Search

Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the consumer experience of community-based residential mental health rehabilitation support at Community Care Units in Australia. These clinical services provide recovery-oriented residential rehabilitation to people affected by severe and persistent mental illness. Typically, nurses occupy the majority of staff roles. However, two of the three sites in the study were trialling a novel integrated staffing model where the majority of staff were people with a lived experience of mental illness employed as peer support workers (PSWs). The interviews explored consumers' experiences of care 12-18 months after admission. Fifteen interviews were completed with an independent interviewer. Most participants were diagnosed with schizophrenia or a related psychotic disorder. The analysis followed a pragmatic approach to grounded theory. Consumers viewed the CCU favourably, emphasizing the value of the relationships formed with staff and co-residents. No major differences in consumers' experience under the traditional versus integrated staffing models were identified; however, those from the integrated staffing model sites valued the contributions of the peer support workers. The understanding of the consumer experience emerging through this study aligned with their expectations of the service at the time of commencement., (© 2021 Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.)

Background: Compensation and adaptation therapies have been developed to improve community functioning via improving neurocognitive abilities in people with schizophrenia. Various modes of delivering compensation and adaptation therapies have been found to be effective. The aim of this trial is to compare two different cognitive interventions, Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) and Computerised Interactive Remediation of Cognition-Training for Schizophrenia (CIRCuiTS). The trial also aims to identify if mismatch negativity (MMN) can predict an individual's response to the compensation and adaptation programmes., Methods: This study will use a randomised, controlled trial of two cognitive interventions to compare the impact of these programmes on measures of neurocognition and function. One hundred clinically stable patients aged between 18 and 65 years with a diagnosis of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder will be recruited. Participants will be randomised to either the CCT or the CIRCuiTS therapy groups. The outcome measures are neurocognition (BACS), subjective sense of cognitive impairment (SSTICS), social functioning (SFS), and MMN (measured by EEG) in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders., Discussion: This trial will determine whether different approaches to addressing the cognitive deficits found in schizophrenia spectrum disorders are of comparable benefit using the outcome measures chosen. This has implications for services where cost and lack of computer technology limit the implementation and dissemination of interventions to address cognitive impairment in routine practice. The trial will contribute to the emerging evidence of MMN as a predictor of response to cognitive interventions., Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12618000161224 . Registered on 2 February 2018. Protocol version: 4.0, 18 June 2018.

Background: Deficits in social cognition are common in people with schizophrenia and are associated with impaired functioning. Finding effective interventions to address these deficits is a priority. Social Cognition Interaction Training (SCIT) is a psychosocial intervention that has demonstrated acceptability and feasibility in various health care settings. Larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the effectiveness of this intervention., Design: A randomized controlled trial., Methods: One hundred and twenty adults diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorder were randomized to receive SCIT (n = 61) or Befriending Therapy (BT) (n = 59). Both intervention groups were delivered weekly for 2 hr over 12 weeks. Neurocognitive assessment was completed at baseline. Participants completed assessments of social cognition, social functioning, and meta-cognition at baseline, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up., Results: There were no clinically significant differences between group outcomes on any measure of social cognition or social functioning. There was a trend for both groups to improve over time but not at a level of statistical significance., Conclusions: SCIT did not show any additional benefits on measures of social cognition compared to Befriending Therapy for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. The findings are discussed in terms of potential improvements to the programme., Practitioner Points: Effective interventions for the social cognitive deficits of schizophrenia spectrum disorders are still being refined. Social Cognition Interaction Training is a promising therapy but requires further modifications to improve its effectiveness., (© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.)

To describe the provision of evidence-based psychological therapies for the treatment of psychosis in a large Australian mental health service; and to explore the barriers and facilitators to providing these therapies. Mixed-methods study including: 1) a retrospective audit of 100 clients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder to estimate adherence to guideline recommended psychological therapies; and 2) a cross-sectional survey of community based mental health practitioners, based on the Theoretical Domains Framework, to understand the barriers and facilitators to delivering psychological therapies to clients with psychosis. Twenty-five percent (25/100) of the audited sample engaged with psychological services. Of those who did, two received the recommended dose of evidence-based therapy. Thirty-three percent (37/112) of mental health practitioners completed the survey. Barriers to the delivery of psychological therapies related to perceived lack of knowledge, skills, and confidence with the therapies, and beliefs about who will (and will not) benefit. Other barriers included lack of time, demanding caseloads, and a culture of risk and crisis management. People with psychosis have poor access to evidence-based psychological therapies. The barriers to providing psychological therapies are multifactorial and should be systematically addressed to improve health and quality of life outcomes for people living with psychosis. Abbreviations: CBT: Cognitive behaviour therapy; CBTp: cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis; CRT: cognitive remediation therapy; FIp: family intervention for psychosis; PORT: Patient Outcomes Research Team; RANZCP: Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists; NICE: UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence; TDF: The Theoretical Domains Framework; HoNos: Health of the Nation Scale; EBPIs: Evidence Based Psychological Interventions; ACT: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. What is already known about this topic: Clinical practice guidelines for the past two decades have recommended psychological interventions be routinely offered to clients with psychosis. There exists a substantial and widely acknowledged evidence-practice gap concerning the implementation of evidence-based psychological interventions for psychosis within public mental health services. Despite knowledge of effective interventions, the translation into clinical practice continues to fall short. Barriers to the provision of evidence-based psychological interventions for psychosis are evident at various levels, including challenges among staff, service recipients and organisational culture. These factors collectively impede the translation of evidence-based psychological interventions into routine psychosis care. What this topic adds: Identifying and understanding local structural, cultural, resourcing, and attitudinal barriers, while emphasising enablers, becomes essential. This understanding forms the foundation for enhancing access to evidence-based psychological interventions, ultimately elevating the quality of care outcomes for people with psychosis. To foster equitable access and awareness of evidence-based psychological interventions for psychosis, initiatives such as increased staff training, service redesign emphasising the value of psychological interventions, improved referral processes, advocacy, role clarification for clinicians, and enhanced supervision opportunities are crucial. These multifaceted strategies collectively may contribute to a more informed and effective approach to evidence-based psychological interventions for psychosis, promoting optimism and treatment choice. Once local structural, cultural, resourcing, and attitudinal factors are recognised and understood targeted improvements in service delivery for psychosis can be strategically implemented, aligning with the unique dynamics of the local context and care setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Various modes of delivering cognitive remediation (CR) are effective, but there have been few head-to-head trials of different approaches. This trial aimed to evaluate the relative effectiveness of two different programmes, Cognitive Compensatory Training (CCT) and Computerized Interactive Remediation of Cognition--Training for Schizophrenia (CIRCuiTs). Methods: The study used a single-blind randomized, controlled trial to examine the efficacy and effectiveness of the two therapies. The study aimed to enroll 100 clinically stable patients between the ages of 18 and 65 years who had been diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Participants were randomized to either the CCT or CIRCuiTs therapy groups. The primary outcome measures were neurocognition using the Brief Assessment of Cognition Scale (BACS) and the Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia (SSTICS). The secondary measure was functional outcomes using the Social Functioning Scale (SFS). Results: There was no group difference in any of the outcome measures post-intervention or at follow-up. Both groups had a small improvement on their SSTICS scores between baseline (M = 30.52 and SD = 14.61) and post-intervention (M = 23.96 and SD = 10.92). Verbal memory scores as measured by list learning improved for both groups between baseline (z = -1.62) and 3-month follow-up (z = -1.03). Both groups improved on the token motor task between baseline (z = -1.38) and post-intervention (z = -0.69). Both groups had a decline in Symbol Coding scores between baseline (z = 0.05) and 3-month follow-up (z = -0.82). Discussion: This underpowered study found no difference in effect between the two approaches studied. If future studies confirm this finding, then it has implications for services where cost and lack of computer technology could pose a barrier in addressing the cognitive domain of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The final sample size compromised the power of the study to conclusively determine a significant effect. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims.: Incorporating consumer perspectives into mental health services design is important in working to deliver recovery-oriented care. One of the challenges faced in mental health rehabilitation services is limited consumer engagement with the available support. Listening to consumers' expectations of mental health services, and what they hope to achieve, provides an opportunity to examine the alignment between existing services and the priorities and preferences of the people who use them. We explored consumer understandings and expectations of three recovery-oriented community-based residential mental-health rehabilitation units using semi-structured interviews; two of these units were trialling a staffing model integrating peer support with clinical care. Methods.: Twenty-four consumers completed semi-structured interviews with an independent interviewer during the first 6 weeks of their stay at the rehabilitation unit. Most participants had a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia or a related psychotic disorder (87%). A pragmatic approach to grounded theory guided the analysis, facilitating identification of content and themes, and the development of an overarching conceptual map. Results.: The rehabilitation units were considered to provide a transformational space and a transitional place. The most common reason given for engagement was housing insecurity or homelessness rather than the opportunity for rehabilitation engagement. Differences in expectations did not emerge between consumers entering the clinical and integrated staffing model sites. Conclusions.: Consumers understand the function of the rehabilitation service they are entering. However, receiving rehabilitation support may not be the key driver of their attendance. This finding has implications for promoting consumer engagement with rehabilitation services. The absence of differences between the integrated and clinical staffing models may reflect the novelty of the rehabilitation context. The study highlights the need for staff to find better ways to increase consumer awareness of the potential relevance of evidence-based rehabilitation support to facilitating their recovery.

Mental health services increasingly involve peer support workers. Staff expectations of working in these services are important because they frame processes and cultures that develop within services, and influence work satisfaction, staff retention, and consumer experience. We examined staff expectations at two new community-based residential rehabilitation units trialing a staffing model where most staff are employed based on their lived experience of mental illness. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten peer support workers and five clinical staff on commencement at Community Care Units that opened in 2014 and 2015. Staff views covered individual motivations, emerging organizational practices and culture, and the nature and philosophy of recovery and recovery-oriented rehabilitation. Subtle differences were evident in staff understandings of recovery and recovery-oriented rehabilitation. Staff were mostly optimistic about the services' potential but expressed uncertainty about how the professions would work together and practicalities of the new roles. Concerns that staff foreshadowed are consistent with those reported in the literature and can be pre-emptively addressed. Future research on staff experiences will enhance understanding of how staff perceptions of recovery-oriented rehabilitation change over time, and of how these relate to consumer experiences and outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study explores how consumers expect community-based residential mental health rehabilitation to compare with previous experiences of care. Understanding what consumers hope to receive from mental health services, and listening to their perspectives about what has and has not worked in previous care settings, may illuminate pathways to improved service engagement and outcomes. A mixed-methods research design taking a pragmatic approach to grounded theory guided the analysis of 24 semi-structured interviews with consumers on commencement at three Community Care Units (CCUs) in Australia. Two of these CCUs were trialling a staffing model integrating peer support work with clinical care. All interviews were conducted by an independent interviewer within the first 6 weeks of the consumer's stay. All participants expected the CCU to offer an improvement on previous experiences of care. Comparisons were made to acute and subacute inpatient settings, supported accommodation, and outpatient care. Consumers expected differences in the people (staff and co-residents), the focus of care, physical environ, and rules and regulations. Participants from the integrated staffing model sites articulated the expected value of a less clinical approach to care. Overall, consumers' expectations aligned with the principles articulated in policy frameworks for recovery-oriented practice. However, their reflections on past care suggest that these services continue to face significant challenges realizing these principles in practice. Paying attention to the kind of working relationship consumers want to have with mental health services, such as the provision of choice and maintaining a practical and therapeutic supportive focus, could improve their engagement and outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A novel staffing model integrating peer support workers and clinical staff within a unified team is being trialled at community based residential rehabilitation units in Australia. A mixed-methods protocol for the longitudinal evaluation of the outcomes, expectations and experiences of care by consumers and staff under this staffing model in two units will be compared to one unit operating a traditional clinical staffing. The study is unique with regards to the context, the longitudinal approach and consideration of multiple stakeholder perspectives. Methods/design: The longitudinal mixed methods design integrates a quantitative evaluation of the outcomes of care for consumers at three residential rehabilitation units with an applied qualitative research methodology. The quantitative component utilizes a prospective cohort design to explore whether equivalent outcomes are achieved through engagement at residential rehabilitation units operating integrated and clinical staffing models. Comparative data will be available from the time of admission, discharge and 12-month period post-discharge from the units. Additionally, retrospective data for the 12-month period prior to admission will be utilized to consider changes in functioning pre and post engagement with residential rehabilitation care. The primary outcome will be change in psychosocial functioning, assessed using the total score on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Planned secondary outcomes will include changes in symptomatology, disability, recovery orientation, carer quality of life, emergency department presentations, psychiatric inpatient bed days, and psychological distress and wellbeing. Planned analyses will include: cohort description; hierarchical linear regression modelling of the predictors of change in HoNOS following CCU care; and descriptive comparisons of the costs associated with the two staffing models. The qualitative component utilizes a pragmatic approach to grounded theory, with collection of data from consumers and staff at multiple time points exploring their expectations, experiences and reflections on the care provided by these services. Discussion: It is expected that the new knowledge gained through this study will guide the adaptation of these and similar services. For example, if differential outcomes are achieved for consumers under the integrated and clinical staffing models this may inform staffing guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]