Search

Alfa-fetoprotein (AFP) is a serum glycoprotein highly produced during fetal development. While AFP synthesis drops dramatically after birth, AFP production only persists or returns under specific pathological condition.We sought to investigate the rate of and the potential meaning of high AFP serum levels in men seeking first medical attention for couple's primary infertility.Socio-demographic and clinical data from 1803 non-Finnish, White-European primary infertile men were retrospectively analysed. AFP was routinely measured in each patient (high AFP was defined as 7 ng/ml). Men with history of liver diseases, testicular cancer, or other known causes of increased AFP levels were excluded from the final analysis. Semen analyses were based on the 2010 World Health Organization reference criteria. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between serum AFP and clinical variables. Possible nonlinear relationships were graphically explored with locally estimated scatterplot smoothing method.Overall, high serum AFP level was found in 29 (1.7%) patients. Normal versus high AFP levels patients were comparable in terms of body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index, waist circumference, smoking habits, history of cryptorchidism, testicular volume, and serum hormones (i.e., follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and total testosterone). Conversely, men with higher AFP levels were older (p = 0.02), had lower sperm concentration (p = 0.003), and were more frequently oligozoospermic and azoospermic (all p ≤ 0.03). At multivariate analysis, high AFP levels were independently associated with oligozoospermia (OR 3.79; p = 0.033) and azoospermia (OR 3.29; p = 0.006). Likewise, if AFP levels increase, patients were found to be older, with higher BMI and to have more comorbidities (all p 0.05).Unexplained high AFP levels account for almost 2% of cases in primary infertile patients without a previous history of associated disorders. Higher serum AFP levels are linked with aberrant sperm counts, older age, obesity, and a greater amount of comorbid conditions.Despite the need for additional validation, these data suggest that serum AFP measurement might have a multifaceted role over the diagnostic work-up of males presenting for couple's infertility.

Objectives To investigate which infertile men with semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first semen analysis deserve a second semen test. Materials and methods Data from 1358 consecutive infertile men were analysed. Patients underwent two consecutive semen analyses at the same laboratory. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between clinical variables and semen parameters. A new predicting model was identified through logistic regression analysis exploring potential predictors of semen parameters below WHO reference limits after a previously normal one. Diagnostic accuracy of the new model was compared with AUA/ASRM and EAU guidelines. Decision curve analyses (DCA) tested their clinical benefit. Results Of 1358, 212 (15.6%) infertile men had semen parameters above WHO reference limits at first analysis. Of 212, 87 (41.0%) had a second semen analysis with results above WHO reference limits. Men with sperm parameters below reference limits at second analysis had higher FSH values, but lower testicular volume (TV) (all p Conclusions Approximately 60% of infertile men with a first semen analysis above WHO limits have a second analysis with results below limits. The newly identified risk model might be useful to select infertile men with initial semen results above WHO limits who deserve a second semen analysis.

To (i) identify a novel risk stratification for patients complaining of haemospermia; and, (ii) compare its predictive ability to select high-risk patients by retrospectively validating the EAU guidelines classification.Data from 283 consecutive patients complaining of a single episode/recurrent haemospermia were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified into low vs high-risk according to EAU guidelines, whose diagnostic performance was then validated. We identified a new risk stratification model based on clinical factors associated with (i) positive semen culture and (ii) prostate cancer (PCa) and bladder cancer (BC). Diagnostic accuracy of the two predictive models (EAU vs New) was assessed and decision curve analyses (DCA) tested their clinical benefit.Overall, 259 (91.5%) were high-risk and 24 (8.5%) low risk according to the EAU guidelines. Recurrent haemospermia was reported by 134 (47.4%) patients. 126 (44.5%) had baseline CCI score ≥ 1. At MVA logistic regression analysis, history of recurrent genito - urinary tract infections was identified as a predictor for positive semen culture (OR: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.77 - 6.57, P =.002). Likewise, baseline CCI ≥ 1 was identified as a predictor for PCa and BC (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.17 - 2.04, P =.009). Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the EAU guidelines were 13.3%, 89.2% and 51% respectively, whereas the new model performed substantially better: 98.9%, 58% and 78% respectively.The application of the EAU guidelines risk stratification does not ensure proper identification of high-risk patients complaining of haemospermia. We propose a novel, better performing and easily implementable risk stratification tool.

Erectile dysfunction aetiology has been historically identified as organic, psychogenic and mixed.To stratify and compare a cohort of patients seeking medical help for erectile dysfunction for the first time according to the newly proposed binary classification of the European Association of Urology guidelines: 'primary organic' versus 'primary psychogenic'.Complete data from 2009 consecutive patients presenting for erectile dysfunction were analysed. All patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function at baseline. According to the presence of erectile dysfunction-related risk factors indexed by the European Association of Urology Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health, patients were categorised as having primary organic (≥1 risk factor) or primary psychogenic (0 risk factor) erectile dysfunction. Descriptive statistics compared the two groups. Linear regression analysis tested the association between the number of risk factors and erectile dysfunction severity. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing method graphically explored the relationship between the number of risk factors for erectile dysfunction and the International Index of Erectile Function domain scores.Median (interquartile range) age at first presentation was 50 (39-61) years. Of all, 1632 (86.2%) and 377 (13.8%) were identified as having primary organic and primary psychogenic erectile dysfunction, respectively. Overall, 1488 (74.1%) patients were40 years of age; in this subgroup, the most frequent risk factors were age, hypertension (29%), active smoking (42%) and alcohol intake (25.1%). Median (interquartile range) International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function score was 15 (7-22). Primary organic erectile dysfunction patients depicted lower International Index of Erectile Function-sexual desire and International Index of Erectile Function-orgasmic function scores (all p ≤ 0.02), whilst groups did not differ in terms of International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function, International Index of Erectile Function-intercourse satisfaction and International Index of Erectile Function-overall satisfaction scores.One out of nine patients complaining of erectile dysfunction depict criteria for primary psychogenic erectile dysfunction. Erectile function severity could be as severe as patients with organic erectile dysfunction. The single-centre-based cross-sectional nature of the study, raising the possibility of selection biases, is our main limitation.One out of nine patients presenting for erectile dysfunction depict criteria suggestive for primary psychogenic erectile dysfunction in the real-life setting. Patients with primary psychogenic and primary organic erectile dysfunction have comparable erectile dysfunction severity, thus outlining the importance of a comprehensive and tailored management work-up in every patient seeking medical help for the first time.

In industrialized countries, air pollutants levels have been monitored closely for environmental and research issues. Using Italian data, we aimed to investigate the association between air pollutants levels and semen parameters in a cohort of non-Finnish white-European men presenting for couple's infertility.Complete demographic and laboratory data from 1,152 infertile men consecutively assessed between January 2015 and January 2018 were analyzed. Semen analyses were based on the 2010 World Health Organization reference criteria. Health-significant comorbidities were scored with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). We analyzed the annual average level of the three main markers of air pollution (Pm10, Pm2.5, and NOOf 1,152 men, 87 (7.55%) had normal sperm parameters at first semen analysis. Of 1,065 patients with abnormal semen analyses, 237 (22.25%), 324 (30.42%), and 287 (26.95%) patients presented 1, 2 or 3 abnormalities, respectively, and 217 (20.38%) were azoospermic. At linear regression analysis, Pm10, Pm2.5, and NOIn a large homogenous cohort of infertile men, Pm10, Pm 2.5, and NO