Search

Differences between breaker bar evolution under high energy (erosive) and subsequent mild energy (accretive) wave conditions are studied based on three data sets from large-scale morphodynamic experiments. Under erosive wave conditions, a clear linear relationship between the height and the cross-shore location of the breaker bar is observed. The similar cross-shore shape of the sediment transport magnitudes underlines the similarity of the bar evolution under erosive wave conditions. Under the subsequent accretive wave conditions, two major evolution patterns are observed during onshore migration (decaying or non-decaying breaker bar). In the presented data, the feedback between the wave conditions and the beach morphology determines if a bar decays during onshore migration. This feedback involves that the wave breaking location depends on the morphology and on the wave conditions resulting in differences in sediment transport patterns between the two types of onshore bar migration. A comparison against numerous other experimental beach profile data sets strongly supports the linear relationship between bar height and bar location under erosive wave conditions. For accretive wave conditions, the number of comparable data sets is very limited. The comparison underlines that breaker bar evolution under accretive wave conditions cannot be condensed to a single pattern as under erosive wave conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

New large-scale experiments on the influence of storm sequencing on beach profile evolution are presented. The experiments comprised three sequences that commenced from the same initial beach profile. Each sequence consisted of two storms of different energy, with each storm followed by a recovery phase. A specific focus of the experiments was the influence of storm chronology as well as the influence of the recovery wave energy and duration on beach evolution. The breaker bar and the shoreline are studied as indicators for the beach response. Both evolve towards an equilibrium location for each wave condition where the breaker bar reaches its equilibrium much faster than the shoreline. Overall, no enhanced beach erosion due to storm sequencing is observed. Despite a similar cumulative wave power of the three sequences, the final beach configuration of each sequence seems to be determined by the last wave condition instead of previous storms. However, storm sequencing is important when the beach profile has not yet fully recovered before being disrupted by the subsequent storm. In this case, the second storm does not necessarily cause further erosion but can result in onshore sediment transport and hence, form part of the recovery. The bulk onshore sediment transport as well as the shoreline recovery rate vary depending on the wave condition and the profile disequilibrium and show a maximum value for a recovery condition with an intermediate wave energy. The very low energy condition that was performed for a long duration (24 hours) generated a near-stationary beach profile with typical features of a reflective beach. • New large-scale experiments on storm sequencing and beach response. • The beach evolves towards an equilibrium state under the performed storm sequences. • The rate of beach change varies depending on the antecedent beach morphology. • Largest bulk onshore sediment transport occurs for intermediate low energy conditions. • A very low energy condition of long duration (24 h) results in a reflective beach profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The evolution of different initial beach profiles towards the same final beach configuration is investigated based on large-scale experimental data. The same wave condition was performed three times, each time starting from a different initial profile morphology. The three different initial profiles are an intermediate energy profile with an offshore bar and a small swash berm, a plane profile and a low energy profile with a large berm. The three cases evolve towards the same final (equilibrium) profile determined by the same wave condition. This implies that the same wave condition generates different sediment transport patterns. Largest beach changes and differences in hydrodynamics occur in the beginning of the experimental cases, highlighting the coupling between morphology and hydrodynamics for beach evolution towards the same profile. The coupling between morphology and hydrodynamics that leads to the same final beach profile is associated with differences in sediment transport in the surf and swash zone, and is explained by the presence of bar and berm features. A large breaker bar and concave profile promote wave energy dissipation and reduce the magnitudes of the mean near-bed flow velocity close to the shoreline limiting shoreline erosion. In contrast, a beach profile with reflective features, such as a large berm and a small or no bar, increases negative velocity magnitudes at the berm toe promoting shoreline retreat. The findings are summarised in a conceptual model that describes how the beach changes towards equilibrium from two different initial morphologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sand transport processes and net transport rates are studied in a large-scale laboratory swash zone. Bichromatic waves with a phase modulation were generated, producing two continuously alternating swash events that have similar offshore wave statistics but which differ in terms of wave-swash interactions. Measured sand suspension and sheet flow dynamics show strong temporal and spatial variability, related to variations in flow velocity and locations of wave capture and wave-backwash interactions. Suspended and sheet flow layer transport rates in the lower swash zone are generally of same magnitude, but sheet flow exceeds the suspended load transport by up to a factor four during the early uprush. The bed level near the inner surf zone is relatively steady during a swash cycle, but changes of O (cm/s) are measured near the mid swash zone where wave-swash interactions lead to strongly non-uniform flows. The two alternating swash events produce a dynamic equilibrium, with bed level changes up to a few mm induced by single swash events, but with net morphodynamic change over multiple events that is two orders of magnitude lower. Most of the intra-swash and the single-event-averaged bed level changes in the swash zone are caused by a redistribution of sediment within the swash. The transport of sediment across the surf-swash boundary is minor at intra-swash time scale, but becomes increasingly significant at swash-averaged time scales or longer (i.e., averaged over multiple swash events). •Large-scale wave flume experiments involving two alternating bichromatic wave induced swash events. •Sediment mobilization as sheet load and suspended load increases substantially from inner surf to lower swash zone. •Sheet flow transport dominates the total transport during the early uprush and during instants of strong wave-backwash interactions. •Single swash events can produce much greater net transport rates and bed level changes than the overall trend over multiple events. •The sediment exchange across the surf-swash boundary becomes increasingly significant when integrated over larger time scales. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]