Search

INTRODUCTION: Successful treatment of TB requires high levels of adherence to treatment. This has been found to be below optimal with directly observed therapy (DOT), and digital adherence technologies (DATs) offer a promising approach to non-adherence to medication and improving treatment outcomes. This study explores the perception, acceptability, and challenges of DATs among healthcare workers (HCWs). METHODS: The study was conducted in eight states in Nigeria among Health Care workers involved in treating patients with TB. This was a descriptive cross-sectional study using an open questionnaire and analysed using IBM SPSS v25. RESULTS: Twenty-three HCWs (95.8%) agreed that DATs helped them provide better support and counselling to their patients. All of them would recommend DATs to their patients and found it easy to explain them. Eleven (45.8%) of them were not able to use DATs on a few occasions; their reasons were poor network (n = 9, 37.5%) and (n = 1, 4.2%) power failure. CONCLUSION: DATs help HCWs provide better support and care regarding real-time tracking of their patients’ adherence to treatment and possibly reduction of attrition. This implies that DATs are a suitable alternative to DOT to help HCWs provide the best care and support to their patients towards achieving the End TB targets.

INTRODUCTION: Poor adherence to TB treatment poses a significant public health threat to TB control programmes. The sustainability of directly observed treatment has been questioned because of its non-patient-centred approach and resource-intensive nature, and Digital Adherence Technologies (DATs) provide a suitable alternative. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of DATs among patients with TB. METHODS: This descriptive study was conducted in eight states in Nigeria among all patients with drug-susceptible TB. RESULT: A total of 230 patients (89.1%) own a phone that no one else uses, and 18 (7.0%) use a family phone. A higher proportion of 189 (73.3%) have airtime credit and 119 (46.1%) have internet credit on their phone. In addition, 216 (83.7%) stated that the reminders they received on their phone helped them remember to take their medicine. Only 11 (4.3%) patients missed a dose of the TB medicine. Equally, 11 (4.3%) patients had taken their TB medicine without using DAT. Of these, 7 (63.3%) did not use DATs because they forgot to text medication labels, and 3 (27.6%) did so because of poor network. Only four (1.6%) purchased additional items to support the use of DATs. CONCLUSION: DATs are acceptable in a wide variety of settings, even with reported challenges. Implementation efforts should ensure access, address technical challenges, and minimise additional cost to patients.