Search

Fractures of the proximal humerus account for 4%-8% of injuries to the appendicular skeleton. Most are stable, minimally displaced osteoporotic fractures in the elderly, and are the result of low-energy falls. A large majority of these patients regain adequate shoulder function without operative intervention. Surgery is considered in approximately 20% of patients because they require improved shoulder function for their activities of daily living or because of the significant deformity of their fracture and the need to restore functional alignment, length, and rotation in active, higher demand individuals. However, fixation of these fractures can pose a challenge due to poor bone quality and displacing forces of the rotator cuff. This is especially true in 3-part and 4-part fractures. These factors lead to the high failure rates seen with early attempts at osteosynthesis. In the last 2 decades, locking plate technology has been an innovation in treating these complex fractures. Despite the improvements in torsional strength and rigidity, outcome studies on locking plate technology demonstrate equivocal results with complication rates as high as 20%-30% and a revision rate of 10%. Specifically, these complications include avascular necrosis, varus collapse, intra-articular screw penetration, and postoperative stiffness. Varus collapse occurs when the weak osteoporotic bone fails around the implant. In turn, fibular strut endosteal augmentation was introduced to provide additional support and decrease implant failure rates in displaced fractures with varus coronal malalignment and significant metaphyseal bone loss. Although clinically successful and biomechanically superior to plate-only constructs, a few concerns remain. In turn, we introduce a novel technique of creating individual cancellous femoral head allograft struts or “French fries” that provides structural support for the humeral head but does not have the potential problems of a cortical fibular strut.

Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has evolved beyond its initial indication for elderly patients with rotator cuff arthropathy and is now performed in younger patients for various shoulder pathologies. This surgical procedure has recently gained popularity and has been shown to result in similar functional improvements and complication rates compared to anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty. Scapular posture and sagittal spine alignment (SSPA) have recently emerged as factors potentially influencing RTSA outcomes. This scoping review aimed to assess the existing body of evidence on this topic. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases to evaluate the impact of scapular posture and SSPA on RTSA outcomes. Results: A total of 6 studies (616 shoulders) were included in this review. Scapular posture was found to influence RTSA outcomes, with studies reporting correlations between scapular posture with postoperative range of motion and functional scores. Suboptimal scapular posture, particularly type C (kyphotic posture with protracted scapulae), appeared to be associated with reduced external rotation. However, findings among the included studies regarding SSPA were varied. Some studies suggested that SSPA, notably thoracic kyphosis, might impact RTSA outcomes by influencing scapular posture, while others did not find a clear relationship. Conclusion: Scapular posture was implicated as a potential factor affecting RTSA outcomes; however, the role of SSPA remains inconclusive. There is currently a lack of high-quality evidence in the literature to draw definitive conclusions regarding the impact of scapular posture and SSPA on RTSA outcomes. More research is warranted to investigate these relationships more comprehensively.

Background: Controlling pain after shoulder surgery is a critical component of postsurgical care. Several recent studies have described the use of periarticular, local infiltration anesthesia, and field blocks (FBs) with clinical efficacy after shoulder surgery. The anatomic accuracy and safety of these FBs have not been well described. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of a surgeon performed shoulder field injection. We hypothesized that our field injection would adequately reach the pain transmitters responsible for postsurgical shoulder pain. Methods: A total of 10 cadaveric specimens were used in the study. A mixture of liposomal bupivacaine, normal saline, and methylene blue totaling 60 cc was prepared. After injection, the specimens were left for 4 hours to allow medication diffusion. The dissection of specimens was performed to identify 4 areas: axillary nerve, suprascapular nerve, supraclavicular nerves, and joint capsule. On dissection, accuracy rates were determined for each area. Results: All 10 cadaveric specimens were injected and dissected to completion. The dissection of the axillary nerve showed methylene blue dye surrounding the nerve in 10 of 10 (100%) specimens, the suprascapular nerve in 9 of 10 (90%), and the supraclavicular nerves in 10 of 10 (100%). Zero of 10 (0%) specimens had any dye penetrate into the glenohumeral joint or capsule. Conclusion: The accuracy rates of the injection of the mixture into the shoulder specimens suggest potential to reproduce an FB to the tissues that are responsible for postoperative pain after shoulder surgery. This may represent an option when interscalene nerve block is not desired or contraindicated.