Search

The TNF inhibitors etanercept (ETA) and adalimumab (ADA) are approved for treating patients older than 2 years with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Because long-term experience of treating children younger than 4 years is limited, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of ETA or ADA in patients aged 2-4 years. This prospective, long-term, observational registry study documented baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, disease activity parameters, and safety of patients treated with ETA or ADA. Efficacy was determined using the JADAS-10, the JADAS criteria for minimal disease activity (MDA) and remission, and the PedACR response criteria after 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Between January 2001 and March 2015, 85 patients with polyarticular JIA aged 2-4 years started anti-TNF-α treatment. Seventy-four (54 girls) patients were treated with ETA and 11 (7 girls) with ADA. After 6/12/24 months of treatment, JADAS-MDA was reached by 55/58/58 % of ETA patients and 50/71/66 % of ADA patients. Furthermore, JADAS-Remission was achieved by 35/44/50 % of ETA patients and 16/28/66 % of ADA patients. PedACR 50/70/90 response was achieved by 64/54/41 % of ETA patients and 56/33/22 % of ADA patients at the last treatment observation. Discontinuation because of remission or inefficacy was recorded in 24 (29 %) and 28 (33 %) patients, respectively. Seventy-nine adverse events and four serious adverse events were reported. Administration of ETA and ADA in JIA patients younger than 4 years was efficacious, well tolerated, and safe. Patients younger than 4 years may show marked improvement following anti-TNF-alpha therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Etanercept is approved for the treatment of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) above the age of 2 years. Experience with younger children is limited. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treatment with etanercept in children with JIA younger than 2 years. The prospective long-term observational BIKER registry documents baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, disease activity parameters and safety issues. Efficacy was determined using the PedACR response criteria, the JADAS-10 and the proposed criteria for inactive disease and remission after 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Safety assessments were based on adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAEs) reports. Between January 2001 and June 2013, a total of 13 patients including four patients with systemic JIA (sJIA), four patients with extended oligoarthritis, one patient with persistent oligoarthritis and four patients with RF negative polyarthritis were treated with etanercept. Eleven patients with follow-up assessments were analysed in our study. Prior to etanercept, all patients have been exposed to methotrexate. At last observation, 6/11 patients reached a PedACR 70 response. Two patients with sJIA and 1 with nonsystemic JIA achieved inactive disease. Tolerability was good in most of the patients. Eight AE and one SAE occurred. One patient with sJIA was affected by Hodgkin's disease 18 months after discontinuation of etanercept. New onset uveitis occurred in two patients. Reasons for discontinuation were inefficacy in three (2 sJIA), intolerance in two, remission in three (2 sJIA) and the parents' request in one patient. Etanercept seems to improve JIA patients younger than 2 years including some of the patients with sJIA. Attention should be paid to the development of malignancies and autoimmune disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The approval of etanercept for the treatment of the juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) categories extended oligoarthritis (ExtOA), enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) and psoriasis arthritis (PsA) was recently added to the approval for the treatment of polyarticular-course JIA (PA). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etanercept in a large number of patients with the additional JIA categories. The Biologika in der Kinderrheumatologie (BIKER) registry documents baseline demographics, clinical characteristics and disease activity parameters. Efficacy was determined using the PedACR 30/50/70 response criteria and the Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS)-10. Safety assessments were based on adverse events' reports. Until December 2012, a total of 1,678 JIA patients, incorporating 238 ERA, 315 ExtOA and 127 PsA patients were included. JADAS-10 demonstrated marked improvement compared to baseline after 3 to 24 months in ExtOA [16.1 ± 7.6 (baseline), 5.1 ± 5.2 (3 months), 3.0 ± 3.5 (24 months)]; ERA (15.3 ± 7.2, 4.4 ± 4.7, 4.0 ± 4.9) and PsA (14.7 ± 6.4, 5.0 ± 4.6, 5.3 ± 6.4). Compared to patients with PA, the rate of serious adverse events [relative risk (RR) 1.39 (0.95-2.03, p = 0.08)] and nonserious [1.18 (1.02-1.35; p = 0.03)] adverse events were elevated. The rate of uveitis flares was significantly higher in PsA (3.3/100 patient-years), ExtOA (2.8/100 patient-years) and ERA (2.7/100 patient-years) than in rheumatoid factor (RF)-negative polyarticular JIA (1.3/100 pat.yrs) or RF-positive polyarticular JIA (0.27/100 patient-years). Reports on chronic inflammatory bowel disease were numerically more frequent in ExtOA, ERA and PsA. Administration of etanercept in patients with the JIA categories ExtOA, ERA and PsA is safe and very efficacious in children. Attention should be paid to the occurrence of extraarticular autoimmunopathies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Little is known about the safety and efficacy of etanercept in children below the age of 4 years. Twenty-five patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) below the age of 4 years, who received etanercept, were documented in the German JIA Etanercept Registry. Patients with the nonsystemic JIA disease-subtype responded more frequently to treatment with etanercept than systemic onset patients. At last observation, two (20%) of the nonsystemic patients did not reach a PedACR 30 response, while six (40%) of the systemic onset patients did not respond to the therapy. Complete resolution of symptoms was observed in two (20%) nonsystemic and in five (33%) systemic onset patients with JIA. Tolerability was good with only two infections occurring in the total patients group. Patients with JIA below the age of 4 years, with a methotrexate-resistant disease course, would also benefit from treatment with etanercept, showing a good tolerability. The restriction to children older than 4 years appears to be artificial without any good rationale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Purpose: To assess efficacy and safety of SC golimumab (GLM) in polyarticular pediatric juvenile idiopathic arthritis pts (aged 2 to <18 yrs) with active arthritis despite MTX for ≥3 months. Methods: In GO-KIDS, a 3-part randomized double-blind, PBO-controlled, withdrawal trial in pts with active JIA with a polyarticular course (≥5 active joints) and disease duration of ≥6 months despite current MTX (10-30 mg/m2/wk). In Part 1(wk 0-12), all pts received open-label (OL) 30 mg/m2 GLM SC (max 50 mg) q4 wks with stable MTX dose. At wk 16, pts with ACR JIA 30 response entered Part 2 (wk 16-48). In Part 2, pts were randomized to continue GLM or switch to PBO q4 wks. Upon Part 2 completion at wk 48 or ACR JIA flare in Part 2, pts received OL GLM in Part 3. Primary endpoint was proportion of ACR JIA 30 responders at wk 16 without a JIA flare in Part 2 using wk 16 as baseline measurement. Secondary outcomes were ACR JIA 30/50/70/90 response rates and inactive disease rates at wk 16 and wk 48 by group and safety. Results: 173 pts (Caucasian 87.9%, 75.7% females; age [median/range] 12 yrs/2-17 yrs) with moderately active disease were enrolled (Table ); 19 (11%) were d/c in Part 1 (lack of efficacy n = 14, AE n = 4, withdrawal of consent n = 1). In Part 1, 151 of 173 (87.3%) achieved an ACR JIA 30 response and 36.1% inactive disease status (Table ). There were 154 pts randomized double-blind in Part 2 (PBO n = 76; continued GLM n = 78). At the end of Part 2, no significant differences between groups in JIA ACR non-flare rates and trial did not meet primary endpoint [PBO-grp vs. GLM-grp: 52.6% vs. 59.0%, p = 0.41) nor were there differences for major secondary endpoints (Table 2). In contrast, sustained response in both groups (PBO, GLM) relative to wk 0 (Table 1 and 2). 6.5% (10 of 154) of pts d/c therapy after wk16 through wk 48. Through wk 48, AEs, serious AE (SAE), and serious infections were reported in 87.9%, 13.3%, and 2.9% of all randomized pts, respectively. Most common SAE was JIA exacerbation. No deaths, active TB or malignancies were reported (1). GLM-treated pt experienced SAE of toxic hepatitis and 1 had SAE of hepatic enzyme increase. One pt switched from PBO to GLM experienced SAE of serum sickness reaction, resulting in GLM d/c. Proportion of pts with ≥1 injection site reaction was 8.1%. None of the reactions were serious, severe, or led to GLM d/c. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]