Search

Objectives: To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of blonanserin in adolescents with schizophrenia. Methods: This 6-week multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study investigated fixed-dose blonanserin (8 or 16 mg/day) in patients 12-18 years of age diagnosed with schizophrenia, as indicated by a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of 60-120 and a Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score of ≥3. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 6 in the PANSS total score, using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis. Safety was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Results: Among 151 randomized patients, 150 were included in the primary analysis population. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar across groups at baseline. The rate of study discontinuation was 14.9%, 23.5%, and 28.3% in patients administered with placebo, blonanserin 8 mg/day, and blonanserin 16 mg/day, respectively. The least-squares mean change (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline to week 6 in PANSS total score was -10.6 (-16.10 to -5.10), -15.3 (-20.80 to -9.86), and -20.5 (-25.89 to -15.16) in patients administered placebo, 8 mg/day blonanserin, and 16 mg/day blonanserin, respectively. The 16-mg/day blonanserin group showed significantly greater reduction in the PANSS total score than the placebo group (least-squares mean difference [95% CI]: -9.9 [-17.61 to -2.25], p  = 0.012, effect size: 0.538), although the 8-mg/day group showed no significant difference. The incidence of AEs such as akathisia, somnolence, and hyperprolactinemia was higher in the blonanserin groups than in the placebo group. AEs associated with blonanserin were generally mild and were consistent with its known profile in adults with schizophrenia. Conclusions: Blonanserin achieved a sufficient efficacy in adolescent patients, and the safety profile was similar to that in adults, which suggests that blonanserin may be a safe treatment option for adolescents with schizophrenia. Study registration number: Japic CTI-111724.

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety/tolerability of oral blonanserin in adolescents with schizophrenia (Study registration number: JapicCTI-111725). Methods: This 52-week, multicenter, open-label extension study enrolled adolescent patients with schizophrenia who opted to enter in this study after the completion of the preceding placebo-controlled study. Blonanserin tablet was orally administered twice daily, after morning and evening meals, for 52 weeks using dose-titration method within a range between 4 and 24 mg/day. The primary end point was the change from baseline to the end of the study in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. Safety/tolerability was assessed by the incidence and severity of adverse events. Results: Of 117 patients who completed the preceding placebo-controlled study, 109 entered this extension study and 43 (39.4%) of them discontinued the study treatment. The safety analysis set comprised 106 patients who received the study drug at least once, including 36 and 70 patients treated with placebo (DB-placebo group) and blonanserin tablet (DB-blonanserin group), respectively, in the placebo-controlled study. At the last assessment, the mean change in PANSS total score overall [mean (standard deviation)] was -24.9 (20.76) from the baseline of the placebo-controlled study, which was similar in the DB-placebo and DB-blonanserin groups. The overall incidence of adverse events was 90.6%, and most of them were mild or moderate in severity, with similar incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms (38.7%) to that in adults receiving long-term blonanserin oral tablet treatment and minimal change in weight and metabolic parameters. Conclusions: This long-term extension study showed that 52 weeks of oral blonanserin treatment improved or stabilized psychiatric symptoms in patients with adolescent schizophrenia. There were no major issues with the safety or tolerability of blonanserin administration in this study. Considering relatively less adverse effects on weight increase and metabolic parameters, blonanserin is expected to be a safe/tolerable treatment option for adolescent schizophrenia that can be used seamlessly from adolescence to adulthood.

Rationale: We conducted a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials of lurasidone (LUR) to examine the difference in the risk ratios (RRs) for adverse events (AEs) between depressive disorders (bipolar depression and major depressive disorders) and schizophrenia., Objectives: Three trials for depressive disorders (n = 1,239) were used for flexible-dose LUR 20-60 (LUR20-60) and/or 80-120 (LUR80-120) mg/day. Nine schizophrenia trials (n = 2,684) were used for fixed-dose LUR. The RRs of LUR20-60 and LUR80-120 for depressive disorders were compared with those of LUR 40 (LUR40) and LUR 80 (LUR80) mg/day for schizophrenia, respectively, to match LUR dose., Results: LUR20-60 caused a higher incidence of akathisia (RR = 2.28; p = 0.003) and weight gain (RR = 4.11; p = 0.05) than placebo in patients with depressive disorders, and LUR40 caused a higher incidence of akathisia (RR = 2.39; p = 0.0001), extrapyramidal symptoms (RR = 1.88; p = 0.02), anticholinergic drug use (RR = 1.58; p = 0.005), somnolence (RR = 2.19; p = 0.002), and dizziness (RR = 2.06; p = 0.05) than placebo in patients with schizophrenia. However, no significant differences in the RRs for all outcomes were found between depressive disorders and schizophrenia. LUR80-120 caused a higher incidence of akathisia (RR = 3.90; p < 0.0001), extrapyramidal symptoms (RR = 2.26; p = 0.04), anticholinergic use (RR = 4.70; p < 0.0001), and nausea (RR = 2.15; p = 0.001) than placebo in patients with depressive disorders. LUR80 caused a higher incidence of akathisia (RR = 2.99; p < 0.0001), extrapyramidal symptoms (RR = 2.55; p = 0.01), anticholinergic use (RR = 1.86; p = 0.01), somnolence (RR = 2.46; p = 0.001), and nausea (RR = 1.64; p = 0.04) than placebo in patients with schizophrenia. Depressive disorders had a higher RR for anticholinergic use than schizophrenia (p = 0.04)., Conclusions: The incidence of AEs did not differ between schizophrenia and depressive disorders., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Schizophrenia significantly limits social functioning with positive and negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction. Blonanserin (LONASEN®), a novel second-generation antipsychotic approved for treating schizophrenia in Japan in 2008, reportedly shows beneficial effects on cognitive function as well as positive and negative symptoms, with potential for improving social functioning. To understand the safety and effectiveness of blonanserin in the real clinical practice, five Japanese post-marketing surveillances have been conducted and published to date. In this article, we reviewed all the Japanese post-marketing surveillances and discussed the clinical usefulness of blonanserin in patients with schizophrenia having diverse clinical characteristics. Adverse drug reactions, such as akathisia and extrapyramidal symptoms, were common in all surveillances. However, those specific to second-generation antipsychotics, such as weight gain and abnormalities in glycometabolism or lipid metabolism, were rarely observed. In addition, no adverse drug reactions apart from clinical trial results were found. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total scores in all surveillances significantly lowered at the last evaluation than at baseline. These results were consistent through 1-year of treatment, suggesting that effectiveness is maintained even after long-term use. In conclusion, blonanserin is considered a beneficial drug in real clinical practice for patients with schizophrenia having diverse characteristics., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All the authors are employees of Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co, Ltd. The authors report no other conflicts of interest related to this work., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To report the efficacy and safety of blonanserin in patients with schizophrenia compared with risperidone in a Japanese multicenter, randomized, double-blind study based on post hoc sensitivity analysis in addition to the previous results reported by Miura and discuss the current approaches for schizophrenia treatment., Methods: Of 302 patients randomized, 156 received blonanserin (8-24 mg/d) and 145 received risperidone (2-6 mg/d) for 8 weeks. Efficacy variables included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score for the primary outcome, PANSS subscale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) for secondary outcomes. Safety variables included treatment-emergent adverse events, Drug Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale scores, laboratory data, vital signs, electrocardiogram, etc RESULTS: Blonanserin was not inferior to risperidone in the change in PANSS total score at a non-inferior margin of -7 (intergroup difference, -0.46; 95% CI, -4.40 to 3.48). Post hoc analyses wholly supported the primary result. No major difference was found in the changes in BPRS scores and the improvement rate on CGI-I between the drugs. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two drugs. Blonanserin was associated with a lower risk of prolactin increase, weight gain, and orthostatic hypotension compared with risperidone. However, blonanserin was associated with a higher incidence of akathisia and excitability compared with risperidone. Most of the adverse events were mild to moderate in severity with no specific events of predominant high severity in the both drugs., Conclusions: Blonanserin exerted the similar efficacy to risperidone in both positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia with a lower risk of prolactin increase, weight gain, and orthostatic hypotension compared with risperidone. Blonanserin will serve as a favorable treatment option for schizophrenia in daily clinical practice., (© 2019 The Authors. Neuropsychopharmacology Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Society of NeuropsychoPharmacology.)

Background: Blonanserin transdermal patch therapy is now available in Japan for the treatment of schizophrenia and may provide several advantages over the tablet formulation., Objective: The aim was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of blonanserin transdermal patches in Japanese patients with schizophrenia., Methods: An open-label study was conducted in adults with schizophrenia at 37 sites in Japan. Patients were enrolled in either cohort 1 or 2. Patients in cohort 1 received 8-16 mg/day blonanserin tablets for 6 weeks and then 40-80 mg/day blonanserin patches for 52 weeks. The dose of blonanserin patches was determined according to the dose of the tablets. In cohort 2, every patient started from 40 mg/day and then 40-80 mg/day blonanserin transdermal patches for 52 weeks. Both cohorts had 1-2 weeks of follow-up. Safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), treatment-related AEs, extrapyramidal AEs [also assessed using the change in Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS) score], the use of any concomitant antiparkinsonian drugs, and skin-related AEs, including skin irritation. Patients also underwent assessment of laboratory values including for serum prolactin concentration, vital signs, body weight, electrocardiographic (ECG) changes, and the corrected QT (QTc) interval. Suicidal ideation was assessed via the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) score. Efficacy was assessed via duration of blonanserin transdermal patch treatment, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total and subscale scores, and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores. Other endpoints included total Drug Attitude Inventory 10 (DAI-10) scores, EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) effect values, and a patient questionnaire about the dosage form., Results: A total of 223 patients with consents, 117 in cohort 1 and 106 in cohort 2 were included in the study. Of the 117 patients in cohort 1, 108 were treated with blonanserin tablets, and 97 received blonanserin patches and were included in the safety analysis set. In cohort 2, 103 of the 106 patients were treated with blonanserin transdermal patches and were included in the safety analysis set. In total, 91 patients were male (45.5%). The mean age was 43.8 years. Discontinuation occurred in 40 patients (41.2%) in cohort 1 and 44 patients (42.7%) in cohort 2. Discontinuation resulted from AEs in 18.6% (cohort 1) and 11.7% (cohort 2) and from withdrawal of consent in 13.4% (cohort 1) and 20.4% (cohort 2), and seven patients overall discontinued due to skin reactions. AEs were reported in 174 patients (87.0%), and 13 serious AEs occurred in 12 patients (6.0%), of which six patients were in cohort 1 and six patients were in cohort 2. Serious AEs were six schizophrenia (n = 6) and seven other AEs (n = 6), which included impulse-control disorder, fracture, epistaxis, asthma, pneumonia aspiration, pneumonia hemophilus, and pneumonia. The most common AEs were nasopharyngitis (n = 62, 31.0%), application site erythema (n = 45, 22.5%), application site pruritus (n = 23, 11.5%), and akathisia (n = 20, 10.0%). AE incidence was similar in cohort 1 (84.5%) and cohort 2 (89.3%). Extrapyramidal and skin-related AEs were reported in 51 patients (25.5%) and 83 patients (41.5%), respectively. None of these AEs were serious. The mean change from baseline in total DIEPSS score at Week 52 {last observation carried forward [LOCF] (standard deviation [SD])} was -0.1 (1.55), indicating no marked effect. In terms of concomitant medications used in cohort 1 and cohort 2, 33.0% (32/97) and 22.3% (23/103) used antiparkinsonian drugs, respectively. The majority of skin-related AEs occurred early in treatment and were appropriately managed with topical therapies. Of the patients who answered "No" to all C-SSRS categories at baseline (n = 129), 13 patients (10.1%) were evaluated as having emergence of suicidal ideation. Among patients who answered "No" to all C-SSRS suicidal behavior categories at baseline (n = 172), one (0.6%) was evaluated as having suicidal behavior during blonanserin transdermal patch treatment. There were no clinically significant changes in laboratory tests or examinations, including prolactin level, vital signs, body weight, ECG, metabolism-related parameters, and QTc interval. The mean (SD) change in body weight was - 0.04 (4.561) kg and - 0.67 (6.841) kg in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively. The mean changes from baseline in PANSS total score at Week 52 (LOCF [SD]) were - 0.1 [11.6] and - 3.4 [15.3] in cohort 1 and 2, respectively. PANSS scores did not change after switching from tablet to patch formulation in cohort 1 and decreased over the 52 weeks of treatment with the blonanserin patches. The mean change from baseline in CGI-S score at Week 52 (LOCF [SD]) was - 0.2 [1.03] in both cohorts combined. After 52 weeks of blonanserin patch treatment, the total DAI-10 score increased or remained unchanged compared with baseline in 82 of the 129 patients (63.6%) for whom these data were available. In the intention-to-treat population of the combined cohorts (n = 200), the mean (SD) change from baseline in EQ-5D score at the last assessment was - 0.0365 (0.17603). Patients' attitudes to the blonanserin transdermal patches were generally positive., Conclusions: Blonanserin transdermal patches are safe and effective in the long-term treatment of schizophrenia. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Registration: NCT02335658.

Objective: This Japanese, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, evaluating the efficacy and safety of blonanserin compared with haloperidol in patients with schizophrenia, was previously published by Murasaki in the Japanese language. In this article, we present the results of the trial based on full analysis dataset instead of per protocol dataset formerly reported and discuss the findings in light of the latest knowledge of pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia., Methods: A total of 265 patients were randomized to receive blonanserin (8 to 24 mg/d) or haloperidol (4 to 12 mg/d) twice daily for 8 weeks. Efficacy assessments included the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)., Results: Blonanserin was not inferior to haloperidol with a margin of 10% with respect to the improvement rate on CGI-I at end of study (60.5% vs 50.0%, P < 0.001). The decrease in the PANSS total score did not differ between the drugs (-10.3 vs -7.1). For the PANSS negative symptom score, the decrease was significantly greater with blonanserin than with haloperidol (P = 0.006). Blonanserin was well tolerated. The incidence of adverse events was similar for the two drugs. Extrapyramidal adverse events, sedation, hypotension, and prolactin increase were rarer with blonanserin than with haloperidol. No clinically important weight gain was observed., Conclusions: Blonanserin is as effective as haloperidol for the treatment of schizophrenia. Blonanserin is more effective for negative symptoms with a lower risk of extrapyramidal symptoms compared with haloperidol., (© 2019 The Authors. Neuropsychopharmacology Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Neuropsychopharmacology.)

Blonanserin is a novel antipsychotic with high affinities for dopamine D(2) and 5-HT(2A) receptors, and it was recently approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in Japan and Korea. Although double-blind clinical trials have demonstrated that blonanserin has equal efficacy to risperidone, and with a better profile especially with respect to prolactin elevation, its profile of in vivo receptor binding has not been investigated in patients with schizophrenia. Using positron emission tomography (PET), we measured striatal and extrastriatal dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy by blonanserin in 15 patients with schizophrenia treated with fixed doses of blonanserin (ie, 8, 16, and 24 mg/d) for at least 4 weeks before PET scans, and in 15 healthy volunteers. Two PET scans, 1 with [(11)C]raclopride for the striatum and 1 with [(11)C]FLB 457 for the temporal cortex and pituitary, were performed on the same day. Striatal dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy by blonanserin was 60.8% (3.0%) [mean (SD)] at 8 mg, 73.4% (4.9%) at 16 mg, and 79.7% (2.3%) at 24 mg. The brain/plasma concentration ratio calculated from D(2) receptor occupancy in the temporal cortex and pituitary was 3.38, indicating good blood-brain barrier permeability. This was the first study to show clinical daily dose amounts of blonanserin occupying dopamine D(2) receptors in patients with schizophrenia. The clinical implications obtained in this study were the optimal therapeutic dose range of 12.9 to 22.1 mg/d of blonanserin required for 70% to 80% dopamine D(2) receptor occupancy in the striatum, and the good blood-brain barrier permeability that suggested a relatively lower risk of hyperprolactinemia.

Background: There is uncertainty about the efficacy and tolerability of blonanserin in schizophrenia., Method: PubMed, the Cochrane Library databases, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were searched up to September 2012. A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized, controlled trials comparing blonanserin with other antipsychotics were conducted. The risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), numbers-needed-to-harm (NNH), and weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated., Results: Four studies (total n = 1080) were identified (vs. risperidone studies [n = 508], vs. haloperidol studies [n = 572]). Comparing blonanserin with other pooled antipsychotics, there were no significant differences in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (p = 0.75), PANSS positive (p = 0.41), PANSS negative (p = 0.09), and PANSS general psychopathology subscale scores (p = 0.96), and response rate (p = 0.72). However, blonanserin showed greater efficacy in PANSS negative subscale scores compared with haloperidol (WMD = -1.29, CI = -2.29 to -0.30, p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%). No significant differences were found in discontinuation rates between blonanserin and other pooled antipsychotics (due to any cause: p = 0.29, inefficacy: p = 0.32, adverse events: p = 0.56). Blonanserin had a 0.31 lower risk of hyperprolactinemia than the other pooled antipsychotics (CI = 0.20-0.49, NNH = not significant). While dizziness (RR = 0.47, CI = 0.23-0.93, NNH = not significant) and akathisia (RR = 0.54, CI = 0.32-0.90, NNH = 7) occurred significantly less often with blonanserin than with haloperidol, blonanserin had a 1.62 higher risk of akathisia than risperidone (CI = 1.18-2.22, NNH = 8) [corrected]., Conclusion: Our results suggest that although blonanserin has a more beneficial effect on negative symptoms than haloperidol, there was a significant difference in the adverse events profile between blonanserin and other antipsychotics., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Blonanserin is a novel atypical antipsychotic agent with potent dopamine D(2) and serotonin 5-HT(2) antagonist properties. It may potentially have a lower incidence of adverse events than other antipsychotic agents., Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of three doses of blonanserin compared with placebo and haloperidol in patients with acute-phase schizophrenia., Methods: This was a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and haloperidol-controlled, international, multicentre study. Patients with an acute exacerbation of their schizophrenia, with a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score >/=70 and a Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score >/=4 ('moderately ill') [with no decrease >/=20% or >/=1 point, respectively, during the wash-out period] were randomized into one of five treatment groups (blonanserin 2.5, 5 or 10 mg, haloperidol 10 mg or placebo once daily). Patients were assessed weekly for clinical efficacy, adverse events, extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) and drug compliance, and were assessed biweekly for other safety variables., Results: All 307 randomized patients received at least one dose of study medication and 228 (74.3%) completed the study. The mean reduction in PANSS total score at week 6 was significantly greater with all active treatments compared with placebo (-12.58; p < 0.001); blonanserin 10 mg was significantly superior to blonanserin 2.5 mg (-30.18 vs -20.6; p < 0.001), but blonanserin 5 mg (-27.19) and haloperidol 10 mg (-28.16) were not. All active treatments showed greater efficacy against the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, and blonanserin (5 and 10 mg) was more effective against the negative symptoms than haloperidol. Blonanserin was well tolerated at all doses and there was no evidence of clinically important weight gain, orthostatic hypotension, corrected QT interval prolongation or clinically relevant changes in laboratory test results. Haloperidol caused persistent elevation in prolactin levels, but this was not seen with any dose of blonanserin throughout the study period. There was a lower incidence of EPS with blonanserin 10 mg (26.6%) than with haloperidol 10 mg (53.3%)., Conclusion: Blonanserin was effective in the treatment of acute schizophrenia and showed greater efficacy in negative symptoms compared with placebo and haloperidol. Blonanserin was well tolerated and its safety profile compared favourably with haloperidol, particularly with respect to prolactin elevation and EPS frequency.