Search

Objective: The aim was to investigate the monitoring, interventions, and occurrence of critical, potentially life‐threatening incidents in patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) and caregivers' knowledge about sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Methods: This multicenter, cross‐sectional study of patients with DS and their caregivers in Germany consisted of a questionnaire and prospective diary querying the disease characteristics and demographic data of patients and caregivers. Results: Our analysis included 108 questionnaires and 82 diaries. Patients with DS were 49.1% male (n = 53), with a mean age of 13.5 (SD ± 10.0 years) and primary caregivers were 92.6% (n = 100) female, with a mean age of 44.7 (SD ± 10.6 years). Monitoring devices were used regularly by 75.9% (n = 82) of caregivers, and most monitored daily/nightly. Frequently used devices were pulse oximeters (64.6%), baby monitors (64.6%), thermometers (24.1%), and Epi‐Care (26.8%). Younger caregiver and patient age and history of status epilepticus were associated with increased use of monitoring, and 81% of monitor users reported having avoided a critical incident with nocturnal monitoring. The need for resuscitation due to cardiac or respiratory arrest was reported by 22 caregivers (20.4%), and most cases (72.7%) were associated with a seizure. Caregivers reported frequently performing interventions at night, including oropharyngeal suction, oxygenation, personal hygiene, and change of body position. Most caregivers were well informed about SUDEP (n = 102; 94%) and monitored for a lateral or supine body position; however, only 39.8% reported receiving resuscitation training, whereas 52.8% (n = 57) knew what to do in case the child's breathing or heart activity failed. Significance: Critical incidents and the need for resuscitation are reported frequently by caregivers and may be related to high mortality and SUDEP rates in DS. Resuscitation training is welcomed by caregivers and should be continuously provided. Oxygen monitoring devices are frequently used and considered useful by caregivers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Epilepsy surgery in low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumors (LEAT) is usually evaluated in drug-resistant cases, often meaning a time delay from diagnosis to surgery. To identify factors predicting good postoperative seizure control and neuropsychological outcome, the cohort of LEAT patients treated with resective epilepsy surgery at the Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Germany between 2015 and 2020 was analyzed. Thirty-five patients (19 males (54.3%) and 16 females, aged 4 to 40 years (M = 18.1), mean follow-up 33 months) were included. Following surgery, 77.1% of patients remained seizure-free (Engel IA/ILAE 1). Hippocampus and amygdala resection was predictive for seizure freedom in temporal lobe epilepsy. In total, 65.7% of all patients showed cognitive deficits during presurgical workup, decreasing to 51.4% after surgery, predominantly due to significantly less impaired memory functions (p = 0.011). Patients with presurgical cognitive deficits showed a tendency toward a longer duration of epilepsy (p = 0.050). Focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (p = 0.019) and young age at onset (p = 0.018) were associated with a higher likelihood of cognitive deficits after surgery. Therefore, we advocate early epilepsy surgery without requiring proof of drug-resistance. This refers especially to lesions associated with the non-eloquent cortex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To provide data on inpatient costs and cost-driving factors in children and adolescents due to non-refractory (NSE), refractory (RSE), and super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE).Methods: All children and adolescents treated for status epilepticus (SE) between 2011 and 2018 at the Frankfurt University Hospital were analyzed for health care utilization.Results: We evaluated 223 admissions in 174 patients (6.8 ± 5.1 years, median 5.5 years, range 0.1-17.5 years, 109 males [62.6%]) treated for SE. Mean costs of hospital treatment were €5,711 (median €2,330, range = €654-€102,414) per patient per admission, with a mean length of stay (LOS) of 9.2 days (median 5.0, range = 1-101), resulting in mean costs of €621 per SE treatment day. Course of SE had a significant impact on the mean costs, which were €3,386 in NSE (median €2,139, range €654-€38,236, €529 per treatment day; 37% of total inpatient costs due to SE), €7,409 in RSE (median €2,772, range €700-€38,236; €612 per treatment day, 38% of total inpatient costs due to SE) and €17,436 in SRSE (median €6,911, range €2,138-102,414; €842 per treatment day, 25% of total inpatient costs due to SE). Independent cost-driving factors were three or more treatment steps, acute-symptomatic etiology, and unfavorable modified Rankin Scale score at admission. Increased LOS was predicted by three or more treatment steps and unfavorable modified Rankin Scale score at admission. Overall mortality at discharge was 1.3% (three patients).Conclusions: Acute treatment of SE, and particularly RSE and SRSE, is associated with high hospital costs and prolonged LOS. Patients with disabilities are at risk for an unfavorable course of SE, resulting in prolonged LOS. In general, mortality associated with SE is low in children and adolescents, however three or more treatment steps are associated with high treatment costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate the long‐term efficacy, retention, and tolerability of add‐on brivaracetam (BRV) in clinical practice. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruited all patients who initiated BRV between February and November 2016, with observation until February 2021. Results: Long‐term data for 262 patients (mean age = 40 years, range = 5–81 years, 129 men) were analyzed, including 227 (87%) diagnosed with focal epilepsy, 19 (7%) with genetic generalized epilepsy, and 16 (6%) with other or unclassified epilepsy syndromes. Only 26 (10%) patients had never received levetiracetam (LEV), whereas 133 (50.8%) were switched from LEV. The length of BRV exposure ranged from 1 day to 5 years, with a median retention time of 1.6 years, resulting in a total BRV exposure time of 6829 months (569 years). The retention rate was 61.1% at 12 months, with a reported efficacy of 33.1% (79/239; 50% responder rate, 23 patients lost‐to‐follow‐up), including 10.9% reported as seizure‐free. The retention rate for the entire study period was 50.8%, and at last follow‐up, 133 patients were receiving BRV at a mean dose of 222 ± 104 mg (median = 200, range = 25–400), including 52 (39.1%) who exceeded the recommended upper dose of 200 mg. Fewer concomitant antiseizure medications and switching from LEV to BRV correlated with better short‐term responses, but no investigated parameters correlated with positive long‐term outcomes. BRV was discontinued in 63 (24%) patients due to insufficient efficacy, in 29 (11%) for psychobehavioral adverse events, in 25 (10%) for other adverse events, and in 24 (9%) for other reasons. Significance: BRV showed a clinically useful 50% responder rate of 33% at 12 months and overall retention of >50%, despite 90% of included patients having previous LEV exposure. BRV was well tolerated; however, psychobehavioral adverse events occurred in one out of 10 patients. Although we identified short‐term response and retention predictors, we could not identify significant predictors for long‐term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and quality of life (QOL) and depressive symptoms among caregivers. Adequate metrics were used to assess HRQOL in children and adolescents with TSC (4–18 years, KINDLR) as well as QOL (EQ-5D) and symptoms of depression (BDI-II) among caregivers. Predictors for reduced HRQOL and depressive symptoms were identified by variance analysis, ordinal regression, and bivariate correlation. The mean HRQOL score was 67.9 ± 12.7, and significantly lower values were associated with increasing age, attending special needs education, TSC-associated psychiatric symptoms, and drug-related adverse events. The mean QOL of caregivers was 85.4 ± 15.7, and caregiver's sex, TSC mutation locus, familial TSC clustering, special needs education, degree of disability, care dependency, presence of TSC-associated psychiatric symptoms, and TSC severity were significant predictors of lower QOL. Depressive symptoms were identified in 45.7% of caregivers, associated with female sex of the caregiver, familial TSC clustering, special needs education, and presence of TSC-associated psychiatric symptoms of the child. Multivariate regression analysis revealed adolescence and drug-related adverse events as significant predictors for lower HRQOL in TSC children, and TSC2 variants predicted lower QOL and depressive symptoms in caregivers. Compared with other chronic diseases, such as headache, diabetes or obesity, children with TSC have significantly lower HRQOL, which further decreases during adolescence. A decreased HRQOL of patients correlates with a lower QOL and increased symptoms of depression of their caregivers. These results may improve the comprehensive therapy and care of children and adolescents with TSC and their families and caregivers. DRKS, DRKS00016045. Registered 01 March 2019, http://www.drks.de/DRKS00016045. • Multicenter study in 184 children with TSC as well as their caregivers • Children with TSC have significantly lower HRQOL than the normal population • Adolescence, drug-related adverse events and the severity of TSC manifestation impact HRQOL • Caregivers have lower QOL and more depressive symptoms than the normal population • TSC2 variants were predictive of lower QOL and increased depressive symptoms in caregivers [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Most patients who die from sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) are found in the prone position. We evaluated whether changes in body position occur during generalized convulsive seizures (GCSs).Method: GCSs in patients undergoing video-EEG-monitoring between 2007 and 2017 at epilepsy centers in Frankfurt and Marburg were analyzed in relation to changes in body position.Results: A total of 494 GCSs were analyzed among 327 patients. At seizure onset, positions included supine (48.2 %), right lateral (19.0 %), left lateral (15.6 %), sitting or standing (14.0 %), and prone (3.2 %). Between seizure onset and the start of generalization, 57.5 % of participants altered body positions. During four seizures, patients adopted a prone position, while, in five seizures, patients moved from a prone position. Patients who experienced GCS onset while in a nonprone position had a 2.1 % risk of entering the prone position by the end of their seizure. In contrast, 56.2 % of those in an initial prone position remained so at the end of the GCS, with an odds ratio for maintaining that position of 60.2 (95 % confidence interval: 29.1-124.3; p < 0.001). The likelihood of ending up in the prone position post-GCS did not vary among patients with different nonprone starting positions (p = 0.147).Conclusions: Seizures in prone position occur during sleep and the highest risk for postictal prone positioning appears to be being in the prone position at GCS onset. Epilepsy patients should therefore be advised to go to sleep in a supine or lateral position to reduce their SUDEP risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To identify factors correlating with poorer quality of life (QoL) in children and adolescents with epilepsy and regarding QoL and depression of their caregivers in Germany.Method: A cross-sectional multicenter study on QoL and depression was performed in two representative German states (Hessen and Schleswig-Holstein). Variance analysis, linear regression, and bivariate correlation were used to identify correlating factors for poorer QoL and symptoms of depression.Results: Data from 489 children and adolescents (mean age 10.4 ± 4.2 years, range 0.5-17.8; 54.0% male) and their caregivers were collected. We identified missing seizure freedom (p = 0.046), concomitant diseases (p = 0.007), hospitalization (p = 0.049), recent status epilepticus (p = 0.035), living in a nursing home or with foster parents (p = 0.049), and relevant degree of disability (p = 0.007) to correlate with poorer QoL in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Poorer QoL of caregivers was associated with longer disease duration (p = 0.004), non-idiopathic (mainly structural-metabolic) epilepsy (p = 0.003), ongoing seizures (p = 0.003), concomitant diseases (p = 0.003), relevant disability (p = 0.003), or status epilepticus (p = 0.003) as well as with unemployment of the primary caretaker (p = 0.010). Symptoms of depression of caregivers were associated with non-idiopathic epilepsy (p = 0.003), concomitant diseases (p = 0.003), missing seizure freedom (p = 0.007), status epilepticus (p = 0.004), or a relevant disability (p = 0.004) of their ward. A poorer QoL value of the children and adolescents correlated with a poorer QoL value of the caregivers (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Epilepsy shows a considerable impact on QoL and symptoms of depression. Early and effective therapy should focus on reduction of seizure frequency and the probability for developing status epilepticus. Furthermore, comprehensive care should pay attention at comorbidities, consequences of disability and dependency on others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is one of the most common genetic causes of epilepsy. Mutations in the TSC1 or TSC2 genes lead to the dysregulation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. This mTOR pathway hyperactivation is associated with several processes resulting in epileptic conditions. The occurrence of seizures and their treatment outcomes seem to play a crucial role in cognitive and behavioral developments in patients with TSC. Mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors have been proven to be effective in epilepsy treatment in individuals with TSC. Specifically, because of their disease-modifying mechanism of action, they have the capability to prevent epileptogenesis in patients with TSC. This article will provide an overview of the current evidence of and delineate future perspectives for mTOR inhibitors and their role in preventing epileptogenesis. Highlights • mTOR inhibitors have been proven effective in epilepsy treatment in patients with TSC. • Because of their disease-modifying mechanism of action, they can prevent epileptogenesis in patients with TSC. • However, many questions are raised regarding the possibility of the preventive treatment of epilepsy in patients with TSC. • The optimal timing of treatment initiation seems to be crucial. • The effects of mTOR inhibition on the developing human brain are still unclear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction This multicenter, retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficiency, retention, safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in children and adolescents with focal epilepsy. Methods All patients aged ≤ 17 years with focal epilepsy who started BRV in 2016 and 2017 were analyzed. Results Thirty-four patients (mean age: 12.2 years, range: 3–17 years, 56% female) were treated with BRV for 25 days to 24 months, with a total exposure time of 19.7 years. Overnight switch from levetiracetam (LEV) to BRV was performed in 20 patients at a median ratio of 10:1. Retention rate was 97% at three months, with only one patient reporting a discontinuation of BRV treatment. Further dropouts were reported in one patient after seven months and in two patients after one year of treatment, respectively. The median length of exposure to BRV was 180 days. Efficacy at three months was 47% (50% responder rate), with 10 patients (29%) reporting seizure freedom. A long-term 50% responder rate was present in 12 patients [35%; four patients seizure-free (12%)] for more than six months and in seven patients (21%; no seizure-free patients) for more than 12 months. Treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 12% of patients, with the most common being sedation, somnolence, loss or gain of appetite, and psychobehavioral adverse events. Conclusions Use of BRV in children and adolescents seems to be safe and well-tolerated. The results with 50% responder rate of 47% are consistent with those from randomized controlled trials and postmarketing studies in adults. An immediate switch from LEV to BRV at a ratio of 10:1 is feasible. The occurrence of psychobehavioral adverse events seems less prominent than under LEV and a switch to BRV can be considered in patients with LEV-induced adverse events. Highlights • Postmarketing data in 34 children with focal epilepsies and brivaracetam treatment • 50% responder rates of 47% (29% seizure-free) for three months • Retention rate of 97% at three months and median exposure of 180 days • Immediate switch from levetiracetam to brivaracetam at 10:1 ratio is feasible without titration. • The main adverse events are sedation, somnolence, and behavioral adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate effectiveness, retention, and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in genetic generalized epilepsies (GGE) in clinical practice. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruiting all patients that started BRV in 2016 and 2017. Results: A total of 61 patients (mean age = 29.8, range = 9‐90 years, 41 female [67%]) were treated with BRV. They were difficult to control, with 2.4 failed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the past, taking 1.9 AEDs on average at baseline. The length of exposure to BRV ranged from 7 days to 24 months, with a mean retention time of 7.9 months, resulting in a total exposure time to BRV of 483 months. The retention rate was 82% at 3 months and 69% at 6 months. Efficacy at 3 months was 36% (50% responder rate), with 25% seizure‐free for 3 months. Patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy showed a responder rate of 60%, with 40% being free of any seizures. Long‐term 50% responder rate was present in 17 patients (28%; 11 seizure‐free [18%]) for >6 months and in 14 patients (23%; 10 seizure‐free [16%]) for >12 months. Treatment‐emergent adverse events were observed in 26% of the patients, with the most common being somnolence, ataxia, and psychobehavioral adverse events. Use of intravenous BRV with bolus injection of 200‐300 mg in two females with absence status epilepticus was well tolerated, but did not result in cessation of status epilepticus. Significance: Use of BRV in GGE is well tolerated, and 50% responder rates are similar to those observed in the regulatory trials for focal epilepsies. An immediate switch from levetiracetam (LEV) to BRV at a ratio of 15:1 is feasible. The occurrence of psychobehavioral adverse events seems less prominent than under LEV, and a switch to BRV can be considered in patients with LEV‐induced adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To evaluate factors predicting efficacy, retention, and tolerability of add-on brivaracetam ( BRV) in clinical practice. Methods A multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruiting all patients who started BRV between February and November 2016 with observation time between 3 and 12 months. Results Of a total of 262 patients (mean age 40, range 5-81 years, 129 male) treated with BRV, 227 (87%) were diagnosed to have focal, 19 (7%) idiopathic generalized and 8 (3%) symptomatic generalized epilepsy, whereas 8 (3%) were unclassified. The length of exposure to BRV ranged from 1 day to 12 months, with a median retention time of 6.1 months, resulting in a total exposure time to BRV of 1,504 months. The retention rate was 79.4% at 3 months and 75.8% at 6 months. Efficacy at 3 months was 41.2% (50% responder rate) with 14.9% seizure-free for 3 months and, at 6 months, 40.5% with 15.3% seizure-free. Treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 37.8% of the patients, with the most common being somnolence, dizziness, and behavioral adverse events ( BAEs). BAE that presented under previous levetiracetam ( LEV) treatment improved upon switch to BRV in 57.1% (20/35) and LEV-induced somnolence improved in 70.8% (17/24). Patients with BAE on LEV were more likely to develop BAE on BRV (odds ratio [ OR] 3.48, 95% confidence interval [ CI] 1.53-7.95). Significance BRV in broad clinical postmarketing use is a well-tolerated anticonvulsant drug with 50% responder rates, similar to those observed in the regulatory trials, even though 90% of the patients included had previously been exposed to LEV. An immediate switch from LEV to BRV at a ratio of 10:1 to 15:1 is feasible. The only independent significant predictor of efficacy was the start of BRV in patients not currently taking LEV. The occurrence of BAE during previous LEV exposure predicted poor psychobehavioral tolerability of BRV treatment. A switch to BRV can be considered in patients with LEV-induced BAE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The intravenous formulation of lacosamide ( LCM) and its good overall tolerability and safety favor the use in status epilepticus ( SE). The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate studies reporting on the use of LCM in SE. Methods We performed a systematic literature search of electronic databases using a combined search strategy from 2008 until October 2016. Using a standardized assessment form, information on the study design, methodologic framework, data sources, efficacy, and adverse events attributed to LCM were extracted from each publication and systematically reported. Results In total, 522 SE episodes (51.7% female) in 486 adults and 36 children and adolescents were evaluated with an overall LCM efficacy of 57%. Efficacy was comparable between use in nonconvulsive (57%; 82/145) and generalized-convulsive (61%; 30/49; p = 0.68) SE, whereas overall success rate was better in focal motor SE (92%; 34/39, p = 0.013; p < 0.001). The efficacy with later positioning of LCM decreased from 100% to 20%. The main adverse events during treatment of SE are dizziness, abnormal vision, diplopia, and ataxia. Overall, lacosamide is well tolerated and has no clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. Significance The available data regarding the use of LCM in SE are promising, with a success rate of 57%. The strength of LCM is the lack of interaction potential and the option for intravenous use in emergency situations requiring rapid uptitration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This non-interventional study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous lacosamide (LCM-iv) under routine conditions in daily clinical practice as a prospective registry.Methods: Patients with any type of seizure or epilepsy syndrome were recruited in 16 neurological and neuropediatric centers in Germany if the treating physician decided to administer LCM-iv for any reason. Observation time per patient was 10 days with daily documentation of LCM-iv administration, type and frequency of seizures, currently used drugs and doses, and adverse events. Treatment efficacy, tolerability, and handling of LCM-iv were assessed using a five-step scale.Results: In 119 patients treating physicians classified epilepsies as focal in 66.1% and generalized in 17.4% (16.5% unclassifiable). Most common etiologies of seizures were tumors (36.1%) and cerebrovascular diseases (21.8%). Reasons for LCM-iv treatment included preparation for surgery (25.2%), convulsive (24.4%) and non-convulsive (18.5%) status epilepticus (SE), series of seizures (16.0%), gastrointestinal causes (5.9%), and acute seizures (4.2%). The median dose of LCM-iv was 300mg per day. In 45 of 64 patients (70.3%) with SE or series of seizures, epileptic activity ceased during observation time. Five patients showed abnormalities in ECG prior to the infusion and one patient afterwards, but during infusion no abnormalities were reported. Treating physicians rated efficacy and tolerability as very good or good in 77.6% and 93.1% of patients, respectively.Conclusions: This large and independent multicenter registry on the use of LCM-iv in clinical practice demonstrates that LCM-iv is well-tolerated and highly efficacious when given in emergency situations, including patients experiencing SE. It is advisable to perform an electrocardiogram prior to LCM-iv administration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The diagnosis of epilepsy is accompanied by relevant personal, interpersonal, and professional restrictions for patients and their caregivers. Specialized epilepsy counseling services (ECS) have been introduced to inform, advise, and support patients with disease-related problems. Aim and scope The objective of this cross-sectional, multicenter study was to determine the demand, typical content, and outcomes of ECS in children, adolescents, and adults in two adjacent German regions of Hessen and Lower Franconia. All ECS sites in these regions participated in 2014 and 2015, offering a total population of 7.5 million inhabitants. Results A total number of 435 patients [323 adults (74.3%), 51.7% female, mean age: 40.3 ± 14.7 years and 112 children/adolescents (25.7%), 52.7% female, mean age: 9.4 ± 4.6 years] were enrolled at six ECS sites. The most common reasons for counseling were general information needs (n = 304; 69.9%), administrative help (n = 208; 47.8%), problems with education or work (n = 176; 40.5%), and recreational activities (n = 119; 27.3%). In addition, 6.2% reported epilepsy-related questions on family planning as a specific reason for desiring counseling. Recommendation by the treating physicians was the most frequent reason for receiving counseling through ECS (62.5%), and most patients preferred to receive a personal consultation (73.1%). Patient satisfaction as measured by the ZUF-8 client satisfaction score was high with a mean of 29.7 points (standard deviation: ± 2.7 points, median: 29.9 points), and 83.9% of patients said they would recommend ECS. Disease-related job loss or change in school was avoided in 72% of 82 patients. Suggestions for improvement of ECS included an extension of service hours (58.6%) and a better availability of more sites located nearby (32.8%). Conclusion Epilepsy counseling services are necessary, valued, and effective institutions for people with epilepsy complementing outpatient and inpatient care. To improve the care for people with epilepsy, access to and availability of ECS should be improved. Highlights • We surveyed 323 adults and 112 children with caregivers at six epilepsy counseling service sites. • Counseling issues are general information needs, administrative help, and problems with education or work. • Epilepsy-related job loss or change in school was avoided in 72% of patients. • Patients are satisfied with epilepsy counseling and would recommend to people with epilepsy in need of advice. • Patients suggest an extension of service hours and a better availability of more sites located nearby. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]