1. Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration With a 19-Gauge Needle vs 21- and 22-Gauge Needles for Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy.
- Author
-
Romatowski NPJ, Gillson AM, Stollery D, Dumoulin E, Vakil E, Dhaliwal I, MacEachern P, Hergott CA, Tyan CC, Mitchell M, Schieman C, Fortin M, and Tremblay A
- Subjects
- Bronchoscopy methods, Canada, Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration, Humans, Lymph Nodes pathology, Needles, Retrospective Studies, Lung Neoplasms diagnosis, Lymphadenopathy diagnosis, Lymphadenopathy pathology, Lymphoma diagnosis, Mediastinal Diseases diagnosis, Mediastinal Diseases pathology, Sarcoidosis diagnosis, Sarcoidosis pathology
- Abstract
Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is commonly used to evaluate mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Studies focusing on malignant lymphadenopathy have compared 21- and 22-gauge (21G and 22G, respectively) needles and have not identified an advantage of one needle size over the other in terms of diagnostic yield., Research Question: Does the 19-gauge (19G) EBUS needle offer greater diagnostic yield and sensitivity vs the 21G and 22G EBUS needles for a diagnosis of sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or mediastinal lymphadenopathy not yet diagnosed?, Study Design and Methods: This study retrospectively examined records of 730 patients from the Stather Canadian Outcomes Registry for Chest Procedures (SCOPE) database who underwent EBUS-TBNA for a diagnosis of suspected sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or mediastinal lymphadenopathy not yet diagnosed. A propensity score analysis of two groups was performed. One group comprised patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA with a 19G needle, the other with a 21G or 22G needle. Cases for analysis were selected with a 1:2 ratio of 19G vs 21/22G using logistic regression and random matching with all eligible 19G cases included., Results: There were 137 patients (312 targets) in the 19G group and 274 patients (631 targets) in the 21/22G group in the propensity score analysis. The diagnostic yield was 107 of 137 (78.1%) in the 19G group vs 194 of 274 (70.8%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 7.3%; 95% CI, -1.9 to 15.6; P = .116). The sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for sarcoidosis was 80 of 83 (96.4%) in the 19G group vs 150 of 156 (96.2%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 0.24%; 95% CI, -6.6 to 85.1; P = .93). In patients with a final diagnosis of lymphoma, EBUS was diagnostic in 10 of 13 (76.9%) in the 19G group vs 12 of 12 (100%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 23.1%; 95% CI, -5.4 to 50.3; P = .08)., Interpretation: The study did not identify an advantage of the 19G EBUS needle over the 21/22G EBUS needles for diagnostic yield nor sensitivity for sarcoidosis or lymphoma., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF