Search

This prospective, observational cohort study investigated the effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation of post Covid-19 sequelae and persistent symptoms and their impact on patients' functioning and quality of life. From 58 patients referred for neurorehabilitation, 43 were eligible for and participated in the present study. Before and after 8 weeks of rehabilitation, patients underwent physical, neuropsychological and respiratory evaluations and assessment of functional independence, impact of fatigue and quality of life. Forty of 43 individuals (52 ± 11.4 years, 24 male) completed the rehabilitation program. Fatigue (87.5%), dyspnea and/or shortness of breath (62.5%), and cognitive impairment (37.5%) were reported by both previously hospitalized and home-confined patients. Neurological sequelae (35.5%) were present only in hospitalized patients. After 8 weeks of rehabilitation, patients reported significant improvements in motor functional independence, upper and lower limb functionality, impact of fatigue on daily activities, respiratory muscle strength, cognitive performance, and quality of life. Post Covid-19 patients present with heterogeneous neurological, physical, and respiratory impairments requiring a multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach to reduce disability and improve functionality and quality of life. A comprehensive assessment of clinical profiles and responses to rehabilitation may facilitate the identification of rehabilitation candidates and help to design effective rehabilitation interventions. Post Covid-19 patients present multiple, heterogeneous neurological, physical and respiratory impairments that are observed in both previously hospitalized and home-confined patients. Eight weeks of multidisciplinary rehabilitation may significantly reduce disability and improve functionality and quality of life. A comprehensive assessment of their clinical profile and response to rehabilitation may facilitate the identification of rehabilitation candidates and help to design more effective rehabilitation interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

About one-third of adult stroke patients suffer from aphasia when they are discharged from hospital. Aphasia seems to be a negative predictive factor affecting post-stroke functional recovery after rehabilitation, but this association has been scarcely addressed in previous research. We aim to evaluate the impact of aphasia in cognitive functional outcomes in working-age first-ever ischemic stroke adults. Retrospective observational cohort study. One hundred and thirty ischemic (≤ 64 years old) adult stroke patients (43.07% with aphasia) admitted to a rehabilitation center between 2007 and 2019 were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate linear regressions were performed using state-of-the-art variables (stroke severity, gender, age) extending them with potential confounders (e.g. diabetes, medication for depression). The cognitive subtest (C-FIM) of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) at discharge and C-FIM gain were the dependent variables. Patients with aphasia (PWA) had lower C-FIM scores at admission and at discharge. No significant differences were observed in relation to C-FIM gain, C-FIM efficiency, C-FIM effectiveness and length of stay (LOS). C-FIM gain was remarkably higher though non-significant (p =.059) in PWA. Regression analysis identifies C-FIM at admission and aphasia as significant predictors of C-FIM at discharge (R2 = 0.72). The same variables plus taking medication for depression predicted C-FIM gain (R2 = 0.38). We identified no significant differences in C-FIM outcomes (gain, efficiency and effectiveness) either in LOS between PWA and patients without aphasia, though C-FIM differences were significant at admission and discharge. Aphasia was a significant predictor of C-FIM gain and C-FIM at discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients present long-lasting physical and neuropsychological impairment, which may require rehabilitation. OBJECTIVES: The current cross-sectional study characterizes post COVID-19 sequelae and persistent symptoms in patients in an outpatient rehabilitation program. METHODS: Thirty patients [16 post-ICU and 14 non-ICU; median age = 54(43.8–62) years; 19 men] presenting sequelae and/or persistent symptoms (>3 months after acute COVID-19) were selected of 41 patients referred for neurorehabilitation. Patients underwent physical, neuropsychological and respiratory evaluation and assessment of impact of fatigue and quality of life. RESULTS: The main reasons for referral to rehabilitation were: fatigue (86.6%), dyspnea (66.7%), subjective cognitive impairment (46.7%) and neurological sequelae (33.3%). Post-ICU patient presented sequelae of critical illness myopathy and polyneuropathy, stroke and encephalopathy and lower forced vital capacity compared to non-ICU patients. Cognitive impairment was found in 63.3% of patients, with a similar profile in both sub-groups. Increased physical fatigue, anxiety and depression and low quality of life were prevalent irrespective of acute COVID-19 severity. CONCLUSIONS: The variability of post COVID-19 physical and neuropsychological impairment requires a complex screening process both in ICU and non-ICU patients. The high impact of persistent symptoms on daily life activities and quality of life, regardless of acute infection severity, indicate need for rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stroke-related falls occur at especially high rates in rehabilitation settings. Inpatient-hospital falls have been identified as one of the most common medical complications after stroke, negatively influencing recovery, nevertheless, the role of cognition in relation to falls during inpatient rehabilitation is largely unexplored. Objective. We aim to predict inpatient falls in a subacute stroke rehabilitation setting using previously reported variables such as stroke severity, gender, age, ataxia, hemiparesis, and functionality in activities of daily living, further extending them with specific cognition variables assessing memory, verbal fluency, attention, and orientation. Methods: This observational study included 158 stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation center between 2007 and 2019, with less than 30 days since stroke onset to admission. Stroke severity was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Four logistic regressions were performed including NIHSS, age, sex, ataxia, and hemiparesis plus one of the following: (1) Functional Independence Measure cognitive (C-FIM) and motor (M-FIM) subtests. (2) individual C-FIM items, (3) Ray Auditory Verbal Memory Test (RAVLT) and (4) verbal fluency test (PMR), Digit Span from Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS III), and Orientation from Test Barcelona. Results: Neither NIHSS, age, sex, ataxia nor hemiparesis predicted falls. C-FIM was a significant predictor (AUC:0.891), but not M-FIM. The problem solving C-FIM item (AUC:0.836), the RAVLT learning subtest (AUC:0.879), and PMR verbal fluency (AUC:0.871) were significant predictors for each model, respectively. Conclusions: Cognition assessments, i.e., one FIM item, one RAVLT item, or a one-minute verbal fluency test are significant falls predictors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rehabilitation can improve cognitive deficits observed in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, despite rehabilitation, the ability of making a choice often remains impaired. Risk taking is a daily activity involving numerous cognitive processes subserved by a complex neural network. In this work we investigated risk taking using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) in patients with acute TBI and healthy controls. We hypothesized that individuals with TBI will take less risk at the BART as compared to healthy individuals. We also predicted that within the TBI group factors such as the number of days since the injury, severity of the injury, and sites of the lesion will play a role in risk taking as assessed with the BART. Main findings revealed that participants with TBI displayed abnormally cautious risk taking at the BART as compared to healthy subjects. Moreover, healthy individuals showed increased risk taking throughout the task which is in line with previous work. However, individuals with TBI did not show this increased risk taking during the task. We also investigated the influence of three patients’ characteristics on their performance at the BART: Number of days post injury, Severity of the head injury, and Status of the frontal lobe. Results indicate that performance at the BART was influenced by the number of days post injury and the status of the frontal lobe, but not by the severity of the head injury. Reported findings are encouraging for risk taking seems to naturally improve with time postinjury. They support the need of conducting longitudinal prospective studies to ultimately identify impaired and intact cognitive skills that should be trained postinjury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]