Search

Background: The authors conducted a two-arm Phase II study of temozolomide to determine its efficacy and toxicity in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) who had received, had refused, or were not eligible for standard chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide (Arm 1) and in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs; Arm 2). Patients with GIST were eligible regardless of prior therapy before imatinib was available., Methods: Sixty patients were enrolled in the current study, 19 of whom had GISTs and 41 of whom had other STSs. The patients received temozolomide at a dose of 85 mg/m2 orally for 21 days followed by 7 days without treatment. Standard radiographic imaging after every two cycles was used to assess the treatment response., Results: Of the 39 patients in Arm 1, there was 1 complete response and 1 partial response of 39 evaluable patients, for a total response rate of 5% (95% confidence interval, 0-12%). The responses lasted 7 months and 8 months, respectively. In Arm 2, there was no response in 17 patients. The disease was stable in 22% of the patients with GISTs and 33% of the patients with other STSs. The median overall survival time was 26.4 months in patients with GISTs and 11 months in patients with other STSs. The median time to disease progression was 2.3 months in patients with GISTs and 3.3 months in patients with other STSs. Grade 3 and Grade 4 adverse effects (according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) were rare and included fatigue (eight patients), anemia (six patients), constipation (four patients), neutropenia (four patients), and thrombocytopenia (four patients)., Conclusions: The data from the current study suggest that temozolomide is well tolerated but has only minimal efficacy and a limited role in the treatment of patients with STSs., (Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NeoCT) does not increase morbidity in patients undergoing radical surgery for soft tissue sarcomas., Patients and Methods: The records of 309 patients who presented to The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center for definitive surgical management of primary soft tissue sarcomas were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred five patients who received NeoCT were compared with 204 patients who had surgery first (Surg). Patients had extremity sarcomas (71 NeoCT patients and 130 Surg patients) or retroperitoneal/visceral sarcomas (34 NeoCT and 74 Surg)., Results: NeoCT patients had larger tumors (median, 12 v 8 cm), more frequently had high-grade tumors (90% v 64%), and were younger (median age 47 v 55 years). The incidence of surgical complications was not different for NeoCT patients than for Surg patients, both in those with extremity sarcomas (34% v 41%) and in those with retroperitoneal/visceral sarcomas (29% v 34%). The most common complications were wound infections and other wound complications. Preoperative radiation therapy, autologous flap coverage, and extremity tumors were associated with increased wound complications. No significant differences in length of hospital stay, rate of readmission, or rate of reoperation for complications were found between the NeoCT and Surg groups. One of the three postoperative deaths in our series occurred in the NeoCT group., Conclusion: In this retrospective review, there was no evidence that NeoCT increased postoperative morbidity in patients with soft tissue sarcomas. Prospective, randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.

The authors evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of dose-intensive doxorubicin and ifosfamide combination chemotherapy in patients with sarcomas. From January 1995 to April 1996, 33 evaluable patients with either metastatic sarcoma or primary sarcomas with a high-risk for metastases (all except one was previously untreated with chemotherapy) were treated on two consecutive protocols. The median age was 45 years (range, 15-68 years). The first protocol included doxorubicin at 75 mg/m2 given as a 72-hour infusion on days 1 to 3 along with ifosfamide at 2 g/m2/d over 2 hours x 5, days 1 to 5 (protocol AI 75/10). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was used only if indicated according to American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines. The second protocol included doxorubicin at 90 mg/m2 as a 72-hour continuous infusion and ifosfamide at 2.5 g/m2/d for 4 days (protocol AI 90/10) with prophylactic G-CSF. A median of four cycles were administered (range, 1-6). Three patients achieved a pathologic complete response (CR) and 18 patients achieved a partial response (PR) for a response rate (RR) of 64% (95% confidence interval (CI), 45-80%). Response rate for the subset of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas was 66% (95% CI, 46-82%). Only three patients progressed on therapy. Febrile neutropenia was noted in 31% of cycles at AI 75/10 and in 56% of cycles at AI 90/10. One patient developed reversible grade 3 central nervous system (CNS) toxicity. There was one treatment-related death on AI 90/10 secondary to doxorubicin cardiac toxicity at a cumulative dose of 435 mg/m2. Dose-intensive doxorubicin plus ifosfamide is feasible in appropriately selected patients and appears to be a very active regimen in patients with sarcomas. The authors are currently testing this regimen with G-CSF and thrombopoietin.

Doxorubicin and ifosfamide are the two most active agents in the treatment of soft-tissue sarcomas. Patients whose tumors have failed these two drugs have very limited systemic therapy options. It is, therefore, important to identify newer drugs with activity against this disease. CI-980 is a synthetic mitotic inhibitor that binds to tubulin at the colchicine binding site and inhibits the polymerization of tubulin and blocks cell cycle progression in mitosis. Given its broad spectrum activity against several solid tumor models in vivo, we decided to perform a phase 2 study of this drug in previously treated soft-tissue sarcomas. A total of 18 eligible and evaluable patients were entered in the first stage of the trial. The median age was 53 yrs (range, 17-72). No objective responses have been noted. Six patients had stable disease after a median of 3.5 cycles of chemotherapy while 12 others had progressive disease. A total of 48 cycles were administered, 42 of which were administered at dose level 0 (4.5 mg/m2/d x 3). The median AGC nadir was 1.2/microl(0.1 -4.7) on day 10 and the median platelet nadir was 150,000/microl (31,000-338,000). Twenty cycles were complicated with grade 3-4 neutropenia and two cycles were complicated with FUO. There were no CNS toxicities. One patient had a grade 1 thrombophlebitis in 2 cycles and one other patient had a grade 4 thrombophlebitis in one cycle. In conclusion, CI-980 was well tolerated at this dose and schedule but inactive in soft-tissue sarcomas.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) at a total dose of 14 g/m2 per cycle with mesna in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in adult patients with sarcomas., Patients and Methods: Between July 1991 and February 1994, 74 patients with sarcomas (37 bone and 37 soft tissue) were treated on two simultaneous phase II studies that evaluated HDI given as a continuous infusion over 74 hours. G-CSF was started on day 5 at 5 microg/kg/d until recovery of granulocyte count. Additionally, between March 1993 and March 1994, 15 similar patients with previously treated bone or soft tissue sarcomas were treated on a pilot study in which the same total dose of ifosfamide was administered by a bolus schedule, along with mesna and G-CSF. Patients were treated until maximal response, and where possible, surgical resection of gross disease was performed., Results: Seventy-two patients from the phase II study using continuous infusion are assessable for response. Four complete responses (CRs) and 17 partial responses (PRs) were noted, for an overall response rate of 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19% to 39%). The response rate was 40% (95% CI, 24% to 56%) for bone sarcomas and 19% (95% CI, 6% to 32%) for soft tissue sarcomas. Fourteen patients from the pilot study that used a bolus schedule are assessable for response. One CR and seven PRs were noted, for an overall response rate of 57% (95% CI, 31% to 83%) and a response rate of 45% for soft tissue sarcomas. Two patients developed grade 3 to 4 renal toxicity, three developed grade 3 CNS toxicity, one had possible grade 3 cardiac toxicity, and two developed severe painful peripheral neuropathy. There were no treatment-related deaths., Conclusion: HDI at 14 g/m2 with mesna and G-CSF is an active salvage regimen for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas. There is a definite positive dose-response curve, and bolus administration appears to be more active than continuous infusion.