Search

The Ames test is the most commonly used mutagenicity test worldwide. It is based on a microbial system that uses histidine auxotrophic Salmonella typhimurium strains. Due to either spontaneous mutations or mutations induced by a mutagenic compound, the cells can regain their ability to grow without histidine supplementation. The degree of mutagenicity of a sample correlates with the number of cells that are able to grow in media that lack histidine. All test variants published up to now are endpoint determinations providing no information about cell growth and respiration activity during the cultivation time. This study aimed to develop an alternative type of Ames test by characterizing the respiration activity of Salmonella typhimurium over time for dynamic mutagenicity detection. It focuses on elucidating the mechanisms underlying this novel test system, and serves as a general proof of principle. Respiration activity (oxygen transfer and uptake rate) and biomass growth of Salmonella typhimurium TA 100 and TA 98 were mechanistically modeled to understand and predict the behavior of the bacteria during the Ames test. The results simulated by the model were experimentally validated by the online monitoring of respiration activity over cultivation time using a Respiration Activity MOnitoring System (RAMOS). The simulated prediction was observed to fit well to the experimental data. When a mutagenic compound was added, its mutagenicity could be detected online due to the elevated cell number and respiration of histidine prototrophic cells. Laborious manual evaluation of mutagenicity after cultivation is not necessary. Mutagenicity evaluation with the presented alternative Ames RAMOS test fitted well to results from an Ames fluctuation test. In the future, a miniaturized RAMOS device for microtiter plates should allow for a high-throughput Ames RAMOS test., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The Ames test is one of the most widely used mutagenicity tests. It employs histidine auxotrophic bacteria, which can mutate back to histidine prototrophy and, thus, grow on a histidine deficient medium. These mutants develop predominantly after adding a mutagenic compound during an initial growth phase on 1 mg/L histidine. In the established test systems, an endpoint determination is performed to determine the relative number of mutants. An alternative Ames test, the Ames RAMOS test, has been developed, which enables the online detection of mutagenicity by monitoring respiration activity. The reproducibility of the newly developed test system was investigated. A strong dependence of the test results on the inoculum volume transferred from the preculture was found. The more inoculum was needed to reach the required initial OD, the more mutagenic a positive control was evaluated. This effect was attributed to the histidine transfer from the preculture to the original Ames RAMOS test. The same problem is evident in the Ames fluctuation test. High reproducibility of the Ames RAMOS test could be achieved by performing the preculture on minimal medium with a defined histidine concentration and termination after histidine depletion. By using 5 mg/L initial histidine within the minimal medium, a higher separation efficiency between negative control and mutagenic samples could be achieved. This separation efficiency could be further increased by lowering the cultivation temperature from 37 to 30 °C, i.e. lowering the maximum growth rate. The optimized Ames RAMOS test was then transferred into a 48-well microtiter plate format (μRAMOS) for obtaining a high throughput test. The online detection of mutagenicity leads to a reduction of working time in the laboratory. Due to the optimization of reproducibility and the increase in separation efficiency, a sound mutagenicity evaluation, even of weak mutagenic compounds, can be achieved., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)