1. Standardisierte DaF/DaZ-Tests: Ein notwendiges Übel?
- Author
-
Jung, Matthias
- Subjects
- *
LANGUAGE ability testing , *TEST validity , *LANGUAGE ability , *STANDARDIZED tests , *GERMAN language , *SECOND language acquisition , *LANGUAGE acquisition - Abstract
The article "Standardized DaF/DaZ Tests: A Necessary Evil?" by Matthias Jung from Düsseldorf discusses the debate about standardized tests in the field of German as a foreign and second language. The author mentions the role of Uwe Koreik, who has been extensively involved in revising the DSH examination regulations. The article emphasizes the growing importance of German certificates for individual life paths and criticizes the blind faith in standardized tests. It is argued that standardized tests do not make the learners' potential visible and do not take individual learning progress into account. The fixation on exams leads to a pure focus on exam preparation and neglects other learning goals. Higher education has responded to this with the concept of "constructive alignments" to better align learning goals and exam preparation. The text discusses various criticisms of standardized language tests, particularly in relation to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). It is pointed out that the classification into CEFR levels does not correspond to the continuous process of language acquisition. Furthermore, the question is raised whether standardized exams are necessary or desirable at all, especially in the context of the integration of refugees or professionals. The text also mentions fraudulent strategies to obtain language certificates, as well as gray areas that question the objectivity of standardized tests. The article discusses various aspects of language tests and their validity. It is noted that it is not prohibited to use lists of typical exam topics or hints to prepare for an exam. However, it is pointed out that pure exam preparations that aim to pass the exam without actually acquiring language proficiency can question the validity of the tests. The article also highlights the differences in the evaluation rules of different language certificates and discusses whether all four skills need to be mastered at the same level to pass the exam. The article discusses the use of standardized language tests, particularly in relation to visa applications and the integration of migrants. It is stated that these tests are often arbitrary and not always reliable. The authors argue that the use of subject-specific language exams would be fairer, but is not practical due to the complexity of the process. It is also noted that language certificates are often abused as instruments to control migration flows. The article concludes that the blind faith in the accuracy of these tests should be questioned. The introduction of the "German Test for Immigrants" (DTZ) in 2009 and the "German Test for the Profession" (DTB) in 2022 demonstrate the increased belief in the objectivity of language tests and the importance of control in this area. However, there are concerns about the validity of language tests for measuring communicative skills and potentials. The phenomenon of fossilization, where no further progress is made in learning, can hinder language integration. Data on integration courses in Germany show that many participants do not pass the exams and may not progress beyond level A2. It is suggested to assess linguistic abilities in real situations and create individual communication and competency profiles. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF