternary complexes formed between the cytoplasmic signaling domains of the chemoreceptors, CheA, and the coupling protein CheW, which is essential for chemotactic behavior in vivo and for receptor-mediated activation of CheA in vitro. The role of CheW in receptor coupling control of CheA is poorly understood, owing to a paucity of structural information about the

Motile bacteria seek optimal living habitats by following gradients of attractant and repellent chemicals in their environment. The signaling machinery for these chemotactic behaviors, although assembled from just a few protein components, has extraordinary information-processing capabilities. Escherichia coli, the best-studied model, employs a networked cluster of transmembrane receptors to detect minute chemical stimuli, to integrate multiple and conflicting inputs, and to generate an amplified output signal that controls the cell's flagellar motors. Signal gain arises through cooperative action of chemoreceptors of different types. The signaling-teams within a receptor cluster may be built from trimers of receptor dimers that communicate through shared connections to their partner signaling proteins.

Aer is a membrane-associated protein that mediates aerotactic responses in Escherichia coli . Its C-terminal half closely resembles the signaling domains of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), which undergo reversible methylation at specific glutamic acid residues to adapt their signaling outputs to homogeneous chemical environments. MCP-mediated behaviors are dependent on two specific enzymes, CheR (methyltransferase) and CheB (methylesterase). The Aer signaling domain contains unorthodox methylation sites that do not conform to the consensus motif for CheR or CheB substrates, suggesting that Aer, unlike conventional MCPs, might be a methylation-independent transducer. Several lines of evidence supported this possibility. (i) The Aer protein was not detectably modified by either CheR or CheB. (ii) Amino acid replacements at the putative Aer methylation sites generally had no deleterious effect on Aer function. (iii) Aer promoted aerotactic migrations on semisolid media in strains that lacked all four of the E. coli MCPs. CheR and CheB function had no influence on the rate of aerotactic movements in those strains. Thus, Aer senses and signals efficiently in the absence of deamidation or methylation, methylation changes, methylation enzymes, and methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins. We also found that chimeric transducers containing the PAS-HAMP sensing domain of Aer joined to the signaling domain and methylation sites of Tar, an orthodox MCP, exhibited both methylation-dependent and methylation-independent aerotactic behavior. The hybrid Aear transducers demonstrate that methylation independence does not emanate from the Aer signaling domain but rather may be due to transience of the cellular redox changes that are thought to trigger Aer-mediated behavioral responses.

Chemical signals sensed on the periplasmic side of bacterial cells by transmembrane chemoreceptors are transmitted to the flagellar motors via the histidine kinase CheA, which controls the phosphorylation level of the effector protein CheY. Chemoreceptor arrays comprise remarkably stable supramolecular structures in which thousands of chemoreceptors are networked through interactions between their cytoplasmic tips, CheA, and the small coupling protein CheW. To explore the conformational changes that occur within this protein assembly during signalling, we used in vivo crosslinking methods to detect close interactions between the coupling protein CheW and the serine receptor Tsr in intact E. coli cells. We identified two signal-sensitive contacts between CheW and the cytoplasmic tip of Tsr. Our results suggest that ligand binding triggers changes in the receptor that alter its signalling contacts with CheW (and/or CheA).

HAMP domains play key signaling roles in many bacterial receptor proteins. The four-helix HAMP bundle of the homodimeric Escherichia coli serine chemoreceptor (Tsr) interacts with an adjoining four-helix sensory adaptation bundle to regulate the histidine autokinase CheA bound to the cytoplasmic tip of the Tsr molecule. The adaptation helices undergo reversible covalent modifications that tune the stimulus-responsive range of the receptor: unmodified E residues promote kinase-off output, and methylated E residues or Q replacements at modification sites promote kinase-on output. We used mutationally imposed adaptational modification states and cells with various combinations of the sensory adaptation enzymes, CheR and CheB, to characterize the signaling properties of mutant Tsr receptors that had amino acid replacements in packing layer 3 of the HAMP bundle and followed in vivo CheA activity with an assay based on Forster resonance energy transfer. We found that an alanine or a serine replacement at HAMP residue I229 effectively locked Tsr output in a kinase-on state, abrogating chemotactic responses. A second amino acid replacement in the same HAMP packing layer alleviated the I229A and I229S signaling defects. Receptors with the suppressor changes alone mediated chemotaxis in adaptation-proficient cells but exhibited altered sensitivity to serine stimuli. Two of the suppressors (S255E and S255A) shifted Tsr output toward the kinase-off state, but two others (S255G and L256F) shifted output toward a kinase-on state. The alleviation of locked-on defects by on-shifted suppressors implies that Tsr-HAMP has several conformationally distinct kinase-active output states and that HAMP signaling might involve dynamic shifts over a range of bundle conformations.

This chapter discusses some genetic approaches for studying signaling pathways and for elucidating the molecular mechanisms of information processing by modular signaling proteins. Bacteria live in precarious environments. Nutrient and toxin levels, acidity, temperature, osmolarity, humidity, and many other conditions can change rapidly and unexpectedly. Bacterial signaling systems are amenable to detailed genetic and biochemical analyses. In this chapter, some general strategies for using genetic methods to study sensory pathways and signaling proteins are discussed. Many signaling proteins, from both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, contain characteristic "transmitters" and "receivers" domains that promote information transfer within and between proteins. Transmitters and receivers are ideally suited as circuit elements for assembling signaling pathways. The only demonstrated mechanisms of transmitter-receiver communication involve phosphorylation and dephosphorylation reactions. With caution, the logic of epistatic analysis can be extended to more elaborate signaling pathways that have branches, feedback loops, and so on. Genetic approaches can provide considerable insight into the operation of signaling pathways and proteins. Even though actual signaling circuits are unlikely to be as simple as the two-component examples in the chapter, the same basic principles should apply.

The serine chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli contains four canonical methylation sites for sensory adaptation that lie near intersubunit helix interfaces of the Tsr homodimer. An unexplored fifth methylation site, E502, lies at an intrasubunit helix interface closest to the HAMP domain that controls input-output signaling in methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins. We analyzed, with in vivo Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) kinase assays, the serine thresholds and response cooperativities of Tsr receptors with different mutationally imposed modifications at sites 1 to 4 and/or at site 5. Tsr variants carrying E or Q at residue 502, in combination with unmodifiable D and N replacements at adaptation sites 1 to 4, underwent both methylation and demethylation/deamidation, although detection of the latter modifications required elevated intracellular levels of CheB. These Tsr variants could not mediate a chemotactic response to serine spatial gradients, demonstrating that adaptational modifications at E502 alone are not sufficient for Tsr function. Moreover, E502 is not critical for Tsr function, because only two amino acid replacements at this residue abrogated serine chemotaxis: Tsr-E502P had extreme kinase-off output and Tsr-E502I had extreme kinase-on output. These large threshold shifts are probably due to the unique HAMP-proximal location of methylation site 5. However, a methylation-mimicking glutamine at any Tsr modification site raised the serine response threshold, suggesting that all sites influence signaling by the same general mechanism, presumably through changes in packing stability of the methylation helix bundle. These findings are consistent with control of input-output signaling in Tsr through dynamic interplay of the structural stabilities of the HAMP and methylation bundles.

The histidine autokinase CheA functions as the central processing unit in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis signaling machinery. CheA receives autophosphorylation control inputs from chemoreceptors and in turn regulates the flux of signaling phosphates to the CheY and CheB response regulator proteins. Phospho-CheY changes the direction of flagellar rotation; phospho-CheB covalently modifies receptor molecules during sensory adaptation. The CheA phosphorylation site, His-48, lies in the N-terminal P1 domain, which must engage the CheA ATP-binding domain, P4, to initiate an autophosphorylation reaction cycle. The docking determinants for the P1-P4 interaction have not been experimentally identified. We devised mutant screens to isolate P1 domains with impaired autophosphorylation or phosphotransfer activities. One set of P1 mutants identified amino acid replacements at surface-exposed residues distal to His-48. These lesions reduced the rate of P1 transphosphorylation by P4. However, once phosphorylated, the mutant P1 domains transferred phosphate to CheY at the wild-type rate. Thus, these P1 mutants appear to define interaction determinants for P1-P4 docking during the CheA autophosphorylation reaction., This work was supported by research grant GM19559 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. The Protein-DNA Core Facility at the University of Utah receives support from National Cancer Institute grant CA42014 to the Huntsman Cancer Institute.

HAMP domains mediate input-output transactions in many bacterial signalling proteins. To clarify the mechanistic logic of HAMP signalling, we constructed Tsr-HAMP deletion derivatives and characterized their steady-state signal outputs and sensory adaptation properties with flagellar rotation and receptor methylation assays. Tsr molecules lacking the entire HAMP domain or just the HAMP-AS2 helix generated clockwise output signals, confirming that kinase activation is the default output state of the chemoreceptor signalling domain and that attractant stimuli shift HAMP to an overriding kinase-off signalling state to elicit counter-clockwise flagellar responses. Receptors with deletions of the AS1 helices, which free the AS2 helices from bundle-packing constraints, exhibited kinase-off signalling behaviour that depended on three C-terminal hydrophobic residues of AS2. We conclude that AS2/AS2' packing interactions alone can play an important role in controlling output kinase activity. Neither kinase-on nor kinase-off HAMP deletion outputs responded to sensory adaptation control, implying that out-of-range conformations or bundle-packing stabilities of their methylation helices prevent substrate recognition by the adaptation enzymes. These observations support the previously proposed biphasic, dynamic-bundle mechanism of HAMP signalling and additionally show that the structural interplay of helix-packing interactions between HAMP and the adjoining methylation helices is critical for sensory adaptation control of receptor output.

The histidine protein kinase CheA plays a central role in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway. Autophosphorylated CheA passes its phosphoryl group to CheY very rapidly (k(cat) approximately 750 s(-)(1)). Phospho-CheY in turn influences the direction of flagellar rotation. The autophosphorylation site of CheA (His(48)) resides in its N-terminal P1 domain. The adjacent P2 domain provides a high-affinity binding site for CheY, which might facilitate the phosphotransfer reaction by tethering CheY in close proximity to the phosphodonor located in P1. To explore the contribution of P2 to the CheA --CheY phosphotransfer reaction in the Escherichia coli chemotaxis system, we examined the transfer kinetics of a mutant CheA protein (CheADeltaP2) in which the 98 amino acid P2 domain had been replaced with an 11 amino acid linker. We used rapid-quench and stopped-flow fluorescence experiments to monitor phosphotransfer to CheY from phosphorylated wild-type CheA and from phosphorylated CheADeltaP2. The CheADeltaP2 reaction rates were significantly slower and the K(m) value was markedly higher than the corresponding values for wild-type CheA. These results indicate that binding of CheY to the P2 domain of CheA indeed contributes to the rapid kinetics of phosphotransfer. Although phosphotransfer was slower with CheADeltaP2 (k(cat)/K(m) approximately 1.5 x 10(6) M(-)(1) s(-)(1)) than with wild-type CheA (k(cat)/K(m) approximately 10(8) M(-)(1) s(-)(1)), it was still orders of magnitude faster than the kinetics of CheY phosphorylation by phosphoimidazole and other small molecule phosphodonors (k(cat)/K(m) approximately 5-50 M(-)(1) s(-)(1)). We conclude that the P1 domain of CheA also makes significant contributions to phosphotransfer rates in chemotactic signaling.

Aerotactic responses in Escherichia coli are mediated by the membrane transducer Aer, a recently identified member of the superfamily of PAS domain proteins, which includes sensors of light, oxygen, and redox state. Initial studies of Aer suggested that it might use a flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) prosthetic group to monitor cellular redox changes. To test this idea, we purified lauryl maltoside-solubilized Aer protein by His-tag affinity chromatography and showed by high performance liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, and absorbance spectroscopy that it bound FAD noncovalently. Polypeptide fragments spanning the N-terminal 290 residues of Aer, which contains the PAS motif, were able to bind FAD. Fusion of this portion of Aer to the flagellar signaling domain of Tsr, the serine chemoreceptor, yielded a functional aerotaxis transducer, demonstrating that the FAD-binding portion of Aer is sufficient for aerosensing. Aerotaxis-defective missense mutants identified two regions, in addition to the PAS domain, that play roles in FAD binding. Those regions flank a central hydrophobic segment needed to anchor Aer to the cytoplasmic membrane. They might contact the FAD ligand directly or stabilize the FAD-binding pocket. However, their lack of sequence conservation in Aer homologs of other bacteria suggests that they play less direct roles in FAD binding. One or both regions probably also play important roles in transmitting stimulus-induced conformational changes to the C-terminal flagellar signaling domain to trigger aerotactic behavioral responses.

CheA, a cytoplasmic histidine autokinase, in conjunction with the CheW coupling protein, forms stable ternary complexes with the cytoplasmic signaling domains of transmembrane chemoreceptors. These signaling complexes induce chemotactic movements by stimulating or inhibiting CheA autophosphorylation activity in response to chemoeffector stimuli. To explore the mechanisms of CheA control by chemoreceptor signaling complexes, we examined the ability of various CheA fragments to interfere with receptor coupling control of CheA. CheA[250-654], a fragment carrying the catalytic domain and an adjacent C-terminal segment previously implicated in stimulatory control of CheA activity, interfered with the production of clockwise flagellar rotation and with chemotactic ability in wild-type cells. Epistasis tests indicated that CheA[250-654] blocked clockwise rotation by disrupting stimulatory coupling of CheA to receptors. In vitro coupling assays confirmed that a stoichiometric excess of CheA[250-654] fragments could exclude CheA from stimulatory receptor complexes, most likely by competing for CheW binding. However, CheA[250-654] fragments, even in vast excess, did not block receptor-mediated inhibition of CheA, suggesting that CheA[250-654] lacks an inhibitory contact site present in native CheA. This inhibitory target is most likely in the N-terminal P1 domain, which contains His-48, the site of autophosphorylation. These findings suggest a simple allosteric model of CheA control by ternary signaling complexes in which the receptor signaling domain conformationally regulates the interaction between the substrate and catalytic domains of CheA.

Bacterial chemotaxis is widely studied because of its accessibility and because it incorporates processes that are important in a number of sensory systems: signal transduction, excitation, adaptation, and a change in behavior, all in response to stimuli. Quantitative data on the change in behavior are available for this system, and the major biochemical steps in the signal transduction/processing pathway have been identified. We have incorporated recent biochemical data into a mathematical model that can reproduce many of the major features of the intracellular response, including the change in the level of chemotactic proteins to step and ramp stimuli such as those used in experimental protocols. The interaction of the chemotactic proteins with the motor is not modeled, but we can estimate the degree of cooperativity needed to produce the observed gain under the assumption that the chemotactic proteins interact directly with the motor proteins.

The newly discovered aer locus of Escherichia coli encodes a 506-residue protein with an N terminus that resembles the NifL aerosensor and a C terminus that resembles the flagellar signaling domain of methyl-accepting chemoreceptors. Deletion mutants lacking a functional Aer protein failed to congregate around air bubbles or follow oxygen gradients in soft agar plates. Membranes with overexpressed Aer protein also contained high levels of noncovalently associated flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD). We propose that Aer is a flavoprotein that mediates positive aerotactic responses in E. coli. Aer may use its FAD prosthetic group as a cellular redox sensor to monitor environmental oxygen levels.

Motile bacteria sense their physical and chemical environment through highly cooperative, ordered arrays of chemoreceptors. These signalling complexes phosphorylate a response regulator which in turn governs flagellar motor reversals, driving cells towards favourable environments. The structural changes that translate chemoeffector binding into the appropriate kinase output are not known. Here, we apply high-resolution electron cryotomography to visualize mutant chemoreceptor signalling arrays in well-defined kinase activity states. The arrays were well ordered in all signalling states, with no discernible differences in receptor conformation at 2–3 nm resolution. Differences were observed, however, in a keel-like density that we identify here as CheA kinase domains P1 and P2, the phosphorylation site domain and the binding domain for response regulator target proteins. Mutant receptor arrays with high kinase activities all exhibited small keels and high proteolysis susceptibility, indicative of mobile P1 and P2 domains. In contrast, arrays in kinase-off signalling states exhibited a range of keel sizes. These findings confirm that chemoreceptor arrays do not undergo large structural changes during signalling, and suggest instead that kinase activity is modulated at least in part by changes in the mobility of key domains.

It is worth noting that the reported phosphorelays, as well as the putative phosphorelay candidates mentioned above, govern major developmental commitments, decisions that should not be lightly made. For instance, activation of the Kin-Spo0 pathway of B. subtilis or the AsgA pathway of M. xanthus ultimately results in sporulation. BvgS, as well as several other BvgS family members, is involved in regulation of a wide variety of virulence factors. Likewise, the RcaE-RcaC chromatic adaptation system modulates dramatic changes in the ratio of the two major chromoproteins of the light harvesting system, which accounts for up to 50% of the total cellular protein. Inappropriate activation of any of these pathways would undoubtedly have deleterious effects on the cell, at the very least a grave misuse of cellular resources.The realization that phosphorelays may be more common than previously appreciated, coupled with the identification of multiple architectural configurations, suggests that these circuits have special signaling properties. In contrast to, for example, a MAP kinase phosphorylation cascade, where activation of downstream kinases by phosphorylation increases the flow of phosphoryl groups through the pathway, the relay approach offers no signal amplification beyond the initial autophosphorylation of H1. Perhaps instead the relay establishes a threshold that requires a signal of minimum proportion or duration to be overcome before a response is seen. The most important advantage of the multi-step relay, however, may be that it provides the potential for multiple regulatory checkpoints (5xGrossman, A.D. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1995; 29: 477–508Crossref | PubMedSee all References, 6xSee all References). In systems with unlinked components, transcriptional regulation of relay components provides one mechanism of control, as has been demonstrated in the Kin-Spo0 pathway. In cases such as BvgS or Sln1p, the presence of several relay steps in one protein may increase signaling efficiency and reduce non-specific crosstalk from other pathways. Phosphatases that act on specific relay sites provide another versatile mechanism for regulating signal flow in phosphorelays. Finally, the multiple phosphorylation sites of the phosphorelay could provide junction points for communicating with other signaling pathways, perhaps endowing the cell with sophisticated information-processing capabilities far beyond the simplistic linear sequence of events depicted in Figure 3Figure 3.The elegant characterization of the yeast Sln1 pathway by Posas et al. 1996xPosas, F, Wurgler-Murphy, S.M, Maeda, T, Witten, E.A, Thai, T.C, and Saito, H. Cell. 1996; 86Abstract | Full Text | Full Text PDF | PubMed | Scopus (616)See all ReferencesPosas et al. 1996 is doubly noteworthy. It provides the first demonstration that proteins of the eukaryotic two-component family undergo phosphorylation reactions characteristic of their bacterial counterparts, and at the same time broadens our view of signal transduction mechanisms in bacteria to emphasize the importance of the multi-step phosphorelay as a versatile and sophisticated signaling strategy exploited by prokaryotes and eukaryotes alike.

Summary The serine chemoreceptor Tsr and other methylaccepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) control the swimming behaviour of Escherichia coli by generating signals that influence the direction of flagellar rotation. MCPs produce clockwise (CW) signals by stimulating the autophosphorylation activity of CheA, a cytoplasmic histidine kinase, and counterclockwise signals by inhibiting CheA. CheW couples CheA to chemoreceptor control by promoting formation of MCP/CheW/CheA ternary complexes. To identify MCP structural determinants essential for CheA stimulation, we inserted fragments of the tsr coding region into an inducible expression vector and used a swimming contest called ‘pseudotaxis’ to select for transformant cells carrying CW-signalling plasmids. The shortest active fragment we found, Tsr (350‐470), stimulated CheA in a CheW-dependent manner, as full-length Tsr molecules do. It spans a highly conserved ‘core’ (370‐420) that probably specifies the CheA and CheW contact sites and other determinants needed for stimulatory control of CheA. Tsr (350‐470) also carries portions of the left and right arms flanking the core, which probably play roles in regulating MCP signalling state. However, this Tsr fragmentlacksall of the methylation sitescharacteristic of MCP molecules, indicating that methylation segments are not essential for generating receptor output signals.

The cheA locus ofEscherichia coliencodes two similar proteins, CheAL (654 amino acids) and CheAS (557 amino acids), which are made by initiating translation from different in-frame start sites [start(L) and start(S)]. CheALplays an essential role in chemotactic signaling. It autophosphorylates at a histidine residue (His-48) and then donates this phosphate to response regulator proteins that modulateflagellar rotation and sensory adaptation. CheAS lacks the first 97 amino acids of CheAL, including the phosphorylation site at His-48.Althoughitisunabletoautophosphorylate,CheAScanformheterodimerswithmutantCheALsubunits to restore kinase function and chemoreceptor control of autophosphorylation activity. To determine whether these or other activities of CheAS are important for chemotaxis, we constructed cheA lesions that abrogated CheASexpression.MutantsinwhichtheCheASstartcodonwaschangedfrommethioninetoisoleucine(M98I) or glutamine (M98Q) retained chemotactic ability, ranging from 50% (M98Q) to 80% (M98I) of wild-type function. These partial defects could not be alleviated by supplying CheAS from a specialized transducing phage, indicating that the lesions in CheAL—not the lack of CheAS—were responsible for the reduced chemotactic ability. In other respects, the behavior of the M98I mutant was essentially normal. Its flagellar rotationpatternwasindistinguishablefromwildtype,anditexhibitedwild-typedetectionthresholdsandpeak positions in capillary chemotaxis assays. The lack of any substantive defect in this start(S) mutant argues that CheAS makes a negligible contribution to chemotactic ability in the laboratory. Whether it has functional significance in other settings remains to be seen. The chemotactic behavior of Escherichia coli provides a model system for investigating signal transduction mechanisms atthemolecularlevel(seereference23forarecentreview).As they swim about, these cells use transmembrane chemoreceptors to monitor concentrations of beneficial or harmful chemicals in their environment. Changes in attractant or repellent levels trigger changes inflagellar rotation that promote migration in favorable directions: counterclockwise (CCW) rotation produces forward movement; clockwise (CW) rotation causes abrupt turns or tumbling episodes. The chemoreceptors communicate with the flagellar motors through a series of intracellularproteinphosphorylationreactions,muchlikethesignal transduction pathways of eukaryotes. ThecheAlocus plays a central role in this signaling cascade. It encodes a histidine kinase that autophosphorylates, using ATP as the phosphate donor (8). CheA donates its phosphate groups to two proteins, CheY and CheB, which controlflagellar responses and sensory adaptation, respectively (9). Phospho-CheY interacts with the switching machinery of theflagellar motors to enhance the probability of CW rotation (2, 35). Phospho-CheBcovalentlymodifiesstimulatedchemoreceptors to attenuate their signaling activity as part of a negative-feedback circuit (17). The phosphorylated forms of CheY and CheB are very short-lived, enabling the chemoreceptors to modulatetheirsteady-statelevelsinresponsetochemicalstimulibycontrollingtheautophosphorylationactivityofCheA(3). An increase in attractant level prolongs forward swimming by inhibiting CheA, thereby reducing the level of phospho-CheY. An increase in repellent level enhances the likelihood of a change in swimming direction by stimulating CheA autophosphorylation, which in turn raises phospho-CheY levels. The

The swimming behavior of Escherichia coli at any moment is dictated by the intracellular concentration of the phosphorylated form of the chemotaxis response regulator CheY, which binds to the base of the flagellar motor. CheY is phosphorylated on Asp57 by the sensor kinase CheA and dephosphorylated by CheZ. Previous work (Silversmith et al., J. Biol. Chem. 276:18478, 2001) demonstrated that replacement of CheY Asn59 with arginine resulted in extreme resistance to dephosphorylation by CheZ despite proficient binding to CheZ. Here we present the X-ray crystal structure of CheYN59R in a complex with Mn(2+) and the stable phosphoryl analogue BeF(3)(-). The overall folding and active site architecture are nearly identical to those of the analogous complex containing wild-type CheY. The notable exception is the introduction of a salt bridge between Arg59 (on the beta3alpha3 loop) and Glu89 (on the beta4alpha4 loop). Modeling this structure into the (CheY-BeF(3)(-)-Mg(2+))(2)CheZ(2) structure demonstrated that the conformation of Arg59 should not obstruct entry of the CheZ catalytic residue Gln147 into the active site of CheY, eliminating steric interference as a mechanism for CheZ resistance. However, both CheYE89A and CheYE89Q, like CheYN59R, conferred clockwise flagellar rotation phenotypes in strains which lacked wild-type CheY and displayed considerable (approximately 40-fold) resistance to dephosphorylation by CheZ. CheYE89A and CheYE89Q had autophosphorylation and autodephosphorylation properties similar to those of wild-type CheY and could bind to CheZ with wild-type affinity. Therefore, removal of Glu89 resulted specifically in CheZ resistance, suggesting that CheY Glu89 plays a role in CheZ-mediated dephosphorylation. The CheZ resistance of CheYN59R can thus be largely explained by the formation of the salt bridge between Arg59 and Glu89, which prevents Glu89 from executing its role in catalysis.

During transmembrane signaling by Escherichia coli Tsr, changes in ligand occupancy in the periplasmic serine-binding domain promote asymmetric motions in a four-helix transmembrane bundle. Piston displacements of the signaling TM2 helix in turn modulate the HAMP bundle on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane to control receptor output signals to the flagellar motors. A five-residue control cable joins TM2 to the HAMP AS1 helix and mediates conformational interactions between them. To explore control cable structural features important for signal transmission, we constructed and characterized all possible single amino acid replacements at the Tsr control cable residues. Only a few lesions abolished Tsr function, indicating that the chemical nature and size of the control cable side chains are not individually critical for signal control. Charged replacements at I214 mimicked the signaling consequences of attractant or repellent stimuli, most likely through aberrant structural interactions of the mutant side chains with the membrane interfacial environment. Prolines at residues 214 to 217 also caused signaling defects, suggesting that the control cable has helical character. However, proline did not disrupt function at G213, the first control cable residue, which might serve as a structural transition between the TM2 and AS1 helix registers. Hydrophobic amino acids at S217, the last control cable residue, produced attractant-mimic effects, most likely by contributing to packing interactions within the HAMP bundle. These results suggest a helix extension mechanism of Tsr transmembrane signaling in which TM2 piston motions influence HAMP stability by modulating the helicity of the control cable segment.

HAMP domains mediate input-output signaling in histidine kinases, adenylyl cyclases, methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins, and some phosphatases. HAMP subunits have two 16-residue amphiphilic helices (AS1, AS2) joined by a 14- to 15-residue connector segment. Two alternative HAMP structures in these homodimeric signaling proteins have been described: HAMP(A), a tightly packed, parallel, four-helix bundle; and HAMP(B), a more loosely packed bundle with an altered AS2/AS2′ packing arrangement. Stimulus-induced conformational changes probably modulate HAMP signaling by shifting the relative stabilities of these opposing structural states. Changes in AS2/AS2′ packing, in turn, modulate output signals by altering structural interactions between output helices through heptad repeat stutters that produce packing phase clashes. Output helices that are too tightly or too loosely packed most likely produce kinase-off output states, whereas kinase-on states require an intermediate range of HAMP stabilities and dynamic behaviors. A three-state, dynamic bundle signaling model best accounts for the signaling properties of chemoreceptor mutants and may apply to other transducers as well.

To test the gearbox model of HAMP signalling in the Escherichia coli serine receptor, Tsr, we generated a series of amino acid replacements at each residue of the AS1 and AS2 helices. The residues most critical for Tsr function defined hydrophobic packing faces consistent with a four-helix bundle. Suppression patterns of helix lesions conformed to the predicted packing layers in the bundle. Although the properties and patterns of most AS1 and AS2 lesions were consistent with both proposed gearbox structures, some mutational features specifically indicate the functional importance of an x-da bundle over an alternative a-d bundle. These genetic data suggest that HAMP signalling could simply involve changes in the stability of its x-da bundle. We propose that Tsr HAMP controls output signals by modulating destabilizing phase clashes between the AS2 helices and the adjoining kinase control helices. Our model further proposes that chemoeffectors regulate HAMP bundle stability through a control cable connection between the transmembrane segments and AS1 helices. Attractant stimuli, which cause inward piston displacements in chemoreceptors, should reduce cable tension, thereby stabilizing the HAMP bundle. This study shows how transmembrane signalling and HAMP input-output control could occur without the helix rotations central to the gearbox model.

HAMP domains are 50-residue motifs, found in many bacterial signaling proteins, that consist of two amphiphilic helices joined by a nonhelical connector segment. The HAMP domain of Tsr, the serine chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli, receives transmembrane input signals from the periplasmic serine binding domain and in turn modulates output signals from the Tsr kinase control domain to elicit chemotactic responses. We created random amino acid replacements at each of the 14 connector residues of Tsr-HAMP to identify those that are critical for Tsr function. In all, we surveyed 179 connector missense mutants and identified three critical residues (G235, L237, and I241) at which most replacements destroyed Tsr function and another important residue (G245) at which most replacements impaired Tsr function. The region surrounding G245 tolerated 1-residue deletions and insertions of up to 10 glycines, suggesting a role as a relatively nonspecific, flexible linker. The critical connector residues are consistent with a structural model of the Tsr-HAMP domain based on the solution structure of an isolated thermophile HAMP domain (M. Hulko, F. Berndt, M. Gruber, J. U. Linder, V. Truffault, A. Schultz, J. Martin, J. E. Schultz, A. N. Lupas, and M. Coles, Cell 126:929‐940, 2006) in which G235 defines a critical turn at the C terminus of the first helix and L237 and I241 pack against the helices, perhaps to stabilize alternative HAMP signaling conformations. Most I241 lesions locked Tsr signal output in the kinase-on mode, implying that this residue is responsible mainly for stabilizing the kinase-off signaling state. In contrast, lesions at L237 resulted in a variety of aberrant output patterns, suggesting a role in toggling output between signaling states. Many signaling proteins in bacteria and archaea contain HAMP domains, a 50-residue motif named for its presence in histidine kinases, adenylyl cyclases, chemoreceptors known as methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), and some phosphatases (8, 46). HAMP domains typically reside between the periplasmic sensing and cytoplasmic signaling regions of transmembrane proteins near the inner face of the cytoplasmic membrane and appear to play a central role in transmitting stimulus-induced conformational changes between the input and output domains of such signaling proteins. Their ability to mediate signaling transactions between heterologous input and output domains in chimeric proteins suggests that the mecha

As an important model for transmembrane signaling, methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) have been extensively studied by using genetic, biochemical, and structural techniques. However, details of the molecular mechanism of signaling are still not well understood. The availability of genomic information for hundreds of species enables the identification of features in protein sequences that are conserved over long evolutionary distances and thus are critically important for function. We carried out a large-scale comparative genomic analysis of the MCP signaling and adaptation domain family and identified features that appear to be critical for receptor structure and function. Based on domain length and sequence conservation, we identified seven major MCP classes and three distinct structural regions within the cytoplasmic domain: signaling, methylation, and flexible bundle subdomains. The flexible bundle subdomain, not previously recognized in MCPs, is a conserved element that appears to be important for signal transduction. Remarkably, the N- and C-terminal helical arms of the cytoplasmic domain maintain symmetry in length and register despite dramatic variation, from 24 to 64 7-aa heptads in overall domain length. Loss of symmetry is observed in some MCPs, where it is concomitant with specific changes in the sensory module. Each major MCP class has a distinct pattern of predicted methylation sites that is well supported by experimental data. Our findings indicate that signaling and adaptation functions within the MCP cytoplasmic domain are tightly coupled, and that their coevolution has contributed to the significant diversity in chemotaxis mechanisms among different organisms.

Motile bacteria follow gradients of attractant and repellent chemicals with high sensitivity. Their chemoreceptors are physically clustered, which may enable them to function as a cooperative array. Although native chemoreceptor molecules are typically transmembrane homodimers, they appear to associate through their cytoplasmic tips to form trimers of dimers, which may be an important architectural element in the assembly and operation of receptor clusters. The five receptors of Escherichia coli that mediate most of its chemotactic and aerotactic behaviors have identical trimer contact residues and have been shown by in vivo crosslinking methods to form mixed trimers of dimers. Mutations at the trimer contact sites of Tsr, the serine chemoreceptor, invariably abrogate Tsr function, but some of those lesions (designated Tsr*) are epistatic and block the function of heterologous chemoreceptors. We isolated and characterized mutations (designated Tar ⋀ ) in the aspartate chemoreceptor that restored function to Tsr* receptors. The suppressors arose at or near the Tar trimer contact sites and acted in an allele-specific fashion on Tsr* partners. Alone, many Tar ⋀ receptors were unable to mediate chemotactic responses to aspartate, but all formed clusters with varying efficiencies. Most of those Tar ⋀ receptors were epistatic to WT Tsr, but some regained Tar function in combination with a suppressible Tsr* partner. Tar ⋀ –Tsr* suppression most likely occurs through compensatory changes in the conformation or dynamics of a mixed receptor signaling complex, presumably based on trimer-of-dimer interactions. These collaborative teams may be responsible for the high-gain signaling properties of bacterial chemoreceptors.

CheA is a multidomain histidine kinase for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. CheA autophosphorylates through interaction of its N-terminal phosphorylation site domain (P1) with its central dimerization (P3) and ATP-binding (P4) domains. This activity is modulated through the C-terminal P5 domain, which couples CheA to chemoreceptor control. CheA phosphoryl groups are donated to two response regulators, CheB and CheY, to control swimming behavior. The phosphorylated forms of CheB and CheY turn over rapidly, enabling receptor signaling complexes to elicit fast behavioral responses by regulating the production and transmission of phosphoryl groups from CheA. To promote rapid phosphotransfer reactions, CheA contains a phosphoacceptor-binding domain (P2) that serves to increase CheB and CheY concentrations in the vicinity of the adjacent P1 phosphodonor domain. To determine whether the P2 domain is crucial to CheA's signaling specificity, we constructed CheADeltaP2 deletion mutants and examined their signaling properties in vitro and in vivo. We found that CheADeltaP2 autophosphorylated and responded to receptor control normally but had reduced rates of phosphotransfer to CheB and CheY. This defect lowered the frequency of tumbling episodes during swimming and impaired chemotactic ability. However, expression of additional P1 domains in the CheADeltaP2 mutant raised tumbling frequency, presumably by buffering the irreversible loss of CheADeltaP2-generated phosphoryl groups from CheB and CheY, and greatly improved its chemotactic ability. These findings suggest that P2 is not crucial for CheA signaling specificity and that the principal determinants that favor appropriate phosphoacceptor partners, or exclude inappropriate ones, most likely reside in the P1 domain., This work was supported by research grant GM19559 from the National Institutes of Health. K.J. was supported by a Feodor Lynen postdoctoral fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. A.G. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Education under the auspices of the Fulbright Program. The Protein-DNA Core Facility at the University of Utah receives support from National Cancer Institute grant CA42014 to the Huntsman Cancer Institute.

The team signaling model for bacterial chemoreceptors proposes that receptor dimers of different detection specificities form mixed trimers of dimers. These receptor “squads” then recruit the cytoplasmic signaling proteins CheA and CheW to form ternary signaling teams, which typically cluster at the poles of the cell. We devised cysteine-directed in vivo crosslinking approaches to ask whether mixed receptor squads could form in the absence of CheA and CheW and, if so, whether the underlying structural interactions conformed to trimer-of-dimers geometry. One approach used cysteine reporters at positions in the serine (Tsr) and aspartate (Tar) receptors that should form disulfide-linked Tsr≈Tar products when juxtaposed at the interface of a mixed trimer. Another approach used a cysteine reporter with trigonal geometry near the trimer contact region and a trifunctional maleimide reagent with a spacer length appropriate for capturing the three axial subunits in a trimer of dimers. Both approaches detected mixed receptor-crosslinking products in cells lacking CheA and CheW. Under these conditions, receptor methylation and ligand-binding state had no discernable effect on crosslinking efficiencies. Crosslinking with the trigonal reporter was rapid and did not increase with longer treatment times or higher reagent concentrations, suggesting that this method produces a short-exposure snapshot of the receptor population. The extent of crosslinking indicated that most of the cell's receptor molecules were organized in higher-order groups. Crosslinking in receptor trimer contact mutants correlated with their signaling behaviors, suggesting that trimers of dimers are both structural and functional precursors of chemoreceptor signaling teams in bacteria.