Search

The network function virtualization (NFV) paradigm replaces hardware‐dependent network functions by virtual network functions (VNFs) that can be deployed in commodity hardware, including legacy servers. Consequently, the use of NFV is expected to reduce operating and capital expenses, as well as improve service deployment operation and management flexibility. For many use cases, the VNFs must be visited and invoked following a specific order of execution in order to compose a complete network service, named service function chain (SFC). Nonetheless, despite the benefits from NFV and SFC virtualization technologies, their introduction must not harm network performance and service availability. On the one hand, redundancy is seen by network service planners as a mechanism well established to combat availability issues. At same time, there is a goal to optimize resource utilization in order to reduce operational expenditure. In this article, we share our experience in the design use of a framework, named SPIDER, focused on SFC placement that considers the network infrastructure condition and the required SFC availability to define the placement strategy. The SPIDER monitors the status of infrastructure nodes and links and defines which servers the VNFs should be placed on and the number of redundant replicas needed. We present a proof‐of‐concept of SPIDER using Kubernetes to launch the VNFs as containers. We also use Kubernetes to forward the traffic between the VNFs, composing the service chain. We perform experiments to evaluate the runtime of SPIDER and the SFC delay under different network conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the emergence of new applications driven by the popularization of mobile devices, the next generation of mobile networks faces challenges to meet different requirements. Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) have been deployed to minimize operational costs and make network management more flexible. In this sense, strategies for VNF placement can impact different metrics of interest. Invoking and visiting VNFs in a specific execution order may be required for different use cases, resulting in a complete network service called Service Function Chain (SFC). The SFC placement problem is to define a feasible path in the physical infrastructure whose nodes and edges meet the computational and bandwidth requirements for the VNFs and virtual links, respectively. It has already been proved that this process is NP-hard and it is difficult to find an optimal solution to this problem. Therefore, in this paper, we propose the use of meta-heuristics to solve the SFC placement problem in cellular networks. We consider a triathlon competition leading to different mobility patterns. We collected real data about the competitors to simulate their movements through the scenario as well as the measured signal quality of the network. We formulate the SFC placement problem as a multi-objective problem where we try to minimize the placement cost and the total SFC delay. To solve the problem, we propose the use of two algorithms, NSGA-II and GDE3, which compare two different greedy approaches that prioritize the different optimization metrics considered in this work. Our results show that the meta-heuristics provide better results for each of the metrics. For all competition stages, GDE3 presented a slightly lower placement costs than NSGA-II, while NSGA-II had a lower delay in some scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]