Search

Background: There is no consensus regarding the acceptable level of medical radiation exposure in patients with early-onset scoliosis. This study aimed to quantify radiation exposure in these patients and investigate factors associated with high exposure., Methods: Patients with early-onset scoliosis who received care for their spine deformity and other comorbidities in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Cumulative radiation exposure and total number of imaging studies were recorded. Patients with ≥30 mSv exposure were classified as high exposure and analyzed to clarify factors associated with high exposure., Results: Thirty-five patients were included for analysis. The etiology of scoliosis was idiopathic in 8 patients, congenital in 7, syndromic in 8, and neuromuscular in 12. Fifteen patients underwent 19 spinal surgeries. The types of operation performed were definitive fusion (n = 12), vertebrectomy for hemivertebra (n = 2), growing rod (n = 1), lengthening (n = 3), and revision/partial implant removal (n = 1). The mean cumulative radiation dose was 22.3 mSv (range, 2.5-94.5 mSv). Spine radiography and computed tomography combined accounted for 15.0 mSv (range, 2.4-52.5 mSv, 67.3% of the mean cumulative dose). The mean radiation dose was significantly higher in patients who underwent spinal surgery than in those who did not (31.2 mSv vs. 15.6 mSv). The high-exposure group comprised 10 patients (1 idiopathic, 1 congenital, 5 syndromic, and 3 neuromuscular scoliosis) and 8 underwent 11 spinal operations. Among 8 patients who underwent spinal surgery, the cumulative radiation dose for spine was ≥30 mSv and spine computed tomography was performed an average of 4.0 times., Conclusions: Nearly one-third of patients with early-onset scoliosis and half of patients who underwent spinal surgery had >30 mSv radiation exposure due to multiple computed tomography. Medical radiation exposure and associated cancer risk should be considered when treating these patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare relevant to this article., (Copyright © 2023 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Instrumentation failure (IF) is a major complication associated with growth-sparing surgery for pediatric spinal deformities; however, studies focusing on IF following each surgical procedure are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the incidence, timing, and rates of unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR) associated with IF following each surgical procedure in growth-sparing surgeries using traditional growing rods (TGRs) and vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs (VEPTRs)., Methods: We reviewed 1,139 surgical procedures documented in a Japanese multicenter database from 2015 to 2017. Of these, 544 TGR and 455 VEPTR procedures were included for evaluation on a per-surgery basis. IF was defined as the occurrence of an implant-related complication requiring revision surgery., Results: The surgery-based incidences of IF requiring revision surgery in the TGR and VEPTR groups were 4.3% and 4.0%, respectively, with no significant intergroup difference. Remarkably, there was a negative correlation between IF incidence per surgical procedure and the number of lengthening surgeries in both groups. In addition, rod breakage in the TGR group and anchor-related complications in the VEPTR group tended to occur relatively early in the treatment course. The surgery-based rates of UPROR due to IF in the TGR and VEPTR groups were 2.0% and 1.5%, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference., Conclusions: We found that IF, such as anchor related-complications and rod breakage, occurs more frequently earlier in the course of lengthening surgeries. This finding may help in patient counseling and highlights the importance of close postoperative follow-up to detect IF and improve outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Various complications have been reported in the treatment of pediatric spinal deformities. Among these, instrument-related complications could be critical concerns and risks of reoperation. This study aimed to identify the incidence and causes of complications after primary definitive fusion for pediatric spine deformities., Methods: The authors retrospectively collected data from 14 institutions about patients who underwent primary definitive fusion between 2015 and 2017. There were 1490 eligible patients (1184 female and 306 male), with a mean age of 13.9 years. The incidence, causes, and reoperation rates were analyzed according to 4 etiologies of pediatric spine deformity (congenital, neuromuscular, syndromic, idiopathic). The complications were also categorized as screw-, hook-, or rod-related complications, implant loosening or backout, and junctional problems., Results: The incidence of overall instrument-related complications was 5.6% (84 cases). Regarding etiology, the incidence rates were 4.3% (idiopathic), 6.8% (syndromic), 7.9% (congenital), and 10.4% (neuromuscular) (p < 0.05). The most common causes were pedicle screw malposition (60.7%), followed by implant backout or loosening (15.4%), junctional problems (13.1%), rod breakage (4.8%), and other complications (6.0%). Univariate analysis showed that etiology, type of deformity (kyphosis), surgical procedure, operation time, and estimated blood loss were significant factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that etiology (neuromuscular), surgical procedure (combined approach), and operation time (> 5 hours) remained as significant risk factors. Among all patients with instrument-related complications, 45% (38/84) required revision surgery. Of these cases, > 50% were related to pedicle screw malposition. Medial breach was the most common complication regardless of location, from upper thoracic to lumbar spine., Conclusions: Pedicle screw malposition was the primary cause of overall complications and subsequent reoperation. In addition to more precise screw insertion techniques, meticulous confirmation of pedicle screw placement, especially of medial breach, may reduce the overall instrument-related complications and revision rates.

Background: Cast and brace treatment is a conservative treatment for early-onset scoliosis (EOS). We analyzed the clinical results of this treatment when extended into patients' schooldays., Methods: Twenty-two children with EOS underwent alternatively repetitive cast and brace treatment (ARCBT). Cast was applied under general anesthesia and remained for some weeks, and the brace was continuously worn, which was repeatedly applied when scoliosis progressed. The change in the major curve angle, requirement for surgical intervention, and complications of ARCBT were analyzed., Results: Six patients had idiopathic scoliosis (IS), 9 had syndromic scoliosis (SS), and 7 had neuromuscular scoliosis. Cast treatment started at 4.9±2.1 years of age, and the patients were followed up for 8.3 years. The average total number of cast applications was 5.5 per patient. The mean major scoliosis angle was 45.4±12.5 degrees at the first visit; this was corrected to 26.5±8.7 degrees at the first cast application and progressed to 75.4±22.1 degrees at the final visit. Nine patients whose scoliosis progressed finally underwent surgery. The mean age at surgery was 11.0 years (range, 8.8 to 13.1 y), and the mean period from first cast application to surgery was 6.1 years (range, 5.0 to 8.9 y). Four patients' IS rapidly progressed after 9 years of age, and all of them underwent final fusion surgery with a correction rate of 56.9%. Among patients with SS, 1 final fusion, and 2 growth-friendly surgeries were performed at a mean age of 9.2 years; the correction rate was 21.5%. Among patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, 2 final fusion surgeries were performed at a mean age of 11.3 years; the correction rate was 30.7%. The cast-related complication rate was 5.0%, and most complications were skin problems., Conclusions: Long-term ARCBT extended into schooldays might be effective for IS. This should be considered as a time-saving treatment option for EOS., Level of Evidence: Level IV-case series., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)