Search

Sitafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone, has strong antibacterial activity. We evaluated the effects of sitafloxacin granules in single‐dose and multidose cohorts and the effects of ABCB1, UGT1A1, and UGT1A9 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of sitafloxacin in healthy subjects. The single‐dose study included 3 fasted cohorts receiving 50, 100, and 200 mg of sitafloxacin granules and 1 cohort receiving 50 mg of sitafloxacin granules with a high‐fat meal. The multidose study included 1 cohort receiving 100 mg of sitafloxacin granules once daily for 5 days. PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental parameters based on concentration‐time data. The genotypes for ABCB1, UGT1A1, and UGT1A9 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms were determined using Sanger sequencing. Subsequently, the association between sitafloxacin PK parameters and target single‐nucleotide polymorphisms was analyzed. Sitafloxacin granules were well tolerated up to 200 and 100 mg in the single‐dose and multidose studies, respectively. Sitafloxacin AUC and Cmax increased linearly within the detection range, and a steady state was reached within 3 days after the administration of multiple oral doses. Our findings showed that Cmax was lower in the ABCB1 (rs1045642) mutation group, whereas t1/2 was longer in the UGT1A1 (rs2741049) and UGT1A9 (rs3832043) mutation groups. In conclusion, sitafloxacin granules were safe at single doses and multiple doses up to 200 and 100 mg/day, respectively, with a linear plasma PK profile. However, ABCB1 (rs1045642), UGT1A1 (rs2741049), and UGT1A9 (rs3832043) genetic polymorphisms are likely to influence the Cmax or t1/2 and thereby merit further clinical evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics and drug interaction of cefotaxime sodium–tazobactam sodium injection (6:1) in Chinese healthy subjects. The results of the safety and pharmacokinetic studies supported further clinical trials. Method: A randomized, single-blind, ascending dose, placebo-controlled, single-center study was conducted. Sixty healthy subjects (38 males, 22 females) participated in this study. For the single-dose part, 0.47, 1.17, 2.34, 3.51, and 4.68 g of cefotaxime sodium–tazobactam sodium injection (6:1) was administered. For the multiple-dose part, the subjects were administered 2.34 and 3.51 g cefotaxime sodium–tazobactam sodium injection (6:1) three times a day for 7 consecutive days. For the drug interaction part, the subjects received 2.0 g cefotaxime sodium and 0.34 g tazobactam sodium alone and in combination. Results: Most adverse events and adverse drug reactions were mild. Moderate rash was considered a serious adverse event because of prolongation of hospitalization. The main pharmacokinetic parameters of cefotaxime and tazobactam had no significance difference between the 1.17, 2.34, and 3.51 g dose cohorts and between genders. There was no difference in trough concentrations on days 6, 7, and 8. The R Cmax and R AUC were (0.921 ± 0.070) and (0.877 ± 0.057) for cefotaxime, and (0.913 ± 0.046) and (0.853 ± 0.060) for tazobactam, respectively. Following the administration of cefotaxime and tazobactam alone and in combination, the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for C max and AUC were within the predetermined range of 80–125%. In the single-dose part, the renal cumulative excretion ratios were (51.7 ± 6.2)% for cefotaxime, and (84.3 ± 8.1)% for tazobactam. There was no significant difference in the maximum excretion rates and cumulative excretion ratios for cefotaxime and tazobactam, alone or in combination. Conclusions: Cefotaxime sodium–tazobactam sodium injection (6:1) was well-tolerated at doses of 0.47 to 4.68 g. The pharmacokinetics of cefotaxime and tazobactam were reported as linear over a dose range of 1.17–3.51 g. Cefotaxime was partially excreted via urine, whereas tazobactam was mainly excreted via urine. There was no significant accumulation after administration over 7 consecutive days. The pharmacokinetics and excretion of cefotaxime and tazobactam were not affected by the co-administration of cefotaxime–tazobactam. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]