Search

Treatment resistant OCD subjects, defined as those patients who undergo an adequate trial of SRI (clomipramine or SSRI) and do not respond or show unsatisfactory results, account for 40-50% of all patients. Once the appropriateness of the trial has been assessed, several options exist for the clinicians. If clomipramine or citalopram have been used, an appropriate strategy consists in giving the same drug intravenously. Double-blind studies exist on the efficacy of clomipramine IV, while data are missing for citalopram. Another option that should be considered first, although data are scarce, is the addition of a cognitive behavioral therapy, when available, in the forms of exposure and response prevention. When such options are not suitable or available, augmentation of the ongoing SRI with another compound represents the preferable strategy. Double-blind, placebo-controlled studies have shown the efficacy of adding pindolol (7.5 mg/d), risperidone (2 mg/d) and olanzapine (5-10 mg/d). Other agents have been proposed, but data emerging from double-blind studies were negative or contradictory. Another option available is switching from CMI to SSRI, or vice versa, or from SSRI to SSRI. Data regarding such treatment strategy, however, are highly preliminary, based on a couple of open label reports and on studies performed in treatment resistant depression. An unresolved question is whether augmentation should be preferred to switching. No data exist in OCD; a practical approach would suggest augmentation first, considering that response should be obtained faster than by switching compound. When all the available and effective strategies prove uneffective, clinicians should consider switching the patient to other compounds in monotherapy, such as venlafaxine, sumatriptan, inositol, although research is strongly needed before conclusions on the efficacy of such compounds can be drawn.

One of the most studied and well-documented strategies for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is the addition of antipsychotic drugs to the ongoing serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) treatment. To date, there has been a paucity of data regarding the use of aripiprazole in OCD patients who failed to respond to SRIs. The aim of the present pilot study was to investigate the efficacy of flexible doses of aripiprazole as augmenting agent in the treatment of resistant OCD patients. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria of treatment-resistant OCD entered a 12-week, open-label, flexible-dose trial of aripiprazole addition to SRIs. Aripiprazole was started at 5 mg/day and increased up to a maximum of 20 mg/day. Twelve patients fulfilled entry criteria; nine patients took at least one dose of study medication and eight of them completed the study. The mean daily dosage of aripiprazole in completers was 11.2+/-5.2 mg/day. Patients showed a significant improvement over the 12-week study period (paired t-test for mean Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale total score at week 12 as compared with baseline - all patients: t = 4.860, d.f. = 8, P = 0.001). The most common adverse event reported was inner unrest reported by four (44.4%) patients. Our study supports the notion that adding aripiprazole to SRIs could be a valid strategy for treatment-resistant OCD patients, and points towards the need of randomized, double-blind studies.

Background and objectives: Aripiprazole is a first-line agent in the treatment of bipolar disorder (BD) and available data demonstrates its efficacy on clinical symptoms in serotonin reuptake inhibitors-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. Therefore, aripiprazole augmentation to mood stabilizers could represent a promising treatment in BD patients with comorbid OCD. The study examined the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole added to lithium or valproate for the treatment of obsessive-compulsive (OC) symptoms in euthymic BD patients with comorbid OCD. Materials and methods: This is a 12-week prospective observational study. The efficacy of aripiprazole on OC symptoms was assessed through the mean change of Yale&ndash, Brown Obsessive-Compulsive (YBOCS) total score. Tolerability was assessed with the Utvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) side effect scale and by reporting adverse events. Results: A total of 70 patients were included in the analyses. The withdrawal rate was 21.4%, mainly due to adverse events. Mean &plusmn, SD final aripiprazole dose was 15.2 &plusmn, 5.3 in the completer sample (N = 55). The Y-BOCS mean score decreased from 24.0 &plusmn, 4.1 at baseline to 17.1 &plusmn, 4.3 at 12 weeks. Treatment response rate (Y-BOCS reduction &ge, 35%) was 41.8%, while partial response rate (Y-BOCS reduction greater than 25% but less than 35% from baseline) accounted for the other 18.2% of patients. Overall, 91.4% of completers had at least 1 adverse effect (tremor, tension/inner unrest, reduced duration of sleep, akathisia). No significant differences emerged comparing aripiprazole efficacy and tolerability between patients treated with lithium or valproate. Conclusion: Our findings show that aripiprazole addition to lithium or valproate can reduce OC symptoms in real-world BD euthymic patients.