Search

The load-settlement behaviour of piled raft foundations (PRFs) resting on sand subjected to vertical uniformly distributed load is studied using three-dimensional elasto-plastic finite element (FE) analyses. The unified Clay and Sand Model (CASM), based on the critical state soil mechanics, is used as the soil constitutive model. In the present study, 38 rectangular, strip, and circular raft connected to different pile configurations resting on four different types of sands in their loose, medium, and dense states are considered. The accuracy of the finite element analysis is confirmed through verification and validation with other numerical and experimental studies. A detailed parametric study is conducted, which includes soil elastic and critical state parameters as well as different dimensions of PRFs. A guideline chart is provided, which will be helpful for a design practitioner to choose the suitable PRF configurations considering serviceability limit states of safety and economical design aspect. This flow chart is based on (i) combined effects of various parameters on PRF load settlement behaviour, (ii) load sharing between the raft and the pile groups, and (iii) a preliminary cost analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Piled raft foundations (PRFs) below stepped high-rise towers are often subjected to nonuniform triangular-shaped loads with eccentricities. In this study, 20 rectangular piled rafts with different pile configurations and orientations, embedded in medium-dense sandy soil, are analyzed using three-dimensional nonlinear finite-element (FE) analysis in which the critical state–based Clay and Sand Model (CASM) is used as the soil constitutive model. Different triangularly distributed loads with and without eccentricities are considered in addition to uniformly distributed loads. A systematic parametric study is performed by varying the different design parameters based on which the PRF behavior is systematically investigated in terms of multiple performance parameters such as maximum settlement, differential settlement, angular distortion, tilt, and load distribution between the raft and the piles and between the individual piles. It is observed that the pile diameter, number of piles, and raft plan area control the differential settlement, angular distortion, and tilt the most. Based on the insights gained from the parametric study, a design optimization exercise is performed, in which the most optimal pile configuration is selected based on the criteria of allowable settlement and angular distortion with additional considerations for tilt, load distribution, and the volume of concrete required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A hand-calculation method for estimation of nonlinear load–settlement response of piled raft foundations (PRFs) embedded in sandy soils is developed using three-dimensional finite-element (FE) analysis in which the elastoplastic constitutive behavior of the soil is modeled using the unified Clay And Sand Model (CASM). Three types of PRFs with rectangular, strip, and circular rafts and with a variety of pile dimensions and arrangements are considered in the study. The PRFs are assumed to be embedded in five different sands (Ottawa sand, Erksak sand, Sacramento sand, Portaway sand, and Decomposed Granite sand) with different elastic properties, critical state parameters, and relative densities. Systematic parametric studies are performed to develop equations for the estimation of the average nonlinear settlement of PRFs. The maximum and differential settlements are also estimated from the average settlement. The proposed equations require the relative density, elastic constants, and critical state friction angle of sand, and the piled raft geometry and properties as inputs. The settlement equations are applicable to PRFs of sizes similar to those considered in the study and can be used by practitioners for quick, initial estimation of PRF settlement as part of design calculations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Time-dependent settlements of piled raft foundations embedded in consolidating clays were studied using three-dimensional (3D) finite-element analysis and critical state-based soil constitutive modified Cam-Clay (MCC) model. In this study, different small to large rectangular rafts connected to circular bored cast-in-situ piles resting on four different types of clays and with varying overconsolidation ratios (OCRs) (1, 2, and 5) for each clay under a single drainage condition were analyzed. The influence of various piled raft parameters (pile length, pile spacing, pile diameter, raft thickness) and soil parameters (Poisson's ratio of soil, soil critical state parameters, stress history of soil or OCR) on immediate and consolidation settlements of piled rafts were investigated. The detailed parametric study shows that critical state parameters and soil elastic properties have important roles in piled raft immediate and consolidation settlements. However, the pattern of parametric influence on immediate settlement and consolidation settlement is different. To capture the total settlement at the end of primary consolidation, a simple and quick calculation method for estimating the average soil subgrade modulus below the piled raft in consolidating clays is proposed through regression analysis and defining a combined influence parameter based on soil parameters, area ratio, and normalized loading. The results of the proposed method were compared with five case studies of piled raft foundations in various normally or overconsolidated clays showing satisfactory matches. It is believed that the proposed method will be very useful for design practitioners to get a quick estimate for the overall settlement of piled raft at the initial design stage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Continuum-based three-dimensional (3D) elasto-plastic finite element (FE) analyses of piled raft foundations (PRFs) resting on sandy soils and subjected to uniformly distributed vertical loads are performed using the software Abaqus, and equations are developed for estimating the nonlinear soil subgrade moduli (spring stiffnesses) beneath the raft, beneath the pile base, and along the pile shaft. The unified clay and sand model (CASM) is used as the soil constitutive model in the continuum-based 3D FE analysis. Four different types of sand with three different states (loose, medium and dense) and twenty different configurations of PRFs with rectangular, square, and strip rafts are considered in this study. The developed equations of the raft and pile spring stiffnesses are subsequently used in a soil spring-based nonlinear FE analysis of PRFs performed using a structural engineering software. It is shown through verification and validation studies that the developed equations of the raft and pile spring stiffnesses can be reliably used in spring-based FE analysis of PRFs, instead of the computationally expensive continuum-based 3D FE analysis, for quick and accurate estimate of PRF responses. The developed equations of spring stiffnesses are applicable to PRFs that are similar in dimensions considered in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]