Search

Background: The use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty has considerably increased since first introduced in 1985. Despite demonstrating early improvement of function and pain, there is limited information regarding the durability and longer-term outcomes of this prosthesis., Questions/purposes: We determined complication rates, functional scores over time, survivorship, and whether radiographs would develop signs of loosening., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 527 reverse shoulder arthroplasties performed in 506 patients between 1985 and 2003. Clinical and radiographic assessment was performed in 464 patients with a minimum followup of 2 years and 148 patients with a minimum followup of 5 years (mean, 7.5 years; range, 5-17 years). Cumulative survival curves were established with end points being prosthesis revision and Constant-Murley score of less than 30 points., Results: Eighty-nine of 489 had at least one complication for a total of 107 complications. Survivorship free of revision was 89% at 10 years with a marked break occurring at 2 and 9 years. Survivorship to a Constant-Murley score of less than 30 was 72% at 10 years with a marked break observed at 8 years. We observed progressive radiographic changes after 5 years and an increasing frequency of large notches with long-term followup., Conclusions: Although the need for revision of reverse shoulder arthroplasty was relatively low at 10 years, Constant-Murley score and radiographic changes deteriorated with time. These findings are concerning regarding the longevity of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and therefore caution must be exercised when recommending reverse shoulder arthroplasty, especially in younger patients., Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

We followed 210 cases of rotator cuff tears treated in four French centers by arthroscopic acromioplasty in 195 cases and by a tenotomy of the Long Head of Biceps (LHB) in 15 cases. All patients were evaluated by means of the Constant score (CS) and radiographic imaging. The mean age was 61 years and the mean follow-up period was 26.6 months (range, 12 to 93 months). The preoperative CS was 38.2 points; 41% were supraspinatus tears, 40.2% were supra and infraspinatus tears, 10.5% were three-tendon tears, and 8.1% were supraspinatus and subscapularis tears. The LHB was altered or disrupted in 77% of cases, dislocated or subluxated in 44% of cases. Acromioplasty was associated to tear debridement in 183 cases (88%) and to a tenotomy of the LHB in 38 cases (19%) of which 15 did not benefit from an associated acromioplasty. Global objective results shown by the corrected CS reached 79.7% and were satisfying in 73% of cases. Poor clinical factors were preoperative shoulder stiffness, postoperative painful crises, worker compensation, a preoperative history longer than 4 years, and young age. The poor anatomic factors were osteoarthritis, a lesion of the acromioclavicular joint or of the LHB tendon. An isolated supraspinatus tear will produce much better results than a triple-tendon tear. The persistence of an aggressive acromion was a prejudicial factor. The benefits of LHB tenotomy were evident and could be isolated in case of massive rotator tears. It seems that LHB tenotomy was particularly effective for massive tears of two or more tendons. Arthroscopic acromioplasty is an excellent indication for elderly patients without professional activity, functionally less demanding that a younger patient.