Search

Introduction: The evolution of MCGR technique has led to modifications in the configuration of the proximal construct to decrease the incidence of implant-related complications (IRC) and revision surgeries. However, there is no data characterizing the performance of the most used configurations reducing the risk of complications., Methods: 487 patients were identified from an international multicenter EOS database., Inclusion Criteria: EOS patients, primary dual MCGR, complete radiographs, and minimum of 2-year follow-up. 76 patients had incomplete X-rays, 5 had apical fusions, and 18 had inconclusive complications, leaving 388 patients for review. A digital spine template was created to document UIV; number of levels; number, type, and location of anchors; as well as implant configuration. First available postoperative and latest follow-up radiographs were reviewed by two senior surgeons and two spine fellows. UPROR due to IRC was defined as any change in proximal anchors between the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs., Results: The most common proximal construct configuration: UIV at T2 (50.0%) with 17.5% UPROR, followed by T3 (34.0%) with 12.1% UPROR; number of levels was three (57.1%) with 16.8% UPROR and two (26.0%) with 17.0% UPROR; number of proximal anchors was six (49.9%) with 14.1% UPROR and four (27.0%) with 18.3% UPROR. The most common anchors were all screws (42.0%) with 9.9% UPROR, and all hooks (26.4%) with 31.4% UPROR (P < 0.001). The construct with the lowest rate of UPROR was a UIV at T2, with six anchors (all screws) across three levels (42 cases), with 0% UPROR. Other construct combinations that yielded 0% UPROR rates were UIV of T3, six anchors (all screws) across three levels (25 cases), and a UIV of T3 with six anchors (screws and hooks) across three3 levels (9 cases)., Conclusion: Proximal anchor configuration impacts the incidence of UPROR due to IRC in MCGR. UIV at T2 and T3 compared to T4, and the use of all screws or combination of screws and hooks compared to all hooks were associated with a lower UPROR rate. The most common construct configuration was T2 UIV, three levels, six anchors, and all screws. The use of a combination of six anchors (screws or screws and hooks) across three levels with a UIV at T2 or T3 was associated with a lower UPROR rate. Additional research is needed to further evaluate the variables contributing to configuration selection and their association with IRC., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Purpose: The relationship between axial surface rotation (ASR) measured by surface topography (ST) and axial vertebral rotation (AVR) measured by radiography in the transverse plane is not well defined. This study aimed to: (1) quantify ASR and AVR patterns and their magnitudes from T1 to L5; (2) determine the correlation or agreement between the ASR and AVR; and (3) investigate the relationship between axial rotation differences (ASR-AVR) and major Cobb angle., Methods: This is a retrospective study evaluating patients (age 8-18) with IS or spinal asymmetry with both radiographic and ST measurements. Demographics, descriptive analysis, and correlations and agreements between ASR and AVR were evaluated. A piecewise linear regression model was further created to relate rotational differences to Cobb angle., Results: Fifty-two subjects met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 14.1 ± 1.7 and 39 (75%) were female. Looking at patterns, AVR had maximal rotation at T8, while ASR had maximal rotation at T11 (r = 0.35, P = .006). Cobb angle was 24.1° ± 13.3° with AVR of - 1° ± 4.6° and scoliotic angle was 20.9° ± 11.5° with ASR of - 2.3° ± 6.6°. (ASR-AVR) vs Cobb angle was found to be very weakly correlated with a curve of less than 38.8° (r = 0.15, P = .001)., Conclusion: Our preliminary findings support that ASR measured by ST has a weak correlation with estimation of AVR by 3D radiographic reconstruction. This correlation may further help us to understand the application of transverse rotation in some clinical scenarios such as specific casting manipulation, padding mechanism in brace, and surgical correction of rib deformity., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Purpose: To determine caregiver-reported back pain prevalence, disability, pain interference, and associations with curve magnitude in early onset scoliosis (EOS) using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) measures., Methods: A single-center, retrospective review was performed in children below 10 years of age according to EOS etiology. Caregiver-reported back pain prevalence, ODI, PROMIS Pain Interference, Mobility, and Anxiety measures, and curve magnitude were recorded as part of routine clinic appointments., Results: A total of 1212 patients with EOS (588 idiopathic, 295 congenital, 217 neuromuscular, 112 syndromic) ages 6.6 ± 2.7 were included; 23% had caregiver-reported back pain. Neuromuscular EOS patients had the highest prevalence of back pain (29%). ODI scores were higher in neuromuscular (48%) and syndromic (35%) patients than congenital (20%, p < 0.05) and idiopathic (16%, p < 0.01) patients. Neuromuscular patients also had higher PROMIS Pain Interference scores (53.3) compared to idiopathic (41.6, p < 0.001) and syndromic (45.0, p = 0.016) patients. A higher curve was associated with the presence of back pain (39° vs. 30°, p < 0.001) and had positive correlations with ODI scores (r = 0.38, p < 0.001) and PROMIS Pain Interference scores (r = 0.34, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Approximately one in five children with EOS under the age of 10 have caregiver-reported back pain, with the neuromuscular EOS type exhibiting higher pain prevalence, interference, and disability scores. Larger curve magnitude is associated with an increased prevalence of caregiver-reported back pain, increased disability, and increased pain interference., Level of Evidence: 3 - case-control study., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Purpose: Children are exposed to significant radiation doses during the investigation and treatment phases of scoliosis. EOS is a new form of low-dose radiation scan which also yields great image quality. However, currently its use is discouraged in the UK due to higher costs. We aimed to quantify the additional radiation dose and cancer risk., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all paediatric cases who received both standing whole spine roentgenograms and EOS scans as part of their investigations for scoliosis during a six-month period. We compared the radiation doses between the two modalities and estimated the additional mean lifetime cancer risk per study., Results: We identified 206 children (mean age 14.4) who met the criteria of having both scans. Dose area products (dGycm 2 ) were converted to estimated effective doses (mSv). The total mean doses were 0.68 mSv (PA 0.49 + Lat 0.19) for plain films, and 0.13 mSv (PA 0.08 + Lat 0.04) for EOS scans (p < 0.001). Additional lifetime cancer risk of a plain film was 543% greater than EOS for both sexes (1/10727 versus 1/5827 in males, 1/34483 versus 1/6350 in females)., Conclusion: There is approximately 5.4-fold increase in risk of cancer for both boys and girls with roentgenograms over EOS, with girls being the most impacted. This carries a significant impact when considering the need for repeat imaging on additional lifetime malignancy risk in children. In our opinion, EOS dual planar scanning is the new gold standard when X-ray of the whole spine is required., Level of Evidence: III., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To compare agreement between surgeons and sterEOS sagittal plane measurements., Methods: EOS radiographs of 74 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were reviewed. The measurements were generated by two surgeons and compared to sterEOS. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were calculated. Agreement was also analyzed for the following subgroups: Cobb angle < 70° vs ≥ 70°, lumbar modifier A vs B/C, and BMI of < 24.5 kg/m 2 vs ≥ 24.5 kg/m 2 . Agreement was poor if the ICC was < 0.5, moderate if 0.5-0.75, good if 0.75-0.9, and excellent if > 0.9. Paired t tests were performed to compare the surgeon's and sterEOS means., Results: For the surgeons, agreement was good (0.75-0.89) except for pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS), which were excellent (0.91-0.92). Agreement between the surgeons and sterEOS were good (0.78-0.9) except PT and SS, which were excellent (0.91-0.93). Agreement was negatively affected for T4-T12 kyphosis, PI, and SS in the ≥ 70°group, LL when BMI was ≥ 24.5 kg/m 2 , and LL, PI, and SS in the lumbar modifier B/C group. The ICCs overlapped with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Paired t-test showed a significant difference for T4-T12 kyphosis (p < 0.001). This was also true in the < 70° group (p < 0.001), the ≥ 70° group (p = 0.04), and the BMI < 24.5 kg/m 2 group. PT was significantly different for the ≥ 70° group., Conclusions: There was good to excellent agreement between the surgeons and surgeons and sterEOS. Some variables may affect agreement. The surgeons overestimated T4-T12 kyphosis., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Purpose: Knowledge about spinal length and subsequently growth of each individual patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) helps with accurate timing of both conservative and surgical treatment. Radiographs taken by a biplanar low-dose X-ray device (EOS) have no divergence in the vertical plane and can provide three-dimensional (3D) measurements. Therefore, this study investigated the criterion validity and reliability of EOS spinal length measurements in AIS patients., Methods: Prior to routine EOS radiograph, a radiographic calibrated metal beads chain (MBC) was attached on the back of 120 patients with AIS to calibrate the images. Spinal lengths were measured from vertebra to vertebra on EOS anteroposterior (AP), lateral view and on the combined 3D EOS view (EOS 3D). These measurements were compared with MBC length measurements. Secondly, intra- and interobserver reliability of length measurements on EOS-images were determined., Results: 50 patients with accurately positioned MBC were included for analysis. The correlations between EOS and MBC were highest for the 3D length measurements. Compared to EOS 3D measurements, the total spinal length was systematically measured 4.3% (mean difference = 1.97 ± 1.12 cm) and 1.9% (mean difference = 0.86 ± 0.63 cm) smaller on individual EOS two-dimensional (2D) AP and lateral view images, respectively. Both intra- and interobserver reliability were excellent for all length measurements on EOS-images., Conclusion: The results of this study indicate a good validity and reliability for spinal length measurements on EOS radiographs in AIS patients. EOS 3D length measure method is preferred above spinal length measurements on individual EOS AP or lateral view images., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is a common neurosurgical procedure performed in patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS). To provide insight into the risks of spine lengthening operations, we investigate the rate of VP shunt complications in patients with EOS undergoing spinal deformity correction interventions., Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients with EOS at a single institution undergoing spinal deformity correction procedures from 2007 to 2018. Patients having undergone VP shunt implantation prior to deformity correction were included. A minimum of 2-year follow-up was required for inclusion. Clinical records and imaging studies were reviewed., Results: Nineteen patients with VP shunts underwent Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR) implantation for treatment of early onset spinal deformity. The mean age at shunt placement and spine instrumentation surgery was 13.7 months (1 day to 13 years) and 6.1 years (0.5-15.1) respectively. The diagnoses associated with shunt implantation were: 12 spina bifida, 3 structural defects or obstructions, 2 intraventricular hemorrhage, 1 cerebral palsy, and 1 campomelic dwarfism. During the first 2 years following rib-based insertion, there was a mean of 2.5 expansion/revision procedures (0-5) with no shunt-related complications. The mean length of follow-up in this series was 7.0 years (2.6-13.2). A total of three (16%) patients required shunt revision following their rib-based device insertion, two patients with proximal shunt malfunctions and one with a mid-catheter breakage, at 2.4, 2.6, and 5.6 years, respectively, after rod implantation (Fig. 2). Each of these shunt revisions occurred more than 50 days following an expansion procedure (1.9, 2.9, and 5.7 months, respectively)., Conclusion: Growing instrumentation procedures in EOS are associated with low risk for post-operative shunt complications in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. There were no shunt revision procedures performed in the first 2 years following rib-based device insertion. Sixteen percent of patients went on to require a shunt revision at some point during their follow-up, which is comparable to the baseline rate of shunt revision in non-EOS patients., Level of Evidence: IV, Case series., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Purpose: An essential component of making the diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Two-dimensional (2D) radiographs inevitably fail to reflect every plane of the three-dimensional (3D) deformity in scoliosis. We have tested the hypothesis that there is no difference in the assessment of the sagittal plane deformity when measured with either 2D or 3D EOS radiography., Methods: A retrospective radiographic analysis was performed on patients diagnosed with AIS, with subdivided into three groups according to the coronal angular deformity (mild group: 45°-69°, moderate group: 70°-89°, and severe group: 90° +). The sagittal parameters were compared between manual measurement with 2D sterEOS and those made using computer-aided 3D reconstruction., Results: Fifty-two patients were included in each group. The inter-study reliability when measuring the thoracic Kyphosis (TK) and lumbar lordosis (LL) between the two study modalities was excellent in mild group (ICC: 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 ~ 0.94 and ICC: 0.84, 95% CI 0.74 ~ 0.91), excellent in TK and fair in LL in moderate group (ICC: 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 ~ 0.85 and ICC: 0.70, 95% CI 0.53 ~ 0.81), and fair in TK and LL in severe group, respectively (ICC: 0.74, 95% CI 0.57 ~ 0.84 and ICC: 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 ~ 0.84). A Bland-Altman plot showed proportional bias in TK measurements in each group and LL in moderate group, which means the measured value is underestimated in 2D method when the angle is small., Conclusion: 3D sterEOS is less vulnerable to the influence of coronal plane than 2D EOS in evaluating the sagittal spinal parameters of patients with a coronal deformity exceeding 70°., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Purpose: Free-hand pedicle screw insertion methods are widely used for screw insertion during scoliosis surgery. Preoperative knowledge about the pedicle size helps to maximize screw containment and minimize the risk of pedicle breach. Radiographs taken by a biplanar low-dose X-ray device (EOS) have no divergence in the vertical plane. The criterion validity and reliability of preoperative EOS images for pedicle size measurements in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) was investigated in this study., Methods: Sixteen patients who underwent surgical treatment for IS were prospectively included. Intra- and extracortical pedicle height and width measurements on EOS images were compared with reconstructed intra-operative 3D images of the isthmus of included pedicles. Secondly, intra- and interobserver reliability of pedicle size measurements on EOS images was determined., Results: The total number of analyzed pedicles was 203. The correlation between the EOS and 3D scan measurements was very strong for the intra- and extracortical pedicle height and strong for the intra- and extracortical pedicle width. There are, however, significant, but likely clinically irrelevant differences (mean absolute differences < 0.43 mm) between the two measure methods for all four measurements except for extracortical pedicle height. For pedicles classified as Nash-Moe 0, no significant differences in intra- and extracortical pedicle width were observed. Both intra- and interobserver reliability was excellent for all pedicle size measurements on EOS images., Conclusion: The results of this study indicate a good validity and reliability for pedicle size measurements on EOS radiographs. Therefore, EOS radiographs may be used for a preoperative estimation of pedicle size and subsequent screw diameter in patients with IS., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS) (defined as a curvature of the spine ≥ 10° with onset before 10 years of age) if not properly treated, can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Traditionally Growing Rods (TGRs), implants fixated to the spine and extended every 6-8 months by surgery, are considered the gold standard, but Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods (MCGRs) avoid multiple surgeries. While the potential benefit of outpatient distraction procedure with MCGR is huge, concerns still remain about its risks, up to the release of a Medical Device Alert (MDA) by the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) advising not to implant MCGRs until further notice. The aim of this literature review is to (1) give an overview on the use of MCGRs and (2) identify what is currently understood about the surgical, implant and patient factors associated with the use of MCGRs., Methods: Systematic literature review., Results: Surgical factors such as use of single rod configuration or incorrect rod contouring might affect early failure of MCGRs. Patient's older age and higher BMI are correlated with rod slippage. Wear debris and distraction mechanism failure may result from implant design and iteration., Conclusion: Despite the complications reported, this technology still offers one of the best solutions to spine surgeons dealing with severe EOS. Lowering the complication rate by identifying risk factors for failure is possible and further studies in this direction are required. Once the risk factors are well described, some of these can be addressed enabling a safer use of MCGRs., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Introduction: At the time of writing, we are all coping with the global COVID-19 pandemic. Amongst other things, this has had a significant impact on postponing virtually all routine clinic visits and elective surgeries. Concurrently, the Magnetic Expansion Control (MAGEC) rod has been issued with a number of field safety notices and UK regulator medical device alerts., Methods: This document serves to provide an overview of the current situation regarding the use of MAGEC rods, primarily in the UK, and the impact that the pandemic has had on the management of patients with these rods., Results and Conclusion: The care of each patient must of course be determined on an individual basis; however, the experience of the authors is that a short delay in scheduled distractions and clinic visits will not adversely impact patient treatment. The authors caution against a gap in distractions of longer than 6 months and emphasise the importance of continued remote patient monitoring to identify those who may need to be seen more urgently.

Background: Severe scoliosis, kyphosis, stiffer curves, short trunk height, and poor bone density are known risk factors for instrumentation failure with traditional growing rods or magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR). To minimize the risk of instrumentation failure in managing complex early-onset scoliosis (EOS) with MCGR, we propose a strategy for staged MCGR insertion., Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of all consecutive MCGR cases with 24 months' minimum follow-up. Inclusion criteria included diagnosis of EOS of any etiology with severe and stiff curves in the coronal or sagittal planes, poor bone density, short trunk height (T1-T12 smaller than 150 mm) or previous instrumentation failure managed with staged MCGR. During the first stage, anchor points and halo-gravity were applied, followed by halo-gravity traction. At a second stage, halo-gravity was removed and MCGR were inserted. Outcome measures included pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements and complications., Results: Seventeen patients with a median age of 7 (range 6-9) years were managed in two stages. Indications for two-stage surgery were short trunk height (T1-T12 height less than 150 mm) in six patients, five poor bone quality, three dislodgement of proximal anchor points in previous instrumentation, and three rigid curves. The rate of unplanned revision surgeries was 11.8%. No infections or traction-related complications were found., Conclusions: According to our results, the staged MCGR insertion strategy combined with halo-gravity traction to manage complex EOS yielded a relatively low instrumentation failure rate as compared with the rates previously reported in the current literature. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the staged strategy for instrumentation with MCGR., Level of Evidence: IV.

Background: Bracing constitutes the mainstay treatment for mild scoliosis. The 3D reconstruction of the spine using low-dose stereoradiographic imaging (LSI) is increasingly being used to determine the true shape of the deformity and to assess the success of bracing., Objective: The aim of the study was to validate the measurement of 3D spinopelvic parameters and vertebral rotation in the setting of bracing treatment via a reliability study conducted in adherence to the guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS)., Material and Methods: Full spine stereoradiographs of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent Chêneau bracing were retrospectively analyzed. The 3D reconstruction was performed by two experienced operators in a blinded manner and randomized order. Rotation of every vertebra was computed in the coronal, sagittal and axial planes. Sagittal spinopelvic parameters were evaluated. All measurements were statistically compared to determine agreement of the measurement of brace correction using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)., Results: In this study, 45 patients (81% females) aged 12.5 ± 2 years were included. The mean absolute difference was less than 3.5° for all measured angles, less than 4 mm for sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and less than 1.5 mm for lateral pelvic shift. The ICC was high for all parameters (ICC >0.81). Despite the overall high reliability, the reliability of axial rotation was lower in the upper and middle thoracic spine and the lower lumbar spine., Conclusion: Brace wearing during full spine LSI acquisition does not affect spinal measurements. The LSI under bracing treatment produces reliable measurements of spinopelvic parameters as well as vertebral rotation. These reproducible 3D data enable spine surgeons to assess the true shape of the deformity, to quantify rotation of each vertebra and enhance the understanding of the efficacy of bracing treatment.

Introduction: Scoliosis is defined as a deformity of the spine with lateral curvature in the coronal plane. It requires regular X-ray imaging to monitor the progress of the disorder, therefore scoliotic patients are frequently exposed to radiation. It is important to lower the risk from these exposures for young patients. The aim of this work is to compare organ dose (OD) values resulting from Scan Projection Radiograph (SPR) mode in CT against projection radiography and EOS ® imaging system when assessing scoliosis., Methods: A dosimetry phantom was used to represent a 10-year old child. Thermoluminescent dosimetry detectors were used for measuring OD. The phantom was imaged with CT in SPR mode using 27 imaging parameters; projection radiography and EOS machines using local scoliosis imaging procedures. Imaging was performed in anteroposterior, posteroanterior and lateral positions., Results: 17 protocols delivered significantly lower radiation dose than projection radiography (p < 0.05). OD values from the CT SPR imaging protocols and projection radiography were statistically significant higher than the results from EOS. No statistically significant differences in OD were observed between 10 imaging protocols and those from projection radiography and EOS imaging protocols (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: EOS has the lowest dose. Where this technology is not available we suggest there is a potential for OD reduction in scoliosis imaging using CT SPR compared to projection radiography. Further work is required to investigate image quality in relation to the measurement of Cobb angle with CT SPR., (Copyright © 2019 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Prospective cohort., Objective: To compare preoperative hemoglobin levels to postoperative hemoglobin levels in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS)., Summary of Background Data: Elevated hemoglobin (Hgb) may be a marker for preoperative hypoxia in patients with EOS and thoracic insufficiency syndrome (TIS). The changes in Hgb level after treatment may be a surrogate marker for improved oxygenation., Methods: Because normal levels of Hgb vary with patient age, Hgb z scores were calculated by dividing age-adjusted mean Hgb levels by the age-adjusted standard deviation. Elevated Hgb was defined by a hemoglobin z score >1. Patients with a baseline Hgb value measured before initial implantation with at least one follow-up measurement, at 6, 12, or 18 months, were included in longitudinal analysis. Change in Hgb z score as well as change in curve magnitude over time was assessed using piecewise linear mixed modeling for patients with elevated Hgb and those without., Results: Two hundred sixty-seven patients with EOS were treated surgically over the study period. Average age at initial implantation was 6.8 years. Forty-eight (18%; 95% confidence interval = 13.7%, 23.2%) subjects had an elevated Hgb (z score > 1) level before implantation procedure. Hgb levels decreased in subjects with elevated Hgb from implantation to 6 months (p < .001) with no change in Hgb from 6 to 12 months (p = .46) or from 12 to 18 months (p = .59), but an overall decrease from preoperative to 18 months (p < .001). There was no change in Hgb levels for subjects without elevated Hgb from implantation to 6 months (p = .94), from 6 to 12 months (p = .61), or from 12 to 18 months (p = .78)., Conclusions: In some patients with EOS and TIS, there appears to be significant positive impact on oxygenation from distraction instrumentation as evidenced by a meaningful proxy measurement: improvement in abnormal preoperative Hgb levels after surgery., Level of Evidence: III., (Copyright © 2018 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is no agreement on frequency of distractions of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) but more frequent and smaller amounts of distractions mimic physiological spine growth. The mid- to long-term follow-up and management at skeletal maturity is unknown., Objective: To analyze patients with mean 6 yr of follow-up and describe the fate of MCGR graduates., Methods: Early onset scoliosis (EOS) patients treated with MCGRs with minimum 4 yr of follow-up and/or at graduation were studied. Parameters under study included Cobb angle, spine and instrumented lengths, and rod distraction gains. Relationship between timing of rod exchanges with changes in rate of lengthening was studied., Results: Ten EOS patients with mean 6.1 yr of follow-up were studied. The greatest Cobb angle correction occurred at the initial implantation surgery and was stable thereafter. Consistent gains in T1-12, T1-S1, and instrumented segment were observed. Rate of lengthening reduced after the first year of use but improved back to initial rates after rod exchange. Seven of the ten patients experienced complications with reoperation rate of 40% for rod distraction failure and proximal foundation problems. Only mild further improvements in all radiological parameters were observed pre- and postfinal surgery. No clinically significant curve progression was observed for rod removal only. All postfinal surgery parameters remained similar at postoperative 2 yr., Conclusion: This study provides an outlook of the end of MCGR treatment. Although this is a fusionless procedure, instrumented segments do experience stiffness limiting further correction and length gain during final surgery whether fusion or rod removal is performed., (Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Purpose: To analyse the complication profile of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) in early onset scoliosis (EOS)., Methods: This is a systematic review using PUBMED, Medline, Embase, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library (keywords: MAGEC, Magnetically controlled growing rods and EOS) of all studies written in English with a minimum of five patients and a 1-year follow-up. We evaluated coronal correction, growth progression (T1-S1, T1-T12) and complications., Results: Fifteen studies (336 patients) were included (42.5% male, mean age 7.9 years, average follow-up 29.7 months). Coronal improvement was achieved in all studies (pre-operative 64.8°, latest follow-up 34.9° p = 0.000), as was growth progression (p = 0.001). Mean complication rate was 44.5%, excluding the 50.8% medical complication rate. The unplanned revision rate was 33%. The most common complications were anchor pull-out (11.8%), implant failure (11.7%) and rod breakage (10.6%). There was no significant difference between primary (39.8%) and conversion (33.3%) procedures (p = 0.462). There was a non-statistically significant increased complication rate with single rods (40 vs. 27% p = 0.588)., Conclusions: MCGRs improve coronal deformity and maintain spinal growth, but carry a 44.5% complication and 33% unplanned revision rate. Conversion procedures do not increase this risk. Single rods should be avoided. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary material.

Study Design: Three-dimensional (3D) spinal models of children with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) were created using the EOS imaging system (EOS) and sterEOS software., Objective: To determine the inter- or intraobserver reproducibility of the 3D spinal models in children with IS of different apex locations., Summary of Background Data: 3D spinal model measurements include the Cobb angle, kyphosis, lordosis, and axial vertebral rotation (AVR). Variation of these measurements between two investigators and two different trials by the same investigator were analyzed by inter- and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs)., Methods: Biplanar radiographic images of 15 patients (age: 6-15 years) with IS were uploaded into the sterEOS software. Spinal and pelvic markers were manually identified to construct a 3D spinal model and measure spinal parameters. Two trained examiners independently performed modeling and performed modeling in spaced out trials. The ICC between inter- and intraobservers were calculated., Results: ICCs between inter- and intraobservers were significant for all parameters (p < .05). Both the inter- and intraobservers showed excellent agreement for the Cobb angles in the thoracic segment, kyphosis and lordosis. Substantial interobserver agreement and excellent intraobserver agreement were determined for the Cobb angle in the thoracolumbar or lumbar (TL/L) segment, with less than 6° difference between two raters and less than 2° difference between two trials. Substantial interobserver agreement for the AVR in the TL/L region and substantial interobserver agreement for the AVR in the thoracic region were found, with less than 4° difference between raters. One rater had substantial intraobserver agreement for the AVR in the TL/L region whereas another rater reported moderate to substantial intraobserver agreement in both the thoracic and TL/L regions, with less than 3° difference between trials., Conclusion: The EOS system shows reliable and repeatable results in 3D spinal modeling of children with IS., Level of Evidence: Level III., (Copyright © 2017 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: A posterior-anterior vertebral vector is proposed to facilitate visualization and understanding of scoliosis. The aim of this study was to highlight the interest of using vertebral vectors, especially in the horizontal plane, in clinical practice., Methods: We used an EOS two-/three-dimensional (2D/3D) system and its sterEOS 3D software for 3D reconstruction of 139 normal and 814 scoliotic spines-of which 95 cases were analyzed pre-operatively and post-operatively, as well. Vertebral vectors were generated for each case. Vertebral vectors have starting points in the middle of the interpedicular segment, while they are parallel to the upper plate, ending in the middle of the segment joining the anterior end plates points, thus defining the posterior-anterior axis of vertebrae. To illustrate what information could be obtained from vertebral vector-based top-view images, representative cases of a normal spine and a thoracic scoliosis are presented., Results: For a normal spine, vector projections in the transverse plane are aligned with the posterior-anterior anatomical axis. For a scoliotic spine, vector projections in the horizontal plane provide information on the lateral decompensation of the spine and the lateral displacement of vertebrae. In the horizontal plane view, vertebral rotation and projections of the sagittal curves can also be analyzed simultaneously., Conclusions: The use of posterior-anterior vertebral vector facilitates the understanding of the 3D nature of scoliosis. The approach used is simple. These results are sufficient for a first visual analysis furnishing significant clinical information in all three anatomical planes. This visualization represents a reasonable compromise between mathematical purity and practical use.

Study Design: Prospectively enrolled early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients undergoing growing rod treatment, who have had no surgery for >1 year and/or have received definitive fusion (growing rod "graduates")., Objectives: To assess oxygen consumption during exercise and determine if a diminished conventional pulmonary function test (PFT) correlates with metabolic, pulmonary, and cardiovascular measures during exercise., Summary of Background Data: Based on clinical impression and sequential PFT values, EOS patients who have undergone extensive treatment are thought to have limited capacity during exercise. The use of PFTs in this population has been a primary outcome measure of respiratory capacity; however, PFTs are dependent on effort, and thus subjective. This led us to find a new assessment of outcome, to better understand their pulmonary capacity., Methods: Patients underwent oxygen consumption (VO 2 ) testing while walking at self-selected speed over-ground and during a graded exercise test. Maximal VO 2 was predicted in those who completed the test to 85% of maximal heart rate (HR). Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman correlation coefficient (α = 0.05)., Results: 12 patients participated. Over-ground walking showed that EOS graduates chose to walk at the same speed, but at a higher VO 2 Cost (0.28 mL/kg/m) than controls (0.22 mL/kg/m; p < .001). Treadmill exercise testing showed 9 of 12 subjects able to complete the 85% of predicted maximum protocol. The EOS group had lower VO 2 during the final stage (27.9 mL/kg/min) compared to controls (34.2 mL/kg/min; p = .021); however, their heart rate reached the same values. Subjects completing the protocol had lower predicted VO 2 max (38.5 mL/kg/min) compared with controls (45.0 mL/kg/min), but this was not significant., Conclusions: Although PFT data suggest clinically relevant pulmonary compromise in EOS patients, the current study shows that these children are able to keep up with their peers in daily activities and also have the capacity to exercise., Level of Evidence: Level II, therapeutic., (Copyright © 2016 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: A prospective, cross-sectional study to determine the impact of arm position on the 3D spine and pelvic parameters and postural balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis., Methods: A total number of 37 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients were enrolled prospectively. Three arm positions, (1) 45° shoulder flexion with knuckles on clavicles, (2) 90° shoulder and elbow flexion with forearms and palms on the front wall, and (3) arms hanging on either side, were instructed to the cohort. Bi-planar low dose X-ray images of the spine and pelvis were registered in a stereoradiography system in the first and second arm positions. A pressure mat recorded the position of the center of pressure in each arm position. Spinal and pelvic parameters were measured for the cohort. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the agreement between the spinal and pelvic parameters and standing balance in different arm positions., Results: Thoracic kyphosis, sacral slope, sagittal vertical axis, T1 tilt, and spinal height were significantly different between the knuckles on clavicle and forearms on the wall positions p < 0.05. Significant differences were observed in the pressure distribution under the feet between the wall and freestanding positions. Bland-Altman plots determined disagreements between the first and second arm positions in clinical measurements and postural assessment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis., Conclusion: The knuckles on clavicles position replicates the functional standing balance in AIS. Significant differences between the spinal and pelvic parameters suggest that the wall and clavicle arm positions should not be used interchangeably in AIS postural assessment., Level of Evidence: Diagnostic level II.

Study Design: Prospective., Objective: To evaluate the reliability of three-dimensional (3D) spinal models from Micro Dose EOS x-rays compared to standard, Low Dose EOS x-rays utilized for evaluating patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)., Summary of Background Data: There is a strong suggestion that radiation exposure to scoliosis patients can be further reduced., Methods: Sixty AIS patients who received biplanar, posteroanterior, and lateral standard Low Dose spine x-rays in our EOS imaging unit (∼0.33 mGy) as part of routine care also underwent an additional set of new reduced "Micro Dose" EOS x-rays (∼0.05 mGy) using a recently developed protocol. Two measurers created 3D models of the images using sterEOS software (Low Dose x2, Micro Dose x2). From this 3D modeling software, coronal Cobb angles, sagittal (T1-T12, T4-T12, L1-L5, L1-S1), and apical axial rotation measurements were obtained. Intraclass correlations (ICCs) and standard error of measurement (upper bound of 95% confidence interval) for the differences between Low Dose and Micro Dose measurements were compared. Interrater reliability was assessed on standard two-dimensional (2D) radiographic measurements., Results: The ICCs were rated as "substantial" to "almost perfect" for Low Dose 3D, Micro Dose 3D, and 2D measures (range 0.78-0.99). The calculated measurement error was not significantly different between groups except for intrarater error on 3D L1-L5 lordosis (2.9° Micro Dose vs. 2.2°, p = .04), interrater 3D rotation of the lumbar apex (2.6° Micro Dose vs. 1.7°, p = .03), and 2D T12-sacrum lordosis (4.6° Micro Dose vs. 3.4°, p = .04)., Conclusions: Although statistically significant differences in average measurement error were observed in lordosis and lumbar apex rotation, these differences are not believed to be clinically significant. The Micro Dose images have slightly less clarity qualitatively, yet the critical 2D and 3D measures of the curvature were reliably measured with error of measurement comparable to standard radiologic techniques., Level of Evidence: Level I, Diagnostic., (Copyright © 2016 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Spinal deformities in children and adolescents can be easily divided into those occurring and diagnosed before the age of 10—early-onset scoliosis—and those occurring and diagnosed after the age of 10—late-onset scoliosis. When the curvature continues to progress and exceeds a Cobb angle of more than 60–65 degrees, surgical treatment should be considered. The most common treatment procedure for EOS is the surgical correction of the deformity using standard growing rods (SGRs), and in the case of congenital defects with additional hemivertebrae, it is the resection of the hemivertebra and short fusion. Minimally invasive controlled growing rods (MICGRs) need to be distracted every 6–9 months through a minimally invasive approach that involves sedation and neuromonitoring to obtain the best possible correction while minimizing complications. The aim of our study is to present a less-invasive surgical technique for MICGR implantation based on a two-case presentation—early-onset idiopathic scoliosis and congenital kyphosis. The surgical technique is the less-invasive percutaneous and subfascial implantation of MICGRs without long incisions in the back. Conclusions: The use of MICGRs is an alternative and safe surgical technique for patients undergoing surgical treatment for EOS. Without the risk of metallosis, like in other implant systems, and the need for replacement after 2 years of use, like in using magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs), the MICGR system can be used as a less-invasive procedure, allowing for the avoidance of many periodic invasive procedures in children with a wider opening of the spine (like in using standard growing rods), minimizing the number of planned hospitalizations, reducing the length of hospital stays, and reducing the physical and mental burdens on young patients, parents, and families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The management of spinal deformities diagnosed before the age of 10 is critical due to the child's development, skeletal system, and growth mechanism. Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) are a surgical treatment option for the growing spine. The aim of this study was to analyze the radiological findings of patients treated with MCGRs for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) of various etiologies. We hypothesized that the MCGRs could provide acceptable long-term radiographic results, such as an increase in the T1–T12 and T1–S1 height and significant overall deformity correction. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 161 EOS patients with a combined total of 302 MCGRs inserted at five institutions between 2016 and 2022 with a mean follow-up of at least two years. The Cobb angle of the major curve (MC), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), and T1–T12 and T1–S1 height measurements were assessed before, after, and during the follow-up. Results: Among the 90 female and 71 male patients, there were 51 neurological, 42 syndromic, 58 idiopathic, and ten congenital scoliosis etiologies. Of the patients, 73 were aged under six years old. The mean follow-up time was 32.8 months. The mean age at placement of the MCGRs was 7 years and that at the last follow-up after fusion surgery was 14.5 years. The mean MC before the initial surgery was 86.2°; following rod implantation, it was 46.9°, and at the last follow-up visit, it was 45.8°. The mean correction rate among the etiology subgroups was from 43% to 50% at follow-up. The mean TK was noted as 47.2° before MCGR implantation, 47.1° after MCGR placement, and 44.5° at the last follow-up visit. The mean T1–T12 height increased by 5.95 mm per year, with a mean T1–S1 height of 10.1 mm per year. Conclusions: MCGR treatment allowed for an average correction of the curvature by 50% during the period of lengthening, while controlling any deformity and growth of the spine, with a significant increase in the T1–T12 and T1–S1 values during the observation period. MCGR treatment in EOS carries a risk of complications. While congenital and syndromic EOS often have short and less flexible curves in those groups of patients, single rods can be as effective and safe. Definitive fusion results in the mean final coronal correction between the start of MCGR treatment and after undergoing PSF of approximately 70%. The mean T1–T12 spinal height increased by 75 mm, while the T1–S1 spinal height gained a mean of 97 mm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report accuracy, repeatability, and agreement of Cobb angle measurements on radiographs and/or stereo-radiographs (EOS) compared against one another or against other imaging modalities. Methods: This review follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature search was conducted on 21 July 2021 using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. Two researchers independently performed title/abstract/ full-text screening and data extraction. Studies were eligible if they reported Cobb angles, and/or their repeatability and agreement, measured on radiographs and/or EOS compared against one another or against other imaging modalities. Results: Of the 2993 records identified, 845 were duplicates and 2212 were excluded during title/abstract/full-text screening. Two more relevant studies were identified from references of eligible studies, leaving 14 studies for inclusion. Two studies compared Cobb angles from EOS vs CT, while 12 compared radiographs vs other imaging modalities: EOS, CT, MRI, digital fluoroscopy, or dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Angles from standing radiographs tended to be higher than those from supine MRI and CT, and angles from standing EOS tended to be higher than those from supine or prone CT. Correlations across modalities were strong (R = 0.78–0.97). Inter-observer agreement was excellent for all studies (ICC = 0.77–1.00), except one (ICC = 0.13 radiographs and ICC = 0.68 for MRI). Conclusion: Differences of up to 11º were found when comparing Cobb angles across combinations of imaging modalities and patient positions. It is not possible, however, to determine whether the differences observed are due to the change of modality, position, or both. Therefore, clinicians should be careful when utilizing the thresholds for standing radiographs across other modalities and positions for diagnosis and assessment of scoliosis.

Vertebral body tethering (VBT) has been originally developed as a growth modulation technique for the surgical management of skeletally immature patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Given the positive results obtained in this setting, the use of VBT is gradually expanding to other patient categories, such as those with no or limited remaining growth or with non-idiopathic scoliosis. Aim of this manuscript is to offer an overview over the current applications of VBT, along with imaging and comments derived from the clinical experience. The work was based on a literature search conducted in January 2023 on Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Following keywords were used for the search: vertebral body tethering, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, early onset scoliosis, neuromuscular scoliosis, syndromic scoliosis. Three patient categories in which VBT has been applied have been highlighted: VBT for growth modulation in AIS, VBT as anterior scoliosis correction in AIS and VBT for non-idiopathic curves or early-onset scoliosis. While growth modulation in AIS still represents the most widespread use of VBT, the use of this technique has yielded positive results in different settings as well, such as scoliosis correction in AIS or temporary or definitive curve management in non-AIS curves. While long-term results are lacking, patient selection seems to play a central role to reduce the complication rate and ensure predictable and stable results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Spinal deformities in children can be caused by various etiologies, such as congenital, syndromic, neuromuscular, or idiopathic. Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is diagnosed before the age of ten years, and when the curvature continues to progress and exceeds a Cobb angle of 60–65 degrees, surgical treatment should be considered. Initial minimally invasive surgery and the implantation of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) allows for the noninvasive distraction of the spine, growing, and avoids multiple operations associated with the classic distractions of standard growing rods. Case presentation: A 2-year-old girl was admitted to our clinic with rapidly progressive thoracic scoliosis. The major curve of the thoracic spine Cobb angle was 122° at 30 months. No congenital deformities were detected. The surgical technique was the less-invasive percutaneous and subfascial implantation of MCGRs, without long incisions on the back and the non-invasive ambulatory lengthening of her spine over the next 4 years. Conclusions: MCGR is a safe procedure for EOS patients. It is extremely effective at correcting spinal deformity; controlling the growth and curvature of the spine as the child develops during growth; reducing the number of hospitalizations and anesthesia; and minimizing the physical and mental burden of young patients, parents, and their families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

EOS® imaging is a proprietary imaging technology that was launched in 2007. Based on a gaseous particle detector with a multi-wire proportional chamber, it offers several advantages over other imaging modalities: low dose of radiation, ability to create 3D reconstructions, ability to conduct whole body imaging, high reproducibility in measuring various parameters of alignment and faster imaging time. EOS® imaging is slowly gaining widespread acceptance as its applications in various disorders continue to evolve. It has been found to be particularly useful and has opened up new avenues of research in the field of spinal deformities. This narrative review seeks to provide an overview of the proprietary technology behind EOS® imaging, compare it to existing imaging modalities, summarize its current applications in various spinal disorders and outline its limitations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Cross-sectional study.Objective: To assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability of thoracic, spino-pelvic, and rod lengthening measurements made on biplanar spinal stereoradiography (EOS imaging) in children treated with magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR).Summary Of Background Data: MCGR treatment aims to gain spine length while gradually correcting the spinal deformity. Monitoring thoracic and spino-pelvic parameters is crucial for successful management. EOS imaging is widely used for diagnosis and monitoring of children with Early Onset Scoliosis. However, there is a paucity of literature on the reliability of thoracic and spino-pelvic parameters on EOS imaging in children treated with MCGR.Methods: Three independent reviewers independently read a random assortment of 20 whole spine posteroanterior and lateral radiographs from patients treated with MCGR. The measurements were repeated 4 weeks after the initial read. The following radiological parameters were measured: Cobb angle of the main and compensatory curves, coronal balance, coronal T1-S1 and T1-T12 length, chest width and depth at T6, pelvic inlet width, MCGR distracted lengths, global kyphosis, proximal and distal junctional angle, lordosis, sagittal balance, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and sacral slope. Statistical analysis was performed with paired t test and Cronbach alpha for inter- and intraobserver reliability.Results: All measurements had good or excellent intra- and interobserver reliability (α>0.8; P < 0.05), except measurements of the proximal junctional angle which showed only poor intra- and interobserver reliability for patients with an upper instrumented vertebra cranial to T4.Conclusion: EOS imaging is reliable for diagnosis and monitoring of children with Early Onset Scoliosis treated with MCGR. EOS imaging is particularly excellent for assessment of MCGR lengthening. Diagnosis and interpretation of early proximal junctional kyphosis within the cervicothoracic junction should be made with caution.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A prospective, a single-institution, nonrandomized study.Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectivity of short-segment instrumentation in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients treated by magnetic-controlled growing rods (MCGRs).Summary Of Background Data: Despite the common use of conventional growing rods and the recent popularity of MCGR in the treatment of progressive EOS, distal instrumented vertebra and number of the spanned levels are not standardized.Methods: Patients with progressive EOS, characterized by the major thoracic curve and nonstructural compensatory curve, were a candidate to be treated by dual MCGR short segment spinal instrumentation spanning the major thoracic curve; such patients are followed up for a minimum period of 30 months. Radiological data were collected and analyzed in terms of Cobb angle of both primary and secondary curve, kyphosis angle, T1-T12, and T1-S1 distances, and T1-T12/T1-S1 ratio in preoperative, postoperative, and last follow-up.Results: Sixteen patients with different diagnoses of EOS, mean age at the operation was 7 years and 10 months (5 years and 6 months-9 years and 10 months), and mean period of follow-up was 37 (30-54) months. The Cobb angle of both major and compensatory curve are corrected by the mean value of 62° (44-85), 35° (22-45) preoperatively to 29° (12-49), 14° (9-24) postoperatively, and maintained at 28° (10-47), 10° (2-20) in the last follow-up, respectively. The T1-T12/T1-S1 ratio was 0.58 preoperatively, 0.6 postoperatively, and 0.62 at the last follow-up. The average yearly T1-T12 and T1-S1 length increase were calculated as 7 and 9 mm/year, respectively.Conclusion: Selective fusion principals are applicable to EOS, in that short segment instrumentation with MGCR in thoracic curve EOS patients is an effective technique in correction of both structural and compensatory curve, and in maintaining the correction during subsequent nonsurgical spinal distraction.Level Of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is an ‘umbrella’ term defining scoliosis presenting before the age of 10 years. It reflects a constellation of conditions, which are challenging to treat. EOS is subdivided aetiologically into: idiopathic, congenital, thoracogenic, neuromuscular and syndromic. Each group has unique issues to address. The cornerstone of treating EOS is the facilitation of optimal conditions for lung development, thoracic growth and spinal movement. As a proxy marker, thoracic height contributes significantly to lung volume. One must adopt a holistic approach with consideration of the impact of multiple treatment interventions in early life on overall development. Treatment is guided by the principles above. In certain patients, bracing or serial casting treatment can restore spinal parameters to normal with no late residual. In other cases, such as neuromuscular and syndromic, operative interventions are often necessary. Surgical options range from primary fusion, to growth sparing implants that are periodically extended to allow spinal lengthening and thereby thoracic volume increase. ‘Growing rods’ have evolved over time–some require multiple surgeries, whilst others rely on a guided growth principle. A further recent development is the externally lengthened magnetic ‘growing rod’. This review addresses the underlying conditions, assessment and treatment of patients with EOS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The assessment of spinal flexibility is essential for the planning of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery. Various radiographic methods have been used but none of them has shown any superiority. The new low-dose stereography system EOS (EOS imaging, Paris, France) captures whole body images in a single scan without vertical distortion. EOS is now used in routine clinical use for AIS follow-up. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the feasibility and the reproducibility of a new suspension test during the EOS imaging for the assessment of spinal flexibility in AIS. Materials and methods: Fifty AIS patients scheduled for surgery were prospectively included. For each patient, a standard EOS radiograph was obtained, then a suspension test in the EOS and a classic traction test on the cotrel frame were performed. The examinations were compared in terms of radiation exposure, tolerance, mean traction force, and Cobb angle reduction for each curve. Axial and sagittal reductions during suspension were analyzed on three-dimensional EOS reconstructions. Results: The tolerance of the suspension test was lower than the traction test but it was less operator dependent. Radiation exposure was 7 times lower during the suspension test. Cobb angle reductions achieved in the proximal and main curves by the two tests were similar. The traction test achieved greater reduction of the distal curve. Flexibility in the axial plane and in the sagittal plane was analyzed with the suspension test. The reduction in apical rotation was not correlated with the reduction in Cobb angle. Conclusion: The EOS suspension test can be used for the assessment of spinal flexibility in AIS. It gives a global vision of the deformity with new flexibility indices in the axial and sagittal planes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the available evidence for the clinical effectiveness of the EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system for the evaluation and monitoring of scoliosis and other relevant orthopaedic conditions. Methods: A systematic review of studies of EOS, compared with standard X-ray film, computed radiography or digital radiography, of patients with orthopaedic conditions was undertaken. Ten electronic databases were searched. The quality of the included studies was assessed and a narrative synthesis undertaken. Results: Three small, limited quality studies, primarily of children with scoliosis, were identified. No patient health outcomes were reported. Spinal image quality was comparable or better overall with EOS. Radiation dose was considerably lower with EOS than X-ray film or computed radiography; the mean entrance surface dose was over five times lower with EOS for the posteroanterior spine radiograph and over six times lower for the lateral spine radiograph. Conclusions: The available clinical evidence for EOS is limited to establishing its basic technical ability. The technical advancements associated with EOS (the ability to generate a full body scan and to construct a three-dimensional model from synchronously acquired lateral and posteroanterior images) have not been evaluated in terms of their ability to improve patient outcomes. Whilst radiation dose is a concern for orthopaedic patients who require repeated imaging, it is difficult to quantify the reductions in radiation dose seen with EOS in terms of patient health benefits. Clinical studies that investigate the impact of EOS on patient management are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]