Search

Background and Aims The effect of rootstock on chloride (Cl−) and sodium (Na+) exclusion capacity and yield of Chardonnay and Shiraz was investigated in the final 2 years (2007/08 and 2008/09) of a long-term (14-year) saline irrigation trial. Methods and Results Chardonnay and Shiraz, on own roots and on nine rootstocks, were irrigated for the first 12 seasons with water of electrical conductivity (ECiw) of 2.1 dS/m, with 7.15 ML/ha the mean total applied. The final two seasons were years of water restrictions, where the vines were irrigated with water of (mean) ECiw of 1.65 dS/m at a seasonal application of 3.04 ML/ha. Vines on own roots had a relatively low yield, for example 2.0 kg/vine (Chardonnay) and 8.8 kg/vine (Shiraz), and a high concentration of both chloride and sodium in grape juice (>1000 mg/L for Chardonnay and >500 mg/L for Shiraz). Ramsey and 1103 Paulsen rootstocks produced a high yield of 11–12 kg/vine with Chardonnay, and Ramsey and C7 produced a high yield of 23.5–24.5 kg/vine with Shiraz. Chardonnay on C5 and Shiraz on C7 rootstocks had the lowest concentration of grape juice chloride and sodium (in each case 10 years) study to compare the effect of rootstocks on the tolerance of Chardonnay and Shiraz to salinity.

Potted grapevines of 140 Ruggeri (Vitis berlandieri × Vitis rupestris), a good Cl(-) excluder, and K 51-40 (Vitis champinii × Vitis riparia 'Gloire'), a poor Cl(-) excluder, and of a family obtained by crossing the two genotypes, were used to examine the inheritance of Cl(-) exclusion. Rooted leaves were then used to further investigate the mechanism for Cl(-) exclusion in 140 Ruggeri. In both a potting mix trial (plants watered with 50 mM Cl(-)) and a solution culture trial (plants grown in 25 mM Cl(-)), the variation in Cl(-) accumulation was continuous, indicating multiple rather than single gene control for Cl(-) exclusion between hybrids within the family. Upper limits of 42% and 35% of the phenotypic variation in Cl(-) concentration could be attributed to heritable sources in the potting mix and solution culture trials, respectively. Chloride transport in roots of rooted leaves of both genotypes appeared to be via the symplastic pathway, since addition of 8-hydroxy-1,3,6-pyrenetrisulphonic acid (PTS), an apoplastic tracer, revealed no obvious PTS fluorescence in the laminae of either genotype, despite significant accumulation of Cl(-) in laminae of K 51-40 during the PTS uptake period. There was no significant difference in either unidirectional (36)Cl(-) flux (10 min) or (36)Cl(-) uptake (3 h) into roots of rooted leaves exposed to 5, 10, or 25 mM Cl(-). However, the percentage of (36)Cl(-) transported to the lamina (3 h) was significantly lower in 140 Ruggeri than in K 51-40, supporting reduced Cl(-) loading into xylem and implicating the root stele in the Cl(-) exclusion mechanism.

Background and Aims: Within-site comparisons were made of rootstock effects on yield, and chloride and sodium concentrations in petioles, juice and wine of Shiraz and Chardonnay vines at sites with irrigation water salinities (ECiw) ranging from low (0.4 dS/m) to moderate-high (1.8 to 3.3 dS/m). It also compared consistency of yield performance of the various rootstocks with both scions over 8 years at one site with an ECiw of 2.1 dS/m. Methods and Results: Chardonnay and Shiraz on own roots and on Ramsey, 1103 Paulsen, 140 Ruggeri, K51-40, Schwarzmann, 101-14, Rupestris St. George and 1202 Couderc were compared. Ramsey resulted in better yields relative to most of the other rootstocks at three of the four sites for each scion. Exceptions were the low salinity site where Schwarzmann was best with Chardonnay, and Padthaway where 140 Ruggeri was best with Shiraz. Chardonnay wine chloride concentrations were similar to grape juice chloride concentrations, but Shiraz wine chloride concentrations were on average 1.7-fold higher than grape juice chloride. Conclusions: Shiraz on own roots, K51-40 and 1202C rootstocks carry some risk of accumulating unacceptable levels of chloride in grape juice and wine when the salinity of the irrigation water is at moderate to high levels. Rootstocks K51-40 (with Chardonnay and Shiraz) and potentially 101-14 (with Shiraz) should be avoided in situations of long term irrigation with moderate to high salinity water. Significance of the Study: The study identifies rootstocks with acceptable yields and grape juice chloride concentrations for potential use in regions affected by salinity.

Field-grown vines of cv. Sultana on either their own roots or grafted to a range of rootstocks, were drip-irrigated at one of three salinity levels (0.40, 1.75 and 3.50 dS/m) over a five year period. Rootstocks were Ramsey, 1103 Paulsen, J17-69 and 4 hybrids (designated R1, R2, R3 and R4) derived from parentage involving Vitis champini, V. berlandieri and V. vinifera. Grape juice total soluble solids, titratable acidity and pH were measured at harvest, while colour of dried fruit was measured before and after processing and again after six months storage. Damage index (an indicator of skin damage) was measured post-processing; sugar crystal formation in dried grapes and dried grape compaction were measured post-storage. There was a strong salinity x rootstock interaction for grape juice soluble solids concentration, soluble solids yield (the product of soluble solids concentration and fruit yield) and pH, but not for titratable acidity when analysed on the basis of 5 year means. Small increases (< 5%) in juice soluble solids concentration were recorded at medium salinity (1.75 dS/m) for the low vigour genotypes, Sultana on own-roots and on J17-69 rootstock, based on the 5 year means and Fisher's protected (interaction) LSDs. Moderate increases (< 10%) also occurred in years of low crop load e.g. 1993 at high salinity for the high vigour rootstock R2 and in 1995 at medium salinity for Sultana on own roots and at high salinity for Sultana on R1 rootstock. By contrast, decreases in soluble solids concentration occurred with increasing salinity for the high vigour rootstocks (Ramsey, 1103 Paulsen and R2) in years of high crop load e.g. 1992. Small (< 2%) increases in grape juice pH were recorded at high salinity for Sultana on R3 rootstock and moderate increases (< 7%) in grape juice titratable acidity were recorded at high salinity for Sultana on own roots and Sultana on J17-69, R1, R2 and R4 rootstocks. Dried grapes from all treatments achieved a light amber colour (quality grade termed 5 crown light) and were generally of high quality. Sultanas from own-rooted grapevines were redder (higher ‘a-value’) than sultanas from 1103 Paulsen and Ramsey when assessed as unprocessed fruit, after processing (both years) and after 6 weeks storage. While soluble solids yields per vine were 23–31% lower at high salinity for Sultana on own roots and on R1, R3 and R4 rootstocks, they were unaffected by high salinity for Ramsey, 1103 Paulsen and R2 rootstocks. Moreover, soluble solids yields for Sultana on Ramsey, 1103 Paulsen and R2 rootstocks were 1.4 to 2.5-fold higher than for Sultana on the other rootstocks at high salinity. This study has shown that over a 5 year period rootstocks such as Ramsey, 1103 Paulsen and R2 grafted with Sultana were tolerant of salinity, producing dried grapes of generally high quality.

Shiraz and Chardonnay grapevines that had been initially assessed for Cl- exclusion in the 1996 and 1997 harvest seasons at both Merbein (inland region of Victoria) and at Padthaway (sub-coastal region of South Australia), were re-evaluated in 2003 and 2004 at those same two locations. Both scion varieties were grown either on their own roots or were grafted to one of the following rootstocks: Ramsey, 1103 Paulsen, 140 Ruggeri, K51-40, Schwarzmann, 101-14, Rupestris St George and 1202 Couderc. Both sites had been irrigated with saline water since 1994. The salinity of irrigation water at Merbein was approximately 2.1 dS/m; at Padthaway irrigation salinity varied between approximately 1.6 dS/m and 2.5 dS/m during the survey period. Changes in the Cl--excluding ability of all rootstock/scion combinations between 1996, 1997 and 2003, 2004 were based upon analysis of Cl- concentrations in grape juice and in laminae at harvest, as well as Electrical Conductivity (EC), pH and Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) of the 1:5 soil:water extract. Taking juice Cl- as indicative of rootstock effectiveness for Cl- exclusion, and considering data from Merbein, our analyses demonstrated that overall means for Shiraz juice Cl- increased from around 190 to 427 mg/L over the survey period (7 years). In Chardonnay grapevines at Merbein, overall mean concentrations of Cl- in juice increased from around 70 to around 225 mg/L over 7 years. Significant differences between rootstocks were evident, with some rootstocks at Merbein showing a diminished capacity for Cl- exclusion in 2003 and 2004. By contrast, in Padthaway there was no consistent deterioration in Cl--excluding capacity by rootstocks supporting either Shiraz or Chardonnay as scions. In 2004 there were significant differences between grapevines at Merbein and Padthaway in the concentration of Cl- accumulated, even though the mean soil EC1:5 after harvest for 0–90 cm depth was the same at both sites, namely 0.4 dS/m. Containment of grapevine salinity at Padthaway (relative to Merbein) between 1996/97 and 2003/04 was most likely due to factors such as a lower volume of saline irrigation, double the rainfall and 27% lower pan evaporation.

Field vines of cv. Sultana, grown either on their own roots, or grafted to a range of rootstocks, were drip-irrigated at three salinity levels (0.40, 1.75 and 3.50 dS/m) over a five-year period. Rootstocks comprised Ramsey, 1103 Paulsen, J17-69 and 4 hybrids (designated R1, R2, R3 and R4) derived from parentage involving Vitis champini, V. berlandieri and V. vinifera. Concentrations of Cl-, Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ were measured in petioles at flowering, and in laminae and grape juice at harvest, in each year of the trial. Vines on all rootstocks accumulated less chloride in either petioles at flowering or in laminae and juice at harvest compared with vines on own roots at all salinity treatments. By inference, all rootstocks behaved as chloride excluders relative to the roots of own-rooted vines. 1103 Paulsen was the best chloride excluder based on lowest concentrations of accumulated Cl- in petioles, laminae and grape juice at high salinity. Sultana on R3 rootstock at high salinity accumulated more Na+ in both laminae and grape juice (at harvest) than did Sultana on own roots or on any of the other rootstocks. Laminae K+ at harvest time was reduced at high salinity in Sultana on own roots and on all rootstocks. Concentrations of both Cl- and Na+ in petioles at flowering and in laminae and grape juice at harvest showed no significant correlation with either yield (as kg of fresh grapes per vine) or vigour (as measured by fresh weight of one-year-old pruning wood per vine) for any salinity treatment. There was however, a strong positive correlation between yield and the subsequent weight of one-year-old pruning wood for all salinity treatments. There was also a negative correlation between Na+ concentrations in petioles at flowering and the subsequent weight of one year-old-pruning wood from the 0.40 dS/m treatment. Similar negative correlations were found between Na+ concentration in both laminae and grape juice at harvest time, and the subsequent weight of one-year-old pruning wood from the 0.40 dS/m treatment (but not from either the 1.75 or 3.50 dS/m treatments). Based on these findings and those from Walker et al. 2002a we conclude that a high innate vigour of a rootstock combined with moderate to high chloride and sodium exclusion ability represents the best combination for salt tolerance in Sultana grapevines as measured by yield at moderate to high salinity.

Vegetative growth and yield of grapevines grown in the field on their own roots or grafted to a range of rootstocks were investigated under drip irrigation with water of three salinity levels (0.40, 1.75 and 3.50 dS/m) over a five-year period. Rootstocks were Ramsey, 1103 Paulsen, J17-69 and 4 hybrids (designated R1, R2, R3 and R4) derived from parentage involving Vitis champini, V. berlandieri and V. vinifera. Of measured yield components (bunches per shoot, bunches per vine, weight per bunch, weight per berry and total yield), only weight per berry was significantly reduced by high salinity (3.50 dS/m) in each year of the trial with the exception of Sultana on 1103 Paulsen and R2 in 1991 and Sultana on Ramsey in 1993. Weights of one-year-old pruning wood were also reduced by high salinity in all years for own roots and all rootstocks, with the exception of R2. Mean yield values at each salinity level over the five-year period of the trial were highest for Sultana on Ramsey, 1103 Paulsen and R2. High salinity had no effect on five-year mean yields of Sultana on Ramsey, 1103 Paulsen and R2. Yield (five-year means) of Sultana on Ramsey and R2 at 1.75 dS/m were significantly higher than at 0.40 dS/m by 14.6% and 13.4% respectively. In contrast, 5-year mean yields of Sultana on J17-69, own roots, R1, R3 and R4 at 3.50 dS/m were reduced by 54, 30, 20, 30 and 30% respectively. Yield of Sultana on J17-69, R1 and R4 rootstocks was reduced by 47, 20 and 24% respectively at 1.75 dS/m. When yield was regressed against bunches per vine and weight per bunch for Sultana on own roots and on Ramsey rootstock, bunches per vine was the main determinant of yield, while weight per berry showed a poor correlation with yield at all salinity levels. Rootstock ranking for salt tolerance based on yield at high salinity was the same as rankings for pruning wood weights at high salinity. The same occurred at medium salinity, demonstrating that vigour imparted by the rootstock was a major factor in Sultana salt tolerance as measured by yield. Mean root weighted soil saturation paste electrical conductivities (RWECe) (determined from soil saturation paste salinities and root length densities) were in the range 2.0-2.6 dS/m for the low salinity treatment, increasing to approximately 5.4 dS/m with increasing salinity of irrigation water. Yield reduction for own-rooted vines for each 1.0 dS/m increase in RWECe above 2.6 dS/m was 9.3%.

Shiraz grapevines on either their own roots, or on the rootstocks Ramsey, 1103 Paulsen, 140 Ruggeri or 101-14, were grown at two separate sites within the Murray-Darling viticultural region with similar irrigation regimes but with an irrigation water salinity of either 0.43 dS/m (low salinity site) or 2.3 dS/m (high salinity site). Rootstock effects on grape berry development, ion concentrations, soluble solids and acidity were followed during one season. Wines were also made and compared using spectral analysis and sensory evaluation. Rootstock effects that were common across both sites were (1) a close relationship between K+ and soluble solids accumulation in developing grape berries which commenced at the onset of veraison and was indicative of a link between K+ and sucrose transport in the phloem, and (2), higher wine K+, pH and colour hue for all rootstocks with one exception, namely 101-14 at high salinity where 101-14 responded similarly to own roots. Juice K+, pH and loss of K+ from juice during winemaking were highest for grapes from the high salinity site. Mean berry weight was smaller and the range in berry size across rootstocks was narrower at the saline site. The narrower range in berry sizes may have contributed to fewer rootstock effects on wine spectral characteristics at high salinity. There was no effect of rootstock on CO2 assimilation rate or stomatal conductance at either site, although intrinsic leaf-based water-use efficiency measured as A/g was 50% higher at the saline site. All treatments exhibited berry shrivel at maturity, but the extent was smaller at high salinity. Slower development of berry colour during veraison was observed on some rootstocks, for example 101-14, and while unrelated to canopy size per se, a higher leaf-to-fruit ratio for 101-14 may have been a factor. Slower berry colour development during veraison had no bearing on the colour density of wine made from the harvested grapes.

Salinity treatments of 0.43, 1.7 and 3.4 dS/m were applied through a drip‐irrigation system to four‐year‐old vines of own‐rooted Sultana (SO) and Sultana on Ramsey rootstock (Sr) The vines were planted in spring 1987 and established for two years under irrigation with low salinity (0.43 dS/m) water before commencing the range of salinity treatments in spring 1989. The effects of salinity and rootstock on yield, size and composition of berries, canopy size, lamina CO2 assimilation, leaf water relations and lamina ion concentrations were studied between veraison and harvest during the second season of salinity treatments. Mature leaves of SR had higher rates of CO2 assimilation (leaf area basis) and stomatal conductance than comparable leaves of SO. The high salinity treatment (3.4 dS/m) reduced CO2 assimilation rate of SO but not of SR. Medium salinity (1.7 dS/m) had no significant effect on CO2 assimilation rate of either type. Laminae of SO accumulated significantly higher concentrations of chloride than SR vines at all salinity levels. There was a significant negative correlation (r2= 0.44) between CO2 assimilation rate and laminae chloride of SO. Leaf sodium concentrations increased with increasing salinity, but concentrations in laminae at high salinity were similar in SO and SR, with SR showing no reduction in CO2 assimilation. Leaf potassium concentrations were higher in SR, but decreased with increasing salinity, whereas magnesium concentrations were similar in SO and SR vines but increased in both at high salinity. Leaf water potential and relative water content were not significantly affected by salinity in either SO or SR vines. Both vine types had reduced total leaf area and pruning wood weights as salinity increased, but they were greater in SR at all salinity levels because of the higher inherent capacity for biomass production in SR vines. The bigger canopies, lower lamina chloride concentrations and ‘normal’ photosynthesis rates of SR vines at 3.4 dS/m enabled these vines to mature crops with similar berry weights, sugar contents and fruit yield compared with those of SO vines at 0.43 dS/m. The research demonstrated the benefit of using Ramsey rootstock for Sultana under saline field conditions and provided a physiological explanation for their higher salt tolerance.