Search

Purpose: To assess direct costs and risks associated with revision operations for distal junctional kyphosis/failure (DJK) following thoracic posterior spinal instrumented fusions (TPSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)., Methods: Children who underwent TPSF for AIS by a single surgeon (2014-2020) were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were minimum follow-up of 2 years, thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusion with a lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) cranial to L2. Patients who developed DJK requiring revision operations were identified and compared with those who did not develop DJK., Results: Seventy-nine children were included for analysis. Of these, 6.3% developed DJK. Average time to revision was 20.8 ± 16.2 months. Comparing index operations, children who developed DJK had significantly greater BMIs, significantly lower thoracic kyphosis postoperatively, greater post-operative lumbar Cobb angles, and significantly more LIVs cranial to the sagittal stable vertebrae (SSV), despite having statistically similar pre-operative coronal and sagittal alignment parameters and operative details compared with non-DJK patients. Revision operations for DJK, when compared with index operations, involved significantly fewer levels, longer operative times, greater blood loss, and longer hospital lengths of stay. These factors resulted in significantly greater direct costs for revision operations for DJK ($76,883 v. $46,595; p < 0.01)., Conclusions: In this single-center experience, risk factors for development of DJK were greater BMI, lower post-operative thoracic kyphosis, and LIV cranial to SSV. As revision operations for DJK were significantly more costly than index operations, all efforts should be aimed at strategies to prevent DJK in the AIS population., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Postoperative distal adding-on and distal junctional kyphosis are major distal junctional complications after selective thoracic fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study aimed to investigate the incidence of distal adding-on and distal junctional kyphosis and evaluate the validity of our selection criteria for the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in patients with Lenke type 1A and 2A AIS., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with Lenke type 1A and 2A AIS, who underwent posterior fusion surgery. LIV selection included the followings: (1) stable vertebra on traction film, (2) disc space neutralization below the LIV on the side-bending film, and (3) lordotic disc below the LIV on the lateral film. Radiographic parameters and the revised 22-item Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS-22r) were evaluated. The incidence of postoperative distal adding-on and distal junctional kyphosis was also investigated., Results: Ninety patients (83 women and 7 men; 64 with type 1A and 26 with type 2A) were included. After the operation, each curve and the SRS-22r of self-image, mental health, and subtotal domains were significantly improved. Distal adding-on occurred in three patients (3.3%, one in type 1A and two in type 2A) at 2 years postoperatively. No patients exhibited distal junctional kyphosis., Conclusions: Our LIV selection criteria could reduce the incidence of postoperative distal adding-on and distal junctional kyphosis in patients with Lenke type 1A and 2A AIS., Level of Evidence: Level IV., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Purpose: To investigate the optimal lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in the treatment of Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) with different curve patterns., Methods: Fifty-two SK patients who underwent posterior surgery between January 2010 and December 2017 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the curve pattern: the Scheuermann thoracic kyphosis (STK group) or Scheuermann thoracolumbar kyphosis (STLK group). Based on the relationship between the sagittal stable vertebra (SSV) and LIV, both groups were further divided into the SSV group and SSV-1 group. Radiographic parameters, distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) incidence and SRS-22 questionnaire scores were evaluated., Results: In STK and STLK groups, there were no significant differences in most pre- and postoperative radiographic assessments between SSV and SSV-1 subgroups. DJK incidence showed no significant differences between groups during follow-up (P > 0.05). LIV-PSVL was significantly more negative in the SSV-1 group than that in the SSV group (P < 0.001). Within the SSV-1 group, patients with DJK showed a more negative LIV-PSVL (P = 0.039). Moderate correlation was observed between preoperative LIV-PSVL and DJK with a Spearman coefficient of - 0.474 (P = 0.035). Receiver operative characteristic curve analysis showed that the threshold value of preoperative LIV-PSVL to predict DJK was - 37.35 mm (area under the curve 0.882)., Conclusion: Shorter fusion stopping at SSV-1 achieved comparable clinical outcomes and did not increase the risk of DJK for both STK and STLK patients. For patients whose preoperative LIV-PSVL <  - 37.35 mm, extending fusion to SSV is an acceptable solution to prevent DJK., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: Typically, selection of lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is based on the coronal radiograph; however, increasing evidence suggests that fusions proximal to the stable sagittal vertebrae (SSV) on the lateral radiograph can result in distal junctional kyphosis (DJK). The purpose of this study is to compare rates of DJK in patients with AIS that have a discordance between the Lowest Touched Vertebra (LTV) and the SSV and to identify risk factors for developing DJK., Methods: Patients with AIS Lenke type 1, 2 and 3 curves treated with a posterior spinal fusion were separated into two groups. Group 1 had SSV that was proximal to the LTV whereas group 2 had SSV that was distal to the LTV. Comparisons were made for patients that were fused to the SSV(a), LTV(b) or between(c). Distal junctional angle (DJA) > 5° and increasing kyphosis at the end of the fusion construct were evaluated as risk factors for DJK., Results: The rate of DJK was 0.0% in group 1a, 1b, and 1c compared to 4.3%, 18.5% and 10.0% in groups 2a, 2b and 2c, respectively(p < 0.001). The rate of DJK was 22.9% when the distal junctional angle(DJA) > 5° versus 1.4% when the DJA < 5°(p < 0.001)., Conclusion: There was a low risk for progression of DJK when the SSV was proximal to the LTV, however, those with SSV distal to the LTV represent a high-risk group. Importantly, the development of DJK occurred almost exclusively in patients with LIV at the thoracolumbar junction which demonstrates that surgeons need to be cautious when ending fusions at T11, T12, and L1 in patients at high risk for DJK. Furthermore, having a distal junctional angle 5° or greater increased the risk of developing DJK by roughly 16-fold. At a minimum of 5-year follow-up, the development of DJK did not appear to adversely impact SRS outcomes or revision rates., (© 2021. Scoliosis Research Society.)

Purpose: The selection of lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is determined by coronal and sagittal plane indicators. Failure to properly select the LIV can lead to suboptimal outcomes and the need for revision surgery. A subset of patients have discordant coronal last touched vertebra (cLTV) and stable sagittal vertebra (SSV) which complicates the choice of LIV. The purpose of this study is to report the incidence of discordant cLTV and SSV when choosing LIV and investigate the association between length of fusion and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and distal junctional kyphosis (DJK)., Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included AIS patients with discordant pre-operative cLTV and SSV. Patients fused only to include the proximal cLTV were compared to patients fused to include the distal SSV. Primary outcomes included DJK and PROs measured by SRS-22., Results: Eight hundred and fifty-six patients were identified of which 114 (13.3%) had discordant SSV and cLTV. The DJK incidence was 7.7% and 45.5% in patients fused to include the SSV versus short of the SSV, respectively. Lenke Modifier type B and C patients with fusions short of the SSV had a 9.2 times increased risk of developing DJK at 2 years compared to patients with fusions including the SSV (95% CI 2.8, 29.7; p < 0.001). However, patients with fusions short of the SSV and no evidence of DJK were 9.2 times more likely to have improvement in the SRS-22 pain domain compared to patients with fusions including the distal SSV (95% CI 1.1, 77.4; p = 0.042) CONCLUSION: Patients fused short of the SSV are at significant risk for the development of DJK at 2 years post-operatively. However, patients with shorter fusions were more likely to have an improvement in their pain as measured by patient-reported outcomes than patients with longer fusions.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: To validate whether fusions that end proximal to the sagittal stable vertebrae are at risk for developing distal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis., Background: Posterior spinal fusion is routinely used for the treatment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Fusions that end in either the lower thoracic or upper lumbar spine have the advantage of preserving motion segments. However, fusions ending proximal to the sagittal stable vertebrae has been shown to be at higher risk for developing distal junctional kyphosis., Methods: A multi-center database of prospectively enrolled subjects was queried for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis that had Lenke type 1, 2 and 3 curves treated with posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. PA (posterior-anterior) and lateral full-length scoliosis films were obtained on each patient. PA radiographs were viewed to determine the coronal deformity and lateral radiographs to determine the sagittal deformity. Distal junctional kyphosis was defined as a greater than 10° increase in segmental kyphosis between the LIV and the LIV + 1 vertebra., Results: 346 patients were included with 85% being female and mean age of cohort 14.2 [Formula: see text] 2.08 years. At 5 years postoperatively, there was significant difference occurrence of distal junctional kyphosis dependent on whether the LIV relative to SSV with only 2.2% of fusions below the SSV developing DJK compared to 6.5% for fusions ending at the SSV and 15% for fusions with LIV above the SSV (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in revision rates based on the relationship of LIV to SSV., Conclusion: There is an increased risk for development of DJK in patients with AIS treated with posterior fusion where the LIV was chosen proximal to the SSV., Level Evidence: Level III.

Study Design: Multicenter retrospective review., Objective: To assess the effectiveness of using the stable sagittal vertebra (SSV) for selecting the lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV) to prevent distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in selective thoracic fusions., Summary of Background Data: Cho et al. reported that including the SSV in a fusion decreased the rate of DJK in thoracic hyperkyphosis., Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients from two pediatric hospitals with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent selective posterior thoracic fusion with the LIV at L2 or above from 2000 to 2012. Patients with less than 2 years' follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome measure was DJK, defined radiographically as ≥10° between the superior end plate of the LIV and the inferior end plate of the vertebra below on a standing lateral radiograph. We investigated the SSV, which was defined as the vertebral level at which 50% of the vertebral body was in front of the posterior sacral vertical line (PSVL) on a standing lateral radiograph. This particular definition was referred to as SSV., Results: A total of 113 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 14.4 years. Mean Cobb angle was 58°. The overall rate of DJK was 7% (8/113). When the LIV was superior to SSV, the rate of DJK was 17% (8/46) versus 0% (0/67) when the LIV was at or inferior to SSV (p=.01). The rates of DJK for patients with the LIV one, two, and three levels above SSV were 17% (4/24), 7% (1/14), and 43% (3/7), respectively. There was no significant association between preoperative or postoperative maximum kyphosis, thoracic kyphosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis, pelvic incidence, sagittal balance or coronal balance, and development of DJK., Conclusion: Although LIV selection is complex, choosing the LIV at or below the SSV is a simple rule that minimizes the risk of DJK., Level of Evidence: Level IV., (Copyright © 2017 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Opposed to proximal junctional kyphosis and proximal junctional failure, their distal equivalents, distal junctional kyphosis and failure (DJK/DJF) have received less attention in the literature. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the problem of DJK-DJF in different clinical scenarios such as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), Scheuermann's kyphosis (SK) and adult deformity surgery and to suggest a strategy for prevention and treatment.Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted to identify the best evidence on the risk factors of the problem.Results: DJK/DJF have been described as a complication of AIS, SK and adult spine deformity (ASD). For AIS and SK, the choice of a lower instrumented vertebra more cranial than the sagittal stable vertebra has shown to increase the incidence of DJK and DJF. For ASD, constructs ending with S1 pedicle screws had a higher incidence of DJK/DJF than those ending distally with S1 pedicle plus iliac screws.Conclusion: The proposed strategy of treatment includes restoration of normal sagittal alignment, choice of a distal fixation point stable in the sagittal, coronal and transverse planes, balancing the fusion mass over the distal fixation point and providing solid fixation at the distal end of the construct. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]