Search

Aims: To examine the prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain and its association with diabetes self-management, glycemic control and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) in primary care., Methods: 329 patients with type 2 DM were recruited at public primary care clinics in Hong Kong. Chronic MSK pain was defined as having MSK pain ≥ 3 months, and the pain severity was measured by Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (DMSES), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and EuroQuol-5D (EQ5D) were collected. Multivariable regression was used to examine the association between the presence of chronic MSK pain with DMSES, HbA1c and EQ5D, adjusted for baseline confounders such as age, sex, BMI, duration of DM and comorbid depression., Results: Approximately 49.5% of respondents reported chronic MSK pain with a median BPI severity score of 3.5 (2.0-5.0). The presence of chronic MSK pain was associated with lower HRQoL (β = -0.053, 95% CI -0.087 to -0.018, P = 0.003), but was not associated with the diabetes self-management and glycemic control. Depression was associated with poorer diabetes self-management (β = -2.776, 95% CI -4.247 to -1.304, P < 0.001) and HRQoL.( β = -0.018,95% CI-0.025 to -0.012, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Chronic MSK pain was present in nearly half of the diabetic patients in primary care; however, the degree of pain was mild and had not shown to affect diabetes self-management and glycemic control. Depression was associated with poorer diabetes self-management. Chronic MSK pain and depression were both associated with poorer HRQoL., (Copyright © 2022 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Diabetes self-management education is a key aspect in the long-term management of type 2 diabetes. The patient and healthcare professional (HCP) perspective on the use of technology-assisted DSME has yet to be studied. Hence, the objective of this study was to better understand the factors that facilitate or hinder the adoptions of such education by adults with type 2 diabetes and their HCPs., Methods: We systematically searched five databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, and PsycINFO) until August 2019. The search included qualitative and mixed-method studies that reported the views of patients and HCPs regarding features, uses, and implementations of technology-assisted DSME. Data were synthesized through an inductive thematic analysis., Results: A total of 13 articles were included, involving 242 patients, ranging from 18 to 81 years and included web-based, mobile application, digital versatile disc (DVD), virtual reality or telehealth interventions. Patients and HCPs had mixed views towards features of the technology-assisted interventions, with patients' personal qualities and HCPs' concerns affecting uses of the interventions. Patients generally preferred technologies that were easy to access, use, and apply and that had reliable information. Patients' ambitions motivated them, and personal attributes such as poor competence with technology, poor literacy, and language barriers acted as barriers. Patients especially liked the peer support that they received but did not like it when there was no regulation of advice on these platforms. HCPs believed that while the interventions were useful to patients, they faced difficulties with integration into their clinical workflows., Conclusion: This review explored the features of technology-assisted diabetes self-management education interventions that enhanced positive patient engagements and the negative aspects of both the platforms and the target groups. Technical support and training will be effective in managing these concerns and ensuring meaningful use of these platforms., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

BACKGROUND: Self-management is important for asthma control, yet it is unclear whether asthmatic patients have sufficient knowledge to optimally manage their disease. We examined the associations between the knowledge of self-management in adult patients attending a polyclinic in Singapore, sociodemographic factors, and asthma control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among adult asthmatic patients in a public primary care clinic (polyclinic) using convenience sampling. A a structured and validated self-administered questionnaire solicited the responses of study participants. Questionnaire comprised three sections: (1) Sociodemographic and asthma-related variables, (2) Modified Asthma Self-Management Questionnaire (ASMQ), and (3) The GINA assessment of asthma control. Participants completed the questionnaire in the clinic waiting area and returned them into a sealed box in the same area. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 29.0. Summary statistics were used to describe the study sample; t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA), as appropriate, tested the differences in self-management knowledge by sociodemographic characteristics. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between asthma control and self-management knowledge controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: The sample comprised 141 asthma patients; Out of a total of 100 points, the mean ASMQ score was 46.8 (standard deviation 21.7). The scores for the knowledge of self-management of Asthma differed by age, level of education, and having been taught about asthma on bivariate analyses (P < 0.05). Linear regression showed a significant association of asthma self-management knowledge with educational level only. No association was observed between ASMQ scores and asthma control. CONCLUSION: There were gaps in patients' knowledge about asthma self-management, although they were generally knowledgeable about the inhaler technique. Higher education levels were associated with higher levels of knowledge beyond the effect of age and having been instructed about asthma, suggest that it is crucial that educational programs on asthma are made accessible to patients with lower levels of education. Further research needs to determine whether asthma educational programs targeting the knowledge gaps found in this study can improve knowledge of self-management and asthma control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]