Search

Background: Our recent meta-analysis indicated that vitamin C may shorten the length of ICU stay and the duration of mechanical ventilation. Here we analyze modification of the vitamin C effect on ventilation time, by the control group ventilation time (which we used as a proxy for severity of disease in the patients of each trial). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and reference lists of relevant publications. We included controlled trials in which the administration of vitamin C was the only difference between the study groups. We did not limit our search to randomized trials and did not require placebo control. We included all doses and all durations of vitamin C administration. One author extracted study characteristics and outcomes from the trial reports and entered the data in a spreadsheet. Both authors checked the data entered against the original reports. We used meta-regression to examine whether the vitamin C effect on ventilation time depends on the duration of ventilation in the control group. Results: We identified nine potentially eligible trials, eight of which were included in the meta-analysis. We pooled the results of the eight trials, including 685 patients in total, and found that vitamin C shortened the length of mechanical ventilation on average by 14% (P = 0.00001). However, there was significant heterogeneity in the effect of vitamin C between the trials. Heterogeneity was fully explained by the ventilation time in the untreated control group. Vitamin C was most beneficial for patients with the longest ventilation, corresponding to the most severely ill patients. In five trials including 471 patients requiring ventilation for over 10 h, a dosage of 1–6 g/day of vitamin C shortened ventilation time on average by 25% (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: We found strong evidence that vitamin C shortens the duration of mechanical ventilation, but the magnitude of the effect seems to depend on the duration of ventilation in the untreated control group. The level of baseline illness severity should be considered in further research. Different doses should be compared directly in future trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sepsis is the most common cause of premature death among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) aged ≤ 50 years in the United States, and infection is the most common cause of admission to the ICU among SLE patients. However, there are no population-level data on the patterns of the demand for critical care services among hospitalized septic patients with SLE or the outcomes of those admitted to the ICU. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study, using the Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File, to identify SLE hospitalizations aged ≥ 18 years and the subgroups with sepsis and ICU admission during 2009–2014. The patterns of ICU admission among septic hospitalizations were examined. Logistic regression modeling was used to identify predictors of short-term mortality (defined as hospital death or discharge to hospice) among ICU admissions with sepsis and to estimate the risk-adjusted short-term mortality among ICU admissions with and without sepsis. Results: Among 94,338 SLE hospitalizations, 17,037 (18.1%) had sepsis and 9409 (55.2%) of the latter were admitted to the ICU. Sepsis accounted for 51.5% of the growth in volume of ICU admissions among SLE hospitalizations during the study period. Among ICU admissions with sepsis, 25.3% were aged ≥ 65 years, 88.6% were female, and 64.4% were non-white minorities. The odds of short-term mortality among septic ICU admissions were increased among those lacking health insurance (adjusted odds ratio 1.40 [95% confidence interval 1.07–1.84]), while being unaffected by gender and race/ethnicity, and remaining unchanged over the study period. On adjusted analyses among ICU admissions, the short-term mortality among those with and without sepsis was 13% (95% CI 12.6–13.3) and 2.7% (95% CI 2.6–2.8), respectively. Sepsis was associated with 63.6% of all short-term mortality events. Conclusions: Sepsis is a major, incremental driver of the demand for critical care services among SLE hospitalizations. Despite its relatively low mortality, sepsis was associated with most of the short-term deaths among ICU patients with SLE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In recent years, researchers have noted an "obesity paradox," where individuals with obesity survive sepsis at higher rates than their nonobese counterparts. This systematic review summarizes the literature on studies examining the association between obesity and 1-year mortality among patients admitted with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock. Materials and Methods: Using a comprehensive search strategy, a systematic review was conducted to identify studies examining the association of obesity and sepsis mortality. PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Elton B. Stephens Company host databases were searched for the terms sepsis, obesity, mortality, and adult. Results: The initial search identified 189 studies, 9 of which met inclusion criteria. Of these, four provided evidence that obese or very obese patients with sepsis have lower mortality than nonobese patients. Methodologic differences in the remaining five studies, which reported conflicting results, limit generalizability. Conclusion: This systematic review on the association of obesity and sepsis mortality found three studies that demonstrated lower sepsis mortality among obese patients in the first 30 days and one showing that this protective effect extends up to 1 year. Given the increased number of patients surviving sepsis, it is important to consider long-term mortality and further describe the variables associated with increased survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death even in the tertiary hospitals of Western Countries and sepsis-related in-hospital mortality contributes to define hospital performance and quality of care. A better understanding of its epidemiological and pathological characteristics seems the key to tailor public health interventions aimed at reducing its incidence, morbidity and mortality. A retrospective analysis of 109 autoptic cases of inpatients that acquired sepsis in a tertiary hospital was performed. In particular, we identified and analysed the recurrent anamnestic/clinical factors and histopathological features. The most common continuous foci were due to respiratory infections. Subendocardial myocardial ischaemia was the clinical cause of death in 56.8% of the study population. An inflammatory infiltrate was identified in specimens of the lung (28.4%), liver (28%), heart (23.5%) and kidneys (15%). Common findings were arteriosclerosis and atherosclerosis (57%), steatosis (24.5%), diffluent spleen (18%) and colliquation of adrenal glands (16.6%). The comorbidities and the autoptic features founded are consistent with the previous evidences in sepsis field. Clinical autopsy is certainly a useful tool to collect data on sepsis, but we did not find any feature that can be considered specific or sensitive for the diagnosis of sepsis. More efforts should be made in the direction of a multidisciplinary approach to in-hospital sepsis autopsies to grant pathologists a key role in the management of claims and clinical risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Archivos de Medicina (1657-320X) is the property of Revista Archivos de Medicina (Manizales) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Sepsis and sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) are common intensive care unit (ICU) diseases; the morbidity and mortality are high. The present study analyzed the sensitivity of different diagnostic criteria of sepsis 1.0 and 3.0, epidemiological characteristics of sepsis and SAE, and explored its risk factors for death, short-term, and long-term prognosis. Methods: The retrospective study included patients in ICU from January 2015 to June 2016. After excluding 58 patients, 175 were assigned to either an SAE or a non-SAE group (patients with sepsis but no encephalopathy). The sensitivity of the diagnostic criteria was compared between sepsis 1.0 and 3.0, respectively. Between-group differences in baseline data, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (APACHE II score), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (SOFA score), etiological data, biochemical indicators, and 28-day and 180-day mortality rates were analyzed. Survival outcomes and long-term prognosis were observed, and risk factors for death were analyzed through 180-day follow-up. Results: The sensitivity did not differ significantly between the diagnostic criteria of sepsis 1.0 and 3.0 (P = .286). The 42.3% incidence of SAE presented a significantly high APACHE II and SOFA scores as well as 28-day mortality and 180-day mortality (all P < .001). The incidence of death was 37.1%. The multivariate stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that the risk of death in SAE group was significantly higher than the non- SAE group (P < .001). Sepsis-associated encephalopathy is a risk factor for sepsis-related death (relative risk [RR] = 2.868; 95% confidence interval: 1.730-4.754; P < .001). Although males showed a significantly high rate of 28-day and 180-day mortality (P = .035 and .045), it was not an independent risk factor for sepsis-related death (P = .072). The long-term prognosis of patients with sepsis was poor with decreased quality of life. No significant difference was observed in prognosis between the SAE and non-SAE groups (P > .05). Conclusion: Both diagnostic criteria cause misdiagnosis, and the sensitivity did not differ significantly. The incidence of SAE was high, and 28-day and 180-day mortality rates were significantly higher than those without SAE. Sepsisassociated encephalopathy is a risk factor for poor outcome. The overall long-term prognosis of patients with sepsis was poor, and the quality of life decreased. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine potential gender disparities in relation to factors associated with sepsis management among a cohort of patients admitted through an emergency department with a discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death globally, with significant associated costs. Predictors of survival for those with sepsis‐related diagnoses are complex. Design and Methods: The study had a retrospective, descriptive cross‐sectional design. The sample (N = 482) included patients 18 years of age or older who presented to the emergency department of a nonprofit, Magnet‐recognized, acute care hospital located in southern California. Subjects included those who subsequently met the criteria for a discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock as defined by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Patient characteristics, clinical variables, care management processes, and outcomes were extracted from the electronic health record. A multivariate model was analyzed. Findings: The sample included 234 women (48.5%) and 248 men (51.5%). Logistic regression with eight independent variables (discharge diagnosis, age, comorbidities, length of hospital stay, source of infection, first serum lactate level measured, recommended fluids administered, and gender) reliably predicted odds for patient survival, ϰ2 (12) = 118.38, p <.001, and correctly classified 77.3% of cases. All eight independent variables significantly contributed to the model. Men had a higher likelihood of hospital survival than women (odds ratio 1.68; 95% confidence interval 1.01–2.79; p =.045). Conclusions: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign has provided a clear pathway for care of patients with sepsis‐related diagnoses. Therapeutic strategies should be developed to address differences in outcome by gender. The adoption of more aggressive applications of evidence‐based interventions for these patients may result in better patient outcomes. Clinical Relevance: Providers should understand the importance of adhering to sepsis protocols, minimizing treatment disparities, and recognizing gender differences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In this study, we aim to describe the post-sepsis syndrome from the perspective of the sepsis survivors.Design and Setting: The study is a prospective, observational online international survey.Participants: Sepsis survivors enrolled via social media from 13 September 2014 to 13 September 2016.Interventions: None.Main Outcome Measures: Physiologic, physical and psychological function post-sepsis; and patient satisfaction with sepsis-centered care.Results: 1731 completed surveys from 41 countries were analyzed, with 79.9% female respondents, age 47.6 ± 14.4 years. The majority of respondents (47.8%) had sepsis within the last year. Survivors reported an increase in sensory, integumentary, digestive, breathing, chest pain, kidney and musculoskeletal problems after sepsis (all P-value <0.0001). Physical functions such as daily chores, running errands, spelling, reading and reduced libido posed increased difficulty (all P-value <0.0001). Within 7 days prior to completing the survey, the survivors reported varying degrees of anxiety, depression, fatigue and sleep disturbance. Sepsis survivors reported dissatisfaction with a number of hospital support services, with up to 29.3% of respondents stating no social services support was provided for their condition.Conclusions: Sepsis survivors suffer from a myriad of physiologic, physical and psychological challenges. Survivors overall reveal dissatisfaction with sepsis-related care, suggesting areas for improvement both in-hospital and post-discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: As immunosuppressive therapy has improved in simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipients (SPKTRs), infection has become the major limitation of disease‐free survival. Methods: We studied all SPKTRs and deceased‐donor kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) between 2003 and 2015. Thirty‐six of 134 SPKTRs (26.9%) were diagnosed with sepsis among which 13/36 SPKTRs (36.1%) developed severe sepsis/septic shock. A control group of 98 SPKTRs without sepsis and 61/538 KTRs (11.3%) with sepsis were used for comparison. Results: Among SPKTRs, female sex, low BMI, CMV seronegativity, CMV disease, and acute cellular rejection increased the risk for sepsis (P < .05). Patient and allograft survival was comparable among SPKTRs with and without sepsis (P > .05), but showed inferior kidney allograft function (P < .05). While urosepsis was less common among SPKTRs (45%), pneumonia (33%) and peritonitis (15%) as site of infections were more frequent (P < .05). Here, gram‐positive and fungal sepsis were more common among SPKTRs compared to KTRs (P < .05). SPKTRs showed a higher incidence and an earlier onset of sepsis compared to KTRs (P < .001). SPKTRs with severe sepsis/septic shock were more likely to show pneumonia as site of infection with gram‐positive/polymicrobial bacteremia (P < .05). Mortality from severe sepsis was 29% among SPKTRs compared to 58% among KTRs (P < .05). Conclusion: Differences in incidence, site, causative pathogens, and onset of sepsis between SPKTRs and KTRs may be attributed to more intense immunosuppression, major surgery, and complications of diabetes among SPKTRs. Lower sepsis‐related mortality may reflect younger age and more timely diagnosis, but also supports recent findings of less sepsis‐related mortality among recipients of solid organ transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Archivos de Medicina (1657-320X) is the property of Revista Archivos de Medicina (Manizales) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background As immunosuppressive therapy and allograft survival have improved, the increased incidence of sepsis has become a major hurdle of disease-free survival after renal transplantation. Methods We identified 112 of 957 kidney transplant recipients ( KTRs) with sepsis. In all, 31 KTRs developed severe sepsis or septic shock, and 30 KTRs died from sepsis. KTRs without sepsis were used for comparison. CMV-specific and alloreactive T cells were measured using an interferon-γ Elispot assay. The extent of immunosuppression was quantified by lymphocyte subpopulations. Results Five-year patient survival was 70.3% with sepsis compared to 88.2% without ( P<.001). Five-year estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in KTRs developing sepsis ( P<.001). Upon multivariate analysis, diabetes, lymphocyte-depleting induction, donor age, CMV replication, and acute rejection increased the risk of sepsis ( P<.05). Age, diabetes, underweight/obesity, and pneumonia as site of infection were predictive factors of mortality ( P<.05). Early-onset sepsis was associated with decreased CD3+ and CD4+ T cells pre-transplantation ( P<.05). Impaired CMV-specific cellular immunity pre-transplantation was associated with CMV replication and early-onset sepsis ( P<.05). High frequencies of alloreactive T cells were associated with acute rejection, lymphocyte-depleting rejection treatment, and early-onset sepsis ( P<.05). Conclusion KTRs developing sepsis show inferior patient survival and allograft function. Identified risk factors and differences in lymphocyte counts, CMV-specific immunity, and alloreactivity may prove useful to identify KTRs at increased risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Sepsis induces inflammation in response to infection and is a major cause of mortality and hospitalization in children. Obesity induces chronic inflammation leading to many clinical manifestations. Our understanding of the impact of obesity on diseases, such as infection and sepsis, is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of obesity with organ dysfunction, mortality, duration, and charges during among US children hospitalized with infection. Methods: Retrospective study of hospitalizations in children with infection aged 0 to 20 years, using the 2009 Kids’ Inpatient Database. Results: Of 3.4 million hospitalizations, 357 701 were for infection, 5685 of which were reported as obese children. Obese patients had higher rates of organ dysfunction (7.35% vs 5.5%, P < .01), longer hospital stays (4.1 vs 3.5 days, P < .001), and accrued higher charges (US$29 019 vs US$21 200, P < .001). In multivariable analysis, mortality did not differ by obesity status (odds ratio: 0.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.23-1.34), however severity of illness modified the association between obesity status and the other outcomes. Conclusions: While there was no difference in in-hospital mortality by obesity diagnosis, variation in organ dysfunction, hospital stay, and hospital charges according to obesity status was mediated by illness severity. Findings from this study have significant implications for targeted approaches to mitigate the burden of obesity on infection and sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Muscle wasting is one of the main contributors to the worse outcomes in sepsis. Whether estrogen could alleviate muscle wasting induced by sepsis remains unclear. This study was designed to test the effect of estrogen on muscle wasting and its relationship with central alteration in sepsis. Thirty Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 3 groups: control group, sepsis group, and estrogen treated sepsis group. Animals were intraperitoneally injected with lipopolysaccharide (10 mg/kg) or saline, followed by subcutaneous injection of 17β-estradiol (1 mg/kg) or saline. Twenty-four hours later, all animals were killed and their hypothalamus and skeletal muscles were harvested for analysis. Muscle wasting markers, hypothalamic neuropeptides, and hypothalamic inflammatory markers were measured. As a result, lipopolysaccharide administration caused a significant increase in muscle wasting, hypothalamic inflammation, and anorexigenic neuropeptides (POMC and CART) gene expression, and a significant decrease in orexigenic neuropeptides (AgRP and NPY) gene expression. Administration of estrogen significantly attenuated lipopolysaccharide-induced muscle wasting (body weight and extensor digitorum longus loss [52 and 62 %], tyrosine and 3-methylhistidine release [17 and 22 %], muscle ring finger 1 [MuRF-1; 65 %], and muscle atrophy F-box [MAFbx] gene expression), hypothalamic inflammation (Tumor necrosis factor-α and interlukin-1β [69 and 70%]) as well as alteration of POMC, CART and AgRP (61, 37, and 1008 %) expression.In conclusion, estrogen could alleviate sepsis-induced muscle wasting and it was associated with reducing hypothalamic inflammation and alteration of hypothalamic neuropeptides. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of atorvastatin combined with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) on plasma early inflammatory cytokine levels as well as pulmonary pathophysiology of rats with sepsis. A total of 122 rats were randomly divided into five groups including the sham operation group (n=10), CLP group (n=10), atorvastatin group (n=34, 20 mg/kg/day), LMWH group (n=34, 100 IU/kg/day), and atorvastatin combined with LMWH group (n=34). Blood samples from 6 rats in each group were collected to detect TNF-α, IL-1β and HMGB1 concentration in plasma by linked immunosorbent assay at baseline and postoperatively at 4, 8, 12 and 24 h. Pulmonary pathophysiology was observed postoperatively at 24 h. The remaining 10 rats in each group were used to calculate the 7-day cumulative mortality rate. Compared to the sham operation group, the scores in CLP were greater than those of the sham operation group (P<0.05). Compared to the CLP group, the sepsis severity scores of the atorvastatin, LMWH, and atorvastatin combined with LMWH groups decreased gradually. Significant difference was detected in the four groups (P<0.05 0.01). Compared to the sham operation group, at 4, 8, 12 and 24 h, the TNF-α, IL-1β and HMGB1 levels in plasma in CLP increased significantly (P<0.01). Compared to the CLP group, the TNF-α, IL-1β and HMGB1 levels of plasma in other groups decreased gradually, and there was a significant difference in the four groups (P<0.01). At 24 h post operation, compared to the sham operation group, the damage of pulmonary pathophysiology in CLP was more severe. Compared to the CLP group, the damage of pulmonary pathophysiology in other groups was slight. Compared to the CLP group, the 7-day cumulative mortality rate in other groups decreased significantly (P<0.05). In conclusion, atorvastatin, combined with LMWH can decrease sepsis severity, plasma inflammatory cytokine levels, pulmonary pathophysiology, and the 7-day cumulative mortality rate. Atorvastatin, and LMWH may therefore be useful for the treatment of sepsis due to its ability to inhibit the release of TNF-α, IL-1β and HMGB1 in septic rats. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in male patients and the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in males. To confirm the diagnosis of prostate cancer, an ultrasound-guided needle biopsy is necessary to obtain prostate tissue sufficient for histologic analysis by pathologists. Ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy can be accomplished via a transperineal or transrectal approach. The latter biopsy technique involves placing an ultrasound probe into the rectum, visualizing the prostate located just anterior to it, and then obtaining 12-14 biopsies. Each biopsy core requires piercing of the rectal mucosa which can inherently contribute to infection. The increasing infectious risk of prostate needle biopsy requires refinement and re-evaluation of the process in which the technique is performed. Such processes include (but are not limited to) prebiopsy risk stratification, antibiotic prophylaxis, use of rectal preparations, and equipment processing. In the subsequent review, we highlight the current available information on different strategies to reduce the risk of infection following prostate needle biopsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Severe sepsis is a major cause of mortality and morbidity globally. As the time to adequate treatment is directly linked to outcome, early recognition is of critical importance. Early, accessible markers for severe sepsis are desirable. The systemic inflammatory response in sepsis leads to changes in vital signs and biomarkers and to symptoms unrelated to the focus of infection. This study investigated whether the occurrence of any of six systemic symptoms could predict severe sepsis in a cohort of patients admitted to hospital for suspected bacterial infections.Methods: A retrospective, consecutive study was conducted. All adult patients admitted during 1 month to a 550-bed secondary care hospital in western Sweden and given intravenous antibiotics for suspected community-acquired infection were included (n = 289). Symptoms (fever/chills, muscle weakness, localised pain, dyspnea, altered mental status and gastrointestinal symptoms) were registered along with age, sex, vital signs and laboratory values. Patients who fulfilled criteria of severe sepsis within 48 h were compared with patients who did not. Odds ratios for severe sepsis were calculated, adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities.Results: Criteria for severe sepsis were fulfilled by 90/289 patients (31.1%). Altered mental status (OR = 4.29, 95% CI = 2.03–9.08), dyspnea (OR = 2.92, 95% CI = 1.69–5.02), gastrointestinal symptoms (OR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.14–4.69) and muscle weakness (OR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.06–4.75) were more common in patients who had or later developed severe sepsis.Conclusions: Systemic symptoms in combination with other signs of infection should be considered warning signs of severe sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and life-threatening complication in patients with cirrhosis. Recently, new criteria for the diagnosis of AKI have been proposed in patients with cirrhosis by the International Club of Ascites. Almost all types of bacterial infections can induce AKI in patients with cirrhosis representing its most common precipitating event. The bacterial infection-induced AKI usually meets the diagnostic criteria of hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). Well in keeping with the 'splanchnic arterial vasodilation hypothesis', it has been stated that HRS develops as a consequence of a severe reduction of effective circulating volume related to splanchnic arterial vasodilation and to an inadequate cardiac output. Nevertheless, the role of bacterial infections in precipitating organ failures, including renal failure, is enhanced when their course is characterized by the development of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), thus, when sepsis occurs. Sepsis has been shown to be capable to induce 'per se' AKI in animals as well as in patients conditioning also the features of renal damage. This observation suggests that when precipitated by sepsis, the pathogenesis and the clinical course of AKI also in patients with cirrhosis may differentiate to a certain extent from AKI with another or no precipitating factor. The purpose of this review is to describe the features of AKI precipitated by bacterial infections and to highlight whether infection and/or the development of SIRS may influence its clinical course, and, in particular, the response to treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Body mass index (BMI) is an easily calculated indicator of a patient's body mass including muscle mass and body fat percentage and is used to classify patients as underweight or obese. This study is to determine if BMI extremes are associated with increased 28-day mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS) in emergency department (ED) patients presenting with severe sepsis. We performed a retrospective chart review at an urban, level I trauma center of adults admitted with severe sepsis between 1/2005 and 10/2007, and collected socio-demographic variables, comorbidities, initial and most severe vital signs, laboratory values, and infection sources. The primary outcome variables were mortality and LOS. We performed bivariable analysis, logistic regression and restricted cubic spline regression to determine the association between BMI, mortality, and LOS. Amongst 1,191 severe sepsis patients (median age, 57 years; male, 54.7 %; median BMI, 25.1 kg/m), 28-day mortality was 19.9 % (95 % CI 17.8-22.4) and 60-day mortality was 24.4 % (95 % CI 21.5-26.5). Obese and morbidly obese patients were younger, less severely ill, and more likely to have soft tissue infections. There was no difference in adjusted mortality for underweight patients compared to the normal weight comparator (OR 0.74; CI 0.42-1.39; p = 0.38). The obese and morbidly obese experienced decreased mortality risk, vs. normal BMI; however, after adjustment for baseline characteristics, this was no longer significant (OR 0.66; CI 0.42-1.03; p = 0.06). There was no significant difference in LOS across BMI groups. Neither LOS nor adjusted 28-day mortality was significantly increased or decreased in underweight or obese patients with severe sepsis. Morbidly obese patients may have decreased 28-day mortality, partially due to differences in initial presentation and source of infection. Larger, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings related to BMI extremes in patients with severe sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim was to evaluate the predictive value of serial serum sodium determination for mortality in enteric fistula (EF) patients complicated with sepsis. Methods: Between January 1st, 2012 to January 13th, 2013, we performed a prospective observational study enrolling 162 patients. Patients were divided into survivors group ( n = 119) and nonsurvivors group ( n = 43) according to 28-day outcomes. Laboratory variables on day 0, day 3, and day 7 after admission were recorded. [Na+]0 was defined as serum [Na+] value on admission. [Na+]3 was defined as serum [Na+] value on day 3. Δ [Na+]3 was defined as changes from [Na+]3 to [Na+]0. The definition applied to other parameters. The results were validated in an independent cohort of 116 patients. Results: ROC analysis showed that [Na+]7>147.5 mmol/L and ΔNa7>5.2 mmol/L were reliable predictors ([Na+]7: 81.2% sensitivity, 87.7% specificity, (area under the curve(AUC):0.872, p < .001; Δ[Na+]7: 81.3% sensitivity, 83.6% specificity, AUC:0.836 , p < .001) for mortality. The combination form ([Na+]7>147.5 mmol/L+ Δ[Na]7>5.2 mmol/L+ ΔPCT7<5.3 ng/ml) had greatest predictive value (AUC:0.899, p < .001). Their predictive values were confirmed in the validation cohort. Conclusions: Serum sodium was a reliable predictor for mortality in abdominal septic patients, which should be paid close attention in the critical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors discuss the influence of gender and sex on adult critically ill patients' outcomes and the methodical implications for critical care research. They claim that being male may be a risk factor for the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and sepsis. They also mentioned the dimorphism in sepsis pathophysiology, dimorphism in trauma pathophysiology, and the divergent critical illness trajectories in both genders.

Purpose: To determine whether there was an association between adjunctive therapy with IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (IgM) and the 30-day mortality rate in patients with septic shock. Methods: In 2008 we introduced IgM as a possible adjunctive therapy to be provided within 24 h after shock onset in the management protocol for patients with septic shock. In this retrospective study we included the adult patients suitable for IgM therapy admitted to our ICU from January 2008 to December 2011. An unadjusted comparison between patients who did or did not receive IgM therapy, a multivariate logistic model adjusted for confounders and propensity score-based matching were used to evaluate the association between early IgM treatment and mortality. Results: One hundred and sixty-eight patients were included in the study. Of these, 92 (54.8 %) received IgM therapy. Patients who did or did not receive IgM were similar with regards to infection characteristics, severity scores and sepsis treatment bundle compliance. Patients who received IgM were more likely to have blood cultures before antibiotics and to attain a plateau inspiratory pressure less than 30 cmHO ( p < 0.05). The 30-day mortality rate was reduced by 21.1 % ( p < 0.05) in the group that received IgM compared to the group that did not. The multivariate adjusted regression model (OR 0.17; CI 95 % 0.06-0.49; p = 0.001) and the propensity score-based analysis (OR 0.35; CI 95 % 0.14-0.85; p = 0.021) confirmed that IgM therapy was associated with reduced mortality at 30 days after the onset of septic shock. Conclusions: Our experience indicates that early adjunctive treatment with IgM may be associated with a survival benefit in patients with septic shock. However, additional studies are needed to better evaluate the role of IgM therapy in the early phases of septic shock. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hepatorenal syndrome in sepsis has been an accepted approach since 2007 and considering the two types of hepatorenal syndrome, type I occurs as a result of severe decline in the circulating volume caused by both significant splanchnic vasodilatation and by a decreased cardiac output, this type of dysfunction is found in sepsis. The aim of the study is to identify correlations between clinical, biochemical and microbiological aspects. The retrospective study included 117 patients with sepsis, hospitalized in the Clinic of Infectious Diseases from November 2012 to April 2014, who have liver/renal dysfunction hepatorenal syndrome and other organ dysfunctions. We conducted an assessment of clinical and laboratory data. The database was developed using Microsoft Excel and the SPSS version 16.0 was used for statistical processing. We identified different levels of biochemical parameters in patients with hepatorenal syndrome compared to patients with sepsis. We identified statistical correlations between values of serum creatinine and the severity of sepsis as well as between values of alkaline reserve and the calculated APACHE II score. The Inflammatory syndrome values no without statistically significant differences in patients with sepsis with hepatorenal syndrome compared to patients with sepsis and other organ dysfunctions. The average serum creatinine clearance in patients with sepsis and hepatorenal syndrome was 33 ml / min. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multimodal therapy for diseases like cancer has only become practicable following the development of staging systems like the TNM (tumor, nodes, metastases) system. Staging enables the identification of subgroups of patients with a disease who not only have a differing prognosis, but who are also more likely to benefit from a specific therapeutic modality. Critically ill patients represent a highly heterogeneous population for whom multiple therapeutic options are potentially available, each carrying not only the potential for differential benefit, but also the potential for differential harm. The PI RO system (predisposition, insult, response, organ dysfunction) is a template proposal for a staging system for acute illness that incorporates assessment of pre-morbid baseline susceptibility (predisposition), the specific disorder responsible for acute illness (insult), the response of the host to that insult, and the resulting degree of organ dysfunction. However the creation of a valid, robust, and clinically useful system presents significant challenges arising from the complexity of the disease state, the lack of a clear phenotype, the confounding influence of the effects of therapy and of cultural and socioeconomic factors, and the relatively low profile of acute illness with clinicians and the general public. This review summarizes the rationale for such a model of illness stratification and the results of preliminary cohort studies testing the concept. It further proposes two strategies for building a staging system, recognizing that this will be a demanding undertaking that will require decades of work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Severe sepsis is a leading cause of death in the United States and the most common cause of death among critically ill patients in non-coronary intensive care units (ICU ). Respiratory tract infections, particularly pneumonia, are the most common site of infection, and associated with the highest mortality. The type of organism causing severe sepsis is an important determinant of outcome, and gram-positive organisms as a cause of sepsis have increased in frequency over time and are now more common than gram-negative infections. Recent studies suggest that acute infections worsen preexisting chronic diseases or result in new chronic diseases, hence leading to poor long-term outcomes in acute illness survivors. People of older age, male gender, black race, and preexisting chronic health conditions are particularly prone to develop severe sepsis, hence prevention strategies should be targeted at these vulnerable populations in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The microbiome is the metagenome of all microbes that live on and within every individual, and evidence for its role in the pathogenesis of a variety of diseases has been increasing over the past several decades. While there are various causes of sepsis, defined as the abnormal host response to infection, the host microbiome may provide a unifying explanation for discrepancies that are seen in septic patient survival based on age, sex, and other confounding factors. As has been the case for other human diseases, evidence exists for the microbiome to control patient outcomes after sepsis. In this review, associative data for the microbiome and sepsis survival are presented with causative mechanisms that may be at play. Finally, clinical trials to manipulate the microbiome in order to improve patient outcomes after sepsis are presented as well as areas of potential future research in order to aid in the clinical treatment of these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sepsis is defined as "life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection". One of the elements of dysregulated host response is an endocrine system disorder. Changes in its functioning in the course of sepsis affect almost all hormonal axes. In sepsis, a function disturbance of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis has been described, in the range of which the most important seems to be hypercortisolemia in the acute phase. Imbalance in the hypothalamic–pituitary–thyroid axis is also described. The most typical manifestation is a triiodothyronine concentration decrease and reverse triiodothyronine concentration increase. In the somatotropic axis, a change in the secretion pattern of growth hormone and peripheral resistance to this hormone has been described. In the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis, the reduction in testosterone concentration in men and the stress-induced "hypothalamic amenorrhea" in women have been described. Catecholamine and β-adrenergic stimulation disorders have also been reported. Disorders in the endocrine system are part of the "dysregulated host response to infection". They may also affect other components of this dysregulated response, such as metabolism. Hormonal changes occurring in the course of sepsis require further research, not only in order to explore their potential significance in therapy, but also due to their promising prognostic value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Septic shock is the most severe form of sepsis, in which profound underlying abnormalities in circulatory and cellular/metabolic parameters lead to substantially increased mortality. A clear understanding and up-to-date assessment of the burden and epidemiology of septic shock are needed to help guide resource allocation and thus ultimately improve patient care. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore to provide a recent evaluation of the frequency of septic shock in intensive care units (ICUs) and associated ICU and hospital mortality.Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from 1 January 2005 to 20 February 2018 for observational studies that reported on the frequency and mortality of septic shock. Four reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved via consensus. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled frequency of septic shock diagnosed at admission and during the ICU stay and to estimate septic shock mortality in the ICU, hospital, and at 28 or 30 days.Results: The literature search identified 6291 records of which 71 articles met the inclusion criteria. The frequency of septic shock was estimated at 10.4% (95% CI 5.9 to 16.1%) in studies reporting values for patients diagnosed at ICU admission and at 8.3% (95% CI 6.1 to 10.7%) in studies reporting values for patients diagnosed at any time during the ICU stay. ICU mortality was 37.3% (95% CI 31.5 to 43.5%), hospital mortality 39.0% (95% CI 34.4 to 43.9%), and 28-/30-day mortality 36.7% (95% CI 32.8 to 40.8%). Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed.Conclusions: Our literature review reaffirms the continued common occurrence of septic shock and estimates a high mortality of around 38%. The high level of heterogeneity observed in this review may be driven by variability in defining and applying the diagnostic criteria, as well as differences in treatment and care across settings and countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute ethanol intoxication has been shown to have contrasting effects on outcomes in sepsis. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of acute ethanol intoxication on hemodynamics, renal function, brain perfusion and lactate/pyruvate in an ovine sepsis model. Methods: Anesthetized, mechanically ventilated female sheep were randomized to an ethanol group (n = 7), which received 1 g/kg ethanol diluted in intravenous (i.v.) saline infusion or a control group (n = 7), which received the same volume of i.v. saline. Both groups received the treatment for a period of 2 h prior to induction of sepsis by intraperitoneal injection of feces. Other treatment included fluid resuscitation but no vasopressors or antibiotics. Global hemodynamics, renal blood flow, brain cortex laser Doppler flowmetry and microdialysis analyses were recorded hourly. Results: In the ethanol group, blood ethanol concentrations were 137 ± 29 mg/dL at the time of feces injection and decreased to become undetectable by 12 h. Arterial hypotension occurred earlier in the ethanol than in the control group (8 [7–12] vs. 14 [11–20] hours, p = 0.03). Lactate levels increased to > 2 mmol/L earlier in the ethanol group. Renal dysfunction (9 [6–13] vs. 13 [12–15] hours, p = 0.05) and oliguria (urine output < 0.5 mL/kg/h; 10 [7–12] vs. 13 [12, 13] hours, p = 0.01) developed earlier in the ethanol than in the control group. Brain blood flow and lactate/pyruvate were unaffected. There was no significant difference in survival time. Conclusions: Acute ethanol intoxication in this model of peritonitis resulted in earlier development of shock and renal dysfunction but did not alter brain perfusion and metabolism or short-term survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]