Search

Objective: Cervical deformity (CD) correction is clinically challenging. There is a high risk of developing complications with these highly complex procedures. The aim of this study was to use baseline demographic, clinical, and surgical factors to predict a poor outcome following CD surgery., Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of a multicenter prospective CD database. CD was defined as at least one of the following: cervical kyphosis (C2-7 Cobb angle > 10°), cervical scoliosis (coronal Cobb angle > 10°), C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA) > 25°. Patients were categorized based on having an overall poor outcome or not. Health-related quality of life measures consisted of Neck Disability Index (NDI), EQ-5D, and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale scores. A poor outcome was defined as having all 3 of the following categories met: 1) radiographic poor outcome: deterioration or severe radiographic malalignment 1 year postoperatively for cSVA or T1 slope-cervical lordosis mismatch (TS-CL); 2) clinical poor outcome: failing to meet the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for NDI or having a severe mJOA Ames modifier; and 3) complications/reoperation poor outcome: major complication, death, or reoperation for a complication other than infection. Univariate logistic regression followed by multivariate regression models was performed, and internal validation was performed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC)., Results: In total, 89 patients with CD were included (mean age 61.9 years, female sex 65.2%, BMI 29.2 kg/m2). By 1 year postoperatively, 18 (20.2%) patients were characterized as having an overall poor outcome. For radiographic poor outcomes, patients' conditions either deteriorated or remained severe for TS-CL (73% of patients), cSVA (8%), horizontal gaze (34%), and global SVA (28%). For clinical poor outcomes, 80% and 60% of patients did not reach MCID for EQ-5D and NDI, respectively, and 24% of patients had severe symptoms (mJOA score 0-11). For the complications/reoperation poor outcome, 28 patients experienced a major complication, 11 underwent a reoperation, and 1 had a complication-related death. Of patients with a poor clinical outcome, 75% had a poor radiographic outcome; 35% of poor radiographic and 37% of poor clinical outcome patients had a major complication. A poor outcome was predicted by the following combination of factors: osteoporosis, baseline neurological status, use of a transition rod, number of posterior decompressions, baseline pelvic tilt, T2-12 kyphosis, TS-CL, C2-T3 SVA, C2-T1 pelvic angle (C2 slope), global SVA, and number of levels in maximum thoracic kyphosis. The final model predicting a poor outcome (AUC 86%) included the following: osteoporosis (OR 5.9, 95% CI 0.9-39), worse baseline neurological status (OR 11.4, 95% CI 1.8-70.8), baseline pelvic tilt > 20° (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.98), > 9 levels in maximum thoracic kyphosis (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.1-4.1), preoperative C2-T3 SVA > 5.4 cm (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.9-1.1), and global SVA > 4 cm (OR 3.2, 95% CI 0.09-10.3)., Conclusions: Of all CD patients in this study, 20.2% had a poor overall outcome, defined by deterioration in radiographic and clinical outcomes, and a major complication. Additionally, 75% of patients with a poor clinical outcome also had a poor radiographic outcome. A poor overall outcome was most strongly predicted by severe baseline neurological deficit, global SVA > 4 cm, and including more of the thoracic maximal kyphosis in the construct.

Comparing risks against benefits of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients participating in sports represents a controversial topic in the literature. Previous studies have reported sports participation as a possible risk factor for AIS development, while others describe its functional benefits for AIS athletes. The objective of this study was to determine if sports participation had an impact on pain, function, mental status, and self-perception of deformity in patients and their parents. Patients had full spine radiographs and completed baseline surveys of demographics, socioeconomics, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO): Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-30, Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire, and Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ: Children and Parent). Patients were grouped by their participation (sports) or nonparticipation (no-sports) in noncontact sports. Demographics, radiographic parameters, and PRO were compared using parametric/nonparametric tests with means/medians reported. Linear regression models identified significant predictors of PRO. Forty-nine patients were included (sports: n=29, no-sports: n=20). Both groups had comparable age, sex, BMI, bracing status, and history of physical therapy (all P>0.05). Sports and no-sports also had similar coronal deformity (major Cobb: 31.1° vs. 31.5°). Sagittal alignment profiles (pelvic incidence, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, and sagittal vertical axis) were similar between groups (all P>0.05). Sports had better SRS-30 (Function, Self-image, and Total) scores, SAQ-Child Expectations, and SAQ-Parent Total Scores (P<0.05). Regression models revealed major Cobb angle (β coefficient: -0.312) and sports participation (β coefficient: 0.422) as significant predictors of SRS-30 Function score (R=0.434, P<0.05). Our data show that for AIS patients with statistically similar bracing status and coronal and sagittal deformities, patients who participated in sports were more likely to have improved functionality, self-image, expectations, and parental perception of deformity. Further investigation is warranted to acquire a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between AIS and patient participation in sports. Maintaining moderate levels of physical activity and participating in safe sports may benefit treatment outcomes. Level of Evidence III - Retrospective Comparative Study.

Study Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database., Objectives: This preliminary investigation sought to identify the quality of care adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients from our large, underserved community had received before presenting at this institution's clinic., Summary of Background Data: AIS affects 1% to 4% of children between ages 10 and 16. Barriers to health care for patients in underserved populations have not been well studied., Methods: Patients who visited a single surgeon's clinic for primary AIS between June 2016 and January 2017 were enrolled. Patients had 36-inch full-spine radiographs and completed a survey of demographics, prior AIS care received (screening, bracing, etc), socioeconomic parameters, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs; Scoliosis Research Society [SRS]-30 Questionnaire and Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire [BIDQ]). Parametric and nonparametric analyses were used and percentages and mean/median values were reported., Results: 47 patients (age: 15 ± 3 years; 82.7% female) were included. Overall, 25.5% of patients reported a family history of scoliosis, and 42.6% had no prior knowledge of scoliosis. Per Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) recommendations, 15 patients required observation (main Cobb angle: <25°), 22 patients were eligible for bracing (25°-45°), and 10 patients were surgical candidates (>45°). In addition, 21.3% of all patients were never screened for scoliosis; of these, 50% had a main scoliosis curve >25°. Seventy percent of surgical candidates never wore a brace, and 59.3% of screened patients who were eligible for bracing were not braced at initial presentation. Patients who were left unbraced when eligible exhibited worse BIDQ scores (1.7 vs. 1.4, p < .05)., Conclusions: One of five children in our population was never screened for scoliosis, and nearly three of five children did not receive optimal care as recommended by SRS. AIS patients in our inner-city populations are potentially at risk of continuing to experience a significant disadvantage in health care access., Level of Evidence: Level IV case series., (Copyright © 2018 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study sought to assess comorbidity profiles unique to early-onset-scoliosis (EOS) patients by employing cluster analytics and to determine the influence of isolated comorbidity clusters on perioperative complications, morbidity and mortality using a high powered administrative database. The KID database was queried for ICD-9 codes pertaining to congenital and idiopathic scoliosis from 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012. Patients <10 y/o (EOS group) were included. Demographics, incidence and comorbidity profiles were assessed. Comorbidity profiles were stratified by body systems (neurological, musculoskeletal, pulmonary, cardiovascular, renal). K-means cluster and descriptive analyses elucidated incidence and comorbidity relationships between frequently co-occurring comorbidities. Binary logistic regression models determined predictors of perioperative complication development, mortality, and extended length-of-stay (≥75th percentile). 25,747 patients were included (Age: 4.34, Female: 52.1%, CCI: 0.64). Incidence was 8.9 per 100,000 annual discharges. 55.2% presented with pulmonary comorbidities, 48.7% musculoskeletal, 43.8% neurological, 18.6% cardiovascular, and 11.9% renal; 38% had concurrent neurological and pulmonary. Top inter-bodysystem clusters: Pulmonary disease (17.2%) with epilepsy (17.8%), pulmonary failure (12.2%), restrictive lung disease (10.5%), or microcephaly and quadriplegia (2.1%). Musculoskeletal comorbidities (48.7%) with renal and cardiovascular comorbidities (8.2%, OR: 7.9 [6.6-9.4], p < 0.001). Top intra-bodysystem clusters: Epilepsy (11.7%) with quadriplegia (25.8%) or microcephaly (20.5%). Regression analysis determined neurological and pulmonary clusters to have a higher odds of perioperative complication development (OR: 1.28 [1.19-1.37], p < 0.001) and mortality (OR: 2.05 [1.65-2.54], p < 0.001). Musculoskeletal with cardiovascular and renal anomalies had higher odds of mortality (OR: 1.72 [1.28-2.29], p < 0.001) and extLOS (OR: 2.83 [2.48-3.22], p < 0.001). EOS patients with musculoskeletal conditions were 7.9x more likely to have concurrent cardiovascular and renal anomalies. Clustered neurologic and pulmonary anomalies increased mortality risk by as much as 105%. These relationships may benefit pre-operative risk assessment for concurrent anomalies and adverse outcomes. Level of Evidence: III - Retrospective Prognostic Study., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background Context: With advances in the understanding of adult spinal deformity (ASD), more complex osteotomy and fusion techniques are being implemented with increasing frequency. Patients undergoing ASD corrections infrequently require extended acute care, longer inpatient stays, and are discharged to supervised care. Given the necessity of value-based health care, identification of clinical indicators of adverse discharge disposition in ASD surgeries is paramount., Purpose: Using the nationwide and surgeon-created databases, the present study aimed to identify predictors of adverse discharge disposition after ASD surgeries and view the corresponding differences in charges., Study Design/setting: This is a retrospective analysis of patients on the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database and of cost data from Medicare PearlDiver Database., Patient Sample: Patients undergoing thoracolumbar surgery for correction of ASD were included in the study., Outcome Measures: Primary analysis was performed to compare patients discharged to home with patients who either expired or were discharged to locations other than home. Secondary analysis was performed to determine the cost differences across discharge groups., Methods: Patients on NSQIP undergoing thoracolumbar ASD-corrective surgery with a primary diagnosis of scoliosis (ICD-9 code 737.x) and over the age of 18 were isolated. Predictors (demographic, clinical, and complications) of not-home (NH; rehab or skilled nursing facility) discharge were analyzed using binary logistic regression controlling for levels fused, decompressions, osteotomies, and revisions. Average 30- and 90-day costs of care were reported in home, rehab, and skilled nursing facility discharge groups in patients undergoing 8+ level thoracolumbar fusion., Results: A total of 1,978 patients undergoing lumbar ASD-corrective surgery were included for analysis (average age: 59.3 years, sex: 64% female). Average length of stay was 6.58 days. On multivariate regression analysis, age over 60 years (odds ratio [OR]: 0.28, confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.34) and female sex (p=.003) were independent predictors of adverse discharge status. Partially dependent preoperational functional status, defined as reliance on another person to complete some activities of daily living, increased likelihood of adverse discharge disposition (OR: 0.57, CI: 0.35-0.90). Despite controlling for all clinical variables except for the ones specific to each analysis, Smith-Petersen osteotomy (OR: 0.51, CI: 0.40-0.64), interbody device placement (OR: 0.80, CI: 0.64-0.98), and fixation to the iliac (OR: 0.54, CI: 0.41-0.70) increased the likelihood of adverse discharge. Complications most associated with adverse discharge were urinary tract infections (OR: 0.34, CI: 0.21-0.57) and blood transfusions (OR: 0.42, CI: 0.34-0.52). Relative to home discharge, 30-day costs of care were +$21,061 more expensive in rehab discharges, but not different in skilled nursing facility discharges (+$5,791, p=.177). The 90-day costs of care were $23,815 in rehab discharges (p<.001), but again not different from skilled nursing facility discharges (+$6,091, p=.212)., Conclusions: Discharge destination to rehabilitation has a significant impact on the cost of thoracolumbar ASD surgeries. Patient selection can predict patients at higher risk of discharges to rehab or skilled nursing facility., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective analysis., Objective: To compare long-term outcomes between patients with and without mental health comorbidities who are undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD)., Summary of Background Data: Recent literature reveals that one in three patients admitted for surgical treatment for ASD has comorbid mental health disorder. Currently, impacts of baseline mental health status on long-term outcomes following ASD surgery have not been thoroughly investigated., Methods: Patients admitted from 2009 to 2013 with diagnoses of ASD who underwent more than or equal to 4-level thoracolumbar fusion with minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed using New York State's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS). Patients were stratified by fusion length (short: 4-8-level; long: ≥9 level). Patients with comorbid mental health disorder (MHD) at time of admission were selected for analysis (MHD) and compared against those without MHD (no-MHD). Univariate analysis compared demographics, complications, readmissions, and revisions between cohorts for each fusion length. Multivariate binary logistic regression models identified independent predictors of outcomes (covariates: fusion length, age, female sex, and Deyo score)., Results: Six thousand twenty patients (MHD: n = 1631; no-MHD: n = 4389) met inclusion criteria. Mental health diagnoses included disorders of depression (59.0%), sleep (28.0%), anxiety (24.0%), and stress (2.3%). At 2-year follow-up, MHD patients with short fusion had significantly higher complication rates (P = 0.001). MHD patients with short or long fusion also had significantly higher rates of any readmission and revision (all P ≤ 0.002). Regression modeling revealed that comorbid MHD was a significant predictor of any complication (odds ratio [OR]: 1.17, P = 0.01) and readmission (OR: 1.32, P < 0.001). MHD was the strongest predictor of any revision (OR: 1.56, P < 0.001). Long fusion most strongly predicted any complication (OR: 1.87, P < 0.001)., Conclusion: ASD patients with comorbid depressive, sleep, anxiety, and stress disorders were more likely to experience surgical complications and revision at minimum of 2 years following spinal fusion surgery. Proper patient counseling and psychological screening/support is recommended to complement ASD treatment., Level of Evidence: 3.