Search

Unlabelled: Co-artemether is an oral tablet of artemether (20 mg) and lumefantrine (120 mg) for the treatment of falciparum malaria. Administration in the presence of mefloquine is likely, as co-artemether may be used following failure of antimalarial prophylaxis or treatment with mefloquine., Objective: The effects on the QTc interval were compared among treatment with three doses of mefloquine (500, 250, 250 mg over 12 h) followed by six doses of co-artemether (6 x 4 tablets over 60 h) and either treatment alone. The study was performed in a randomised, double-blind, parallel group design in 14 healthy male subjects per dose group., Methods: Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded before dosing and repeatedly thereafter. The Bazett formula was used to calculate the QTc interval. The maximum and average QTc intervals for the first, third and sixth dosing intervals of co-artemether treatment were compared among treatments. Drug plasma concentrations were determined at identical times with the ECG recordings for exploratory pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation., Results: No clinically relevant differences in the QTc interval were observed after sequential administration of mefloquine and co-artemether relative to either treatment given alone, and there were no clinically relevant study drug-related effects on the QTc interval after either treatment. Plasma drug measurements revealed adequate systemic exposure to artemether, dihydroartemisinin, lumefantrine and mefloquine, well in line with the clinical setting. No correlation between the length of the QTc interval and plasma drug concentrations was found for any of the compounds., Conclusions: Untoward effects on the QTc interval are unlikely to occur when co-artemether is administered following prophylaxis or treatment with mefloquine.

Forty-two healthy subjects were randomized in a parallel three-group design trial to investigate potential electrocardiographic and pharmacokinetic interactions between the new antimalarial co-artemether, a combination of artemether and lumefantrine (both of which are predominantly metabolized through CYP3A4), and mefloquine, another antimalarial described as a substrate (and possible inhibitor) of CYP3A4. Subjects were assigned to one of the three possible treatment groups (i.e., co-artemether alone or mefloquine alone or the combination of both). The dosage was 1000 mg mefloquine (divided into three doses over 12 h) followed 12 h later by six applications of co-artemether (40 mg artemether+480 mg lumefantrine each) over 60 h. The study medications were generally well tolerated after all treatments. Concomitant administration with mefloquine caused statistically significant lower (around 30-40%) plasma concentrations of lumefantrine than when co-artemether was administered alone. Even if important, this decrease in lumefantrine exposure was considered unlikely to impact clinical efficacy given the wide therapeutic index of co-artemether and the usual high variability in lumefantrine plasma levels, mostly and more importantly influenced by food intake. However, patients should be encouraged to eat at dosing times to compensate for this decreased bioavailability. The pharmacokinetics of artemether, DHA or mefloquine were not affected. Artemether concentrations significantly decreased over doses, independently of mefloquine co-administration, while DHA concentrations slightly (not significantly) increased. Therefore, no clinically relevant risks due to pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction are expected at the enzymatic level following co-administration of co-artemether with CYP3A4 substrates with similar affinity to that of mefloquine.

Artemether-lumefantrine is a new fixed antimalarial combination effective against multidrug-resistant falciparum malaria. A prospective electrocardiographic study was conducted in 150 patients receiving artemetherlumefantrine and 50 treated with artesunate-mefloquine. There was no evidence for clinically significant changes in the electrocardiographic intervals and in particular no relationship between plasma concentrations of lumefantrine and QTc prolongation. Artemether-lumefantrine does not have significant cardiac effects at therapeutic doses.

The combination of artemether and lumefantrine (benflumetol) is a new and very well tolerated oral antimalarial drug effective even against multidrug-resistant falciparum malaria. The artemether component is absorbed rapidly and biotransformed to dihydroartemisinin, and both are eliminated with terminal half-lives of around 1 hour. These are very active antimalarials which give a rapid reduction in parasite biomass and consequent rapid resolution of symptoms. The lumefantrine component is absorbed variably in malaria, and is eliminated more slowly (half-life of 3 to 6 days). Absorption is very dependent on coadministration with fat, and so improves markedly with recovery from malaria. Thus artemether clears most of the infection, and the lumefantrine concentrations that remain at the end of the 3- to 5-day treatment course are responsible for eliminating the residual 100 to 10 000 parasites. The area under the curve of plasma lumefantrine concentrations versus time, or its correlate the plasma concentration on day 7. has proved an important determinant of therapeutic response. Characterisation of these pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships provided the basis for dosage optimisation, an approach that could be applied to other antimalarial drugs.

Aims: To investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of artemether and benflumetol in a fixed combination tablet (CGP 56697) and to offer an explanation for the lower than expected cure rate in a Thai clinical trial., Methods: Two hundred and sixty patients were enrolled into a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, dose-finding trial. CGP 56697 was given orally, either as: A, 4 x 4 tablets over 48 h; B, 4 x 2 tablets over 48 h or C, 3 x 4 tablets over 24 h. Each tablet contained artemether 20 mg amd benflumetol 120 mg. The pharmacokinetics were determined using a population-based approach combining full profiles (42 patients) and sparse data (218 patients). Parasite clearance time and 28 day cure rate were correlated with the derived pharmacokinetic parameters., Results: The median absorption half-life of benflumetol was 5.3 h, with a tmax of 10 h and terminal elimination half-life of 4.5 days. For artemether (and its metabolite, dihydroartemisinin), the corresponding values were 1.9 (1.9) h, 1.8 (1.2) h, and 0.84 (0.43) h. The variability in bioavailability of artemether and dihydroartemisinin was large both between doses and between patients, but was less pronounced for benflumetol. Compared with the first dose, benflumetol bioavailability was estimated to increase three-fold by the third and fourth doses. Higher artemether or dihydroartemisinin AUC was found to decrease parasite clearance time. Higher benflumetol AUC was found to significantly increase the chance of cure., Conclusions: Using a population-based approach it was confirmed that the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of benflumetol and artemether differ markedly. Benflumetol AUC is associated with cure and the effect of benflumetol when coadministered with artemether is to prevent recrudescence. The mode of action of benflumetol is consistent with its longer elimination half-life. A short course of low-dose artemether, which is rapidly absorbed and has a short elimination half-life, produced effective parasite clearance. The complementary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of benflumetol and artemether was the main rationale for developing a fixed-dose combination. While the 4 x 4 dose regimen is very effective in most endemic areas, the poorer absorption (2.5 fold lower than in China) and the more resistant parasites in Thailand require higher doses of this drug.