Search

Objective: To assess the correlation of different vulvovaginal atrophy therapeutic options with the quality of life of postmenopausal women., Study Design: The CRETA study is a descriptive, observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study designed to measure, besides treatment satisfaction and adherence, the quality of life of postmenopausal women diagnosed with vulvovaginal atrophy in 29 hospitals and centers across Spain., Main Outcome Measures: The study enrolled postmenopausal women currently receiving treatment with vaginal moisturizers, local estrogen therapy or ospemifene. Clinical features and treatment perceptions were collected by self-report questionnaire and quality of life was evaluated using the Cervantes scale., Results: Among the 752 women included, the ospemifene cohort showed a statistically significant lower global score (44.9 ± 21.7) on the Cervantes scale (and therefore, a better quality of life) than the cohorts treated with moisturizers (52.5 ± 21.6, p = 0.003) or local estrogen therapy (49.2 ± 23.8, p = 0.0473). In the analysis by domains, ospemifene-treated women showed statistically significant better scores in menopause & health and psychological status than moisturizers-treated women (p < 0.05). In the domains of sexuality and couple relations, the score for the quality of life of the ospemifene cohort was statistically significantly better than the scores in either of the cohorts treated with moisturizers (p < 0.001) or local estrogen therapy (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Postmenopausal women diagnosed with vulvovaginal atrophy and treated with ospemifene have better quality of life than women treated with vaginal moisturizers or local estrogen therapy. The improvement observed with ospemifene is more remarkable in those aspects related to sex life and couple relations. CLINCIALTRIALS., Gov Number: NCT04607707., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Shionogi S.L.U. sponsored the study and provided support for the medical writing assistance by Kalispera medical writing S.L. RS-B has received consulting fees and speaker's honoraria from Shionogi. SP has received consulting fees and speaker's honoraria from Shionogi and Bayer HC, Exeltis, Gedeon Richter, NovoNordisk, Procare H, Serelys, Lacer, Sandoz, Pfizer, Theramex. MJC has received consulting fees and speaker's honoraria from Shionogi. JGC and JJQM are currently working at Shionogi S.L.U. The other authors declare that they have no competing interest., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC) is projected as a progestogen-free option for the treatment of estrogen deficiency symptoms in postmenopausal, non-hysterectomized women. TSEC combines the benefits of estrogen with a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), in this case bazedoxifene acetate (BZA), which has an antagonistic effect on the endometrium, thus avoiding the use of progestins. The authorized TSEC combination (conjugated estrogens [CE] 0.45 mg/BZA 20 mg) for the alleviation of vasomotor symptoms has been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials compared with placebo or menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). In addition, TSEC has shown improvements in quality of life and vaginal atrophy. In respect to MHT using progestins, the benefits of TSEC are found mainly in the bleeding pattern, amenorrhea rate, and reduction in mammary repercussion (i.e., breast tenderness and radiological density). The objective of this guide will be to analyze the efficacy and safety of TSEC consisting of CE/BZA in postmenopausal women.

In this review, we analyze the efficacy and safety of DT56a in the treatment of postmenopausal symptoms. Similar to all selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), DT56a demonstrates dual agonistic and antagonistic effects due to the synergy between its components. DT56a is referred to as a plant-origin SERM (phyto-SERM) and, for this reason, its therapeutic capacity in postmenopausal women differs from other phytoestrogens used independently. Although interesting data on relief of vasomotor symptoms have been reported for DT56a, further clinical studies with a greater number of cases and a longer period of study are required to correctly identify its indications for use as an alternative to hormone therapy, especially in preventing osteoporosis.

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women," by J. A. Kanis, E. V. McCloskey, H. Johansson, C. Cooper, R. Rizzoli, and J. Y. Reginster.