Search

Background: We aimed to determine if pre-existing immunocompromising conditions (ICCs) were associated with the presentation or outcome of patients with acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) admitted for pediatric intensive care., Methods: Fifty-five hospitals in 30 US states reported cases through the Overcoming COVID-19 public health surveillance registry. Patients <21 years admitted 12 March 2020-30 December 2021 to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) or high-acuity unit for acute COVID-19 were included., Results: Of 1274 patients, 105 (8.2%) had an ICC, including 33 (31.4%) hematologic malignancies, 24 (22.9%) primary immunodeficiencies and disorders of hematopoietic cells, 19 (18.1%) nonmalignant organ failure with solid-organ transplantation, 16 (15.2%) solid tumors, and 13 (12.4%) autoimmune disorders. Patients with ICCs were older, had more underlying renal conditions, and had lower white blood cell and platelet counts than those without ICCs, but had similar clinical disease severity upon admission. In-hospital mortality from COVID-19 was higher (11.4% vs 4.6%, P = .005) and hospitalization was longer (P = .01) in patients with ICCs. New major morbidities upon discharge were not different between those with and without ICC (10.5% vs 13.9%, P = .40). In patients with ICCs, bacterial coinfection was more common in those with life-threatening COVID-19., Conclusions: In this national case series of patients <21 years of age with acute COVID-19 admitted for intensive care, existence of a prior ICCs were associated with worse clinical outcomes. Reassuringly, most patients with ICCs hospitalized in the PICU for severe acute COVID-19 survived and were discharged home without new severe morbidities., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. B. M. C. reports grants from NHLBI, American Lung Association, Doris Duke Foundation/Walder Foundation, and American Thoracic Society; payment for expert testimony from Tripplett Woolf Garretson; and participation on a multidisciplinary team for Sobi. N. B. H. reports grants from Sanofi, Quidel, and Merck. C. V. H. reports royalties, consulting fees, for Reviewer for Up To Date and Dynamed clinical databases; payment for presentations from Biofire; and expert consultation for the AstraZeneca FluMist Board. A. G. R. reports licenses as a Section Editor for Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, UpToDate, Inc; consulting fees from ThermoFisher, Inotrem; honoraria from a Grand Rounds presentation at St. Jude; support for meetings and/or travel from International Sepsis Forum, Institut Merieux, ThermoFisher; participation on an advisory board for the NIH Grace Study, REMAP-CAP, NIH-PREVENT-VILI; a medical advisory board member for Families Fighting Flu; chair member for International Sepsis Forum; and received reagents from Illumina, Inc. M. K. reports support for meetings and/or travel from the National Institute of Health (NIH) and a role on an advisory board for KultureCity. H. D. reports honoraria from Delex Pharma International, Inc. N. Z. C. reports grants from Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. J. C. F. reports grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK119463 and P50DK114786), and Pennsylvania CURE Grant. M. W. H. reports licenses from Kiadis, sub-board service for the American Board of Pediatrics, participation on a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) for Abbvie, and receipt of drugs from Partner Therapeutics and Sobi. J. C. reports receipt of equipment from Illumina. B. L. reports receipt of an Immune Deficiency Foundation Research Grant. G. E. M. reports payment for expert testimony from Orlando Health, Bush Ross, Hall, Schiefflin & Smith, PA, Poole Brooks and Plumlee, PA, Hilltop Specialty Insurance, Smith, Hulsey, and Busey, PA. J. E. S. reports grants from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), consulting fees from the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), payment for presentations from the American Academy of Pediatrics, and participation on an advisory board for the American Association of Medical Colleges. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Infants aged <6 months are not eligible for COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccination during pregnancy has been associated with protection against infant COVID-19-related hospitalization. The Overcoming COVID-19 Network conducted a case-control study during March 9, 2022-May 31, 2023, to evaluate the effectiveness of maternal receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine dose (vaccine effectiveness [VE]) during pregnancy against COVID-19-related hospitalization in infants aged <6 months and a subset of infants aged <3 months. VE was calculated as (1 - adjusted odds ratio) x 100% among all infants aged <6 months and <3 months. Case-patients (infants hospitalized for COVID-19 outside of birth hospitalization and who had a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result) and control patients (infants hospitalized for COVID-19-like illness with a negative SARS-CoV-2 test result) were compared. Odds ratios were determined using multivariable logistic regression, comparing the odds of receipt of a maternal COVID-19 vaccine dose (completion of a 2-dose vaccination series or a third or higher dose) during pregnancy with maternal nonvaccination between case- and control patients. VE of maternal vaccination during pregnancy against COVID-19-related hospitalization was 35% (95% CI = 15%-51%) among infants aged <6 months and 54% (95% CI = 32%-68%) among infants aged <3 months. Intensive care unit admissions occurred in 23% of all case-patients, and invasive mechanical ventilation was more common among infants of unvaccinated (9%) compared with vaccinated mothers (1%) (p = 0.02). Maternal vaccination during pregnancy provides some protection against COVID-19-related hospitalizations among infants, particularly those aged <3 months. Expectant mothers should remain current with COVID-19 vaccination to protect themselves and their infants from hospitalization and severe outcomes associated with COVID-19., Competing Interests: All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Regina M. Simeone reports payments received by her spouse from a previously managed Pfizer investment, which was sold in April 2023. Natasha Halasa reports grant support from Sanofi, Quidel, and Merck, and testing and vaccine donation for Sanofi; and an education grant for delivering a lecture. Satoshi Kamidani reports institutional support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Pfizer, Meissa, and Emergent BioSolutions; and honoraria from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). Pia S. Pannaraj reports institutional support from AstraZeneca and NIH, payment for expert testimony, and unpaid service on the AAP’s Committee on Infectious Diseases and the California Immunization Coalition. Aline B. Maddux reports support from the International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infections Consortium for conference attendance. Charlotte V. Hobbs reports receipt of consulting fees from Dynamed.com for review of a clinical database and honoraria from bioMérieux for speaking at Biofire (bioMérieux) 2022. Julie A. Boom reports receipt of royalties from UpToDate, Inc. for chapter authorship. Michele Kong reports institutional support from NIH and KultureCity board membership. Jennifer E. Schuster reports institutional support from NIH and the Food and Drug Administration, consulting fees from the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology and the Association of American Medical Colleges, and honoraria from the Missouri American Academy of Pediatrics. Janet R. Hume reports institutional support from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and NIH, consulting fees from Entegrion, and uncompensated service on a data safety managing board for an institutional study at the University of Minnesota. Mary A. Staat reports institutional support from NIH, Merck, and Cepheid, and royalties from UpToDate, Inc. for unrelated subject matter. Emily R. Levy reports institutional support from the National Institute on Allergy and Infectious Diseases and consulting fees from the Health Resources and Service Administration Regional Pediatric Pandemic Network. Heidi R. Flori reports consulting fees from NOTA Laboratories and Lucira Health, unrelated to the current work; housing compensation from the Society of Critical Care Medicine for participation in the Pediatric Surviving Sepsis Campaign; and unfunded participation on a data safety monitory board for normoxia in cardiothoracic surgery and cyclodextrin in Niemann-Pick disease. Adrienne G. Randolph reports grant support from NIH for work related to COVID-19, royalties from UpToDate, Inc. for work as the Pediatric Critical Care Medicine section editor; honoraria from grand rounds presentations on multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and sepsis; meeting attendance support from the International Sepsis Forum, participation on a data safety monitoring board for the NIH Grace Study; chair of the Families Fighting Flu International Sepsis Forum medical advisory board; and receipt of reagents from Illumina, Inc. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Background: Racial disparities in SARS-CoV-2 infection, hospitalization, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) have been reported. However, these reports have been based on incomplete data relying on passive reporting, unknown catchment populations, and unknown infection prevalence. We aimed to characterize population-based incidence of MIS-C and COVID-19 hospitalizations among non-Hispanic Black and White children using active surveillance based on seroprevalence-based cumulative incidence of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection in a defined catchment 16-county area of Mississippi., Methods: Active, population-based surveillance for MIS-C and acute COVID-19 hospitalizations meeting clinical and laboratory criteria was conducted by adjudicating clinicians at the major pediatric referral hospital for Mississippi, University of Mississippi Medical Center, from March 2020, to February 2021. Race-stratified SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was estimated using convenience samples from persons <18 years to calculate cumulative SARS-CoV-2 infections in the population., Results: Thirty-eight MIS-C cases and 74 pediatric acute COVID-19 hospitalizations were identified. Cumulative incidence of MIS-C was 4.7 times higher among Black compared with White children (40.7 versus 8.3 cases per 100,000 SARS-CoV-2 infections). Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 hospitalization was 62.3 among Black and 33.1 among White children per 100,000 SARS-CoV-2 infections., Conclusions: From the same catchment area, active surveillance, and cumulative incidence of infection estimated by seroprevalence, we show strikingly higher incidence of SARS-CoV-2-hospitalization and MIS-C in non-Hispanic Black children compared with White children before COVID-19 vaccination introduction in children. These disparities in SARS-CoV-2 manifestations cannot be accounted for by differences in exposure or testing. Targeted vaccine interventions will lessen disparities observed with SARS-CoV-2 manifestations in children., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Neutralization capacity of antibodies against Omicron after a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adolescents is not well studied. Therefore, we evaluated virus-neutralizing capacity against SARS-CoV-2 Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron variants by age-stratified analyses (<5, 5-11, 12-21 years) in 177 pediatric patients hospitalized with severe acute COVID-19, acute MIS-C, and in convalescent samples of outpatients with mild COVID-19 during 2020 and early 2021. Across all patients, less than 10% show neutralizing antibody titers against Omicron. Children <5 years of age hospitalized with severe acute COVID-19 have lower neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 variants compared with patients >5 years of age. As expected, convalescent pediatric COVID-19 and MIS-C cohorts demonstrate higher neutralization titers than hospitalized acute COVID-19 patients. Overall, children and adolescents show some loss of cross-neutralization against all variants, with the most pronounced loss against Omicron. In contrast to SARS-CoV-2 infection, children vaccinated twice demonstrated higher titers against Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Omicron. These findings can influence transmission, re-infection and the clinical disease outcome from emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants and supports the need for vaccination in children., (© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Background: Spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) B.1.1.529 (omicron) variant, which led to increased U.S. hospitalizations for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), generated concern about immune evasion and the duration of protection from vaccines in children and adolescents., Methods: Using a case-control, test-negative design, we assessed vaccine effectiveness against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 leading to hospitalization and against critical Covid-19 (i.e., leading to receipt of life support or to death). From July 1, 2021, to February 17, 2022, we enrolled case patients with Covid-19 and controls without Covid-19 at 31 hospitals in 23 states. We estimated vaccine effectiveness by comparing the odds of antecedent full vaccination (two doses of BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine) at least 14 days before illness among case patients and controls, according to time since vaccination for patients 12 to 18 years of age and in periods coinciding with circulation of B.1.617.2 (delta) (July 1, 2021, to December 18, 2021) and omicron (December 19, 2021, to February 17, 2022) among patients 5 to 11 and 12 to 18 years of age., Results: We enrolled 1185 case patients (1043 [88%] of whom were unvaccinated, 291 [25%] of whom received life support, and 14 of whom died) and 1627 controls. During the delta-predominant period, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization for Covid-19 among adolescents 12 to 18 years of age was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89 to 95) 2 to 22 weeks after vaccination and was 92% (95% CI, 80 to 97) at 23 to 44 weeks. Among adolescents 12 to 18 years of age (median interval since vaccination, 162 days) during the omicron-predominant period, vaccine effectiveness was 40% (95% CI, 9 to 60) against hospitalization for Covid-19, 79% (95% CI, 51 to 91) against critical Covid-19, and 20% (95% CI, -25 to 49) against noncritical Covid-19. During the omicron period, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization among children 5 to 11 years of age was 68% (95% CI, 42 to 82; median interval since vaccination, 34 days)., Conclusions: BNT162b2 vaccination reduced the risk of omicron-associated hospitalization by two thirds among children 5 to 11 years of age. Although two doses provided lower protection against omicron-associated hospitalization than against delta-associated hospitalization among adolescents 12 to 18 years of age, vaccination prevented critical illness caused by either variant. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for persons who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or who might become pregnant in the future, to protect them from COVID-19. § Infants are at risk for life-threatening complications from COVID-19, including acute respiratory failure (1). Evidence from other vaccine-preventable diseases suggests that maternal immunization can provide protection to infants, especially during the high-risk first 6 months of life, through passive transplacental antibody transfer (2). Recent studies of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy suggest the possibility of transplacental transfer of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies that might provide protection to infants (3-5); however, no epidemiologic evidence currently exists for the protective benefits of maternal immunization during pregnancy against COVID-19 in infants. The Overcoming COVID-19 network conducted a test-negative, case-control study at 20 pediatric hospitals in 17 states during July 1, 2021-January 17, 2022, to assess effectiveness of maternal completion of a 2-dose primary mRNA COVID-19 vaccination series during pregnancy against COVID-19 hospitalization in infants. Among 379 hospitalized infants aged <6 months (176 with COVID-19 [case-infants] and 203 without COVID-19 [control-infants]), the median age was 2 months, 21% had at least one underlying medical condition, and 22% of case- and control-infants were born premature (<37 weeks gestation). Effectiveness of maternal vaccination during pregnancy against COVID-19 hospitalization in infants aged <6 months was 61% (95% CI = 31%-78%). Completion of a 2-dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccination series during pregnancy might help prevent COVID-19 hospitalization among infants aged <6 months., Competing Interests: All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Adrienne G. Randolph reports institutional support from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and National Institutes of Health (NIH) and being the UpToDate Pediatric Critical Care Section Editor. Matt S. Zinter reports institutional support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), NIH and the American Thoracic Society. Laura Smallcomb reports support from the Medical University of South Carolina for conference attendance. Jennifer E. Schuster reports institutional support from Merck. Ryan A. Nofziger reports institutional support from NIH. Emily R. Levy reports institutional support from NIH. Michele Kong reports institutional support from NIH. Satoshi Kamidani reports institutional support from NIH and Pfizer. Janet R. Hume reports institutional support from the National Institute for Child Health and Development, NIH, and serving on a data safety monitoring board for an institutional study of magnesium for analgesia in complex medical patients. Charlotte V. Hobbs reports consultant fees from BioFire (bioMérieux). Natalie Z. Cvijanovich reports institutional support from NIH. Bria M. Coates reports institutional support from NHLBI, NIH, the American Lung Association, and the American Thoracic Society. Kathleen Chiotos reports institutional support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and serving as the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Research Network Chair. Samina S. Bhumbra reports receipt of an NIH, National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases training grant. Pia S. Pannaraj reports institutional support from AstraZeneca and Pfizer, consulting fees from Sanofi-Pasteur and Seqirus, payment from law firms for expert testimony, serving in the Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, and unpaid service on the California Immunization Coalition. Mary A. Staat reports institutional support from NIH and receipt of lecture fees from the American Academy of Pediatrics for PREP ID Course. Natasha B. Halasa reports grant support from Sanofi and Quidel and honoraria from Genentech. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Competing Interests: All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Competing Interests: POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Background Community-onset bacterial coinfection in adults hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is reportedly uncommon, though empiric antibiotic use has been high. However, data regarding empiric antibiotic use and bacterial coinfection in children with critical illness from COVID-19 are scarce. Methods We evaluated children and adolescents aged <19 years admitted to a pediatric intensive care or high-acuity unit for COVID-19 between March and December 2020. Based on qualifying microbiology results from the first 3 days of admission, we adjudicated whether patients had community-onset bacterial coinfection. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics of those who did and did not (1) receive antibiotics and (2) have bacterial coinfection early in admission. Using Poisson regression models, we assessed factors associated with these outcomes. Results Of the 532 patients, 63.3% received empiric antibiotics, but only 7.1% had bacterial coinfection, and only 3.0% had respiratory bacterial coinfection. In multivariable analyses, empiric antibiotics were more likely to be prescribed for immunocompromised patients (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.34 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.01–1.79]), those requiring any respiratory support except mechanical ventilation (aRR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.05–1.90]), or those requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (aRR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.36–2.47]) (compared with no respiratory support). The presence of a pulmonary comorbidity other than asthma (aRR, 2.31 [95% CI, 1.15–4.62]) was associated with bacterial coinfection. Conclusions Community-onset bacterial coinfection in children with critical COVID-19 is infrequent, but empiric antibiotics are commonly prescribed. These findings inform antimicrobial use and support rapid de-escalation when evaluation shows coinfection is unlikely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]