Search

Innovations currently available with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty include shorter stem designs and augmented/inset/inlay glenoid components. Regarding reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), metal augmentation, including custom augments, on both the glenoid and humeral side have expanded indications in cases of bone loss. In the setting of revision arthroplasty, humeral options include convertible stems and newer tools to improve humeral implant removal. New strategies for treatment and surgical techniques have been developed for recalcitrant shoulder instability, acromial fractures, and infections after RSA. Finally, computer planning, navigation, PSI, and augmented reality are imaging options now available that have redefined preoperative planning and indications as well intraoperative component placement. This review covers many of the innovations in the realm of shoulder arthroplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Computer assisted planning without patient specific instrumentation may be utilized to guide reverse total shoulder arthroplasty baseplate placement. The purpose of this study was to determine the difference between planned and achieved inclination and retroversion correction with three-dimensional preoperative computer assisted planning in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty without patient specific instrumentation with bone grafting for severe glenoid erosion. Methods: Preoperative three-dimensional computer assisted planning without patient specific instrumentation was performed on 15 patients undergoing primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with glenoid bone grafting for severe glenoid erosion. On preoperative and immediate postoperative computed tomography slices, two-dimensional retroversion and inclination were measured. Preoperative three-dimensional baseline retroversion and inclination and planned postoperative three-dimensional retroversion and inclination were measured. Planned and achieved version and inclination changes were compared. Results: The planned and achieved retroversion corrections were 18° and 12°, respectively (p < 0.001). The planned and achieved inclination corrections were 11° and 11°, respectively (p = 0.803). Conclusions: Three-dimensional computer assisted planning without patient specific instrumentation in the setting of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid erosion requiring bone grafting can accurately guide baseplate placement. All cases in which failure to correct retroversion or inclination within 10° of planning occurred in patients with severe erosion (B3 or E3 glenoids), therefore patient specific guides may be warranted in these cases to improve accuracy of implantation. Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Restoration of muscular strength is predicated on restoration of muscle length. The purpose of this study was to describe infraspinatus and deltoid length preoperative to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) to guide distalization and lateralization to restore preoperative muscle length. This was a retrospective radiographic study. We measured the infraspinatus length on preoperative computed tomographic images and the deltoid length on preoperative radiographs. For all measurements, reliability was first established by comparing measurements between 2 observers, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. We then calculated descriptive statistics for these muscle lengths and developed a formula to predict these muscle lengths from patient demographics. We measured infraspinatus length in 97 patients and deltoid length in 108 patients. Inter-rater reliability was excellent, with all ICCs >0.886. The mean infraspinatus length was 15.5 cm (standard deviation 1.3) and ranged from 12.6-18.9 cm, whereas the deltoid length was 16.2±1.7 cm and ranged from 12.5-20.2 cm. Both infraspinatus (r = 0.775, P <.001) and deltoid length (r = 0.717, P <.001) were highly correlated with patient height but did not differ between diagnoses. Formulae developed through linear regression allowed prediction of muscle length to within 1 cm in 78% and within 2 cm in 100% for the infraspinatus and 60% and 88% for the deltoid. Deltoid and infraspinatus length are variable but highly correlated with patient height. To maintain tension, 2 mm of lateralization and distalization should be added for every 6 inches (∼15 cm) of height above average for a Grammont-style RTSA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Large glenoid defects present a challenge during primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) especially when humeral head autograft is not available as a bone graft source. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of RTSA with concomitant structural allografting to reconstruct large glenoid defects. From May 2008 to July 2016, 22 patients underwent primary or revision RTSA with structural glenoid allografting. Of 22 patients, 19 (86%) were available for a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (average, 2.8 ± 1.3 years), and 17 of 22 (77%) were available for a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up. Functional outcomes, range of motion, radiographic deformity correction, allograft incorporation, and complication rates were determined. From preoperatively to postoperatively, significant improvements in the average Simple Shoulder Test score (2 ± 2 preoperatively vs. 10 ± 8 postoperatively, P =.002), the average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (31 ± 19 preoperatively vs. 70 ± 25 postoperatively, P <.001), and average active forward elevation (71° ± 41° preoperatively vs. 128° ± 28° postoperatively, P <.001) were noted. Coronal-plane radiographic correction was 29° ± 12° as measured with the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (P <.001) and 14° ± 11° as measured with the β angle (P <.001). Postoperatively, of 17 patients with a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up, 14 (82%) had complete radiographic incorporation of the graft. Acromial fracture nonunions developed in 2 patients and loosening and migration of the baseplate were found in 2 patients, although no patients elected to undergo further surgery. RTSA with allograft reconstruction of severe glenoid defects allows restoration of glenoid anatomy and leads to high rates of bony incorporation with low rates of glenoid loosening or requirement for revision. Structural allograft is an excellent alternative to autograft in revision RTSA to avoid graft-site morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative skin preparation with hydrogen peroxide reduces intraoperative culture positivity for Cutibacterium acnes in shoulder arthroplasty. This was a prospective, controlled, parallel/noncrossover, nonrandomized, single-blinded trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov. We included a consecutive series of patients scheduled to undergo primary anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The first group of patients underwent a standard skin preparation and the second group underwent the same preparation with the addition of hydrogen peroxide. We then took skin, dermis, glenohumeral joint, and air (negative control) aerobic and anaerobic culture swabs. We blinded the laboratory analyzing the samples. An a priori power analysis determined that 56 patients would be needed to see a 50% reduction in culture positivity rates. We also conducted a post hoc gender-stratified analysis. Between January 2017 and October 2018, the authors performed 124 primary shoulder arthroplasties, of which we included 65 and collected samples on 61. There were no demographic differences. There were fewer patients within the peroxide group with triple-positive cultures (skin, dermis, and joint) (0% vs. 19%, P =.024) and positive cultures from the joint (10% vs. 35%, P =.031). In our subgroup analysis, these differences were only significant in males. The vast majority of positive cultures were with C. acnes. Although larger, randomized studies are needed, adding hydrogen peroxide to the preoperative skin preparation may be a low-cost, low-risk method to reduce deep tissue contamination with C. acnes , particularly within males. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It remains unclear whether changes in scapular rotation influence the surgeon's ability to achieve resting radiographic neutral or inferior baseplate tilt at final follow-up. The purposes of this study were (1) to determine whether reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) changes the resting scapular rotation, (2) to determine the association between glenoid inclination with respect to the scapula (β angle) and resting scapular rotation, and (3) to determine the β angle threshold that will most likely lead to resting radiographic neutral or inferior baseplate tilt relative to the thorax. This was a retrospective radiographic study. Patients with adequate-quality standing anteroposterior and Grashey radiographs obtained preoperatively and after primary RTSA at a minimum of 1 year were included. Glenoid inclination (β angle) was measured between the supraspinatus fossa and the glenoid. Resting scapular rotation was measured between the supraspinatus fossa and a vertical line. Baseplate tilt was then calculated as the angle between the glenoid and a vertical line. The study included 74 patients with a mean follow-up period of 3 years (range, 1-9 years). Scapular rotation changed 2° ± 12° (mean ± standard deviation) into upward rotation (P =.048). No association was found between the β angle and scapular rotation. In 71% of patients with a neutral or inferior baseplate tilt, a postoperative β angle greater than 85° was found. Resting radiographic scapular rotation changed 2° into upward rotation with RTSA and was not associated with the β angle. If the β angle is greater than 85°, resting radiographic baseplate tilt will most likely be inferior or neutral. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with variation in direct costs with shoulder arthroplasty. This was a retrospective study of all shoulder arthroplasties performed at a single facility between July 1, 2011, and November 30, 2016. We collected patient factors, indications, procedure (including implant details), implant brand (A, B, and other), and complications. We collected direct costs over a 90-day period using a validated internal tool. We identified patient and procedure characteristics associated with costs using multivariable generalized linear models. A total of 361 patients were included, 19% with revision arthroplasty procedures, 32% with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties, and 66% with reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (RTSAs). Of total costs, 13% were operative facility utilization costs and 58% were operative supply costs. Factors associated with increased total cost included younger age (P =.002) and an indication for surgery of other, that is, not osteoarthritis, a failed arthroplasty, or the sequelae of a rotator cuff tear (P =.030). Factors associated with increased operative costs included younger age (P =.002), use of an RTSA (P <.001), use of a bone graft (P <.001), implant brand B (P =.098), implant brands other than A and B (P =.04), the sequelae of a rotator cuff tear as an indication for surgery (P =.041), or an indication for surgery of other (P =.007). Most short-term (90-day) costs with shoulder arthroplasty are operative costs. Nonmodified factors associated with increased cost included younger age and less common indications for surgery, whereas potentially modifiable factors included the intraoperative use of a bone graft, implant brand, and RTSA use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of humeral articular component positioning on changes in patient-reported outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Methods This was a retrospective series of consecutive patients at 2 high-volume referral centers. The study included patients with (1) a preoperative and postoperative radiograph demonstrating a perfect or nearly perfect profile of the humerus and implant and (2) Simple Shoulder Test, visual analog scale for pain, and American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Standardized Shoulder Assessment scores preoperatively and at greater than 2 years postoperatively. Head height, head diameter, tuberosity-to-head height distance, inclination, and medial offset of the center of rotation (COR) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Distance and direction from the ideal COR to the reconstructed center of rotation was measured. Measurements were correlated with improvement in functional outcomes. Results The study included 95 patients, aged 66 ± 9 years, with a mean follow-up of 4.3 ± 1.7 years. An a priori power analysis suggested that a sample size of 95 patients provided 80% power to detect correlations of R 2  = 0.07. The COR shift was >2 mm in 62% of patients and >4 mm 15%. Thirty-two percent had a change of ASES of <21 points. On multivariate analysis, there were no significant associations between any change in measured prosthetic radiographic parameters and changes in the visual analog scale, Simple Shoulder Test, or ASES scores ( P  > .05). Conclusion In this retrospective analysis of total shoulder arthroplasty in which most components were well positioned, humeral component positioning did not associate with change in postoperative outcomes. These findings should be prospectively confirmed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The diagnosis of infection after shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging. The current study evaluated the utility of a prerevision biopsy sample in predicting positive cultures or a final diagnosis of infection in the setting of an “at-risk” failed shoulder arthroplasty. Methods The study reviewed 77 patients with no history of infection undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty by a single surgeon between June 2010 and July 2015. All patients with a C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate within normal reference ranges and no fluid on aspirate, or an abnormal value for the erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein, or both, and no growth on aspirate, underwent a prerevision biopsy because they were considered “at-risk” for infection. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to evaluate the utility of biopsy specimens to predict positive cultures as well as a final determination of infection. Results A prerevision biopsy was performed in 17 patients with a failed arthroplasty. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV, for a positive prerevision biopsy sample to predict a positive final culture were 0.75, 0.6, 0.82, and 0.5, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for an infection defined by a prerevision biopsy sample to predict an infection defined by the combined final revision and biopsy cultures were 0.9, 0.86, 0.9, and 0.86, respectively. Conclusions The ability for prerevision biopsy specimens of failed arthroplasties to predict the presence of bacteria at the time of revision surgery is high, although lower than previously reported. If biopsy results are used to define and predict a diagnosis of infection, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV all significantly improve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and a visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain have not been previously described using an anchor-based method after shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCIDs for these measures after shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis or advanced rotator cuff disease. Methods Primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), primary reverse TSA, or hemiarthroplasty was performed in 326 patients by 1 of 5 shoulder and elbow surgeons. The SST score, ASES score, and VAS pain score were collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively (mean, 3.5 years). The MCIDs were calculated for the ASES score, SST score, and VAS pain score using an anchor-based method. Results The MCIDs for the ASES score, SST score, and VAS pain score were 20.9 ( P  < .001), 2.4 ( P  < .0001), and 1.4 ( P  = .0158), respectively. Duration of follow-up and type of arthroplasty (anatomic TSA vs reverse TSA) did not have a significant effect on the MCIDs ( P  > .1) except shorter follow-up correlated with a larger MCID for the ASES score ( P  = .0081). Younger age correlated with larger MCIDs for all scores ( P  < .024). Female sex correlated with larger MCIDs for the VAS pain score ( P  = .123) and ASES score ( P  = .05). Conclusions Patients treated with a shoulder arthroplasty require a 1.4-point improvement in the VAS pain score, a 2.4-point improvement in the SST score, and a 21-point improvement in the ASES score to achieve a minimal clinical importance difference from the procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Studies have reported high rates of transfusion in shoulder arthroplasty. This study was conducted to evaluate the rate of transfusion at our institution, to confirm reported risk factors for transfusion, and to look for changes over time.We hypothesized that transfusion rates associated with shoulder arthroplasty at our institution are lower than those recently reported and that the incidence of transfusion is higher in individuals with low preoperative hemoglobin, with revision arthroplasty, and in older individuals. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of 366 shoulder arthroplasties (323 patients) was performed. This included total shoulder arthroplasties, hemiarthroplasties, revision arthroplasties, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties. Logistic regression analysis evaluated the association of clinical variables with transfusion. Early (1996-2005) and late (2006-2009) groups were compared to evaluate changes in demographics and transfusion rates over time. Results: The overall transfusion rate was 7.4% (27 of 339). Predictors of transfusion were higher intraoperative blood loss, low preoperative hemoglobin level, and humeral cement fixation. Procedure type was not predictive of transfusion. There was no difference in transfusion rates between the early and late groups, but the late group had an increased use of general anesthesia combined with a regional block, increased intraoperative blood loss, and increased use of sequential compression devices for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Conclusions: Lower preoperative hemoglobin, higher intraoperative blood loss, and humeral cement fixation were predictors of transfusion, but not female sex, increasing age, type of procedure, or comorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Large glenoid bone defects in the setting of glenohumeral arthritis can present a challenge to the shoulder arthroplasty surgeon. The results of large structural autografting at the time of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are relatively unknown. Methods This retrospective case series describes the clinical and radiographic results of large structural autografting from the humeral head to the glenoid during primary RTSA. Results Of 17 patients who met inclusion criteria, 14 (82% follow-up) were evaluated postoperatively at a mean of 2.6 years (range, 2.0-5.4 years). Mean inclination correction was 19° ± 12° (range, 3°-35°). Complications occurred in 3 patients, including 1 transient brachial plexus palsy, 1 loose baseplate, and 1 dislocation treated with closed reduction. Radiographic images showed 100% of grafts incorporated. Active forward elevation improved from 80° ± 40° to 130° ± 49° ( P  = .028). The visual analog scale score for pain improved from 8.1 ± 1.3 to 2.5 ± 3.1 ( P  = .005). The Simple Shoulder Test improved from 1.8 ± 1.1 to 6.5 ± 4 ( P  = .012). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score improved from 22 ± 10 to 66 ± 25 ( P  = .012). All patients (100%) were satisfied, and all patients (93%) but 1 stated that they would undergo the procedure again if given the chance. Conclusions RTSA incorporating structural grafting of the glenoid with humeral head autograft results in significant improvements in active forward elevation, pain, and function, with a low complication rate. This technique can reliably be used to achieve correction of large (up to 35°) glenoid defects with a 93% chance of baseplate survival and a 100% chance of graft incorporation in the short-term. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]